Search

Purpose: To evaluate the association between the HER2 score as provided by the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay, tumor characteristics, and outcomes in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative breast cancer (BC)., Methods: All women insured by the Clalit Health Services, with early-stage, ER + HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 2008 and 2011 were included. Patient/tumor characteristics and Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by HER2 category, based on the HER2 score provided by the RS assay: lower HER2 score group representing the lower third of the HER2 score range (≤ 8.5); higher HER2 score group representing the upper 2 thirds of the HER2 score range (8.6-10.7)., Results: 1535 patients were included (948 node negative, 587 node positive); 330 (21.5%) were categorized as lower HER2 score and 1205 (78.5%) as higher HER2 score. Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group included a significantly higher proportion of patients with RS ≥ 26 in both node-negative (41% vs. 13.6%, P < .001) and node-positive diseases (36% vs. 19.4%, P < .001). Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group had significantly lower Oncotype ER and PR scores and lower proportion of lobular disease. Age and tumor size were comparable between the HER2 score groups. Within each RS category, DRFS and OS were not associated with the HER2 score., Conclusion: Lower HER2 score was associated with higher RS results. Further study is desired to elucidate the role and significance of HER2 expression in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests Author HG reports personal fee from: AstraZeneca (Honorarium), Gilead (Honorarium and consulting), Eli-Lilly (Honorarium and consulting), MSD (Honorarium and consulting), Novartis (Honorarium and consulting), Pfizer (Honorarium and consulting), Roche (Honorarium), Rhenium Oncotest (Honorarium and consulting), all not related to the submitted manuscript. Author RY reports personal fees from: Roche (consulting, invited speaker, Research grant), Pfizer (consulting), Novartis (consulting, invited speaker), Rhenium (consulting), Medison (invited speaker), MSD (consulting, invited speaker), Astra-Zeneca (consulting, invited speaker), Eli Lilly (consulting, invited speaker), Gilead (consulting), Stemline (invited speaker, consulting) all not related to submitted manuscript. Author SPS reports: Roche (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Novartis (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Pfizer (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant, Institutional independent research grant), Astra-Zeneca (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Gilead (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Eli Lily (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), MSD (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Stemline (consultancy), all via institutional fees and not related to the submitted manuscript. Author AS reports: Roche(consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Novartis (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Pfizer (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant, institutional independent research grant), Astra-Zeneca (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Gilead (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau, travel grant), Lily (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), MSD (consultancy, advisory board, speaker's bureau), Stemline (consultancy), all via institutional fees and not related to the submitted manuscript. Author AS reports: Eli Lilly (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau), Pfizer (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau), Roche (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, research grant), Novartis (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, research grant), Gilead (consulting, advisory board), MSD (consulting, advisory board, speakers bureau, travel grant), Astra-Zenca (consulting, advisory board), Progenetics (consulting, advisory board), Rhenium (consulting, advisory board), Neopharm (travel grant), Celgene (travel grant), Medison (travel grant), all not related to the submitted work. Author ABS reports being a consultant for Oncotest Rhenium, and Exact Sciences, related to the submitted manuscript, and to Pfizer, Can-Fite, and MDI, not related to the submitted manuscript. Author SMS reports: research grant from Can-Fite, AstraZeneca, Bioline RX, BMS, Halozyme, Clovis Oncology, CTG Pharma, Exelexis, Geicam, Halozyme, Incyte, Lilly, Moderna, Teva pharmaceuticals, and Roche, and owning stocks and options in CTG Pharma, DocBoxMD, Tyrnovo, VYPE, Cytora, and CAN-FITE, all not related to the submitted manuscript. All other authors have no conflicts of interest. This study was funded by Oncotest-Rhenium. The funder played no role in the design and conduct of the analysis or its interpretation, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Methods: Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000-12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed., Results: There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups., Conclusions: In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Eitan Amir reports personal fee from: AstraZeneca (consulting), Gilead (honorarium), Novartis (consulting), Seagen (honorarium), all not related to the submitted manuscript. Dr. Ariadna Tibaue reports personal fee from: Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca (travel grant), Eli-Lilly (Honorarium), Novartis (Honorarium and travel grant), Seagen (consulting), all not related to the submitted manuscript. Dr. Mark E. Robson reports personal fee from: Change Health Care (consulting), AstraZeneca (travel grant and other personal fees), Research and Practice (other personal fees), Clinical Care Options (other personal fees), Physician Education Resource (other personal fees), Pfizer (other personal fees), MyMedEd (other personal fees), Clinical Education Alliance (other personal fees), MJH Healthcare Holdings, LLC (other personal fees), all not related to the submitted manuscript. Dr. Hadar Goldvaser reports personal fee from: AstraZeneca (Honorarium), Gilead (Honorarium and consulting), Eli-Lilly (Honorarium and consulting), MSD (Honorarium and consulting), Novartis (Honorarium and consulting), Pfizer (Honorarium and consulting), Roche (Honorarium), Rhenium Oncotest (Honorarium and consulting), all not related to the submitted manuscript. All other authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whether germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PV) affect prognosis of women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether it has implications for treatment decisions in the neoadjuvant setting is unclear., Methods: This is a retrospective two-center cohort study comprising all women with early stage TNBC who have completed genetic testing and were treated with neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin. All eligible patients treated between 10.2014 and 3.2020 were included. Data on clinico-pathological, pathological response, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. Differences in clinico-pathological features and outcomes were analyzed according to gBRCA status., Results: Sixty-four women were included in the final analysis, of which 31 had gBRCA PV (gBRCA carriers) and 33 were gBRCA wild-type. Clinico-pathological characteristics were similar between both groups. The odds for pathological complete response (pCR) were significantly higher in gBRCA carriers (74.2%) compared to BRCA wild-type women (48.5%), p = 0.035. At a median follow-up of 30 months, gBRCA carriers had significantly favorable OS (HR = 8.64, 95% CI 1.08-69.21, p = 0.042). The difference in DFS did not reach statistical significance (HR = 7.4, 95% CI 0.91-60.27, p = 0.062). The favorable OS for gBRCA carriers remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.029) and was noted regardless of pathological response (p = 0.018)., Conclusion: Compared to wild-type, gBRCA carriers with locally advanced TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing carboplatin had a higher pCR rate and better outcomes. These results strengthen the contention that gBRCA status should be considered when tailoring treatment decisions in women with locally advanced TNBC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: As the treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often includes sequential lines of therapy, data on post-protocol treatment in clinical trials are valuable in the assessment of long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the reported data on post-protocol