Search

Pain after hip arthroscopy can be severe, yet we lack a consensus method for non-narcotic analgesia. Here we describe anatomic elements of hip arthroscopy and our current understanding of the relevant sensory innervation as a prelude to the evaluation of locoregional analgesic techniques. Many regional nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration techniques are reviewed, including 2 newer ultrasound fascial plane blocks. Further study of targeted, motor-sparing approaches, either ultrasound-guided or under direct surgical visualization is needed., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr F.W. Gwathmey is a consultant and speaker for Arthrex, a consultant for Allosource, and receives royalties from Elsevier. None of the other authors have any disclosures with regard to this article., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/Objectives : Recurrent shoulder instability following Bankart lesion repair often necessitates surgical revision. This systematic review aims to understand the failure rates of arthroscopic revision Bankart repair. Methods : Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO, this systematic review examined twenty-five articles written between 2000 and 2024. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility across three databases, focusing on recurrent instability as the primary endpoint, while also noting functional measures, adverse events, revision operations, and return-to-sport rates when available. Results : The key surgical techniques for recurrent instability post-Bankart repair were identified, with revision arthroscopic Bankart being the most common (685/1032). A comparative analysis revealed a significantly lower recurrence for open coracoid transfer compared to arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (9.67% vs. 17.14%; p < 0.001), while no significant difference was observed between remplissage plus Bankart repair and Bankart repair alone (23.75% vs. 17.14%; p = 0.24). The majority of studies did not include supracritical glenoid bone loss or engaging Hill-Sachs lesions, and neither subcritical nor non-engaging lesions significantly influenced recurrence rates ( p = 0.85 and p = 0.80, respectively). Conclusions : Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair remains a viable option in the absence of bipolar bone loss; however, open coracoid transfer appears to have lower recurrence rates than arthroscopic Bankart repair, consistent with prior evidence. Further studies should define cutoffs and investigate the roles of critical glenoid bone loss and off-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Preoperative measurements of GBL on three-dimensional computed tomography and characterizing lesions based on glenoid track will help surgeons to choose ideal candidates for arthroscopic revision Bankart repair.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine factors correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR., Design: cross sectional study., Setting: controlled laboratory., Participants: 164 patients (82 M/82 F, 22.5 ± 8.9yr, 171.6 ± 11.0 cm, 77.4 ± 18.6 kg, 8.6 ± 3.4 months post-ACLR) participated in this study after a primary, isolated, and uncomplicated ACLR., Main Outcome Measures: ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI)., Results: ACL-RSI scores demonstrated a weak positive correlation with activity level at the time of injury and a fair positive correlation with activity level at the time of post-operative testing (p-values: 0.004, <0.001). ACL-RSI scores showed a statistically significant fair negative correlation with pain and a moderate negative correlation with kinesiophobia during rehabilitation (p-values: <0.001, <0.001). There was no statistical significance between ACL-RSI and the surgical variables (p-value range: 0.10-0.61)., Conclusions: Outcomes from testing during postoperative rehabilitation were most correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. Increased pain and kinesiophobia were associated with a decreased psychological readiness. Increased activity level prior to injury and activity level at the time of testing during rehabilitation were both correlated with increased psychological readiness. Psychological readiness to return to activity may need to be customized based on potentially modifiable patient-specific factors during the post-operative rehabilitation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We sought to utilize a noninvasive technology to assess the effects of activity on Achilles tendon stiffness and define baseline Achilles tendon stiffness in female college athletes compared with nonathletes using tendon shear wave velocity as a marker for tendon stiffness., Hypothesis: Training status and exercise may affect Achilles tendon stiffness., Level of Evidence: Level 4., Methods: A total of 32 college-age female athletes were prospectively enrolled (n = 17 varsity athletes and n = 15 nonathletes). Demographic characteristics, activity level, and previous injuries were recorded. Sonographic shear wave elastography (SWE) was used to assess Achilles tendon shear wave velocity bilaterally for all subjects, both at baseline and after 2 minutes of exercise. Student t tests were used to compare the mean elastography measurements between participants stratified by athlete status and pre/postexercise stimulus. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean proximal, middle, and distal Achilles tendon elastography measurements., Results: As seen by a greater mean shear wave velocity (8.60 ± 1.58 m/s vs 8.25 ± 1.89 m/s; P = 0.02), athletes had stiffer tendons than nonathletes. Exercise stimulus decreased average tendon shear wave velocity (8.57 ± 1.74 m/s vs 8.28 ± 1.72 m/s; P = 0.05). Tendon shear wave velocity was greatest proximally and least distally with significant differences between each region ( P < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant 2-way interaction between weekly training status and foot dominance ( P = 0.01). Post hoc analysis showed that this result was due to differences in tendon shear wave velocity between the dominant and nondominant lower extremity in nonathletes (7.73 ± 2.00 m/s vs 8.76 ± 1.62 m/s; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Female varsity collegiate athletes have higher baseline Achilles tendon stiffness as measured by SWE compared with nonathletes. Mean tendon stiffness varies based on Achilles measurement location. SWE is a quick, cost-effective, and noninvasive imaging modality that can be used to evaluate tendon stiffness and elasticity., Clinical Relevance: SWE is an efficient and noninvasive imaging modality that can evaluate dynamic tendon stiffness and elasticity. SWE may be helpful to assess injuries in female college athletes and may play a role in risk stratification or clinical follow-up. In theory, SWE could be used to identify athletes with increased elasticity as a marker for potential risk for rupture in this population., Competing Interests: The following author declared potential conflicts of interest: F.W.G. is employed as a consultant by Stryker, a paid speaker/presenter for Arthrex Inc., and receives publishing royalties, financial, or material support from Sunders/Mosby-Elsevier.

