Search

Among the different interventions to alleviate the symptoms of unilateral neglect, prism adaptation (PA) appears especially promising. To elucidate the contribution of some neuroanatomical and behavioural factors to PA's effectiveness, we conducted a study combining neuropsychological and lesion mapping methods on a group of 19 neglect patients who underwent two sessions of PA during one week and assessed their improvement relative to the baseline until the following week (7-8 days later). Correlation analyses revealed a significant positive relationship between the magnitude of the proprioceptive after-effect and the improvement at the follow-up session in two perceptual tasks requiring motor responses. Conversely, no correlation was found between the proprioceptive after-effect and the improvement in a perceptual task with no motor involvement. This finding suggests that patients' potential to show a prism-related improvement in motor-related tasks might be indicated by the strength of their proprioceptive response (proprioceptive after-effect). As for the neuroanatomical basis of this relationship, subtraction analyses suggested that patients' improvement in perceptual tasks with high motor involvement might be facilitated by the integrity of temporo-parietal areas and the damage of frontal and subcortical areas.

Although the existence of directional motor deficits (DMD) associated with movement planning and/or execution seems to be widely recognized, neglect and single cell studies examining their neuroanatomical foundation have produced contradictory and inconclusive findings. The present study assessed the occurrence of DMD following the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over two regions, as commonly reported in the neglect literature, namely the right middle frontal gyrus (rMFG) and the right angular gyrus (rAG). Fourteen healthy subjects underwent rTMS while performing an auditory choice task, involving pointing toward two laterally located targets, under internally (i.e., pointing side freely selected) and externally guided conditions (i.e., pointing side guided by spatial auditory cues). In order to examine whether subjects compensated for induced deficits with the help of vision, visual feedback was occluded at movement onset in half of the trials. rTMS applied to the rAG significantly increased reaction times (RTs) for leftward internally-guided movements. In contrast, rTMS applied to the rMFG reduced the likelihood to complete leftward internally-guided movements under blindfolded conditions. These effects suggest that DMD might involve cognitive processes contributing to the different stages of motor control, such as movement selection and goal maintenance., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)