therapy in clinical trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of drugs for MBC., Methods: All initial and subsequent publications related to FDA approved indications for MBC between January 2000 and February 2023 were identified. Collected data included study design, patients' characteristics and whether reporting on post-protocol therapy was available. Differences in study design and population between studies with and without data on post-protocol therapy were evaluated., Findings: Forty-one indications for MBC were identified. Data were evaluated from 249 publications or abstracts, comprising 20,152 patients. Reporting of post-protocol therapy was available for 22 (53.7 %) indications. Reported data were often incomplete. Reporting has not improved over time with reported data in 50 % and 55.2 % studies between 2000 and 2010 and 2011-2023 (p value for the difference = 1.0), respectively. Studies with OS as their primary endpoints were associated with significantly higher reporting of post-protocol therapy, (p = 0.02). Other characteristics of study design and population were comparable between studies with and without data on post-protocol therapy., Conclusions: Data on post-protocol therapy in trials supporting FDA approval of drugs for MBC are available for only half of the indications. As subsequent lines of therapy may have a crucial role in patients' outcome, post-protocol reporting should be included in the regulatory submission and be made available publicly., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Data on using the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) testing on second breast cancer (BC; second primary or local recurrence) are lacking. This cohort study examined patients with first and second BC, who underwent 21-gene testing both times. It included a 'study-cohort' (60 N0/N1mi/N1 ER + HER2‒ BC patients with ≥2 RS results >1 year apart) and a 'general 21-gene-tested BC-cohort' (2044 previously described N0/N1mi/N1 patients). The median time between the first and second BC was 5.2 (IQR, 3.1-7.1) years; the second BC was ipsilateral in 68%. Patient/tumor characteristics of the first- and second-BC in the 'study-cohort' were similar, except for the RS which was higher in the second BC (median [IQR]: 23 [17-30] vs 17 [14-22], p < 0.001). Overall, 56 patients had follow-up data, of whom 5 experienced distant recurrence (2 RS 11-25 patients and 3 RS 26-100 patients). Studies exploring the prognostic utility of the RS in this setting are warranted., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Telomerase (human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is considered a hallmark of cancer, being active in cancer cells but repressed in human somatic cells. As such, it has the potential to serve as a valid cancer biomarker. Exosomal hTERT mRNA can be detected in the serum of patients with solid malignancies but not in healthy individuals. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of measuring serum exosomal hTERT transcripts levels in patients with lung cancer. Methods: A prospective analysis of exosomal hTERT mRNA levels was determined in serum-derived exosomes from 76 patients with stage III-IV lung cancer (11 SCLC and 65 NSCLC). An hTERT level above RQ = 1.2 was considered "detectable" according to a previous receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve. Sequential measurements were obtained in 33 patients. Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively from patients' charts. Data on response to systemic therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) were collected by the treating physicians. Results: hTERT was detected in 53% (40/76) of patients with lung cancer (89% of SCLC and 46% of NSLCC). The mean hTERT levels were 3.7 in all 76 patients, 5.87 in SCLC patients, and 3.62 in NSCLC patients. In total, 25 of 43 patients with sequential measurements had detectable levels of hTERT. The sequential exosomal hTERT mRNA levels reflected the clinical course in 23 of them. Decreases in hTERT levels were detected in 17 and 5 patients with partial and complete response, respectively. Eleven patients with a progressive disease had an increase in the level of exosomal hTERT, and seven with stable disease presented increases in its exosomal levels. Another patient who progressed on the first line of treatment and had a partial response to the second line of treatment exhibited an increase in exosomal hTERT mRNA levels during the progression and a decrease during the response. Conclusions: Exosomal hTERT mRNA levels are elevated in over half of patients with lung cancer. The potential association between hTERT levels and response to therapy suggests its utility as a promising cancer biomarker for response to therapy. This issue should be further explored in future studies.

Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4-99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6-99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6-94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0-94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1-3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5-4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2-8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0-17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)- mRNA was shown to be elevated in exosomes derived from the sera of a variety of hematological and solid cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate its role as a diagnostic marker in patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer and in hereditary syndromes with predisposition to colon cancer., Methods: hTERT -mRNA levels were determined in serum-derived exosomes from 88 patients with colon cancer, 71 Lynch-syndrome carriers with unknown active malignancies and 50 healthy controls. Data, including demographics, background diseases, clinical data regarding tumor characteristics and genetic data, were retrieved data from medical files., Results: Patients with colon cancer had both higher exosomal hTERT mRNA levels and a higher proportion of patients with positive exosomal hTERT mRNA than controls (29.5% vs. 4%, respectively, P values < 0.001). Within the cancer group, patients with a metastatic disease had higher levels of telomerase mRNA than non-metastatic disease patients, and these levels correlated with CEA levels. Likewise, Lynch syndrome carriers had a higher proportion of positive exosomal hTERT mRNA than controls (21.1% vs. 4%, respectively, P value 0.008) but only a trend towards higher exosomal hTERT mRNA levels. Higher telomerase mRNA levels were not correlated with the mutated gene., Conclusions: Exosomal serum hTERT -mRNA levels are associated with metastatic colon cancer and were also demonstrated in a subset of Lynch syndrome carriers. Its significance as a biomarker for developing malignancy should be elucidated., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Laish, Levi, Mahajna, Albshesh, Horesh, Katz, Feldman, Shinar, Picard, Yavzori, Fudim, Raanani, Berger, Goldvaser, Beery and Uziel.)

Background: Existing data on adding internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) to the regional nodal fields are inconsistent. Methods: Randomized trials investigating the addition of IMNI to standard adjuvant radiation were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for overall-survival (OS), breast cancer specific-survival (BCSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) as well as distant-metastasis free survival (DMFS). The odds ratios (ORs) for regional and loco-regional recurrence, non-breast cancer mortality, secondary non-breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were also extracted. Results: Analysis included five trials comprising 10,994 patients, predominantly with higher risk, lymph node positive disease. Compared to the control group, IMNI was associated with significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.91, p = 0.004), BCSS (HR = 0.84, p < 0.001), DFS (HR = 0.89, p= 0.01), and DMFS (HR = 0.89, p = 0.02). IMNI was also associated with reduced odds for regional (OR = 0.58, p < 0.001) and loco-regional recurrence (OR = 0.85, p = 0.04). The odds for cardiotoxicity were not statistically significantly higher (OR = 1.23, p = 0.07). There were comparable odds for cardiovascular mortality (OR = 1.00, p = 1.00), non-breast cancer mortality (OR = 1.05, p = 0.74), secondary cancer (OR = 0.95, p = 0.51), and contra-lateral breast cancer (OR = 1.07, 95% 0.77−1.51, p = 0.68). Conclusions: Compared to the control group, the addition of IMNI in high-risk patients is associated with a statistically significant improvement in survival, albeit with a magnitude of questionable clinical meaningfulness.

