Search

Aims In patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), the mortality benefit of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been challenged. Left ventricular (LV) scar identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is associated with a high risk of malignant arrhythmia in NICM. We aimed to determine the impact of LV scar on the mortality benefit from a primary prevention ICD in NICM. Methods and results We recruited 452 consecutive heart failure patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III] with NICM and LV ejection fraction ≤35% from a state-wide CMR service. All patients fulfilled European Society of Cardiology guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation; however, the decision to implant was at the treating physician's discretion. Baseline clinical and CMR data were recorded prospectively and heart failure mortality risk (MAGGIC score) was calculated. The primary study outcome measurement was all-cause mortality based on presence or absence of ICD, stratified by LV scar. Median follow-up was 37.9 months and there was no difference in MAGGIC score between those who did and did not receive a primary prevention ICD (19.30 ± 5.46 vs. 18.90 ± 5.67, P  = 0.50). In patients without LV scar, ICD implantation was not associated with improved mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53–2.78, P  = 0.64]. In patients with LV scar, ICD implantation was independently associated with reduced mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26–0.77, P  = 0.003). Conclusions In patients with NICM, primary prevention ICD implantation is only associated with reduced mortality in patients with LV scar. This may enable more effective selection of NICM patients for ICD implantation compared with current guidelines. View large Download slide View large Download slide [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) result in different patterns of left ventricular remodeling and hypertrophy. We characterized left ventricular wall stress (LVWS) profiles in pressure and volume-overloaded systems, examined the relationship between baseline LVWS and cardiac remodeling, and assessed the acute effects of valve intervention on LVWS using invasive pressures combined with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging measures of left ventricular volumes/mass. A total of 47 patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and 15 patients with severe MR undergoing MitraClip (MC) underwent a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), transthoracic echocardiogram, and CMR before their procedures. Catheters in the left ventricle were used to record hemodynamic changes before and after valve/clip deployment. This was integrated with CMR data to calculate LVWS before and after intervention. The TAVR group demonstrated significant reductions in systolic LVWS post procedure (median 24.7 Pa [IQR: 14 Pa] pre vs median 17.3 Pa [IQR: 12 Pa] post; P < 0.001). The MC group demonstrated significant reductions in diastolic LVWS (median 6.4 Pa [IQR: 5 Pa] pre vs median 4.3 Pa [IQR: 4.1 Pa] post; P = 0.021) with no significant change in systolic LVWS (30.6 ±1.61 pre vs 33 ±2.47 Pa post; P = 0.16). There was an inverse correlation between baseline systolic LVWS and 6MWT in the TAVR group (r = −0.31; P = 0.04). TAVR results in significant reductions in systolic LVWS acutely. MC results in significant reductions in diastolic LVWS. Higher baseline systolic LVWS in TAVR is associated with shorter 6MWT suggesting that in AS, LVWS may be a useful marker of early decompensation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]