Search

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network implemented the Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network (COIIN) to improve the use of donors with kidney donor profile index >50%. COIIN recruited 2 separate cohorts of kidney transplant programs. Cohort A included 19 programs of 44 applicants (January 1, 2017, to September 30, 2017), and cohort B included 39 programs of 47 applicants (October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018). We investigated the effect of COIIN on kidney yield (number of kidneys transplanted from donors from whom any organ was recovered), offer acceptance, deceased donor transplant rates, and waitlist mortality rates for January 1, 2016, to March 31, 2019. COIIN did not notably affect kidney yield or waitlist mortality rates. Cohort A, but not cohort B, had significantly higher deceased donor transplant and offer acceptance rates during its intervention period than programs not in COIIN (adjusted transplant rate ratio: cohort A, 1.08 1.17 1.27 , cohort B, 0.94 1.01 1.08 ; adjusted offer acceptance ratio: cohort A, 1.08 1.18 1.29 , cohort B, 0.93 1.00 1.08 ). Thus, COIIN improved the use of kidneys at programs in cohort A but not at those in cohort B. Further research is necessary to understand the different effects for cohorts A and B, and further monitoring of posttransplant outcomes is required., (Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have fundamentally changed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and reduced the discard rate of HCV-infected organs by offering a treatment option with a high likelihood of cure posttransplant. This has spurred increased interest in transplanting organs from HCV-positive donors into recipients both with and without HCV. In this chapter, we examine data from 2007 to 2018 to determine trends in HCV (+) donor transplants across various organ types. Since 2015, willingness to accept HCV (+) organs increased for candidates waitlisted for kidney, lung, heart, and pancreas transplant, but decreased for those listed for intestine transplant. For candidates listed for liver transplant, willingness to accept HCV (+) organs decreased from 2007 to 2017, but began increasing in 2017. Willingness to accept was not concentrated in a single US geographic area, and there was substantial variation among transplant programs and donation service areas. Numbers of anti-HCV (+) donor kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplants have increased considerably in the past few years. Short-term allograft survival for kidney and liver transplant recipients of anti-HCV (+) organs appears to be comparable to that for recipients of anti-HCV (-) organs in an unadjusted analysis. However, an unadjusted analysis indicates that long-term allograft survival may be worse. Kidney transplant between HCV-infected donors and uninfected recipients with posttransplant DAA treatment is an emerging area. Short-term data are promising, with similar 1-year allograft survival compared with HCV-uninfected donor to HCV-uninfected recipient kidney transplants in unadjusted analyses. However, long-term data are lacking and close monitoring in the future is warranted., (.)

Despite the ongoing severe mismatch between organ need and supply, data from 2018 revealed some promising trends. For the fourth year in a row, the number of patients waiting for a kidney transplant in the US declined and numbers of both deceased and living donor kidney transplants increased. These encouraging trends are tempered by ongoing challenges, such as a large proportion of listed patients with dialysis time longer than 5 years. The proportion of candidates aged 65 years or older continued to rise, and the proportion undergoing transplant within 5 years of listing continued to vary dramatically nationwide, from 10% to nearly 80% across donation service areas. Increasing trends in the recovery of organs from hepatitis C positive donors and donors with anoxic brain injury warrant ongoing monitoring, as does the ongoing discard of nearly 20% of recovered organs. While the number of living donor transplants increased, racial disparities persisted in the proportion of living versus deceased donors. Strikingly, the total number of kidney transplant recipients alive with a functioning graft is on track to pass 250,000 in the next 1-2 years. The total number of pediatric kidney transplants remained steady at 756 in 2018. Deeply concerning to the pediatric community is the persistently low level of living donor kidney transplants, representing only 36.2% in 2018., (.)

The overall number of pancreas transplants continued to increase to 1027 in 2018, after a nadir of 947 in 2015. New additions to waiting list remained stable, with 1485 candidates added in 2018. Proportions of patients with type II diabetes waiting for transplant (14.6%) and undergoing transplant (14.8%) have steadily increased since 2016. Waiting times for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant have decreased; median months to transplant was 13.5 for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant and 19.7 for pancreas transplant alone in 2018. Outcomes, including patient and kidney survival, as well as rejection rates, have improved consistently over the past several years. Pancreas graft survival data are being collected by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and will be included in a future report once there are sufficient cohorts for analysis., (.)