Purpose: To evaluate the total biopsy and positive biopsy rates in women at high risk of breast cancer compared to the general population., Methods: The study group consisted of 330 women with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 attending the dedicated multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic of a tertiary medical center in Israel. Clinical, genetic, and biopsy data were retrieved from the central healthcare database and the medical files. Patients aged 50 years or older during follow-up were matched 1:10 to women in the general population referred for routine breast cancer screening at the same age, as recommended by international guidelines. The groups were compared for rate of biopsy studies performed and percentage of positive biopsy results. Matched analysis was performed to correct for confounders., Results: The total biopsy rate per 1000 follow-up years was 61.7 in the study group and 22.7 in the control group (p < 0.001). The corresponding positive biopsy rates per 1000 follow-up years were 26.4 and 2.0 (p < 0.001), and the positive biopsy percentages, 42.9% and 8.7% (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Women aged 50 + years with PVs in BRCA1/2 attending a dedicated clinic have a 2.7 times higher biopsy rate per 1000 follow-up years, a 13.2 times higher positive biopsy rate per 1000 follow-up years, and a 4.9 times higher positive biopsy percentage than same-aged women in the general population., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Sari LiebermanHonoraria: AstraZenea/Israel Hadar GoldvaserHonoraria: Roche, Novartis, Genomic Health, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Pfizer Ephrat Levy-LahadHonoraria: NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Pneumonia is more common in smokers compared with non-smokers. A high 1-year prevalence of lung cancer following hospitalization for pneumonia was demonstrated in heavy smokers., Aim: To assess the association between hospitalization for pneumonia among ever-smokers and subsequent lung cancer risk., Design: Retrospective analysis., Methods: The study cohort included all ever-smokers aged 55-80 hospitalized for pneumonia between the years 2010-15 covered by a large medical insurer in Israel. Controls were matched to cases by age in a 4:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the association between hospitalization for pneumonia and subsequent 1-year incidence of lung cancer, adjusted for gender, smoking status (past/current) and pack years. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses excluded heavy smokers (smoking history of more than 30 pack years) and patients diagnosed with lung cancer within 30 days of hospitalization, as they probably had clinical or radiological findings suggestive of lung cancer, making them ineligible for screening., Results: Lung cancer was identified in 275 of 12 807 (2.1%) patients following hospitalization for pneumonia and in 44 of 51 228 (0.1%) controls (adjusted odds ratio 22.46, 95% CI 16.29-30.96, P < 0.001). Among patients hospitalized for pneumonia, 1-year lung cancer incidence remained high after excluding heavy smokers and patients diagnosed within 30 days of the index date (1.3% and 1.4%, respectively)., Conclusions: Hospitalization for pneumonia is associated with high 1-year incidence of lung cancer in ever-smokers, supporting the important role of the widely used practice of performing follow up imaging post-pneumonia to exclude occult malignancy., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: A 35 years old woman was diagnosed with clinical stage 2, grade 3, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative invasive ductal carcinoma, with ki-67 of 60%. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dose dense adriamycin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel. Six days following the third cycle of paclitaxel the patient presented with rapidly progressive weakness, proximal paresthesia and decreased sensation in both legs. Physical examination revealed hypoesthesia below level, proximal and distal weakness in both lower limbs and absence of reflexes. MRI of the spine demonstrated diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement from T11 to S1 including the cauda equina roots. The rapidly progressive neurological symptoms and the MRI findings were initially interpreted as leptomeningeal spread. High dose dexamethasone was promptly initiated and the patient was urgently planned for radiotherapy and received the first fraction of 3 Gy to level T11-S1. Further workup included lumbar puncture which showed elevated protein level (350 mg/dL), negative cytology for malignancy and EMG which demonstrated demyelinating injury compatible with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). A diagnosis of GBS was made and treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) was initiated, followed by a gradual clinical improvement. Two months after the initial diagnosis, she had a near complete resolution of her neurological deficits. This case illustrates both the tendency to ascribe new symptoms and clinical findings in cancer patients to progressive disease, and the importance of keeping a wide differential diagnosis for non-cancer etiologies when treating our patients.

Background: Recent data suggest that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer may represent a distinct entity. We aimed to compare disease characteristics and outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-0 in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, early-stage breast cancer., Methods: A single center retrospective study comprising all women with ER positive, HER2 negative early breast cancer, for whom an Oncotype DX test was performed between 2005 and 2012. Women were grouped to HER2-low (immunohistochemistry +1 or +2 and in situ hybridization not amplified) or HER2-0. Clinico-pathological features and Oncotype recurrence score (RS) were collected. Data on overall-survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were evaluated according to HER2 expression status., Results: 608 women were included, of which 304 women had HER2-0 and 304 had HER2-low disease. Lobular subtype was significantly more common in HER-0 compared to HER2-low disease (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The prevalence of other clinic-pathological characteristics and long-term prognosis were comparable between both groups. For women with high genomic risk (RS > 25), HER2-low expression was associated with significantly favorable OS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.78, p = 0.01), DFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.82, p = 0.01) and DDFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.63, P = 0.002) compared to women with HER2-0. For women with low genomic risk (RS ≤ 25), long-term prognosis was unrelated to HER2 expression., Conclusion: The prognostic impact of HER2-low expression in early-stage luminal disease varies across the genomic risk, with significant favorable outcomes of HER2-low expression compared to HER2-0 in women with high genomic risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All other authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Several targeted therapies have been approved in recent years for second-line treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), providing an alternative to rituximab and splenectomy. The extent to which these drugs reduce bleeding risk has not been well defined. Targeted therapies recently approved for the treatment of ITP in adults were identified through a search of recently published professional guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supporting regulatory approval were identified through a search of drug labels on FDA@gov. Odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for pre-specified efficacy outcomes including platelet recovery to ≥ 50,000/µL, major and minor bleeding events, and survival. ORs for all adverse events were also computed. Four targeted therapies were identified, including three thrombopoietin receptor agonists and one tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Six RCTs, comprising 752 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. More patients treated with targeted therapies for ITP as compared to placebo achieved platelet counts over ≥ 50,000/µL (OR 8.29, 95% CI 5.59-12.29). Compared to placebo, targeted therapies for ITP were associated with significantly lower odds for major bleeding (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.91), minor bleeding (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97), and with numerically lower mortality rates (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.05-1.07). The odds for adverse events were comparable between the two arms (OR 1.43 95% CI 0.76-2.67). Compared to placebo, targeted therapies for ITP increase platelet counts, decrease bleeding events, and show a trend towards lower mortality, without increased toxicity. These findings support their use as a second-line ITP treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: There is uncertainty regarding the role of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)., Methods: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs combined with NACT to NACT in early-stage TNBC. Efficacy outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS). Toxicity data included any grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, AEs leading to death, common and meaningful AEs associated with chemotherapy and immune-related AEs. Odds ratio (ORs), hazard ratios (HR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) for efficacy and toxicity were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. Differences in the odds for pCR between programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors were also assessed., Results: Five RCTs comprising 2,075 patients were analyzed. Compared to NACT alone, combination of ICIs and NACT significantly improved pCR (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.25-2.47, p = 0.001) and EFS (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.91, p = 0.01). Magnitude of effect on pCR was similar between PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors (p for the subgroup difference = 0.80) and between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors (p = 0.27). The combination treatment resulted in higher odds of any grade 3/4 AEs (OR 1.31, p = 0.02) and serious AEs (OR 1.84, p = 0.006), with no statistically significant difference in AEs leading to death (OR 1.67, p = 0.51). Higher magnitude of toxicity was observed for immune-related AEs., Conclusion: Combination of ICIs and NACT were associated with improved outcome in early-stage TNBC while increasing toxicity significantly. Longer follow-up is desired to better understand the risk and benefit ratio of this combination., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The impact of interval of restaging on the observed magnitude of benefit of progression-free survival (PFS) is undefined., Materials and Methods: Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating anti-neoplastic drugs for metastatic breast cancer which reported the restaging interval and hazard ratio (HR) for PFS were included. Data on study design and study population were collected. HRs and 95% confidence intervals for PFS and OS (overall survival) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Studies were categorized according to short (<9 weeks) or long (≥9 weeks) restaging interval. The differences in PFS and OS effect between trials employing short and long restaging intervals were assessed as subgroup analyses. Analyses were repeated for pre-specified subgroups., Results: Eighty-nine studies comprising 95 comparisons and 44,901 patients were included. The magnitude of PFS benefit was larger in trials which employed short compared to long restaging intervals, but this difference did not reach the pre-defined threshold for statistical significance (HR = 0.79 vs. 0.86, P = 0.15). Short restaging interval was associated with significantly higher magnitude of effect on PFS in pre-specified subgroups including non-first line trials (HR = 0.78 vs. 0.92, P = 0.04), trials with drugs replacing standard treatment (HR = 0.86 vs. 1.04, P = 0.02) and studies performed in exclusively human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive disease (HR = 0.72 vs. 0.90, P = 0.02). The magnitude of OS benefit was similar with short and long restaging intervals., Conclusions: Shorter restaging intervals are associated with a higher magnitude of effect on PFS, but not OS. Awareness of the impact of the restaging interval on quantification of PFS is important for the design and interpretation of RCTs., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Menstrual and parity history might impact the risk for breast cancer. Data on the impact of these factors on other tumor characteristics are limited., Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study comprising all women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, early breast cancer whose tumors were sent to OncotypeDX analysis. The prespecified subgroups were investigated: age of menarche (< 12 vs. ≥ 12 years), number of deliveries (0 vs. ≥ 1 childbirth and ≥ 5 childbirth vs. other), age of first delivery (≥ 30 years vs. younger age) and postmenopausal compared to premenopausal. The impact of age of menopause was also assessed categorically, using early (< 45 years) and late age of menopause (> 55 years). Differences in tumor characteristics were evaluated using T-test or Mann Whitney for continuous variables or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with the log-rank test., Results: A total of 620 women were included. After median follow-up of 10.4 years, early menopause was associated with significantly worse disease-free survival (HR = 2.26, p = 0.004) and overall-survival (HR = 2.60, p = 0.004), and multiparity was associated with significant worse disease-free survival (HR = 2.16, p = 0.026). These differences remain significant in multivariate analyses. Post-menopausal women were more likely to have stronger ER intensity (p = 0.002) but progesterone receptor (PR) positivity was less frequent (p = 0.009(. Early age of menarche was associated with PR positivity (p = 0.039). No other associations were found between the evaluated subgroups and tumor characteristics., Conclusions: The impact of endogenous estrogen exposure had little effect on breast cancer characteristics of early stage, luminal disease. Early menopause and multiparity were associated with worse outcome., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To assess whether results of observational studies of potential anti-COVID-19 drugs were reproduced in subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, including studies published online between 1 January and 27 October 2020 that evaluated potential COVID-19 treatments and reported all-cause mortality., Results: Of 133 comparisons included in 117 studies, most were non-randomized (104/133, 78%). Hydroxychloroquine was the most common drug type, combined with azithromycin (n = 27, 20%) or alone (n = 22, 16%), followed by IL-6 inhibitors (n = 36, 27%) and corticosteroids (n = 26, 20%). Seventy-one percent (74/104) of non-randomized studies reported adjusted survival results and only 8% (8/104) adjusted for immortal time bias. Only two RCTs (2/29, 7%) reported significant survival benefit, both reporting treatment with corticosteroids, while 32/104 (31%) non-randomized studies showed statistically significant survival benefit associated with the intervention arm. The results of the majority (28/32, 88%) of non-randomized studies reporting survival benefit were not replicated by large-scale RCTs., Conclusions: The results of most non-randomized studies reporting survival benefit of potential anti-COVID-19 drugs were not replicated by large RCTs. Regulators and healthcare professionals should exercise caution and resist the pressure to approve and prescribe drugs of unproven efficacy and potential toxicity to optimize patient care and maintain public trust in medical science., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Locoregional therapy (LRT) in de novo metastatic disease is controversial with inconsistent results from randomized control trials (RCTs)., Methods: RCTs comparing LRT and systemic therapy to standard therapy alone in de novo metastatic breast cancer were identified. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and pooled in a meta-analysis using generic inverse variance. Overall survival (OS) and time to locoregional progression data were extracted for the intention to treat (ITT) population. Data on OS for pre-specified subgroups defined by tumor subtype and by site of metastases were also extracted., Results: Analyses included 4 trials comprising 970 patients. LRT included standard surgery to the primary breast tumor in all studies, and adjuvant radiation per standard of care was required in 3 studies. Compared to standard treatment, LRT was not associated with improved OS in the ITT population (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72-1.29, p = 0.81). However, LRT was associated with improved time to locoregional progression (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.95, p = 0.04). LRT was not associated with improved OS in any tumor subtypes, including hormone receptor positive (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.43), triple negative (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.50-3.91) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive disease (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.28). Additionally, LRT did not improve OS in bone only disease (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58-1.62) and in visceral disease (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.35). Our critical appraisal has identified some methodological problems in the design and conduct of the studies included that could affect the meta-analysis result., Conclusions: LRT in de novo metastatic breast cancer is not associated with improved OS. Results are consistent among different breast cancer subgroups. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution in view of the limitations identified in meta-analysis., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of a taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard of care for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. The combination of vinorelbine with trastuzumab and pertuzumab showed anti-tumor activity in a phase 2 trial., Patients and Methods: The databases of two tertiary medical centers were retrospectively searched for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line treatment in 2013-2019 with a taxane or vinorelbine in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Groups were compared for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile., Results: The study included 87 patients in the taxane group and 65 in the vinorelbine group. Overall median PFS was significantly longer in the taxane group [HR 0.56 (0.36-0.88), P = 0.01], but on multivariate analysis the difference was not statistically significant [HR 0.68 (0.4-1.1, P = 0.11)]. PFS was comparable in both groups of patients with recurrent disease [HR 0.94 (0.5-1.79), P = 0.85]. However, in patients with de novo metastatic disease, the difference in favor of the taxane group was pronounced [HR 0.4 (0.2-0.78), P = 0.007] and maintained significance on multivariate analysis [HR 0.46 (0.2-0.97, P = 0.04)]. There was no statistical significant difference in OS in the whole cohort [HR 0.69 (0.39-1.23)] or the subgroups., Conclusions: Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer had similar survival with first-line treatment of taxane or vinorelbine combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. When the analysis was adjusted for prognostic factors, there was no PFS benefit for taxanes except in the subgroup with de novo disease.