Aims: The aim of this study was to establish consensus statements on medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, and rehabilitation and return to sporting activity in patients with patellar instability, using the modified Delphi process., Methods: This was the second part of a study dealing with these aspects of management in these patients. As in part I, a total of 60 surgeons from 11 countries contributed to the development of consensus statements based on their expertise in this area. They were assigned to one of seven working groups defined by subtopics of interest. Consensus was defined as achieving between 80% and 89% agreement, strong consensus was defined as between 90% and 99% agreement, and 100% agreement was considered unanimous., Results: Of 41 questions and statements on patellar instability, none achieved unanimous consensus, 19 achieved strong consensus, 15 achieved consensus, and seven did not achieve consensus., Conclusion: Most statements reached some degree of consensus, without any achieving unanimous consensus. There was no consensus on the use of anchors in MPFL reconstruction, and the order of fixation of the graft (patella first versus femur first). There was also no consensus on the indications for trochleoplasty or its effect on the viability of the cartilage after elevation of the osteochondral flap. There was also no consensus on postoperative immobilization or weightbearing, or whether paediatric patients should avoid an early return to sport., Competing Interests: S. L. Sherman reports royalties or licenses from CONMED Linvatec, consulting fees from Arthrex, BioVentus, JRF Ortho, Kinamed, Smith & Nephew, Vericel, CONMED Linvatec, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Arthex, Joint Restoration Foundation, Kinamed, Smith & Nephew, and Vericel, and stock or stock options from Epic Bio, Reparel, Sarcio, and Vivorte, all of which are unrelated to this study. J. Chahla reports consulting fees from Arthrex, CONMED Linvatec, Ossur, and Smith & Nephew, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Smith & Nephew, all of which are unrelated to this study. M. J. Alaia reports consulting fees from BodyCad, JRF Ortho, and Mitek, institutional grants from Orcosa, and royalties from Springer, all of which are unrelated to this study. M. J. Tanaka reports grants or contracts from FujiFilm, royalties or licenses from Verywell, and consulting fees from Depuy Synthes, all of which are unrelated to this study. J. L. Pace reports consulting fees from Arthrex and JRF Ortho, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Arthrex, and stock or stock options from OutcomeMD, all of which are unrelated to this study. L. M. Jazwari reports grants or contracts from Arthrex, Mitek, Smith & Nephew, and Wolters Kluwer Health, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Wolters Kluwer Health, and stock or stock options from Lazurite, all of which are unrelated to this study., (© 2023 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Background: The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommends intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSIs) for managing hip osteoarthritis (OA) based on short-term, prospective studies. Recent retrospective studies have raised concerns that CSIs may lead to rapidly progressive OA (RPOA). We sought to systematically review the literature of CSIs for hip OA to estimate the incidence of RPOA., Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify original research of hip OA patients receiving CSIs. Overall, 27 articles involving 5831 patients published from 1988 to 2022 were included. Study design, patient characteristics, CSI details, follow-up, and cases of RPOA were recorded. Studies were classified by their ability to detect RPOA based on follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the incidence of RPOA for studies able to detect RPOA., Results: The meta-analytic estimate of RPOA incidence was 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-9%) based on 10 articles classified as able to detect RPOA. RPOA definitions varied from progression of OA within 6 months to the presence of destructive changes. These studies were subject to bias from excluding patients with missing post-CSI radiographs. The remaining 17 articles were classified as unable to detect RPOA, including all of the studies cited in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery recommendation., Conclusions: The incidence of RPOA after CSIs remains unknown due to variation in definitions and follow-up. While RPOA following CSIs may be 6%, many cases are not severe, and this may reflect selection bias. Further research is needed to understand whether clinically significant RPOA is incident enough to limit CSI use., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: The inherent nature of the torque-velocity relationship is the inverse nature between the velocity of muscle contraction and torque production and is an indication of muscle function. The purpose of this study was to characterize the torque-velocity relationship in the quadriceps following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared to healthy limbs., Methods: 681 participants were included, 493 of which were patients at least four months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (23.2 ± 10.08 yr, 6.6 ± 5.37 months post-surgery) and 188 were healthy participants (21.6 ± 3.77 yr). A subset of 175 post-surgical participants completed a repeated visit (8.1 ± 1.71 months post-surgery). Participants completed isokinetic knee extension at 90°/s and 180°/s. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare torque velocity relationships by limb type (surgical, contralateral, healthy). Paired samples t-tests were conducted to analyze the torque-velocity relationship across limbs and across time., Findings: There was a large effect for limb type on torque-velocity (F (2, 1173)  = 146.08, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.20). Surgical limbs demonstrated significantly lower torque-velocity relationships compared to the contralateral limbs (ACLR: 0.26 Nm/kg, contralateral:0.55 Nm/kg, p < 0.001, d = 1.18). Healthy limbs had similar torque-velocity relationships bilaterally (dominant limb: 0.48 Nm/kg, non-dominant limb: 0.49 Nm/kg, p = 0.45). The torque velocity relationship for the involved limb significantly increased in magnitude over time (+0.11 Nm/kg, p < 0.001, d = -0.61) while the contralateral limb torque-velocity relationship remained stable over time (0.0 Nm/kg difference, p = 0.60)., Interpretation: Following surgery, the knee extensors appear to have altered torque-velocity relationships compared to contralateral and healthy limbs. This may indicate a specific target for assessment and rehabilitation following surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Return-to-play (RTP) assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rarely includes hip strength., Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that (1) patients after ACLR will have weaker hip abduction (AB) and adduction (AD) strength compared with the contralateral limb, with larger deficits in women, (2) there will be a correlation between hip and thigh strength ratios and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (3) hip AB and AD strength will improve over time., Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study., Methods: Included were 140 patients (74 male, 66 female; mean age, 24.16 ± 10.82 years) who underwent RTP assessment at 6.1 ± 1.6 months after ACLR; 86 patients underwent a second assessment at 8.2 ± 2.2 months. Hip AB/AD and knee extension/flexion isometric strength were measured and normalized to body mass, and PRO scores were collected. Strength ratios (hip vs thigh), limb differences (injured vs uninjured), sex-based differences, and relationships between strength ratios and PROs were determined., Results: Hip AB strength was weaker on the ACLR limb (ACLR vs contralateral: 1.85 ± 0.49 vs 1.89 ± 0.48 N·m/kg; P < .001) and hip AD torque was stronger (ACLR vs contralateral: 1.80 ± 0.51 vs 1.76 ± 0.52 N·m/kg; P = .004), with no sex-by-limb interaction found. Lower hip-to-thigh strength ratios of the ACLR limb were correlated with higher PRO scores ( r = -0.17 to -0.25). Over time, hip AB strength increased in the ACLR limb more than in the contralateral limb ( P = .01); however, the ACLR limb remained weaker in hip AB at visit 2 (ACLR vs contralateral: 1.88 ± 0.46 vs 1.91 ± 0.45 N·m/kg; P = .04). In both limbs, hip AD strength was greater at visit 2 than visit 1 (ACLR: 1.82 ± 0.48 vs 1.70 ± 0.48 N·m/kg; contralateral: 1.76 ± 0.47 vs 1.67 ± 0.47 N·m/kg; P < .01 for both)., Conclusion: The ACLR limb had weaker hip AB and stronger AD compared with the contralateral limb at initial assessment. Hip muscle strength recovery was not influenced by sex. Hip strength and symmetry improved over the course of rehabilitation. Although strength differences across limbs were minor, the clinical importance of these differences is still unknown., Clinical Relevance: The evidence provided highlights the need to integrate hip strength into RTP assessments to identify hip strength deficits that may increase reinjury or lead to poor long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.C.W. has received education payments from Arthrex and Fortis Surgical, consulting and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex, and hospitality payments from Integra LifeSciences. D.R.D. has received consulting fees from DePuy/Medical Device Business Services and OsteoCentric Tech and royalties from OsteoCentric Tech and Smith & Nephew. F.W.G. has received education payments from Fortis Surgical and consulting fees from Arthrex, DePuy, and Stryker. S.F.B. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, DePuy, Exactech, Heron Therapeutics, and Zimmer Biomet; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex; and royalties from Exactech and Zimmer Biomet. M.D.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex and Ipsen Bioscience, nonconsulting fees and royalties from Arthrex, and honoraria from Encore Medical. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Background: Clinical outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are not well understood., Hypothesis: Patients undergoing revision ACLR would demonstrate worse patient-reported outcomes and worse limb symmetry compared with a cohort undergoing primary ACLR., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: 672 participants (373 with primary ACLR, 111 with revision ACLR, and 188 uninjured) completed functional testing at a single academic medical center. Descriptive information, operative variables, and patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner Activity Scale score) were assessed for each patient. Quadriceps and hamstring strength tests were conducted using a Biodex System 3 Dynamometer. Single-leg hop for distance, triple hop test, and the 6-m timed hop test were also assessed. Limb symmetry index (LSI) between the ACLR limb and contralateral limb was calculated for strength and hop testing. Normalized peak torque (N·m/kg) was calculated for strength testing., Results: No differences were found in group characteristics, excluding body mass ( P < .001), or in patient-reported outcomes. There were no interactions between revision status, graft type, and sex. Knee extension LSI was inferior ( P < .001) in participants who had undergone primary (73.0% ± 15.0%) and revision (77.2% ± 19.1%) ACLR compared with healthy, uninjured participants (98.8% ± 10.4%). Knee flexion LSI was inferior ( P = .04) in the primary group (97.4% ± 18.4%) compared with the revision group (101.9% ± 18.5%). Difference in knee flexion LSI between the uninjured and primary groups, as well as between the uninjured and revision groups, did not reach statistical significance. Hop LSI outcomes were significantly different across all groups ( P < .001). Between-group differences in extension in the involved limb ( P < .001) were noted, as the uninjured group exhibited stronger knee extension (2.16 ± 0.46 N·m/kg) than the primary group (1.67 ± 0.47 N·m/kg) and the revision group (1.78 ± 0.48 N·m/kg). As well, differences in flexion in the involved limb ( P = .01) were found, as the revision group exhibited stronger knee flexion (1.06 ± 0.25 N·m/kg) than the primary group (0.97 ± 0.29 N·m/kg) and the uninjured group (0.98 ± 0.24 N·m/kg)., Conclusion: At 7 months postoperatively, patients who had undergone revision ACLR did not demonstrate inferior patient-reported outcomes, limb symmetry, strength, or functional performance compared with patients who had undergone primary ACLR. Patients who had undergone revision ACLR exhibited greater strength and LSI than their counterparts with primary ACLR, but these parameters were still inferior to those of uninjured controls.

