Rationale and Objectives: To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI., Materials and Methods: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 ± 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWI S ) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWI DL ). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b-values (0 and 800 s/mm 2 ) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWI S and DWI DL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWI DL compared to DWI S for b = 0 s/mm 2 , b = 800 s/mm 2 , and ADC maps by all readers (P < .05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWI DL compared to DWI S for b = 0 s/mm 2 , b = 800 s/mm 2 , and ADC maps by all readers (P < .001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P > .05). Acquisition time for DWI S was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWI DL was 1:12 minutes., Conclusion: DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships that may be considered potential competing interests: Elisabeth Weiland and Thomas Benkert report a relationship with Siemens Healthineers that includes employment, and both provided us with the deep learning reconstruction. Full control over the patient data was with all other authors at the University of Tübingen., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)