Abstract: Radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancers (IRTCs) are uncommon and have a poor prognosis. Treatment options for radioiodine-refractory and anaplastic tumors (ATCs) are limited. Although the genomic landscape of thyroid cancer has been studied, there is little evidence on whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) findings translate to tumor control.We analyzed all patients with IRTC and ATC who underwent commercially available NGS in 3 cancer centers.Twenty-two patients were identified, 16 patients with IRTCs and 6 patients with ATCs. Eighteen (82%) had targetable findings in NGS, nine patients were treated accordingly. Median progression-free survival for targeted treatment was 50 months [95% confidence interval (CI95%) 9.8-66.6] and2 months (CI95% 0.2-16.5) for IRTC and ATC, respectively. Of 4 patients who achieved durable responses of 7 to 50 months, 2 are ongoing. The estimated median OS of IRTC receiving targeted treatment was not reached (CI95% 89.7-111.4 months) and was 77.8 months (CI95% 52.5-114.6) for patients treated conventionally (P = .3).NGS may detect clinically significant genetic alterations and benefit patients with advanced thyroid cancers., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Patients receiving chemotherapy are at high risk for severe infections and complications such as acute respiratory syndrome. The most commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy protocols (docetaxel-cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks or the dose-dense regimen, doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide every 2 weeks followed by paclitaxel) incorporate granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). G-CSF is routinely administered to prevent chemotherapy-associated neutropenia but often results in significant neutrophilia. The present case describes a patient with breast cancer who was successfully treated for severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome while under adjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel-cyclophosphamide) treatment and long-term G-CSF support. In addition, the potential effect of G-CSF on the respiratory deterioration of the patient given its cardinal role in innate inflammation and, accordingly, the cytokine storm associated with COVID-19 was described. The case described in the present study indicated how solutions to the immunity challenges faced when treating a patient with chemotherapy may be the source of a larger problem within the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright: © Yerushalmi et al.)

Data suggest that for newly approved cancer drugs safety and tolerability are worse than in control arms of registration trials. Less is known about the balance between efficacy and toxicity of drugs studied in unselected phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including those not resulting in regulatory approval. We searched Clinicaltrials.gov to identify phase 3 RCTs in patients with advanced breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer completed between January 2005 and October 2016. We extracted efficacy and safety data from publications. For efficacy hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted. For safety, we computed odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for toxic death, treatment discontinuation without progression and commonly reported grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). Data were then pooled in a meta-analysis. Of 377 RCTs identified initially, 143 RCTs comprising 88,603 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 79 (57%) trials met their primary endpoint. Compared to control groups, both PFS (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.78-0.82) and OS (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.89) were improved with experimental drugs. Toxic death (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.27), treatment discontinuation without progression (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.56-1.71) and grade 3/4 AEs were also more common with experimental drugs compared to respective control group therapy. Just over half of phase 3 RCTs in common solid tumors met their primary endpoint and in nearly half, experimental therapy had worse safety compared to control arms.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the pattern and outcome of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in breast cancer by age at diagnosis., Methods: A retrospective database of a tertiary cancer center yielded 174 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with CNS metastases in 2006-2019. Data on histopathology, characteristics of CNS involvement, treatments, and survival (at three time points during the disease course) were compared between patients aged ≤ 45 and > 45 years. Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank test were used for statistical analyses., Results: Study population was divided according to age at diagnosis of breast cancer. 65 patients were ≤ 45 years old and 109 patients > 45 years old. The younger group was characterized by longer median overall survival (117.1 months vs 88 months, p = 0.017) and longer interval between breast cancer diagnosis to development of CNS metastases (97.4 months vs 75.9 months, p = 0.026). Median survival after development of CNS disease was not significantly different (18.7 months vs 11.1 months, p = 0.341), although it was significantly longer in younger patients within the subgroup of patients with triple-negative disease (22.5 vs 7.9 months, p = 0.033). There were no between-group differences in number, location, and clinical presentation of CNS metastases or in systemic and CNS-directed treatment approaches., Conclusion: While the presentation of CNS involvement was similar between the different age groups, younger patients had significantly longer CNS-free interval and longer overall survival, and for the subgroups of triple-negative patients, younger age at breast cancer diagnosis was associated with longer survival after diagnosis of CNS disease.

