Search

Copyright of Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb is the property of Fachmedien Otto Schmidt KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb is the property of Fachmedien Otto Schmidt KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb is the property of Fachmedien Otto Schmidt KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Legal disputes in the field of equine medicine and, thus, in equine practice have increased significantly. They concern both allegations of treatment errors in curative practice and erroneous purchase examinations. The need for expert witnesses has risen accordingly. The medical professions are qualified as experts by virtue of their licence to practice. The fulfilment of expert opinion assignments often conflicts with day-to-day business in practice and is often rejected. “Hippological” experts, who are publicly appointed and sworn in as particularly qualified (öbv) by bodies such as chambers of industry and commerce, chambers of agriculture or regional councils following an examination, are responsible for questions relating to horse husbandry and the assessment of horses. Therefore, courts need two experts to answer the questions in legal disputes in equine matters. Veterinary liability law is only partially standardised by law. In many cases, case law is, consequently, based on analogies from human medicine without any legal basis. The most common forms of expert opinions, the appearance of experts in court, liability and fees for the preparation of expert opinions are also discussed. It is obvious that more experts are needed than are currently willing to provide expert opinions for the courts. Specialised equine physicians are particularly suitable for this purpose based on their qualifications. Furthermore, they should take advantage of opportunities for further and advanced training and obtain additional qualifications in the specialised fields of horse breeding, husbandry and valuation. This requires further and advanced training opportunities and qualification modules to be offered and the remuneration in the Justizvergütungs- und -entschädigungsgesetz (Judicial Remuneration and Compensation Act) to be adapted to market conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article deals with a ruling by the Administrative Court of Austria (VwGH) regarding claims for compensation for loss of earnings under the Crime Victims Compensation Act (VOG). The court states that specific findings regarding health damage and causal actions must be made in order to assess claims. The ruling overturns a previous decision due to procedural errors. It was found that the plaintiff suffers from various health problems, but could not prove a causal connection between the suffered abuse and the current health problems. The court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint and declared an ordinary appeal inadmissible. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Recht & Psychiatrie is the property of Psychiatrie Verlag GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die MKG-Chirurgie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Die Urologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb is the property of Fachmedien Otto Schmidt KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Das Gutachten zur Krankenhauslandschaft in Sachsen-Anhalt wurde Anfang April dieses Jahres im Gesundheitskabinett des Landes in Form eines Zwischenstandsberichts vorgestellt, der den langfristigen Investitionsbedarf in Krankenhäusern, die Versorgungsstrukturen mit Notfallversorgung und den sich abzeichnenden Fachkräftebedarf bis zum Jahr 2035 ermitteln soll. Mit der Erstellung des Gutachtens war am 1. Juli 2022 die Partnerschaft Deutschland (PD) – ein Beratungsunternehmen für Bund, Länder, Kommunen sowie andere öffentliche Körperschaften und Einrichtungen und zu 100 Prozent in öffentlicher Hand – beauftragt worden, nachdem sich der Koalitionsausschuss am 3. Mai 2022 zu den zu begutachtenden Eckpunkten verständigt hatte. Eigentlich hätte das Gutachten schon bis zum Jahresende abgeschlossen werden sollen, um auch die Gelder aus dem Corona-Sondervermögen zielgerichtet für die Krankenhausplanung einsetzen zu können. Das Gutachten, das in den kommenden Wochen abgeschlossen wird, soll auch unter Berücksichtigung der Krankenhausreform des Bundes die Grundlage für die weiteren Planungen im Land sein.

Copyright of Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of HNO is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Hochschullehre is the property of wbv Media GmbH & Co. KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Projekt-Management Aktuell is the property of Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH & Co.KG and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

x

Die Beiträge des Bandes beschäftigen sich mit Begutachtungspraktiken verschiedener Epochen und zeigen die Entwicklung des Gutachtens als einen Prozess auf, der zunehmend der Diskussion, Ausverhandlung und dem Einfluss von Wissen und Gegenwissen um soziokulturelle Normen unterliegt. Ausgehend von der Annahme, dass der Medizin in der Klassifikation, Bewertung und Einschätzung bzw. in der Subjektivierung von Einzelnen und Gruppen eine besondere Bedeutung zukommt, rückt insbesondere jenes Verhältnis in den Fokus, das durch die Tätigkeit des Gutachtens zwischen und für Menschen hergestellt wird.