Kidney transplant recipients aged <65 years qualify for Medicare coverage, but coverage ends 3 years posttransplant. We determined the association between timing of Medicare loss and immunosuppressive medication fills and kidney allograft loss. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), US Renal Data System, and Symphony pharmacy fill database, we analyzed 78 861 Medicare-covered, kidney-alone recipients aged <65 years, and assessed the timing of Medicare loss posttransplant: early (<3 years), on-time (at 3 years), or late (>3 years). Immunosuppressant use was measured as medication possession ratio (MPR). Allograft loss was assessed using SRTR data. MPR was lower for recipients with early or late Medicare loss compared with no coverage loss for all immunosuppressive medication types. For calcineurin inhibitors, early Medicare loss was associated with a 53% to 86% lower MPR. On-time Medicare loss was not associated with a lower MPR. When recipients were matched by age, posttransplant timing of Medicare loss, and donor risk, the hazard of allograft loss was 990% to 1630% higher after early Medicare loss, and 140% to 740% higher after late Medicare loss, with no difference in the hazard for on-time Medicare loss. Ensuring ongoing Medicare access before and after 3 years posttransplant could affect graft survival., (Published 2019. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

The C-statistic of the risk-adjustment model is often used to judge the accuracy of program evaluations. However, the C-statistic depends on the variability in risk for individual transplants and may be inappropriate for determining the accuracy of program evaluations. A simulation study investigated the association of the C-statistic with several metrics of program evaluation accuracy, including categorizing programs into the 5-tier system and identifying programs for regulatory review. The simulation study used data from deceased donor kidney-alone transplants for adult recipients in the program-specific reports released January 2018. A range of C-statistics was generated by changing the variability in risk for individual transplants. The C-statistic had no association with any metric of program evaluation accuracy. Instead, the number of expected events at a program was the most important factor. For example, Spearman's rho, which is the correlation of ranks, was -0.27 and -0.72 between the true program-specific hazard ratios and assigned tiers for programs with, respectively, <3 and >10 expected events. Presence of unadjusted risk factors did not modify the associations, although the accuracy of program evaluations was systematically lower. Therefore, the C-statistic provides no information on the accuracy of program evaluations., (Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

To improve accessibility of program-specific reports to patients, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients released a 5-tier system for categorizing 1-year posttransplant program evaluations. Whether this system predicts subsequent posttransplant outcomes at the time patients are waitlisted has been questioned. We investigated the association of tier at listing and the corresponding continuous score used for tier assignment, which ranges from 0 (poor outcomes) to 1 (good outcomes), with eventual 1-year posttransplant graft survival for candidates listed between July 12, 2011, and June 16, 2014, who underwent transplant before December 31, 2016. One additional tier at listing was associated with better 1-year posttransplant outcomes in liver (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.97) and lung transplant (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.97) but not kidney (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.01) or heart transplant (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10). In liver and lung transplant, longer time between listing and transplant was associated with stronger protective effects for high-tier programs. In kidney, liver, and lung transplant, posttransplant evaluations at listing had nonlinear associations with eventual posttransplant outcomes: relatively flat for 5-tier scores <0.5 and decreasing for scores >0.5. After adjustment for measured recipient and donor risk factors, posttransplant evaluations at listing predicted differences in eventual outcomes in liver and lung transplant, providing useful information to patients., (© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is responsible for understandable reporting of program metrics, including transplant rate, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant outcomes. SRTR developed five-tier systems for each metric to improve accessibility for the public. We investigated the associations of the five-tier assignments at listing with all-cause candidate mortality after listing, for candidates listed July 12, 2011-June 16, 2014. Transplant rate evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in kidney (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 0.95 0.97 ), liver (HR, 0.87 0.90 0.92 ), and heart (HR, 0.92 0.96 1.00 ) transplantation. For lung transplant patients, mortality after listing was highest at programs with above- and below-average transplant rates and lowest at programs with average transplant rates, suggesting that aggressive acceptance behavior may not always provide a survival benefit. Waitlist mortality evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in kidney (HR, 0.94 0.96 0.99 ) transplantation, and posttransplant graft survival evaluations with one additional tier were associated with lower mortality after listing in lung (HR, 0.90 0.94 0.98 ) transplantation. Transplant rate typically had the strongest association with mortality after listing, but the strength of associations differed by organ., (© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Many positive trends in kidney transplantation were notable in 2017. Deceased donor kidney transplant rates and counts continued to rise, the kidney transplant waiting list declined for the third year in a row after decades of growth, and both short- and long-term allograft survival continued to improve year over year. In total, more than 220,000 patients were living in the United States with a functioning allograft. With 3 years of data available since implementation of the new kidney allocation system, better prediction of longer-term results of the allocation policy changes became possible. The data also reveal several areas in need of improvement and attention. Overall, the challenge of providing adequate access to kidney transplant persisted nationally, with additional dramatic regional variation. The proportion of living donor kidney transplants in both adults and children continued to fall, and racial disparities in living donor kidney transplant grew in the past decade., (.)