Background: Graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) is a common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts., Hypothesis: Application of the "N+10 rule" in endoscopic ACLR with BPTB grafts will result in acceptable tibial tunnel length (TTL), minimizing GTM., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Endoscopic BPTB ACLR was conducted on the paired knees of 10 cadaveric specimens using 2 independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques-accessory anteromedial portal and flexible reamer. The graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 × 20 mm, and the intertendinous distance (represented by "N") between the bone blocks was measured. The N+10 rule was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate number of degrees for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A GTM threshold of ±7.5 mm was set based on prior studies., Results: The mean BPTB ACL intertendinous distance was 47.5 ± 5.5 mm. The mean measured intra-articular distance was 27.2 ± 3 mm. Using the N+10 rule, the mean total (flexion plus extension) GTM was 4.3 ± 3.2 mm (GTM in flexion, 4.9 ± 3.6 mm; GTM in extension, 3.8 ± 3.5 mm). In 18 of 20 (90%) cadaveric knees, the mean total GTM fell within the ±7.5-mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured TTL to the calculated TTL, there was a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.9 mm. When comparing femoral tunnel drilling techniques, the total GTM for the accessory anteromedial portal technique was 2.1 ± 3.7 mm, while the total GTM for the flexible reamer technique was 3.6 ± 5.4 mm ( P = .5)., Conclusion: The N+10 rule resulted in an acceptable mean GTM in both flexion and extension. The mean difference between the measured versus calculated TTL using the N+10 rule was also acceptable., Clinical Relevance: The N+10 rule is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired TTL regardless of patient-specific factors to avoid excessive GTM in endoscopic BPTB ACLR using independent femoral tunnel drilling., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.E.D. has received education payments from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Stryker. I.S.M. has received education payments from Medwest. T.E.M. has received education payments from Fortis Surgical. B.C.W. has received education payments, consulting fees, and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Integra LifeSciences. F.W.G. has received education payments from Fortis Surgical; consulting fees from DePuy/Medical Device Business Services and OsteoCentric Technologies; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex; royalties from OsteoCentric Technologies and Smith & Nephew; and hospitality payments from Stryker. M.D.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex and Ipsen Bioscience; nonconsulting fees and royalties from Arthrex; and honoraria from Encore Medical. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Objective: To compare patient outcomes at the time of the return to activity (RTA) progression between those with a prior interim assessment and those without., Design: Retrospective, Cohort Study., Setting: Controlled Laboratory., Participants: Patients following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) were recruited through an ongoing RTA assessment program. Patients were stratified into two testing groups = "Single RTA test": only assessment between 6 and 9 months post-ACLR and "Repeat RTA test": prior assessment performed >2-months before their RTA assessment. Patients were matched based on time post-surgery, age, activity level, and graft type., Main Outcome Measure: Self-reported knee function and isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength/symmetry were compared between groups., Results: 392 patients were identified. Once matched, 138 patients (21.1 ± 7.0 years, 7.3 ±0 .9 mo post-ACLR) were analyzed. Repeat RTA test patients demonstrated higher measures of self-reported knee function (P = .04) and greater knee flexion strength (P = .006) and symmetry (P = .05)., Conclusion: Patients with interim functional assessments reported greater self-reported knee function and higher hamstring strength at the time of RTA compared to patients that completed their only assessment within this time point. Early functional assessments may identify individualized deficits that can be addressed while patients are under supervision of rehabilitation specialists., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Mark Miller is current president of AOSSM, receives royalties from Elsevier and Wolters-Kluwer, and consulting fees from Arthrex. Dr. Werner receives consulting fees from Arthrex and has current research grants with Exactech, Zimmer Biomet, and Arthrex. Dr. Joe Hart has a board seat with Springbok Analytics. No disclosures are related to the current data or prepared manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H443 ).

Similar to elite athletes, surgeons use their skills on a daily basis but coaching for skillset refinement is not common among surgeons. Surgeon coaching has been proposed a method by which surgeons can gain insight into their performance and optimize their practice. However, many barriers exist to surgeon coaching such as logistics, time, cost, and pride. Ultimately, the tangible improvement in surgeon performance, the elevation of surgeon well-being, the optimization of the practice, and better patient outcomes support a wider implementation of surgeon coaching for surgeons at all stages of their career., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To identify the influence of timing between staged bilateral hip arthroscopy on 90-day postoperative medical complications and 2-year surgical complications including revision, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and infection., Methods: The Mariner data set of the PearlDiver all-payer claims database was queried for patients undergoing staged bilateral hip arthroscopy. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on time between arthroscopies: (1) ≤3 months, (2) 3 to ≤6 months, (3) 6 to ≤12 months, and (4) >1 year. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to control for any confounding variables., Results: In total, 998 patients underwent staged bilateral hip arthroscopy out of 38,080 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy. The 2-year revision rate was 7.6% for all patients undergoing bilateral hip arthroscopy, while 1.9% of patients underwent conversion to THA. Patients with arthroscopy procedures staged less than 1 year apart (cohorts 1, 2, and 3) had significantly decreased risk of revision compared to the greater than 1 year cohort (P = .008, .025, and .044, respectively). There were no differences in rates of major medical, minor medical, or remaining surgical complications between the cohorts. Direct comparisons between the cohorts staged ≤1 year apart showed no significant differences in medical or surgical complications (P > .05)., Conclusions: The revision rate in all patients undergoing staged bilateral hip arthroscopy was 7.6%. Staging hip arthroscopy ≤1 year apart was associated with a decreased risk of revision when compared to the staged cohort >1 year. Among those staged less than 1 year, the timing of staging had no association with rates of medical or surgical complications. Patients who are indicated for bilateral hip arthroscopy may benefit from staging under 1 year apart to reduce the risk of revision surgery. Optimal timing decisions may be patient specific and rely on the duration of symptoms, severity of pathology, or progression of rehabilitation after the index procedure., Level of Evidence: III, retrospective comparative study., (Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Arthroscopic hip surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Femoral nerve blocks have been shown to improve postoperative analgesia at the expense of quadriceps weakness. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block could be an alternative that may improve postoperative analgesia while preserving quadriceps strength. Our hypothesis was that a PENG block would provide superior postoperative analgesia compared with a sham block following arthroscopic hip surgery., Methods: Subjects presenting for arthroscopic hip surgery were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an ultrasound-guided unilateral, single-injection PENG block (PENG group) with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or a sham injection with 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline (Sham group) prior to receiving general anesthesia. The primary outcome of this study was worst pain score within 30 min of emergence from anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, patient satisfaction with analgesia, opioid-related adverse events, and persistent opioid use at 1 week., Results: Sixty-eight subjects, 34 from the PENG group and 34 from the Sham group, completed the study per protocol. Analysis of the primary outcome demonstrated a mean difference in pain scores of -0.79 (95% CI -1.96 to 0.37; p=0.17) between the PENG and Sham groups immediately following surgery. No secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between groups., Discussion: This study demonstrates that a preoperative PENG block does not improve analgesia following arthroscopic hip surgery., Trial Reigstration Number: NCT04508504., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Performance on strength and functional tests is often used to guide postoperative rehabilitation progress and return to activity decisions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Clinicians may have difficulty in determining which criteria to follow if there is disagreement in performance outcomes among the tests., Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare pass rates between strength tests and single-leg hop (SLHOP) tests among men and women and between patients with lower and higher preinjury activity levels recovering from ACLR. We hypothesized that pass rates would be nonuniformly distributed among test types, sex, and activity level and that more participants would pass hop tests than strength tests., Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A total of 299 participants (146 men; 153 women)-at a mean of 6.8 ± 1.4 months after primary, unilateral, and uncomplicated ACLR (mean age, 23 ± 9.7 years; mean height, 172 ± 10.5 cm; mean mass, 75.8 ± 18.4 kg)-completed testing. Quadri.tif strength was evaluated using peak torque during isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and 180 deg/s. Jump distance during the SLHOP and triple hop tests was measured (in cm). Strength and hop test measures were evaluated based on the limb symmetry index ((LSI) = (ACLR / contralateral side) × 100). We operationally defined "pass" as > 90% on the LSI., Results: Pass rates were nonuniformly distributed between isokinetic knee extension at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test ( χ 2 = 18.64; P < .001). Disagreements between isokinetic testing at 90 deg/s and the SLHOP test occurred in 36.5% (109/299) of the participants. Among those who failed strength testing and passed hop testing, a greater portion reported higher activity levels before their injury ( χ 2 = 6.90; P = .01); however, there was no difference in pass rates between men and women. Similar patterns of disagreement were observed between all strength test and hop test outcomes., Conclusion: ACLR patients with higher activity levels may be more likely to pass hop testing despite failing quadri.tif strength testing. This may be an indicator of movement compensations to achieve jump symmetry in the presence of quadri.tif weakness.