The guidelines, which were first published in 2012, were fundamentally revised by a panel of experts from 9 medical and psychological societies and published on the website of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany in December 2019 (AWMF registration number 051-029). The guidelines contribute to interdisciplinary quality assurance when assessing applicants for insurance or other compensation benefits who claim psychological or psychosomatic illnesses with resulting functional disorders. The guidelines are divided into 3 separate parts: part I describes specific aspects of the expert examination, part II describes the criteria for assessing occupational performance capacity in terms of different legal fields and part III deals with questions of causality in cases of claimed posttraumatic mental disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Germany, the integration of product-evaluating certificates and reports (Gutachten) into advertisements triggered repeated condemnations of "advertisement- Gutachten " (Reklamegutachten), and scientists and science administrators introduced various restrictions to prevent the appearance of such documents. At the same time, the provision of Gutachten to private individuals and firms seemed crucial to the success of many private and public laboratories. Some chemical and other professionals, moreover, argued that the authoring and use of Reklamegutachten could represent a "scientific" and, therefore, ethical practice. By examining the contested history of the advertisement- Gutachten, this article reveals how a previously tolerated knowledge service lost its legitimacy in a particular place and period of time, and highlights the challenges of eliminating this practice or restoring its legitimacy afterward. The article also explores how professional scientists' approaches to maintaining a reputation for integrity in the face of commercial and competitive pressures related to the better-known efforts of professionals in other fields, particularly the medical. I emphasize that, in determining whether a Gutachten qualified as scientific, the nature and transparency of the underlying research process was only one of the criteria that were considered, and often not the most significant yardstick. At the same time, however, ideas about the personal and professional/institutional integrity of providers of Gutachten were inextricably connected with assessments of the honesty and objectivity of their research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Der Anteil jener psychisch kranken, jedoch zurechnungsfähigen Straftäter, die in Österreich nach einer Unterbringung in einer Maßnahme nach § 21 Abs. 2 StGB erneut straffällig wurden, ist über viele Jahre stark gesunken. In einer empirischen Studie wurden Entlassungsgruppen im Detail untersucht und verglichen, um mögliche Ursachen für diese Veränderung zu identifizieren. Es zeigte sich, dass neben einer über die Zeit besseren Selektion bereits entlassungsbereiter Personen primär Verbesserungen in der Betreuung während der Unterbringung sowie im Zuge der bedingten Entlassung für die positive Entwicklung ausschlaggebend waren. The number of mentally ill offenders who relapsed into crime after having been released from a custodial measure regulated by § 21 para. 2 Austrian Criminal Code declined considerably over the years. Two groups of former detainees differing in their date of release were examined to identify the changes and developments leading to this decrease. On the one hand, improvements in the experts' reports used to assess the future risk of former detainees became apparent, enhancing the accuracy of this selection process. On the other hand, changes were discovered concerning the treatment during the confinement as well as the circumstances created for the time of the conditional release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Psychotherapeut is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