Introduction: The impact of exogenous estrogen exposure on breast cancer characteristics and outcomes is not well described. We aimed to investigate the effect of prior treatment with oral contraceptives (OCT), hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and fertility treatments on early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study comprising all women with ER-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer whose tumors were sent to Oncotype DX analysis between 2005 and 2012. Data on prior exposures to OCT, HRT, and fertility treatments were collected. The impact of these exposures on prespecified histopathological features was assessed including tumor size, nodal status, intensity of the hormonal receptors, grade, Oncotype recurrence score, Ki67, and lymphovascular and perineural invasion. The impact of these exposures on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was also evaluated., Results: A total of 620 women were included, of which 19% had prior exposure to OCT, 30% to HRT, and 11% to fertility treatments. OCT use was associated with smaller (≤1 cm) tumors (p = 0.023) and were less likely to have grade 3 disease (p = 0.049). No other associations were found between exogenous estrogen exposure and tumor characteristics. Median follow-up was 10.4 years. Ten-year DFS was 85.7%, and it was not influenced by exogenous exposure. Ten-year OS was 90.2%, and OCT was associated with improved OS in univariate analysis (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.85), but this difference did not remain significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.275)., Conclusion: The impact of exogenous estrogen exposure on ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer characteristics is limited. In the long term, none of the evaluated exposures had negative effect on DFS and OS., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines can include recommendations for off-label use of anti-cancer drugs. Here, we evaluate NCCN recommendations not supported by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and explore associations with such recommendations., Methods: All NCCN recommendations for MBC and their supporting data were identified. Drug labels were reviewed to determine whether recommendations are FDA approved. Logistic regression was used to compare FDA approved and off-label recommendations for pre-specified categories, including drug type, tumor subtype, level of recommendation and line of therapy., Results: Of 124 recommendations identified, 68 (55%) were off-label. Chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted drugs were associated with lower odds of FDA approval (OR = 0.28, p = 0.001 and OR = 0.29, 95% p = 0.005, respectively). Recommendations for endocrine therapy (OR = 3.44, p = 0.009) and non-HER2 targeted treatment (OR = 10.0, p < 0.001) were more commonly FDA approved indications. Compared to combination therapies, monotherapies were more likely to be FDA approved (OR = 3.45, p = 0.001) as were category 1 (OR = 7.63, p = 0.001) and preferred NCCN recommendations (OR = 4.07, p < 0.001). Compared to off-label recommendations, NCCN recommendations of approved drugs were based on significantly higher sample size (mean 477 vs. 342 patients, p = 0.02) and were non-significantly associated with availability of randomized data (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 0.89-4.49, p = 0.09)., Conclusion: More than half of all NCCN recommendations for MBC are off-label, mostly involving chemotherapy containing regimes for HER2 negative disease and combinations which include HER2-targeted drugs. Improved transparency of NCCN guidelines may result from reporting of the strength of the evidence supporting recommendations for MBC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kaposi sarcoma is a rare vascular mesenchymal neoplasm, associated with Human Herpes Virus 8 (HHV8). Gout is a condition clinically characterized by recurrent flares of arthritis and hyperuricemia. Following our clinical impression that patients with classical Kaposi sarcoma (CKS) have a high rate of gout, we explored this in a retrospective manner., Methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with sarcoma or carcinosarcoma within a single tertiary center between 1/2012-12/2017 were identified through the pathology department database. A cohort of CKS patients was compared with the non-Kaposi sarcoma and carcinosarcoma cohort. Data were extracted from patients' electronic medical records. Patients younger than 18 and patients without clinical data available were excluded. Association between diagnosis of gout and CKS was assessed and adjusted for risk factors., Results: Three hundred and sixty-one patients were eligible for this analysis, 61 were diagnosed with CKS and 300 with other types of sarcoma. We found a higher incidence of gout in CKS patients, 11/61 (18%) patients, compared with 8/300 (2.6%) with other types of sarcoma, odds ratio (OR) 8.0 ( P < 0.00001). This association persisted when adjusted for age >39 years (OR = 6.7, P < 0.00001), age and male sex (OR = 4.97, P < 0.0001), and when adjusting for multiple confounding factors and medical comorbidities., Conclusions: We have demonstrated a statistically significant association between gout and CKS. As risk factors for gout were accounted for, this association may be explained by HHV8 immune-related effects. This should be further explored in vitro and in population-based studies., Competing Interests: Assaf Moore declares honoraria from Merck, Roche. Idit Perez, Lilach Yosef, Daniel A. Goldstein, Suzanna Horn, and Yonatan Edel declare no conflicts of interest to disclose. Hadar Goldvaser declares honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Oncotest. Alona Zer declares advisory role from Astra Zeneca, Merck, Roche; honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche; and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb., (Copyright © 2020 Assaf Moore et al.)

Background: Anti-cancer drugs are approved typically on the basis of efficacy and safety as evaluated in phase III randomized trials (RCTs). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a direct measure of patient benefit, but is under-reported. Here we explore associations with reporting of HRQoL data in phase III RCTs in common solid tumors., Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify phase III RCTs evaluating new drugs in adults with advanced cancers that completed accrual between January 2005 and October 2016. Data on HRQoL, safety, and tolerability comprising treatment-related death, treatment discontinuation and commonly reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were extracted. Associations between these measures and reporting of HRQoL data were explored using logistic regression., Results: Of 377 phase III RCTs identified initially, 143 studies were analysed and comprised 55% positive trials and 90% industry sponsored trials. HRQoL was listed as an endpoint in 59% trials; and of these, only 65% reported HRQoL data. There were higher odds of reporting HRQoL data for positive trials (OR 2.05, P = .04) and trials published in journals with higher impact factor (OR 1.35, P = .01). Reporting of HRQoL was not associated with treatment-related death (OR 1.25, P = .40) or treatment discontinuation (OR 1.12, P = .61), but was positively associated with dyspnea and dermatological adverse events., Conclusions: HRQoL is reported in only two-thirds of RCTs that describe collecting such data. Reporting of HRQoL is associated with positive trial outcome and higher journal impact factor, but not associated with overall safety and tolerability of anti-cancer drugs., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is inconsistent. Whether the efficacy of ICIs is comparable across different subgroups remains unknown., Methods: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared standard treatment for metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma to ICIs. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. Prespecified subgroups were included as follows: age at randomization (65 years), gender (female vs male), ethnicity (Asians vs non-Asians), performance-status (0 vs 1), tumor location (gastric vs GEJ), and histological subtype (diffuse vs others). OS in patients with programmed death ligand (PD-L1) positive and with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) were also extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis., Results: Five RCTs comprising 2,264 patients were analyzed. Compared to standard therapy, ICIs did not improve OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.03, P = .10) and the effect of ICIs on OS was similar in all subgroups. Nonsignificantly greater effect sizes were seen in older patients (HR = 0.85 vs 0.88, P = .81), male (HR = 0.82 vs 0.99, P = .16), Asians (HR = 0.86 vs 0.96, P = .55), performance-status 0 (HR = 0.84 vs 0.88, P = .81), GEJ tumors (HR = 0.78 vs 0.90, P = .37), and nondiffuse subtype (HR = 0.71 vs 0.79, P = .62). ICIs were associated with significantly improved OS in patients with MSI-H (HR = 0.33, P = .001), but not in PD-L1 positive disease (HR = 0.86, P = .06)., Conclusions: Compared to standard treatment, ICIs in metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma did not improve OS. None of the evaluated subgroups has shown increased magnitude of effect to ICIs, aside of the small group with MSI-H tumors., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Early glottic cancers are