Context: Return-to-activity (RTA) assessments are commonly administered after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to manage the patient's postoperative progressions back to activity. To date, few data are available on the clinical utility of these assessments to predict patient outcomes such as secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury once the athlete has returned to activity., Objective: To identify the measures of patient function at 6 months post-ACLR that best predict RTA and second ACL injury at a minimum of 2 years after ACLR., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Laboratory., Patients or Other Participants: A total of 234 patients with primary, unilateral ACLR completed functional assessments at approximately 6 months post-ACLR. Of these, 192 (82.1%) completed follow-up at ≥2 years post-ACLR., Main Outcome Measure(s): The 6-month functional assessments consisted of patient-reported outcomes, isokinetic knee-flexor and -extensor strength, and single-legged hopping. We collected RTA and secondary ACL injury data at ≥2 years after ACLR., Results: Of the patients who were able to RTA (n = 155), 44 (28.4%) had a subsequent ACL injury, 24 (15.5%) to the ipsilateral graft ACL and 20 (12.9%) to the contralateral ACL. A greater proportion of females had a secondary injury to the contralateral ACL (15/24, 62.5%), whereas a greater proportion of males reinjured the ipsilateral ACL graft (15/20, 75.0%; P = .017). Greater knee-extension symmetry at 6 months increased the probability of reinjury (B = 0.016, P = .048). Among patients with RTA at <8 months, every 1% increase in quadriceps strength symmetry at 6 months increased the risk of reinjury by 2.1% (B = 0.021, P = .05). Among patients with RTA at >8 months, every month that RTA was delayed reduced the risk of reinjury by 28.4% (B = -0.284, P = .042). Descriptive statistics of patient function stratified between the early and delayed RTA groups can be found in the Supplemental Table (available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0407.20.S1)., Conclusions: Patients with more symmetric quadriceps strength at 6 months post-ACLR were more likely to experience another ACL rupture, especially those who returned to sport at <8 months after the index surgery. Clinicians should be cognizant that returning high-functioning patients to activity at <8 months post-ACLR may place them at an increased risk for reinjury., (© by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.)

Pain after hip arthroscopy can be severe, yet we lack a consensus method for non-narcotic analgesia. Here we describe anatomic elements of hip arthroscopy and our current understanding of the relevant sensory innervation as a prelude to the evaluation of locoregional analgesic techniques. Many regional nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration techniques are reviewed, including 2 newer ultrasound fascial plane blocks. Further study of targeted, motor-sparing approaches, either ultrasound-guided or under direct surgical visualization is needed., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr F.W. Gwathmey is a consultant and speaker for Arthrex, a consultant for Allosource, and receives royalties from Elsevier. None of the other authors have any disclosures with regard to this article., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Meniscal injuries are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Treatment of meniscal injuries can impart delayed weightbearing and range of motion restrictions, which can affect the rehabilitation protocol. The effect of meniscal treatment and subsequent restrictions on strength recovery after ACL reconstruction is unclear., Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare strength, jumping performance, and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who underwent surgical intervention for meniscal pathology at the time of ACLR. Our hypothesis was that patients who underwent concurrent meniscal repair (MR) would have lower strength recovery owing to postoperative restrictions., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: Patients with ACLR were stratified into isolated ACLR, ACLR and meniscectomy (ACLR-MS), or ACLR-MR groups and were compared with healthy controls. The ACLR-MR group was restricted to partial weightbearing and to 90° of knee flexion for the first 6 weeks postoperatively. All participants completed patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) and underwent bilateral isokinetic and isometric strength tests of the knee extensor and flexor groups as part of a return-to-sports test battery at 5 to 7 months postoperatively., Results: A total of 165 patients with ACLR (50 with isolated ACLR, 44 with ACLR-MS, and 71 with ACLR-MR) and 140 healthy controls were included in the study. Follow-up occurred at a mean of 5.96 ± 0.47 months postoperatively. The control group demonstrated higher subjective knee function, unilateral peak extensor torque, and limb symmetry than did the ACLR-MS and ACLR-MR groups combined ( P < .001 for all). There were no differences in IKDC, KOOS subscales, or unilateral or limb symmetry measures of peak knee extensor or flexor torque among the isolated ACLR, ACLR-MS, and ACLR-MR groups., Conclusion: Persistent weakness, asymmetry, and reduced subjective outcome scores at 6-month follow-up after ACLR were not influenced by meniscal treatment. These findings suggested that the weightbearing and range of motion restrictions associated with meniscal repair recovery do not result in loss of early strength or worse patient-reported outcomes., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: A.J.C. has received education payments from Supreme Orthopedic Systems. F.W.G. has received consulting fees from DePuy. B.C.W. has received education payments from Arthrex and Supreme Orthopedic Systems, consulting and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex, and hospitality payments from Integra LifeSciences. M.D.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex and Ipsen, nonconsulting fees from Arthrex, honoraria from Encore Medical, and hospitality payments from Ipsen. D.R.D. has received consulting fees from DePuy/Medical Device Business Services and royalties from Smith & Nephew. S.F.B. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, DePuy/Medical Device Business Services, Exactech, Heron Therapeutics, and Zimmer Biomet; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex; and royalties from Exactech and Zimmer Biomet. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Purpose: This prospective, multicenter trial evaluates the clinical success (as measured by reoperation rates and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures) of using circumferential compression stitches with all-suture techniques for horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs) of the meniscus., Methods: Investigators enrolled 30 patients (mean age, 38.2 years; standard deviation, 11.1 years) aged 18 to 60 years with HCTs in the symptomatic compartment at 8 centers in the United States who underwent HCT repair with all-suture circumferential stitches using a self-retrieving all-inside suture passing device. Postoperative follow-up visits were conducted at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Study outcomes included freedom from reoperation of the index meniscus repair site; knee pain and function, as measured by International Knee Documentation Committee Knee evaluation (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm Knee Scale, and Tegner Activity Scale; and serious complications observed during the study. Minimal clinically important difference at 1 year was assessed for IKDC and Lysholm., Results: Twenty-three patients had 2-year follow-up data available. Freedom from reoperation was 96.0% at 6 months (26/27, 91.7% at 1 year [23/25], and 82.6% at 2 years [19/23]). Significant improvement was observed in over baseline at 2 years for IKDC (36.7-82.5; P < .001), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (52.2-89.3; P < .001), Lysholm (50.2-87.4; P < .001), and Tegner scores (3.3-5.3; P  = .007). Minimal clinically important difference was met or exceeded for IKDC and Lysholm scores at 1 year 69.2% and 65.4% of patients, respectively. Four patients (6.7%) experienced serious complications, of which 2 were assessed as being related to the procedure., Conclusions: Repair of HCTs using all-suture circumferential stitches placed with a self-retrieving all-inside suture passing device leads to a favorable reoperation rate (17.4%), significant improvements in clinical outcomes, and an acceptable rate of serious complications (6.7%) at 2 years, supporting the viability of this treatment approach in this indication., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series., (© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and postoperative rehabilitation may affect strength recovery differently in men than women and therefore affect a timely and successful return to sport., Purpose: To compare knee extensor and flexor strength between men and women who underwent isolated ACLR with either patellar tendon or hamstring tendon (HST) autografts., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A total of 166 patients (87 women, 79 men) with primary unilateral and uncomplicated ACLRs were recruited for participation. A total of 100 patients had bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts and 66 had HST autografts. At 6 months postoperatively, all patients completed the Tegner activity scale and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation as well as underwent bilateral isokinetic (90 deg/s) tests of the knee extensor and flexor groups. Outcomes were recorded in a single session as part of a return-to-sport test battery. Surgical notes were obtained to determine the type of autograft and nerve block used at the time of ACLR., Results: There was a significant sex × graft type interaction for mass-normalized knee flexor torque ( P = .017). Female patients with an HST graft had a significantly lower knee flexor torque compared with female patients with a BPTB graft (0.592 ± 0.49 N·m/kg vs 0.910 ± 0.24 N·m/kg; Cohen d [95% CI] = 0.91 [0.45, 1.36]). They also had a significantly lower knee flexor torque when compared with male patients with an HST graft (0.592 ± 0.49 N·m/kg vs 0.937 ± 0.35 N·m/kg; Cohen d [95% CI]= 0.88 [0.45, 1.31]). There were significant main effects for graft type with knee flexion ( P = .001) and extension ( P = .008) symmetry. Patients with a BPTB graft demonstrated lower knee extensor symmetry (65.7% ± 17.0%) and greater knee flexor symmetry (98.7% ± 18.0%) compared with patients with an HST graft (extension: 77.1% ± 32%, Cohen d [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.16, 0.79]; flexion: 82.9% ± 33.3%, Cohen d [95% CI] = 0.63 [0.31, 0.95]). We also observed a significant main effect for sex ( P = .028) and graft type ( P = .048) for mass-normalized knee extensor strength. Female participants and patients of either sex with BPTB grafts had lower knee extensor strength compared with male participants and patients with HST grafts, respectively., Conclusion: At approximately 6 months after ACLR, female patients reconstructed with HST autografts demonstrated weaker HST strength compared with female patients with a BPTB autograft. There were no differences in HST strength between graft types in male patients. Female patients appear to be recovering HST strength differently than male patients when using an HST autograft. These findings may have implications in surgical planning, postoperative rehabilitation, and return-to-sport decision making., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: D.R.D. has received research support from Zimmer, Aesculap/B. Braun, and Moximed; consulting fees from DePuy; and royalties from Smith & Nephew and Springer. S.F.B. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, Zimmer Biomet, Exactech, Depuy Synthes, and Medical Device Business Services and has received research support from Arthrex and Zimmer Biomet. M.D.M. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, honorarium from Encore Medical, and hospitality payments from IPSEN Innovation. F.W.G. has received hospitality payments from Stryker, Smith & Nephew, and Medical Device Business Systems. B.C.W. has received educational support from Supreme Orthopedics Systems and research support from Arthrex, Integra LifeSciences, and Zimmer Biomet; is a paid speaker/presenter for Arthrex; and has received hospitality payments from Medical Device Business Systems. J.M.H. has stock/stock options in Springbok. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Background: Patients often have quadriceps or hamstring weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), despite postoperative physical therapy regimens; however, little evidence exists connecting nerve blocks and ACLR outcomes., Purpose: To compare muscle strength at return to play in patients who received a nerve block with ACLR and determine whether a specific block type affected subjective knee function., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: Patients were recruited 5 to 7 months after primary, isolated ACLR and completed bilateral isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensor/flexor groups as a single-session return-to-sport test. Subjective outcomes were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. Strength was expressed as torque normalized to mass (N·m/kg) and limb symmetry index as involved/uninvolved torque. Chart review was used to determine the type of nerve block and graft used. Nerve block types were classified as knee extensor motor (femoral nerve), knee flexor motor (sciatic nerve), or isolated sensory (adductor canal block/saphenous nerve). A 1-way analysis of covariance controlling for graft type was used., Results: A total of 169 patients were included. Graft type distribution consisted of 102 (60.4%) ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and 67 (39.6%) ipsilateral hamstring tendon. Nerve block type distribution consisted of 38 (22.5%) femoral, 25 (14.8%) saphenous, 45 (26.6%) femoral and sciatic, and 61 (36.1%) saphenous and sciatic. No significant difference was found in knee extensor strength ( P = .113) or symmetry ( P = .860) between patients with knee extensor motor blocks (1.57 ± 0.45 N·m/kg; 70.1% ± 15.3%) and those without (1.47 ± 0.47 N·m/kg; 69.6% ± 18.8%). A significant difference was found between patients with knee flexor motor blocks (0.83 ± 0.26 N·m/kg) and those without (0.92 ± 0.27 N·m/kg) for normalized knee flexor strength ( P = .21) but not knee flexor symmetry ( P = .592). Controlling for graft type, there were no differences in subjective knee function (IKDC score) between all nerve block groups ( P = .57)., Conclusion: Our data showed that use of a sciatic nerve block with ACLR in patients with hamstring and BTB grafts influences persistent knee flexor strength deficits at time of return to sports. Although the cause of postoperative muscular weakness is multifactorial, this study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that perioperative nerve blocks affect muscle strength and functional rehabilitation after ACLR.

Purpose: To analyze the biomechanical integrity of 2 posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction techniques using a sophisticated robotic biomechanical system that enables analysis of joint kinematics under dynamic external loads., Methods: Eight cadaveric human knee specimens were tested. Five N·m external torque followed by 5 N·m varus torque was dynamically applied to each specimen. The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the joint were measured in 4 states (intact, PLC-deficient, fibular-based docking, and anatomic PLC reconstructed) at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Tibial external rotation (ER) and varus rotation (VR) were compared., Results: Under external torque, ER significantly increased from the intact state to the PLC-deficient state across all flexion angles. At 30° of flexion, ER was not significantly different between the intact state (19.9°) and fibular-based (18.7°, P = .336) and anatomic reconstructions (14.9°, P = .0977). At 60°, ER was not significantly different between the intact state and fibular-based reconstruction (22.4°, compared with 19.8° in intact; P = .152) but showed overconstraint after anatomic reconstruction (15.7°; P = .0315). At 90°, ER was not significantly different between the intact state and anatomic reconstruction (15.4°, compared with 19.7° in intact; P = .386) but was with the fibular-based technique (23.5°; P = .0125)., Conclusion: Both a fibular-based docking technique and an anatomic technique for isolated PLC reconstruction provided appropriate constraint through most tested knee range of motion, yet the fibular-based docking technique underconstrained the knee at 90°, and the anatomic reconstruction overconstrained the knee at 60°. Biomechanically, either technique may be considered for surgical treatment of high-grade isolated PLC injuries., Clinical Relevance: This biomechanical study utilizing clinically-relevant dynamic forces on the knee shows that either a simplified fibular-based docking technique or a more complex anatomic technique may be considered for surgical treatment of high-grade isolated PLC injuries., (Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chronic strain and/or tendinopathy of the adductor longus tendon can be a cause of long-standing groin pain in the elite athlete, resulting in significant time lost from competition. Accurate diagnosis and treatment can expedite return to play., Purpose/hypothesis: To evaluate return to sport and performance in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football players and National Football League (NFL) players following adductor longus release with or without sports hernia repair. We hypothesized that adductor release will be an effective method of treatment for recalcitrant groin/adductor pain in these athletes., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: A cohort study was performed of all NFL players and NCAA Division I college athletes who had undergone an adductor longus tendon release with or without sports hernia repair by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons between May 1999 and January 2013. All patients reported groin pain below the inguinal ligament and localized to their adductor longus. Symptoms lasted longer than 10 weeks and limited their ability to effectively perform during sport, as assessed by their coach and self-assessment. Questionnaires were given to all 26 patients to assess long-term surgical outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed for NFL players, in which "performance scores" were calculated according to individual player statistics while playing. Scores obtained before the diagnosis of chronic adductor longus tendinopathy or strain were compared with those after surgery. Patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery, radiographic evidence of degenerative joint disease of the hip, labral tears or femoral acetabular impingement, prostatic or urinary tract disease, or nerve entrapment of the ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, or lateral femoral cutaneous nerves were excluded from the study., Results: A total of 32 athletes underwent an adductor longus tenotomy during the study period. Of these patients, 28 were college- or professional-level athletes who underwent an adductor longus tenotomy, with a mean ± SD follow-up time of 6.2 ± 4.2 years (range, 12-178 months). Of the 32 patients, 20 had a concomitant sports hernia repair in addition to an adductor longus tenotomy. Thirty-one patients (97%) were able to return to their previous sport, and 30 (94%) were able to return at their previous level of play. Thirty patients (94%) reported that they were satisfied with their decision to have surgery. No player complained of weakness or a decrease in running speed or power. Mean return to play was 12 weeks from date of surgery. In the subgroup analysis of 16 NFL players, there were no statistically significant differences for the pre- versus postoperative comparisons of the athlete performance scores ( P = .74) and the percentage of the games started versus played ( P = .46). After separation of players who had a concomitant hernia repair from players who did not, there was no statistically significant difference in performance scores or percentages of games started., Conclusion: In this study of elite athletes, adductor longus tenotomy with or without a concomitant sports hernia repair provided overall acceptable and excellent results. Athletes were able to return to their previous level of athletic competition and performance with consistent relief of groin pain. Return to play in an NFL game averaged 12 weeks following surgery., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: T.J.G. has received consulting fees from ConMed Linvatec and Mitek and royalties from SLACK Inc and has stock/stock options in Visionscope Technologies. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Three-dimensional printing is a valuable modality with broad clinical applications. Hip preservation surgery outcomes are dependent on correction of morphological abnormalities that may be optimally visualized with three-dimensional models. To assess the efficacy of three-dimensional models for patient and trainee education and to determine its benefits during pre-operative planning in hip preservation surgery. Sixteen patients with hip pathology were selected. Computed tomography was utilized to generate three-dimensional models. Customized Likert-style questionnaires were given to 10 hip preservation surgeons, 11 orthopedic surgery residents and 10 patients. All residents strongly agreed or agreed that the three-dimensional hip models helped them to understand patients' pathology. All but one patient agreed that the models assisted in their understanding of the treatment plan. Surgeons concurred that although they do not routinely order three-dimensional models, their use would improve trainee and patient education, especially when treating atypical osseous pathomorphologies. Three-dimensional models are tools that can help surgeon, trainee and patient understanding and participation in treatment of complex hip disorders. Patients and trainees agree that the prototypes enhanced their educational experience, as the surgeon can directly demonstrate complex morphological abnormalities. Trainees can therefore gain a better understanding of hip pathologies and treatment. As patients better understand their hip disorder, they can more fully participate in shared treatment decision-making., Level of Evidence: Level IV, Retrospective Case Series., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to (1) examine trends in preoperative and prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use in patient undergoing hip arthroscopy, (2) characterize risk factors for prolonged opioid analgesic use following hip arthroscopy, and (3) explore preoperative and prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use as independent risk factors for complications following hip arthroscopy., Methods: A private insurance database was queried for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy from 2007 to 2015 with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Independent risk factors for prolonged opioid analgesic use were determined. Preoperative and prolonged opioid analgesic use as risk factors for complications were examined., Results: There was a significantly decreasing trend in preoperative (P = .002) and prolonged postoperative (P = .009) opioid analgesic use. The most significant risk factor for prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use was preoperative use (odds ratio [OR], 3.61; P < .0001). Other preoperative prescriptions, including muscle relaxants (OR, 1.5; P < .0001) and anxiolytics (OR, 2.0; P < .0001), were also significant risk factors. Preoperative opioid analgesic use was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications, including emergency room visits (OR, 2.1; P < .0001) and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) (OR, 1.6; P < .0001). Prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use was associated with a higher risk of revision hip arthroscopy (OR, 1.4; P = .0004) and conversion to THA (OR, 1.8; P < .0001)., Conclusions: More than a quarter of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy continue to receive opioid analgesic prescriptions more than 3 months postoperatively. The most significant risk factor for prolonged opioid analgesic use is preoperative opioid analgesic use. Additionally, anxiolytics, substance use or abuse, morbid obesity, and back pain were among the more notable risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use. Preoperative and prolonged postoperative opioid analgesic use was associated with a higher likelihood of several adverse effects/complications., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study., (Copyright © 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The primary goal of this review is to update recent literature on revision PCL reconstruction and to discuss factors relevant to surgical failure, surgical indications and goals, patient evaluation, surgical decision-making, graft selection, surgical technique, associated surgical procedures, postoperative rehabilitation, and revision PCL reconstruction results., Recent Findings: Specifically, it is paramount to consider and treat posteromedial and posterolateral instability. Success in revision surgery focuses on appropriate graft choice and precise tunnel placement at anatomical attachment sites. Furthermore, correct tensioning of the graft, secondary or backup fixation and well-designed PT and rehab protocols are integral components. The factors causing failure of the primary reconstruction should be identified, as revision surgery must address the errors and follow strict surgical principals to be successful. There are many variables that play a role in successful revision posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. In general, as in most ligament reconstruction surgery, it is important to identify and address all associated pathology such as lower extremity malalignment and additional instability.