In 2017, 1492 patients were added to the pancreas transplant waiting list, 964 listed as active, a slight increase from 2016. This is significant because for the first time in the past decade, the steady downward trend in additions to the waiting list has been reversed. Proportions of pancreas donors with cerebrovascular accident as cause of death decreased, with a concomitant increase in proportions with anoxia and head trauma. This is partly a result of the national opioid crisis, and it reflects increasing use of younger donors for pancreas transplant. The 2017 outcome report remains compromised by previous variation in reporting graft failure. Although the OPTN Pancreas Transplantation Committee has approved more precise definitions of pancreas graft failure, implementation of these definitions took place recently, and the data are not reflected in this report., (.)

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) is considering more prominent reporting of program-specific adjusted transplant rate ratios (TRRs). To enable more useful reporting of TRRs, SRTR updated the transplant rate models to adjust explicitly for components of allocation priority. We evaluated potential associations between TRRs and components of allocation priority that could indicate programs' ability to manipulate TRRs by denying or delaying access to low-priority candidates. Despite a strong association with unadjusted TRRs, we found no candidate-level association between the components of allocation priority and adjusted TRRs. We found a strong program-level association between median laboratory Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at listing and program-specific adjusted TRRs (r = .37; P < .001). The program-level association was likely confounded by regional differences in donor supply/demand and listing practices. In kidney transplantation, higher program-specific adjusted TRRs were weakly associated with better adjusted posttransplant outcomes (r = -.14; P = .035) and lower adjusted waitlist mortality rate ratios (r = -.15; P = .022), but these associations were absent in liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Program-specific adjusted TRRs were unlikely to be improved by listing candidates with high allocation priority and can provide useful information for transplant candidates and programs., (Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Data from 2016 show ongoing positive trends in short- and long-term allograft survival, and a decrease in the number of active listed candi- dates for the first time in more than a decade, with a concomitant in- crease in deceased donor kidney transplants. Transplant rates that had changed dramatically for some groups after implementation of the new kidney allocation system in 2014 are stabilizing, allowing for evaluation of new steady states and trends. Many challenges remain in adult kid- ney transplantation, including stagnant rates of living donor transplant, geographic disparities in access to transplant, racial disparities in living donor transplant, and overall a continuing demand for kidneys that far outpaces the supply. For pediatric recipients, a decline in the proportion of living donor transplants is of concern. In 2016, only 34.2% of pediatric transplants were from living donors, compared with 47.2% in 2005. The number of related donors decreased dramatically over the past decade, and the number of unrelated directed transplants performed in pediatric candidates remained low (50)., (.)

The number of pancreas transplants performed in the United States increased by 7.0% in 2016 over the previous year, the first such increase in more than a decade, largely attributable to an increase in simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants. Transplant rates increased in 2016, and mortality on the waiting list decreased. The declining enthusiasm for pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants persisted. The uniform definition of graft failure was approved by the OPTN Board of Directors in 2015 and will be implemented in early 2018. Meanwhile, SRTR continues to refrain from reporting pancreas graft failure data. The OPTN/UNOS Pancreas Transplantation Committee is seeking to broaden allocation of pancreata across compatible ABO blood types in a proposal out for public comment July 31 to October 2, 2017. A new initiative to provide guidance on the benefits of PAK transplants is also out for public comment., (.)