often treated with radiotherapy (RT). We assessed the economic impact of fractionation scheme and planning method for payers in the United States., Methods: A population-based analysis of the total cost of RT for early glottic cancers in the United States was performed annually. The target population was calculated using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RT costs were based on 2019 pricing by Medicare., Results: We estimate that 3794 patients with early glottic cancers are treated with RT annually. The cost of RT per patient ranges between US $13 964 and $26 599 by fractionation and planning method. Hypofractionation reduces costs by 9% to 14%, while Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) increases costs by 65% to 72%. IMRT-based standard fractionation leads to an excess cost of $47 937 076 compared with 3D-based hypofractionation., Conclusions: 3D-based hypofractionated RT is the current standard of care. It would be reasonable for public and private payers to consider evidence-based policies for radiation reimbursement., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer can be guided by genomic assays such as OncotypeDX. The concordance of expected clinical decisions guided by OncotypeDX and prognostication online tools such as PREDICT is unknown., Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study comprising all women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative, node negative disease, whose tumors were sent for OncotypeDX analysis. Expected decision on adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated using OncotypeDX and using PREDICT. The concordance between these two tools was calculated. The impact on concordance of prespecified features was assessed, including age, tumor size, intensity of ER and progesterone receptor (PR), grade, Ki67 and perineural and lymphovascular invasion., Results: A total of 445 women were included. Overall concordance was 75% (K = 0.284). The concordance was significantly higher for grade 1 disease compared to grade 2-3 (93% vs 72%, P < .001), tumor ≤ 1 cm compared to >1 cm (85% vs 72%, P = .009), PR positive compared to PR negative (78% vs 58%, P < .001) and ki67 < 10% compared to ≥10% (92% vs 63%, P < .001). The intensity of ER and the presence of perineural or lymphovascular invasion had no significant impact on concordance., Conclusions: Compared to PREDICT, using OncotypeDx in node negative, ER positive disease is expected to change the clinical decision in a quarter of patients. The concordance between OncotypeDx and PREDICT is influenced by pathological features. In patients with very low risk, treatment decisions may be made based solely on clinical risk assessment., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy is a gold standard in early-stage, hormone receptor positive breast cancer. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are associated with improved outcome compared to tamoxifen monotherapy. Differences in the toxicity profiles of these drugs are described; however, little is known about whether the risk of adverse events changes over time., Methods: Sequential reports of large, randomized, adjuvant endocrine therapy trials comparing AIs to tamoxifen were reviewed. Data on pre-specified adverse events were extracted including cardiovascular events, bone fractures, cerebrovascular disease, endometrial cancer, secondary malignancies excluding breast cancer, venous thrombosis and death without recurrence. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for each adverse event at each time over the course of follow-up. The change in the ORs for adverse events over time was evaluated using weighted linear regression., Results: Analysis included 21 reports of 7 trials comprising 30,039 patients and reporting outcomes between 28 and 128 months of follow-up. Compared to tamoxifen, AIs use was associated with a significant reduction in the magnitude of increased odds of bone fracture over time (β = - 0.63, p = 0.013). There was a non-significant decrease in the magnitude of reduced odds of secondary malignancies over time (β = 0.448, p = 0.094). The differences in other toxicity profiles between AIs and tamoxifen did not change significantly over time., Conclusions: The increased risk of bone fractures associated with adjuvant AIs falls over time and after discontinuation of treatment. Differences in other toxicities between AIs and tamoxifen do not change significantly over time including a persistently elevated risk of cardiovascular events.

Background: Salivary gland cancers (SGCs) are rare. The approach to metastatic patients is histology-dependent. There is little evidence on whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) findings translate to tumor control in SGCs., Methods: We analyzed all patients with histologically confirmed SGC who underwent NGS., Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified, 14 (51.8%) had targetable findings in NGS: 5 ERBB2 amplifications, 3 PIK3CA mutations, 2 RUNX1 mutations, 1 TRIM33-RET fusion, 1 FGFR3-TACC3 fusion, 1 microsatellite instability-high, and 2 high mutational burden. Ten patients were treated accordingly. Median progression-free survival for targeted treatment was 8.4 months. Of five patients who achieved durable responses of 8.4 to 31.3 months, two are ongoing. The overall median survival was not reached for patients receiving targeted treatment and was 40.4 months for patients treated conventionally (P = .18)., Conclusions: In the absence of a well-established therapeutic approach, NGS may detect clinically significant genetic alterations and benefit patients with advanced SGC., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: There is uncertainty about outcomes differences between partial breast irradiation (PBI) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) for early-stage breast cancer., Methods: Prospective randomized trials comparing adjuvant PBI to WBI in early-stage invasive breast cancer were identified using PubMed. Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals and absolute risks were computed for pre-specified efficacy and toxicity outcomes including cosmesis. Subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of PBI modality (external beam radiation treatment [EBRT], intraoperative radiation treatment [IORT] or brachytherapy) on efficacy. Meta-regression analysis explored the influence of median follow-up, patient and tumor characteristics on results., Results: Nine trials comprising 14514 patients were included. While PBI was associated with increased odds of local recurrence compared to WBI (OR 1.69, P < 0.001), it was associated with reduced odds of death without breast cancer recurrence (OR 0.55, P < 0.001) and with improvement in overall survival (OS) that approached, but did not meet statistical significance (OR 0.84, P = 0.06). Subgroup analysis for PBI modality showed significant differences in the odds of local recurrence, based on method of PBI with EBRT showing the lowest magnitude of inferiority. Nodal involvement was associated with higher local recurrence risk, while larger tumors were associated with lesser improvement in death without breast cancer recurrence and OS. PBI was associated with higher odds of fat necrosis (OR 1.72, P = 0.002). Worse cosmetic outcome with PBI approached statistical significance (OR 1.23, P = 0.06)., Conclusions: Compared to WBI, PBI is associated with higher odds for local recurrence and toxicity, but less death without breast cancer recurrence. The balance between benefit and risk of PBI appears optimal for women with smaller hormone receptor positive tumors, without nodal involvement and treated with EBRT.

Background: One year of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy is the standard of care in early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Existing data on shortening trastuzumab treatment show conflicting results., Methods: A search of PubMed and abstracts from key conferences identified randomized trials that compared abbreviated trastuzumab therapy to 1 year of treatment in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses evaluated the effect of nodal involvement, estrogen receptor expression, and the duration of abbreviated trastuzumab (9-12 weeks vs 6 months). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were computed for prespecified cardiotoxicity events including cardiac dysfunction and congestive heart failure. P values were two-sided., Results: Analysis included six trials comprising 11 603 patients. Shorter trastuzumab treatment was associated with worse DFS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.25, P  = .002) and OS (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.29. P  = .02). The effect on DFS was not influenced by estrogen receptor status ( P for the subgroup difference = .23), nodal involvement ( P  = .44), or the different duration of trastuzumab in the experimental arm ( P  = .09). Shorter trastuzumab treatment was associated with lower odds of cardiac dysfunction (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.81, P  < .001) and congestive heart failure (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.50 to 0.86, P  = .003)., Conclusions: Compared with 1 year, shorter duration of adjuvant trastuzumab is associated with statistically significantly worse DFS and OS despite favorable cardiotoxicity profile. One year of targeted HER2 treatment should remain the standard adjuvant treatment in early-stage HER2-positive disease with appropriate cardiac monitoring.