The use of hip arthroscopy continues to expand. Understanding potential pitfalls and complications associated with hip arthroscopy is paramount to optimizing clinical outcomes and minimizing unfavorable results. Potential pitfalls and complications are associated with preoperative factors such as patient selection, intraoperative factors such as iatrogenic damage, traction-related complications, inadequate correction of deformity, and nerve injury, or postoperative factors such as poor rehabilitation. This article outlines common factors that contribute to less-than-favorable outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The hip is a complex joint which commonly generates referrals to orthoaedic surgeons. Hip arthroscopy continues to expand its indications for addressing hip pathology. Before operative intervention, the appropriate information must be obtained with magnetic resonance imaging playing a significant role in the workup given its outstanding characterization of soft tissue anatomy. We attempt to highlight multiple hip findings to correlate intraoperative arthroscopic findings with specific magnetic resonance imaging images and sequences.

The purpose of this study was to use fluoroscopy to measure the distance between the transseptal portal and the popliteal artery under arthroscopic conditions with an intact posterior knee capsule, and to determine the difference between 90 degrees of knee flexion and full extension. The popliteal artery of eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees was dissected and cannulated proximal to the knee joint. The posterolateral, posteromedial, and transseptal portals were then established at 90 degrees of flexion. A 4-mm switching stick was placed through the transseptal portal, and barium contrast was injected into the popliteal artery. A lateral fluoroscopic image was taken with the knee in 90 degrees of flexion and full extension, and the distance between the popliteal artery and the switching stick was measured and compared using a paired t -test. In knee flexion, the average distance between the transseptal portal and the anterior aspect of the popliteal artery for the eight cadaveric specimens was 12.0 mm ± 3.3 mm; in extension, this decreased to 9.0 mm ± 2.7 mm. The distance between the transseptal portal and popliteal artery was significantly higher at 90 degrees of knee flexion as compared with extension ( p  = 0.0005). The transseptal posterior knee arthroscopic portal must be carefully created due to the close proximity to the popliteal artery, and may be closer to the artery than previously reported in specimens with an intact posterior knee capsule. Creating the portal with the knee in flexion significantly displaces the popliteal artery away from the portal reducing the risk of arterial injury., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Traditionally, horizontal cleavage meniscus tears have been associated with osteoarthritis, indicative of the degenerative process. Recent treatment measures have focused on maintaining as much meniscal tissue as possible, despite the routine extension of these tears into the central white-white zones. In the absence of tunnel drilling for cruciate ligament reconstructions, the use of an exogenous fibrin clot is a useful adjunct to increase the local growth factors at the tear repair to aid in healing. This surgical technique is to describe the use of an all-arthroscopic tied circumferential suture repair of horizontal meniscal tears augmented with exogenous fibrin clot to treat all locations of horizontal meniscal tears.

Purpose: To evaluate the appropriate amount of knee flexion in which to secure the graft during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction., Methods: Heavy suture was used to simulate graft tissue during MPFL reconstruction on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The sutures were passed through two transverse patellar tunnels and draped over a Kirschner wire at Schöttle's point on the femur. Suture displacement at the location of the wire was measured during knee range of motion from 0 to 135°. The wire's location was then moved to 3 additional locations (1 cm proximal, 1 cm distal, and 1 cm anterior), and the measurements were repeated., Results: Using Schöttle's point, the suture length did not vary throughout all ranges of knee flexion. The distal location resulted in a greater distance between attachment points (i.e. graft tightened) if the measurements began with the knee flexed and then brought into extension. Conversely, with the proximal location, the opposite occurred as the knee was extended (i.e. graft loosened). For all locations other than Schöttle's point, the amount of initial knee flexion for fixation was directly related to the amount of suture length change when the knee was brought into extension., Conclusion: For non-anatomic femoral MPFL graft fixation locations, suture length (and thus graft length) in full extension becomes increasingly altered if the graft is secured in high degrees of knee flexion. Thus, graft fixation in lower degrees of knee flexion is recommended to minimize over or under tensioning the graft when the knee goes into extension if the graft position is placed in a non-anatomic location. To avoid this problem, fluoroscopy should be used to locate the anatomic footprint of the MPFL insertion. While recognizing the limitations of cadaveric research, this study is the first to provide any data to corroborate the widely used practice of securing the MPFL in lower degrees of knee flexion.