Background: Current Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy restricts certain blood type-compatible simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants. Using the Kidney Pancreas Simulated Allocation Model, we examined the effects of 5 alternative allocation sequences that allowed all clinically compatible ABO transplants., Methods: The study cohort included kidney (KI), SPK, and pancreas alone (PA) candidates waiting for transplant for at least 1 day between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010 (full cohort), and kidneys and pancreata recovered for transplant during the same period. Additionally, because the waiting list has shrunk since 2010, the study population was reduced by random sampling to match the volume of the 2015 waiting list (reduced cohort)., Results: Compared with the current allocation sequence, R4 and R5 both showed an increase in SPK transplants, a nearly corresponding decrease in KI transplants, and virtually no change in PA transplants. Life-years from transplant and median years of benefit also increased. The distribution of transplants by blood type changed, with more ABO:A, B, and AB transplants performed, and fewer ABO:O across all transplant types (KI, SPK, PA), with the relative percent changes largest for SPK., Discussion: Broadened ABO compatibility allowances primarily benefitted SPK ABO:A and AB candidates. ABO:O candidates saw potentially reduced access to transplant. The simulation results suggest that modifying the current allocation sequence to incorporate broadened ABO compatibility can result in an increase in annual SPK transplants., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The number of pancreas transplants performed in the United States stabilized over the last 3 years after nearly a decade of steady decline. Numbers of new additions to the list also stabilized during the same period. Notably, the persistent decline in pancreas after kidney transplants also seems to have abated, at least for now. The first full year of data after implementation of the new pancreas allocation system revealed no change in the distribution of organs between simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant and pancreas transplant alone. The percentage of kidneys used in SPK transplants was also unchanged. While a uniform definition of pancreas graft failure was approved in June 2015, it is awaiting implementation. Meanwhile, SRTR will refrain from publishing pancreas graft failure data in the program-specific reports. Therefore, it is difficult to track trends in outcomes after pancreas transplant over the past 2 years. New initiatives by the OPTN/UNOS Pancreas Transplantation Committee include facilitated pancreas allocation and broadened allocation of pancreata across compatible ABO blood types to increase organ utilization., (.)

The first full year of data after implementation of the new kidney allocation system reveals an increase in deceased donor kidney transplants among black candidates and those with calculated panel-reactive antibodies 98%-100%, but a decrease among candidates aged 65 years or older. Data from 2015 also demonstrate ongoing positive trends in graft and patient survival for both deceased and living donor kidney transplants, but the challenges of a limited supply of kidneys in the setting of increasing demand remain evident. While the total number of patients on the waiting list decreased for the first time in a decade, this was due to a combination of a decrease in the number of candidates added to the list and an increase in the number of candidates removed from the list due to deteriorating medical condition, as well as an increase in total transplants. Deaths on the waiting list remained flat, but this was likely because of an increasing trend toward removing inactive candidates too sick to undergo transplant., (.)

In December 2014, a new kidney allocation system (KAS) was implemented in the United States in an attempt to improve access to transplant for historically underrepresented groups, and to incorporate longevity matching such that donor kidneys with the longest projected graft survival are given to recipients with the longest projected patient survival. The development of organ allocation policies is often guided by simulated allocation models, computer programs that simulate the arrival of donated organs and new candidates on the waiting list over a 1-year period to project outcomes under a new allocation method. We examined the early outcomes under the new KAS using quarterly data beginning in 2013, revealing whether trends were already underway before implementation. Quarterly data also serve to reveal any bolus effect, or a rapid rise or fall in the proportion of transplants in a given group due to reordering of the list, followed by tapering toward a new steady state. Post-KAS changes were notable for an increase in the proportion of transplants among younger candidates, black and Hispanic candidates, highly sensitized candidates, and those on dialysis for at least 5 years. Transplants among blood type B candidates increased slightly but these candidates remain underrepresented relative to their prevalence on the waiting list. Regional and national sharing increased under the new KAS, but transplants of kidneys with a kidney donor profile index above 85% decreased. Early graft survival appears unchanged, but given the increases in regional sharing, cold ischemia time, and transplants among highly sensitized candidates and candidates with long pretransplant dialysis time, long-term graft survival will need to monitored., (.)

