Search

Introduction: The optimal pathway for ultra-early diagnostics and treatment in patients with acute stroke remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate how three different methods of simulated, rural prehospital computed tomography (CT) affected the time to prehospital treatment decision in acute stroke., Materials and Methods: In this pragmatic, simulation, pilot study of prehospital CT we investigated a conventional ambulance with transport to a standard care rural stationary CT machine managed by paramedics, a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU), and a helicopter with a simulated CT machine. Each modality completed 20 real-life dispatches combined with simulation of predetermined animated patient cases with acute stroke symptoms and CT images. The primary endpoint of the study was the time from alarm to treatment decision., Results: Median time from alarm to the treatment decision differed significantly between the three groups ( p  = 0.0005), with 38 min for rural CT, 33 min for the MSU, and 30 min for the helicopter. There was no difference in time when comparing rural CT with MSU, nor when comparing the MSU with the helicopter. There was a difference in time to treatment decision between the rural CT and the helicopter ( p  < 0.0001). The helicopter had significantly lower estimated time from treatment decision to hospital ( p  = 0.001)., Disscussion/conclusion: Prehospital CT can be organized in several ways depending on geography, resources and need. Further research on paramedic run rural CT, MSU in rural areas, and helicopter CT is needed to find the optimal strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Purpose: Timely prehospital stroke recognition was explored in the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) by implementation of stroke education for paramedics and use of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) through a mobile application. The study tested triage and facilitated communication between paramedics and stroke physicians. To complement the quantitative results of the clinical trial, a qualitative approach was used to identify factors that influence triage decisions and diagnostic accuracy in prehospital stroke recognition experienced by paramedics and stroke physicians., Method: Semi-structured qualitative individual interviews were performed following an interview guide. Informants were recruited from the enrolled paramedics and stroke physicians who participated in the ParaNASPP trial from Oslo University Hospital. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and approached inductively using the principles of thematic analysis., Results: Fourteen interviews were conducted, with seven paramedics and seven stroke physicians. Across both groups two overarching themes were identified related to triage decisions and diagnostic accuracy in prehospital stroke recognition: prehospital NIHSS reliably improves clinical assessment and communication quality; overtriage is widely accepted whilst undertriage is not., Conclusion: Paramedics and stroke physicians described how prehospital NIHSS improved communication quality and reliably improved prehospital clinical assessment. The qualitative results support a rationale of an application algorithm to decide which NIHSS items should prompt immediate prenotification rather than a complete NIHSS as default., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Timely treatment of acute stroke depends on early identification and triage. Improved methods for recognition of stroke in the prehospital setting are needed. We aimed to assess whether use of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) by paramedics in the ambulance could improve communication with the hospital, augment triage, and enhance diagnostic accuracy of acute stroke., Methods: The Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) was a stepped-wedge, single-blind, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Patients with suspected acute stroke, who were evaluated by paramedics from five ambulance stations in Oslo, Norway, were eligible for inclusion. The five ambulance stations (defined as clusters) all initially managed patients according to a standard stroke protocol (control group), with randomised sequential crossover of each station to the intervention group. The intervention consisted of supervised training on NIHSS scoring, a mobile application to aid scoring, and standardised communication with stroke physicians. Random allocation was done via a simple lottery draw by administrators at Oslo University Hospital, who were independent of the research team. Allocation concealment was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value (PPV) for prehospital identification of patients with a final discharge diagnosis of acute stroke, analysed by intention to treat. Prespecified secondary safety outcomes were median prehospital on-scene time and median door-to-needle time. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04137874, and is completed., Findings: Between June 3, 2019, and July 1, 2021, 935 patients were evaluated by paramedics for suspected acute stroke. 