2005 und 2013 erstellte und konsentierte die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurowissenschaftliche Begutachtung in Kooperation mit anderen Fachgesellschaften, darunter die GNP, Leitlinien auf S1-Niveau zum Thema der Begutachtung gedeckter Schädel-Hirntraumen und publizierte diese über die Arbeitsgemeinschaft Wissenschaftlicher Medizinischer Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Die erneute Revision der Leitlinie erfolgte auf dem Evidenzniveau S2k. Die Leitlinie stellt dar, welche Bildgebungs- und klinischen Befunde die Annahme einer strukturellen Hirnschädigung und bleibender Defizite erlauben. In 2005 and 2013, the German Society for Neurocientific Medicolegal Evaluations (DGNR) developed and consented together with other learned societies, among them the Society for Neuropsychology (GNP), guidelines for the medicolegal evaluation of adults with closed head injuries. The new revision was developed on the higher S2k level of consent through a Delphi Conferebce concerning the crucial statements. The guideline describes which radiological and cliniceal features allow the assumption of structural brain damage and therefore remaining deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Rechtsmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Hautarzt is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Baurechtliche Blatter is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht is the property of Verlag Oesterreich GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka / Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci is the property of Pravni fakultet Sveucilista u Rijeci and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Der anteriore, superiore Schulterquadrant enthält wesentliche, funktionell bedeutsame anatomische Strukturen des Schultergelenks. Dessen akromioklavikuläres Dach inklusive Processus coracoideus hat auch verbindende Elemente zu den Rotatorensehnen, den kapsulären Strukturen, aber auch zum Verlauf der Bizepssehne, zum Pulley-Komplex und zum anterioren Rotatorenintervall. Die anatomische Komplexität muss bei fraglichen isolierten Verletzungen im Bereich des anterioren, superioren Schulterquadranten berücksichtigt werden, da tatsächlich isolierte Verletzungen als Unfallfolge unwahrscheinlich sind. Für ein Gutachten ist daher eine komplexe Diagnostik nicht nur der vermuteten Verletzungsregionen, sondern auch deren Begleitstrukturen erforderlich. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Rechtsmedizin is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Hintergrund: Nicht nur die Umstände des gemeinsamen Todes von König Ludwig II. und seinem Psychiater Bernhard von Gudden am Pfingstsonntag 1886, sondern auch die gutachterliche Fundierung der Absetzung Ludwigs und die Natur seiner psychischen Erkrankung werden unverändert kontrovers diskutiert.Ergebnis: Geht man allerdings vom psychiatrischen Zeitwissen aus, wird der Weg der vier Gutachter zur Diagnose „Paranoia (Verrücktheit)" klarer. Gudden hinterließ kein Lehrbuch. Seine Lehrmeinung findet sich aber im Compendium, der 1. Auflage (1883) des Lehrbuchs seines langjährigen Schülers Emil Kraepelin wieder, wenn Aufbau und Symptomwichtung des Gutachtens und die Systematik des Lehrbuchs gegenübergestellt werden. Die gutachterliche Interpretation von Ludwigs Krankheit ist ein herausragendes psychiatriegeschichtliches Zeugnis. Auch nach Guddens und Ludwigs Tod änderten die drei Mitgutachter vor den untersuchenden Landtagskommissionen ihre Auffassung nicht.Schlussfolgerung: Gudden und den Mitgutachtern eine Fehldiagnose vorzuhalten, ist nicht gerechtfertigt, wenn das Wissen der Zeit zur Grundlage unserer heutigen Beurteilung gemacht wird. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Berichte zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Das berufsgenossenschaftliche (BG-liche) Heilverfahrenssystem erweist sich aus Sicht eines niedergelassenen Durchgangsarztes (D-Arzt) als zuverlässiges Instrument zur Heilverfahrenssteuerung. Wie alle praktisch ausgerichteten Schemata bedarf es jedoch einer regelmäßigen Überarbeitung und Anpassung an geänderte Strukturen. In diesem Beitrag soll ein Auszug an problematischen Abläufen dargestellt und ein Lösungsvorschlag präsentiert werden. Die einzelnen Themen umfassen: hinderliche Vorgaben zur Niederlassung eines D‑Arztes; Anpassung der Fortbildungsstrukturen; Auslagern der Gutachtentätigkeit an speziell ausgebildete Ärzte; Verbesserung der Kommunikationsstrukturen zwischen den Akteuren der Heilverfahrenssteuerung; Einführung einer „BG-ID-Card“; Anpassen der UV-GOÄ und einheitliche Handhabung. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]