For recipients of liver transplantations (LTs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HCC recurrence after transplantation remains a major concern. Sirolimus (SRL), an immunosuppressant with anticarcinogenic properties, may reduce HCC recurrence and improve survival. In our study, the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was linked to pharmacy claims. For liver recipients transplanted for HCC, Cox regression was used to estimate associations of early SRL use with recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality, adjusting for recipient ethnicity, calendar year of transplant, total tumor volume, alpha-fetoprotein, transplant center size, use of interleukin 2 induction therapy, and allocated and calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. We performed stratified analyses among recipients who met Milan criteria, among those without renal failure, among those with deceased liver donors, by age at transplantation, and by tumor size. Among the 3936 included HCC LTs, 234 (6%) were SRL users. In total, there were 242 recurrences and 879 deaths, including 261 cancer-related deaths. All-cause mortality was similar in SRL users and nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.39). HCC recurrence and cancer-specific mortality rates appeared lower in SRL users, but associations were not statistically significant (recurrence aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.45-1.65; cancer-specific mortality aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43-1.50). Among recipients >55 years old, associations were suggestive of better outcomes for SRL users (all-cause mortality aHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-1.01; recurrence aHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.19-1.44; cancer-specific mortality aHR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11-1.09), whereas among recipients ≤55 years old, SRL users had worse outcomes (all-cause mortality aHR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.75; recurrence aHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.62-3.61; cancer-specific mortality aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.71-3.32). In conclusion, among HCC liver recipients overall, SRL did not appear beneficial in reducing all-cause mortality. However, there were suggestions of reductions in recurrence and cancer-specific mortality, and effects appeared to be modified by age at transplantation. Liver Transplantation 22 627-634 2016 AASLD., (© 2016 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: In December 2014, a new national deceased donor kidney allocation policy was implemented, which allocates kidneys in the top 20% of the kidney donor profile index to candidates in the top 20% of expected survival. We examined the cost implications of this policy change., Methods: A Markov model was applied to estimate differences in total lifetime cost of care and quality-adjusted life years (QALY)., Results: Under the old allocation policy, average lifetime outcomes per listed patient discounted to 2012 US dollars were US $342,799 and 5.42 QALY, yielding US $63,775 per QALY gained. Under the new policy, average lifetime cost was reduced by US $2090 and lifetime QALYs increased by 0.03. Thus, the new policy improved on the old policy by producing more QALYs at lower cost. The present value of total lifetime cost savings from the policy change is estimated to be US $271 million in the first year and US $55 million in subsequent years. The higher transplant rates and allograft survival expected for candidates in the top 20% of expected survival would decrease costs by reducing time on dialysis. Most cost savings are expected to accrue to Medicare, and most increased access to transplant is expected in private payer populations., Conclusions: The new allocation policy was found to be dominant over the old policy because it increases QALYs at lower cost.