Opinion statement Bisphosphonates are utilized routinely in breast cancer. In metastatic disease with bone involvement, bisphosphonates prevent or delay skeletal-related events and can improve pain control. Different agents have shown benefit compared with placebo or no treatment. While in unselected patients, comparison between zoledronic acid and pamidronate did not show a significant difference, exploratory analyses showed that in patients with osteolytic lesions or hypercalcemia, zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate. De-escalating treatment with zoledronic acid from every 4 to every 12 weeks has been shown to provide similar control of skeletal morbidity and may result in less toxicity and reduced cost. While available data support bisphosphonate treatment for 2 years in metastatic disease, typical treatment duration is influenced by performance status with treatment discontinued only once patients are not well enough to continue receiving systemic therapy or developed treatment-related adverse events. In early-stage breast cancer, individual trials of adjuvant bisphosphonates have reported inconsistent results. However, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group showed that bisphosphonates significantly reduce distant recurrence, bone recurrence, and breast cancer mortality, an effect observed in postmenopausal women only. The relative benefit of bisphosphonates was not influenced by receptor status, tumor grade, nodal involvement, or administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Current guidelines support consideration of adjuvant zoledronic acid or oral clodronate for 3-5 years in postmenopausal women with early-stage disease. Although bisphosphonates are tolerated well, serious adverse events, including osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal impairment, can occur, especially for higher dose density schedules utilized in metastatic disease. Decision to include bisphosphonates in the treatment plan should be based on the anticipated absolute benefit and potential for adverse effects. In some patients with both early-stage and metastatic disease, omission of bisphosphonates is reasonable as the potential benefit from this treatment is not likely to outweigh its risks.

Background: Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is considered a negative prognostic factor in early breast cancer, but its role in decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear in the current era of molecular profiling. This study sought to evaluate the association of LVI status with the recurrence score (RS) on the multigene Oncotype DX (ODX) assay and its impact on outcome., Methods: Patients with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who underwent ODX analysis in 2005-2012 were retrospectively identified. Clinical data were collected from the medical records. The Cox proportional-hazards ratio was used to determine recurrence rates. The prognostic significance of LVI was evaluated by competing risks analysis., Results: LVI was detected in 38 of 657 patients (6%). LVI was not associated with ODX RS (p = 0.225). However, it was significantly associated with other known prognostic factors and with worse 5-year disease-free survival (HR 2.93; 95% CI 1.02-8.39; p = 0.04). Overall survival (OS) analysis according to the ODX subgroups showed that the presence of LVI was associated with worse 5-year OS (p = 0.04) only in the intermediate-risk group, while LVI had no effect on the low- or high-risk groups., Conclusions: Although LVI was not significantly associated with a higher ODX RS, it may infer a worse outcome, especially in ODX intermediate-risk patients., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To investigate whether US Food and Drug Administration approval of new drugs without randomization or an active drug comparator is associated with more postmarketing safety-related label modifications., Methods: We searched Drugs@FDA for new drugs approved from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2014. Drugs approved without supporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were matched to between 1 and 2 controls from similar therapeutic categories approved with supporting RCTs within 3 years of the reference drug. Study characteristics, regulatory pathways, and label modifications up to December 2017 were collected from drug labels. Differences in postmarketing safety modifications between cases and controls were assessed using conditional logistic regression., Results: The study cohort included 52 drugs approved without supporting RCTs and 91 matched controls. Drug approvals not supported by RCTs were associated with lower sample size (odds ratio [OR] per 100 patients, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68-0.87) and were more likely to receive orphan drug designation (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 2.23-11.69), fast-track designation (OR, 4.80; 95% CI, 2.25-10.23), and accelerated approval (OR, 7.00; 95% CI, 3.14-15.60). Drugs approved without supporting RCTs were associated with more modifications in black box warnings (28.8% vs 13.2%; OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.27), warnings and precautions (73.1% vs 52.7%; OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16-5.09), and common adverse reactions (48.1% vs 23.1%; OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.49-6.41)., Conclusion: Food and Drug Administration approval of new drugs without supporting RCTs is associated with more postmarketing safety-related label modifications than drugs approved with supporting RCTs. Robust postmarketing studies are required for drugs approved without supporting RCTs. Health care professionals should be vigilant for unrecognized adverse effects when prescribing these drugs., (Copyright © 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Many adjuvant breast cancer trials have observed smaller than anticipated differences between experimental and control groups. Accurate estimation of the absolute benefits of treatment is essential for the planning of clinical trials., Methods: We searched PubMed to identify contemporary randomized trials comparing different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. The absolute difference in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall-survival between experimental and control groups were extracted, weighted by individual study sample size and pooled. Analyses were performed for estrogen receptor (ER) negative and ER-positive disease. Meta-regression explored the influence of patients and tumor characteristics and median follow-up on the benefit from treatment., Results: Analysis included 19 studies comprising 41,564 patients. Studies comparing chemotherapy regimens of different generations showed the largest difference in 5-year DFS (+7.4% for 3rd vs. 2nd generation and +5.9% for 2nd vs. 1st generation for ER-negative disease, and +2.3% for 3rd vs. 2nd generation and +1.8% for 2nd vs. 1st generation for ER-positive disease). Studies comparing chemotherapy regimens from the same generation showed smaller differences in DFS in both subgroups. Meta-regression showed that larger tumors and nodal involvement had significant greater magnitude of effect on 5-year DFS for ER-negative, but not ER-positive disease. Age and menopausal status had no effect in either subgroup., Conclusions: Absolute differences between adjuvant chemotherapy regimens of the same generation are small even in ER-negative disease. Enrichment of trials for patients with poor clinical features results in larger magnitudes of benefit from treatment at 5 years in ER-negative, but not ER-positive disease., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hormone receptor positive breast cancer is characterized by a prolonged risk of recurrence. Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy improves disease-free survival (DFS), but no effect on overall survival has been observed. This may be explained by changes in the relative contribution of local, regional and distant recurrences as well as non-breast cancer death to DFS events over time., Patients and Methods: We reviewed sequential reports of large, randomized, adjuvant endocrine therapy trials extracting the number and types of recurrences defining DFS events at each point over follow-up. Meta-regression was performed to explore the relative contribution of contralateral, loco-regional and distant recurrences as well as non-breast cancer death to DFS over time., Results: Analysis included 17 reports of 6 trials reporting outcomes between 28 and 120 months of follow-up. Over time, there was increasing contribution of contralateral breast cancer (5% of events at 20 months to 12% at 120 months; β = 0.663, p = 0.004) and non-breast cancer death (20% of events at 20 months to 32% at 120 months; β = 0.581, p = 0.01). There was a non-significant reduction in the contribution of distant recurrence (57% of events at 20 months to 45% at 120 months; β = -0.397, p = 0.11), but no change in loco-regional recurrence (18% of events at 20 months to 11% at 120 months; β = -0.301, p = 0.30)., Conclusions: With increasing follow-up, DFS events are increasing defined by contralateral recurrence and non-breast cancer deaths with a trend for fewer distant recurrences. This may explain the limited association between DFS and overall survival with extended adjuvant endocrine therapy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)