Hip problems due to dysplasia are commonly associated with female athletes in sports demanding supraphysiologic motion, such as ballet, gymnastics and figure skating. However, hip problems are rarely mentioned among wrestlers, a male sport in which flexibility is advantageous. Dysplasia may have a mostly unrecognized prevalence among wrestlers that can lead to problems and benefit from reorientation periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Study design in this research is Level 4 evidence case reports. Three consecutive intercollegiate wrestlers ages 20, 21 and 22 years underwent PAO for dysplasia and are reported. Two underwent concomitant arthroscopy. Each returned successfully to intercollegiate wrestling at 6, 8 and 11 months. There were no complications. This work concludes that dysplasia has an unknown but mostly unrecognized prevalence among wrestlers. With proper recognition and treatment with PAO, there is a reasonable expectation that they could return to wrestling.

Background: Anatomic femoral tunnel placement for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is now well accepted. The ideal location for the tibial tunnel has not been studied extensively, although some biomechanical and clinical studies suggest that placement of the tibial tunnel in the anterior part of the ACL tibial attachment site may be desirable. However, the concern for intercondylar roof impingement has tempered enthusiasm for anterior tibial tunnel placement., Purpose: To compare the potential for intercondylar roof impingement of ACL grafts with anteriorly positioned tibial tunnels after either transtibial (TT) or independent femoral (IF) tunnel drilling., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaver knees were randomized to either a TT or IF drilling technique. Tibial guide pins were drilled in the anterior third of the native ACL tibial attachment site after debridement. All efforts were made to drill the femoral tunnel anatomically in the center of the attachment site, and the surrogate ACL graft was visualized using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Reformatting was used to evaluate for roof impingement. Tunnel dimensions, knee flexion angles, and intra-articular sagittal graft angles were also measured. The Impingement Review Index (IRI) was used to evaluate for graft impingement., Results: Two grafts (2/6, 33.3%) in the TT group impinged upon the intercondylar roof and demonstrated angular deformity (IRI type 1). No grafts in the IF group impinged, although 2 of 6 (66.7%) IF grafts touched the roof without deformation (IRI type 2). The presence or absence of impingement was not statistically significant. The mean sagittal tibial tunnel guide pin position prior to drilling was 27.6% of the sagittal diameter of the tibia (range, 22%-33.9%). However, computed tomography performed postdrilling detected substantial posterior enlargement in 2 TT specimens. A significant difference in the sagittal graft angle was noted between the 2 groups. TT grafts were more vertical, leading to angular convergence with the roof, whereas IF grafts were more horizontal and universally diverged from the roof., Conclusion: The IF technique had no specimens with roof impingement despite an anterior tibial tunnel position, likely due to a more horizontal graft trajectory and anatomic placement of the ACL femoral tunnel. Roof impingement remains a concern after TT ACL reconstruction in the setting of anterior tibial tunnel placement, although statistical significance was not found. Future clinical studies are planned to develop better recommendations for ACL tibial tunnel placement., Clinical Relevance: Graft impingement due to excessively anterior tibial tunnel placement using a TT drilling technique has been previously demonstrated; however, this may not be a concern when using an IF tunnel drilling technique. There may also be biomechanical advantages to a more anterior tibial tunnel in IF tunnel ACL reconstruction., Competing Interests: The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution.

The purpose of this study is to report on the operative findings and the outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. All hip arthroscopy cases are prospectively assessed with a modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) preoperatively and postoperatively. This study consists of 190 consecutive hips (186 patients) who underwent revision arthroscopy with minimum 2-year follow-up. There were 69 males and 117 females with a mean age of 32.7 (14-64). The mean time from index to revision procedure was 24.5 months (3-146). Common diagnoses included labral tears (102) and unaddressed or residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (49 cam, 11 pincer, and 20 combined). In addition to FAI correction, there were 82 labral debridements, 28 repairs/refixations, and 6 excisions of labral calcifications. Ninety-three underwent various amounts of synovectomy and 21 underwent iliopsoas release/debridement. At a mean follow-up of 46.9 months, 84.5% of patients reported symptomatic improvement. Twenty patients underwent subsequent surgery at mean of 51 months (11 repeat arthroscopy and 9 THA). Among 166 patients who had no further surgery, the mHHS had improved 27.1.8 points from a preoperative mean of 54.5 to 81.6. Patients who underwent treatment of FAI demonstrated a mean mHHS improvement of 25.7 points. Complications included two cases of transient pudendal neurapraxia, one case of transient quadriceps weakness, one case of retroperitoneal extravasation, and one case of perioperative myocardial infarction. In conclusion, for properly selected patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms following previous hip arthroscopy, revision surgery can result in favorable outcomes with an acceptably low complication rate.

Case: A 14-year-old male competitive soccer player presented with a history of recurrent right hip pain for 18 months. He was diagnosed with an anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) apophyseal avulsion fracture nonunion with subspinal impingement, which was confirmed by radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The patient underwent surgical fixation and subspinal decompression. He returned to competitive soccer 5 months postoperatively., Conclusion: AIIS apophyseal avulsion fractures occur in adolescent athletes and generally respond to nonoperative treatment. When such management is unsuccessful, surgical fixation can lead to resolution of pain with return of full function.

Purpose: To report the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for adolescent patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in relation to a control group of adult patients treated arthroscopically for FAI., Methods: All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were assessed with a modified Harris Hip Score preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months. Inclusion criteria were all patients less than 18 years of age who underwent arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic FAI and had achieved minimum 1-year follow-up. These cases were gathered over an 8-year period., Results: The study group consisted of 122 consecutive hips (108 patients), and the control group consisted of 122 hips. Follow-up averaged 30 months (range 12 to 60 months). For the study group, the average age was 16 years, with 55 males and 65 females; control group average age was 36 years, with 71 males and 51 females. In the study group, the average scores were preoperative 68.3 and postoperative 93.6, with a 25.4-point improvement. The duration of symptoms averaged 16.6 months, and 95.9% participated in athletic activities. The study group included 36 cam, 17 pincer, and 69 combined lesions. One hundred eleven labral tears underwent 85 refixations and 26 debridements; there were 101 acetabular chondral lesions (51 grade 3 or 4), with 4 microfractures and 3 femoral chondral lesions. Among the control group, the average scores were preoperative 63.3 and postoperative 85.5, with a 22.2-point improvement. The duration of symptoms averaged 31.2 months, and 61.5% participate in athletic activities. The control group consisted of 53 cam, 5 pincer, and 64 combined FAI lesions. One hundred three labral tears underwent 52 refixations and 51 debridements; there were 112 acetabular lesions (92 grade 3 or 4), with 20 microfractures and 17 femoral chondral lesions. The study group included 15 concomitant extra-articular procedures, and there were 5 in the control group. In the study group, 4 underwent repeat arthroscopy and 1 periacetabular osteotomy; in the control group, 1 patient underwent repeat arthroscopy., Conclusions: Favorable outcomes of arthroscopic management of FAI in adolescents are reported compared with an adult control group. The present data support that arthroscopy does have a role in the management of FAI in adolescents., Level of Evidence: Level III, case control study., (Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adolescent athletes with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) may respond well to arthroscopic intervention., Purpose: This study reports the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic FAI in adolescents., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: Included in this study were 104 consecutive athletes (116 hips) younger than 18 years who underwent arthroscopic correction of symptomatic FAI with a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients were prospectively assessed with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Pincer lesions were defined by acetabular overcoverage or retroversion with an accompanying labral injury, and cam lesions were defined by loss of sphericity of the femoral head with associated acetabular articular failure., Results: The average follow-up was 38 months (range, 24-120 months), and the average patient age was 16 years (range, 12-17 years), with 47 male and 57 female patients. There were 67 combined, 33 cam, and 16 pincer lesions. The average improvement on the mHHS was 25 points (average score: 69 preoperatively, 94 postoperatively), with 97% improved and 94% good and excellent results. Athletes returned to their sport after 100 procedures (86%). After 16 procedures, 5 patients were unable to return to sport, 6 chose not to, and 5 had completed their high school athletic careers. There were 2 complications, both transient pudendal nerve neurapraxias, that resolved within 2 weeks. Four patients underwent repeat arthroscopic surgery, and 1 underwent periacetabular osteotomy., Conclusion: This study reports favorable outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of FAI among adolescent athletes. A high proportion improved, although only 87% actually returned to their sport. Return to sport may be influenced by factors other than just the success of the procedures., (© 2016 The Author(s).)

