− Pharmaceutical technology has primarily focused on the development of the best dosage forms dependingon the route of administration. The design of dosage forms is greatly influenced by the route of administration. Due to avariety of advantages such as avoidance of first-pass effect, abundant blood supply and easy access to the absorption site,the oral cavity has frequently been selected as a site for drug delivery. Since the oral cavity is relatively unique from theanatomical and physiological viewpoint, one should always consider these conditions when designing the drug delivery sys-tems for the oral cavity. In this regard, the current review paper was prepared to summarize the essential features of the drugdelivery systems utilized in the oral cavity, along with the introduction of various dosage forms developed to date.Key words − Oral cavity, Buccal, Bioadhesive, Mucoadhesive, Drug delivery system, Dosage forms A number of buccal delivery systems are being investigatedand have been used for drug absorption via the oral mucosa.These include aqueous solutions (e.g. mouth wash, a dose ≤25 mL), conventional buccal and sublingual tablets, liquid-filled capsules, adhesive tablets, adhesive gels, adhesivepatches, chewing gums, metered-dose aerosols and devicesattached to the teeth or implanted in the tooth enamel (Merkleet al., 1990). The selection of dosage form primarily relies onthe therapeutic intention, such as rapid or prolonged effect andsystemic or local therapeutic effect, as well as the physico-chemical properties of the drug molecules. It would be addi-tionally important to increase the patient acceptability of thedelivery system i.e. ease of use and avoidance of discomfort.Karsenty et al. (1994) have evaluated clinically the patientacceptance of a transmucosal patch (a matrix of polyacrylicacid and polyisobutylene with adhesive impermeable backinglayer) with regard to comfort, irritation and feeling when pre-sented and removed. They reported that it is important to dem-onstrate patient acceptance if the delivery system is to gain awide range of applicability for a number of therapies. It is alsoimportant that the additives used to formulate oral mucosaldosage forms do not stimulate salivary secretion as this maycause the loss of a large fraction of the active ingredient priorto absorption. Rathbone et al. (1994) have reported that thesize, shape and the thickness of the delivery system should beconsidered to maximise patient compliance. Anders andMerkle (1989) have proposed the appropriate dimensions ofdosage forms for buccal use. For an inflexible conventionaltablet, 5-8 mm in diameter is suitable for comfort and the abil-ity of the patient to constantly detect its presence. In the caseof a flexible patch, the maximum size would be 10-15 cm