Search

Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effect of programmed exercise on depressive symptoms (DSs) in midlife and older women. Methods We carried out a structured search of PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scielo, from database inception through June 29, 2017, without language restriction. The search included the following terms: “depression”, “depressive symptoms”, “exercise”, “physical activity”, “menopause”, and “randomized controlled trial” (RCTs) in midlife and older women. The US, UK and Australian Clinical Trials databases were also searched. We assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of exercise for at least 6 weeks versus no intervention on DSs as the outcome (as defined by trial authors). Exercise was classified according to duration as “mid-term exercise intervention” (MTEI; lasting for 12 weeks to 4 months), and “long-term exercise intervention” (LTEI; lasting for 6–12 months). Mean changes (±standard deviations) in DSs, as assessed with different questionnaires, were extracted to calculate Hedges’ g and then used as the effect size for meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of DSs after intervention were pooled using a random-effects model. Results Eleven publications were included for analysis related to 1943 midlife and older women (age range 44–55 years minimum to 65.5 ± 4.0 maximum), none of whom was using a hormone therapy. Seven MTEIs were associated with a significant reduction in DSs (SMD = −0.44; 95% CI −0.69, −0.18; p = 0.0008) compared with controls. The reduction in DSs was also significant in six LTEIs (SMD = − 0.29; 95% CI −0.49; −0.09; p = 0.005). Heterogeneity of effects among studies was moderate to high. Less perceived stress and insomnia (after exercise) were also found as secondary outcomes. Conclusion Exercise of low to moderate intensity reduces depressive symptoms in midlife and older women.

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding endometriosis and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).We carried out a search of the following databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Scielo, Clinicaltrials.gov, the UK Clinical Trials Gateway, and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, from inception through April 28 2017, without language restrictions, in order to evaluate the effect of endometriosis over GDM risk, in women with and without endometriosis. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated as effects. Methodological quality of evidence was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and heterogeneity among studies with the IWe identified 12 studies (10 cohort and two case control studies) with a total of 48,762 pregnancies, including 3,461 with endometriosis. Endometriosis had no significant effect on GDM risk (OR =1.14; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.51; p = .35, IBetter-designed studies are needed to confirm our results.

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to clarify the effect of programmed exercise over mild-to-moderate anxiety symptoms (ASs) in midlife and older women. A structured search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scielo, and the US, UK and Australian Clinical Trials databases (from inception through July 27, 2017) was performed, with no language restriction using the following terms: 'anxiety', 'anxiety symptoms', 'exercise', 'physical activity', 'menopause', and 'randomized controlled trial' (RCTs) in mid-aged and older women. We assessed RCTs that compared the effect of exercise for at least 6 weeks versus no intervention over ASs as outcome (as defined by trial authors). Exercise was classified according to duration as 'mid-term exercise intervention' (MTEI; for 12 weeks to 4 months), and 'long-term exercise intervention' (LTEI; for 6-14 months). Mean ± standard deviations of changes for ASs, as assessed with different questionnaires, were extracted to calculate Hedges' g and then used as effect size for meta-analyses. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of ASs after intervention were pooled using a random-effects model. Ten publications were included for analysis related to 1463 midlife and older women (minimum age 54.2 ± 3.5 and maximum age 77.6 ± 5.4 years). Eight MTEIs were associated with a significant reduction of ASs (SMD = -0.42; 95% CI -0.81 to -0.02) as compared to controls. There was no reduction of ASs in seven LTEIs (SMD = -0.03; 95% CI -0.18 to 0.13). It can be concluded that MTEIs of low-to-moderate intensity seem to improve mild-moderate ASs in midlife and older women.

To compare the efficacy of single- versus double-balloon catheter (SBC vs. DBC) for cervical ripening and labor induction with an unfavorable cervix. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs (qRCT) regarding the use of SBC or DBC for labor induction of live singleton cephalic pregnancies (≥ 35 weeks) of any parity with an unripe cervix (Bishop score ≤ 6). Nine research databases were searched for original articles published in all languages up to November 2017 comparing both devices for labor induction. Five RCTs and one qRCT were included. Primary outcome measures were time from intervention (device placement) to birth time, vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates, and maternal satisfaction with the procedure. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane tool. Random effects models were used to combine data for meta-analyses. Summary measures were reported as mean differences and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Regardless of parity, pooled analyses of the six trials (n = 1060 women) found that mean intervention to birth time, vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates, and maternal satisfaction to the procedure were similar for both studied groups (SBC vs. DBC). Measured primary outcome measures were similar regardless of the type of device used for labor induction of singleton pregnancies.