This article presents a brief review of pincer impingement pathomechanics and the current methods of diagnosis, followed by a discussion of many of the current controversies in addressing pincer morphology. These controversies include controversial surgical indications such as global acetabular retroversion and the role of prophylactic surgery, controversial surgical techniques to address the acetabular labrum, as well as the best methods for intraoperative evaluation of the arthroscopic acetabuloplasty., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the increasing involvement in organized athletics among children and adolescents, more anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are being recognized in the skeletally immature population. The goal of the present study is to utilize a national database to characterize the recent epidemiologic trends of ACL injuries, ACL reconstruction, and treatment of associated meniscal and chondral pathology in the pediatric and adolescent populations., Methods: A national database was queried for ACL tear (ICD-9 844.2) and arthroscopic reconstruction of an ACL tear (CPT 29888) from 2007 to 2011. Searches were limited by age group to identify pediatric and adolescent cohorts: (1) ages 5 to 9 years old, (2) ages 10 to 14 years old, and (3) ages 15 to 19 years old. A comparative cohort of adult patients from ages 20 to 45 was also created. The database was also queried for concomitant procedures at the same time as ACL reconstruction for each age group, including partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair, microfracture, osteochondral autograft or allograft transfer, and shaving chondroplasty. The χ analysis was used to determine statistical significance., Results: A total of 44,815 unique pediatric or adolescent patients with a diagnosis of an ACL tear and 19,053 pediatric or adolescent patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were identified. Significant increases in pediatric and adolescent ACL tear diagnosis and reconstruction compared with adult patients were noted. Significant increases in many concomitant meniscus and cartilage procedures in pediatric and adolescent patients compared with adult patients were also noted., Conclusions: The present study demonstrates a significant increase in the overall diagnosis of ACL injury and ACL reconstruction in both pediatric and adolescent patients, rising at a rate significantly higher than adults. In addition, pediatric and adolescent patients who undergo ACL reconstruction had significant increases in incidences of concomitant meniscal and cartilage procedures., Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Background: The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy and consistency of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark in achieving the desired tibial tunnel location during primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction., Methods: One hundred consecutive adult patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were enrolled in the study. One sports-fellowship trained surgeon performed all ACL reconstructions using independent tunnel drilling with an accessory anteromedial portal for the femoral tunnel. All guide pins for the tibial tunnel were placed using a 55-degree guide using the posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark. Following pin placement, a true lateral fluoroscopic image was obtained. These were digitally analyzed to measure the location of the pin along the length of the tibial plateau., Results: The average anteroposterior (A-P) distance achieved using the posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark for tibial tunnel placement was 37.0%±5.2% (mean±standard deviation) [range 26.4%-49.2%]. 66% of tibial tunnels were located between 30.0% and 39.9% of the A-P tibial distance. Only 18% of tibial tunnels localized between 40.0% and 44.9%, the area of the anatomic footprint described by Staubli and Rauschning [9] 16% of patients were significant outliers, with tunnels localizing to 25.0%-29.9% (6 patients) or 45.0%-49.9% (10 patients)., Conclusions: Use of the posterior border of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus as a landmark for tibial tunnel placement during anatomic ACL reconstruction yields an inconsistent tunnel location., Level of Evidence: II, Prospective study., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Though a relatively rare orthopedic injury, knee dislocation in the morbidly obese population has been increasingly reported in the literature. These injuries are often referred to as "ultralow-velocity knee dislocations" since they commonly occur after a seemingly trivial injury, such as a ground level fall. As a result, these injuries are often underappreciated and initially misdiagnosed. Even though these injuries are low-velocity, they should still be regarded as a high energy injury because of the large amount of mass contributing to the dislocating force. Knee dislocations in the morbidly obese are associated with a particularly high rate of neurovascular injury. A timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid serious limb-threatening complications, including the need for amputation. Therefore, evaluating physicians should maintain a high suspicion for a knee dislocation in any morbidly obese patient who presents with knee pain following a seemingly innocuous injury. Management of these injuries is controversial. Associated vascular injuries must be identified promptly and appropriately managed by a vascular surgery team. There is no consensus on the ideal orthopedic treatment of knee dislocations in the morbidly obese patient. Operative treatment can be fraught with complications, including a higher rate of neurovascular injury, increased surgical complications, and poor subjective patient outcome scores compared with nonobese patients sustaining a high-velocity knee dislocation. It is paramount that treating physicians are familiar with the unique challenges of treating knee dislocations in the morbidly obese patient when discussing risks and benefits of treatment options. This article presents a review of the existing literature on knee dislocations in the morbidly obese population, including diagnosis, management, and outcomes., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: The goal of this study was to employ a national database to evaluate the association of preoperative injection before shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty with the incidence of postoperative infection., Methods: A national database of Medicare patients was queried for patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy or arthroplasty after ipsilateral shoulder injection. Three arthroscopy cohorts were created: arthroscopy within 3 months of injection (n = 3625), arthroscopy between 3 and 12 months after injection (n = 7069), and matched control arthroscopy without prior injection (n = 186,678). Three arthroplasty cohorts were created: arthroplasty within 3 months of injection (n = 636), arthroplasty between 3 and 12 months after injection (n = 1573), and matched control arthroplasty (n = 6211). Infection rates within 3 and 6 months postoperatively were assessed., Results: The incidence of infection after arthroscopy at 3 months (0.7%; odds ratio [OR], 2.2; P < .0001) and 6 months (1.1%; OR, 1.6; P = .003) was significantly higher in patients who underwent injection within 3 months before arthroscopy compared with controls. The incidence of infection after arthroplasty at 3 months (3.0%; OR, 2.0; P = .007) and 6 months (4.6%; OR, 2.0; P = .001) was significantly higher in patients who underwent injection within 3 months before arthroplasty compared with controls., Conclusions: There was a significant increase in postoperative infection in Medicare patients who underwent injection within 3 months before shoulder arthroscopy and arthroplasty. This association was not noted when shoulder arthroscopy or arthroplasty occurred >3 months after injection., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Given the overall success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the infrequent occurrence of complications detectable on radiographs, the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine radiographs in the early postoperative setting is questionable., Methods: Nine hundred thirty-three consecutive adult patients undergoing uncomplicated ACL reconstruction at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed to determine whether a postoperative knee radiograph was obtained within the first three months postoperatively. Images, reports and clinical notes were reviewed to determine if any clinical management change occurred due to x-ray findings. Radiograph charges, including imaging, technical and professional charges were calculated., Results: Five hundred ninety-nine of 933 primary ACL reconstruction patients (64.8%) had postoperative knee radiography at an average of 6.3±3.5 weeks postoperatively. A musculoskeletal radiologist read 97.7% of x-rays as normal. In the associated visit note, 70.3% of x-ray results were documented. Only 14.1% of patients with a postoperative x-ray had subsequent imaging. There were no significant management changes based on the routine postoperative radiographs using the defined criteria. A total of $336,683 ($562 per patient) was billed to patients for postoperative radiographs., Conclusions: Routine early postoperative radiography after primary ACL reconstruction is of questionable utility. The significant per-patient expense is not balanced by the low yield of clinically meaningful data, as nearly all radiographs in the present series were normal and none resulted in significant changes in postoperative clinical management. These results suggest that routine radiographs after uncomplicated ACL reconstruction may be unnecessary although larger, multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings., Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)