1. The anti-emetic efficacy of maropitant (Cerenia?) in the treatment of ongoing emesis caused by a wide range of underlying clinical aetiologies in canine patients in Europe
- Author
-
E. M. Siedek, V. A. De La Puente-Redondo, T.G Rowan, R.G Clemence, H. A. Benchaoui, and N. Tilt
- Subjects
Male ,Quinuclidines ,Metoclopramide ,Vomiting ,Veterinary clinics ,Treatment outcome ,law.invention ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Dogs ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Animals ,Medicine ,Clinical significance ,Dog Diseases ,Small Animals ,business.industry ,Europe ,Treatment Outcome ,chemistry ,Anesthesia ,Anti-emetic ,Antiemetics ,Female ,business ,Maropitant ,After treatment ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objectives: The efficacy of maropitant (Cerenia™; Pfizer Inc.) as an anti-emetic for use in dogs with ongoing emesis was evaluated in a two-phase multi-centric study conducted at veterinary clinics in France, Italy, Slovakia and the UK. Methods: In phase I, dogs with ongoing emesis were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either maropitant (32 dogs) or metoclopramide (34 dogs). In phase II, dogs were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to maropitant (77 dogs) or metoclopramide (40 dogs). Maropitant was administered subcutaneously at 1 mg/kg/day for up to five days. Metoclopramide was administered as recommended on the product labels as licensed at 0·5 to 1 mg/kg/day subcutaneously or orally with the daily dose divided over two to three administrations per day for up to three to five days. Results: In phase I, 97 per cent of dogs treated with maropitant and 71 per cent of dogs treated with metoclopramide did not vomit after treatment (P
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF