Kindler, Reimo, Siemens, Jan, Kaiser, Klaus, Walmsley, David Christopher, Bernhofer, Christian, Buchmann, Nina, Cellier, Pierre, Eugster, Werner, Gleixner, Gerd, Grünwald, Thomas, Heim, Alexander, Ibrom, Andreas, Jones, Stephanie, Jones, Mike, Klumpp, Katja, Kutsch, Werner L, Larsen, Klaus Steenberg, Lehuger, Simon, Loubet, Benjamin, McKenzie, Rebecca, Moors, Eddy, Osborne, Bruce, Pilegaard, Kim, Rebmann, Corinna, Saunders, Matt, Schmidt, Michael, Schrumpf, Marion, Seyfferth, Janine, Skiba, Ute M, Soussana, Jean-Francois, Sutton, Mark A., Tefs, Cindy, Vowinckel, Bernhard, Zeeman, Matthias, Kaupenjohann, Martin, University of Zurich, Siemens, J, Chair of Waste Management and Environmental Research, Technische Universität Berlin (TU), INRES Bodenwissenschaften, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Soil Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg (MLU), UCD School of Biology & Environmental Science, University College Dublin [Dublin] (UCD), Department of Hydrosciences [Dresden], Technische Universität Dresden = Dresden University of Technology (TU Dresden), Institute of Plant-, Animal-, & Agroecosystem Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich] (ETH Zürich), Department of Geography, Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich (UZH), Botany, Trinity College Dublin, Institut für Agrarrelevante Klimaforschung, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institut, Biosystems Division [Roskilde], Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy (Risø DTU), Technical University of Denmark [Lyngby] (DTU)-Technical University of Denmark [Lyngby] (DTU), School of Biology & Environmental Science, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), and Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Estimates of carbon leaching losses from different land use systems are few and their contribution to the net ecosystem carbon balance is uncertain. We investigated leaching of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved methane (CH4), at forests, grasslands, and croplands across Europe. Biogenic contributions to DIC were estimated by means of its δ13C signature. Leaching of biogenic DIC was 8.3±4.9 g m−2 yr−1 for forests, 24.1±7.2 g m−2 yr−1 for grasslands, and 14.6±4.8 g m−2 yr−1 for croplands. DOC leaching equalled 3.5±1.3 g m−2 yr−1 for forests, 5.3±2.0 g m−2 yr−1 for grasslands, and 4.1±1.3 g m−2 yr−1 for croplands. The average flux of total biogenic carbon across land use systems was 19.4±4.0 g C m−2 yr−1. Production of DOC in topsoils was positively related to their C/N ratio and DOC retention in subsoils was inversely related to the ratio of organic carbon to iron plus aluminium (hydr)oxides. Partial pressures of CO2 in soil air and soil pH determined DIC concentrations and fluxes, but soil solutions were often supersaturated with DIC relative to soil air CO2. Leaching losses of biogenic carbon (DOC plus biogenic DIC) from grasslands equalled 5–98% (median: 22%) of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) plus carbon inputs with fertilization minus carbon removal with harvest. Carbon leaching increased the net losses from cropland soils by 24–105% (median: 25%). For the majority of forest sites, leaching hardly affected actual net ecosystem carbon balances because of the small solubility of CO2 in acidic forest soil solutions and large NEE. Leaching of CH4 proved to be insignificant compared with other fluxes of carbon. Overall, our results show that leaching losses are particularly important for the carbon balance of agricultural systems. Estimates of carbon leaching losses from different land use systems are few and their contribution to the net ecosystem carbon balance is uncertain. We investigated leaching of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved methane (CH), at forests, grasslands, and croplands across Europe. Biogenic contributions to DIC were estimated by means of its δC signature. Leaching of biogenic DIC was 8.3±4.9gmyr for forests, 24.1±7.2gmyr for grasslands, and 14.6±4.8gmyr for croplands. DOC leaching equalled 3.5±1.3gmyr for forests, 5.3±2.0gmyr for grasslands, and 4.1±1.3gmyr for croplands. The average flux of total biogenic carbon across land use systems was 19.4±4.0gCmyr. Production of DOC in topsoils was positively related to their C/N ratio and DOC retention in subsoils was inversely related to the ratio of organic carbon to iron plus aluminium (hydr)oxides. Partial pressures of CO in soil air and soil pH determined DIC concentrations and fluxes, but soil solutions were often supersaturated with DIC relative to soil air CO. Leaching losses of biogenic carbon (DOC plus biogenic DIC) from grasslands equalled 5-98% (median: 22%) of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) plus carbon inputs with fertilization minus carbon removal with harvest. Carbon leaching increased the net losses from cropland soils by 24-105% (median: 25%). For the majority of forest sites, leaching hardly affected actual net ecosystem carbon balances because of the small solubility of CO in acidic forest soil solutions and large NEE. Leaching of CH proved to be insignificant compared with other fluxes of carbon. Overall, our results show that leaching losses are particularly important for the carbon balance of agricultural systems.