134 patients met exclusion criteria or did not consent to participate. The primary analysis included 447 patients in the intervention group and 354 in the control group. There was no difference in PPV for prehospital identification of patients with a final discharge diagnosis of acute stroke between the intervention group (48·1%, 95% CI 43·4-52·8) and control group (45·8%, 40·5-51·1), with an estimated percentage points difference between groups of 2·3 (95% CI -4·6 to 9·3; p=0·51). Median prehospital on-scene time increased by 5 min in the intervention group (29 min [IQR 23-36] vs 24 min [19-31]; p<0·0001), whereas median door-to-needle time was similar between groups (26 min [21-36] vs 27 min [20-36]; p=0·90). No prehospital deaths were reported in either group., Interpretation: The intervention did not improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected stroke. A general increase in prehospital time during the pandemic and the identification of smaller strokes that require more deliberation are possible explanations for the increased on-scene time. The ParaNASPP model is to be implemented in Norway from 2023, and will provide real-life data for further research., Funding: Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation and Oslo University Hospital., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Training prehospital personnel in identifying patients with acute stroke is key to providing rapid treatment. This study aimed to investigate whether game-based digital simulation training is a feasible alternative to standard in-person simulation training., Methods: Second-year paramedic bachelor students at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway were invited to participate in a study to compare game-based digital simulation (intervention) to standard in-person training (control). For 2 months, students were encouraged to practice the NIHSS, and both groups logged their simulations. Then, they performed a clinical proficiency test, and their results were assessed using a Bland-Altman plot with corresponding 95% limits of agreement (LoA)., Results: Fifty students participated in the study. Individuals in the game group (n = 23) spent an average (SD) of 42:36 min (36) on gaming and performed 14.4 (13) simulations on average, whereas the control group (n = 27) spent 9:28 min (8) simulating and performed 2.5 (1) simulations. Comparing time variables collected during the intervention period, the mean time for each simulated assessment was significantly shorter in the game group (2:57 min vs. 3:50 min, p = 0.004). In the final clinical proficiency test, the mean difference from the true NIHSS score was 0.64 (LoA: - 1.38 to 2.67) in the game group and 0.69 (LoA: - 1.65 to 3.02) in the control group., Conclusion: Game-based digital simulation training is a feasible alternative to standard in-person simulation training to acquire competence in NIHSS assessment. Gamification seemed to give an incentive to simulate considerably more and to perform the assessment faster, with equal accuracy., Trial Registration: The study was approved by the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (reference no. 543238)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Less than 50% of stroke patients in Norway reach hospital within 4 h of symptom onset. Early prehospital identification of stroke and triage to the right level of care may result in more patients receiving acute treatment. Quality of communication between paramedics and the stroke centre directly affects prehospital on-scene time, emphasising this as a key factor to reduce prehospital delay. Prehospital stroke scales are developed for quick and easy identification of stroke, but have poor sensitivity and specificity compared to an in-hospital assessment with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The aim of the Paramedic Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (ParaNASPP) is to assess whether a structured learning program, prehospital NIHSS and a mobile application facilitating communication with the stroke physician may improve triage of acute stroke patients., Methods: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled intervention design will be used in this trial in Oslo, Norway. Paramedics at five ambulance stations will enrol adult patients with suspected stroke within 24 h of symptom onset. All paramedics will begin in a control phase with standard procedures. Through an e-learning program and practical training, a random and sequential switch to the intervention phase takes place. A mobile application for NIHSS scoring, including vital patient information for treatment decisions, transferring data from paramedics to the on-call stroke physician at the Stroke Unit at Oslo University Hospital, will be provided for the intervention. The primary outcome measure is positive predictive value (PPV) for prehospital identification of patients with acute stroke defined as the proportion of patients accepted for stroke evaluation and discharged with a final stroke diagnosis. One thousand three hundred patients provide a 50% surplus to the 808 patients needed for 80% power to detect a 10% increase in PPV., Discussion: Structured and digital communication using a common scale like NIHSS may result in increased probability for better identification of stroke patients and less stroke mimics delivered to a stroke team for acute diagnostics and treatment in our population., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04137874 . Registered on October 24, 2019., (© 2022. The Author(s).)