Background and Objectives: In December of 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network implemented a new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) for deceased donor transplant, with increased priority for highly sensitized candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA] >99%). We used a modified version of the new KAS to address issues of access and equity for these candidates., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In a simulation, 10,988 deceased donor kidneys transplanted into waitlisted recipients in 2010 were instead allocated to candidates with cPRA≥80% (n=18,004). Each candidate's unacceptable donor HLA antigens had been entered into the allocation system by the transplant center. In simulated match runs, kidneys were allocated sequentially to adult ABO identical or permissible candidates with cPRA 100%, 99%, 98%, etc. to 80%. Allocations were restricted to donor/recipient pairs with negative virtual crossmatches., Results: The simulation indicated that 2111 of 10,988 kidneys (19.2%) would have been allocated to patients with cPRA 100% versus 74 of 10,988 (0.7%) that were actually transplanted. Of cPRA 100% candidates, 74% were predicted to be compatible with an average of six deceased donors; the remaining 26% seemed to be incompatible with every deceased donor organ that entered the system. Of kidneys actually allocated to cPRA 100% candidates in 2010, 66% (49 of 74) were six-antigen HLA matched/zero-antigen mismatched (HLA-A, -B, and -DR) with their recipients versus only 11% (237 of 2111) in the simulation. The simulation predicted that 10,356 of 14,433 (72%) candidates with cPRA 90%-100% could be allocated an organ compared with 7.3% who actually underwent transplant., Conclusions: Data in this simulation are consistent with early results of the new KAS; specifically, nearly 20% of deceased donor kidneys were (virtually) compatible with cPRA 100% candidates. Although most of these candidates were predicted to be compatible with multiple donors, approximately one-quarter are unlikely to receive a single offer., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have improved survival among end-stage heart disease patients. Since 2002, heart transplant candidates with VADs have been afforded 30 days of elective time at the highest urgency category (Status 1A) under Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy. We aimed to determine the effect of increasing elective time at the highest urgency category for heart transplant candidates with VADs. This analysis was requested by OPTN during its evaluation of heart allocation policy., Methods: We simulated several allocation schemes wherein elective Status 1A time was increased to 45, 60, and 90 days; results were compared with a baseline simulation of 30 days and with the actual observed heart transplant waiting list cohort., Results: The simulations showed that increasing elective Status 1A time for candidates with VADs did not substantially change waiting list mortality overall or for sub-groups of concern, which were candidates with VADs listed at a lower-urgency category (Status 1B), those with with VAD complications, total artificial heart, or intraaortic balloon pump support; or those with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Across the different time allowances, the average post-transplant death rate remained stable. It also remained stable for recipients previously listed as Status 1A or 1B categories for VAD and for recipients with VAD complications or an intraaortic balloon pump at transplant, on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and those without devices., Conclusions: Our results suggest that increasing time in the highest urgency category for candidates with VADs would not improve waiting list mortality or post-transplant outcomes for heart transplant candidates overall., (Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Confounding, a concern in nonexperimental research using administrative claims, is nearly ubiquitous in claims-based pharmacoepidemiology studies. A fixed-length look-back window for assessing comorbidity from claims is common, but it may be advantageous to use all historical claims. We assessed how the strength of association between a baseline-identified condition and subsequent mortality varied by when the condition was measured and investigated methods to control for confounding., Methods: For Medicare beneficiaries undergoing maintenance hemodialysis on 1 January 2008 (n = 222 343), we searched all Medicare claims, 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2007, for four conditions representing chronic and acute diseases, and classified claims by number of months preceding the index date. We used proportional hazard models to estimate the association between time of condition and subsequent mortality. We simulated a confounded comorbidity-exposure relationship and investigated an alternative method of adjustment when the association between the condition and mortality varied by proximity to follow-up start., Results: The magnitude of the mortality hazard ratio estimates for each condition investigated decreased toward unity as time increased between index date and most recent manifestation of the condition. Simulation showed more biased estimates of exposure-outcome associations if proximity to follow-up start was not considered., Conclusions: Using all-available claims information during a baseline period, we found that for all conditions investigated, the association between a comorbid condition and subsequent mortality varied considerably depending on when the condition was measured. Improved confounding control may be achieved by considering the timing of claims relative to follow-up start., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Kidney transplant provides significant survival, cost, and quality-of-life benefits over dialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease, but the number of kidney transplant candidates on the waiting list continues to grow annually. By the end of 2014, nearly 100,000 adult candidates and 1500 pediatric candidates were waiting for kidney transplant. Not surprisingly, waiting times also continued to increase, along with the number of adult candidates removed from the list due to death or deteriorating medical condition. Death censored graft survival has increased after both living and deceased donor transplants over the past decade in adult recipients. The majority of the trends seen over the past 5 years continued in 2014. However, the new allocation system was implemented in late 2014, providing an opportunity to assess changes in these trends in the coming years., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Even though pancreas transplant numbers have steadily declined over the past decade, new listings increased in 2014 compared with the previous year, notably for pancreas transplant alone (PTA) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. The number of new PTAs also increased over the past two years. Whether this is a sustainable trend remains to be seen. Significant events in 2014 included implementation of a new pancreas allocation system and development of a proposed uniform definition of pancreas graft failure. Meanwhile, overall pancreas transplant rates and outcomes continued to improve. Substantial decline in pancreas after kidney transplants remains a serious concern. SRTR has not published pancreas graft failure data in the program-specific reports for the past two years. While this will not change in the near future, the acceptance of a uniform definition of graft failure is a crucial first step toward resuming graft failure reporting. Continued improvements and innovation, both surgical and immunological, will be critical to keep pancreas transplant as a viable option for treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes. As alternative therapies for diabetes such as islet transplant and artificial pancreas are evolving, improved outcomes with minimizations of complications are more important than ever., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Sirolimus has anti-carcinogenic properties and can be included in maintenance immunosuppressive therapy following kidney transplantation. We investigated sirolimus effects on cancer incidence among kidney recipients. The US transplant registry was linked with 15 population-based cancer registries and national pharmacy claims. Recipients contributed sirolimus-exposed time when sirolimus claims were filled, and unexposed time when other immunosuppressant claims were filled without sirolimus. Cox regression was used to estimate associations with overall and specific cancer incidence, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers (not captured in cancer registries). We included 32,604 kidney transplants (5687 sirolimus-exposed). Overall, cancer incidence was suggestively lower during sirolimus use (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.11). Prostate cancer incidence was higher during sirolimus use (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.15-3.02). Incidence of other cancers was similar or lower with sirolimus use, with a 26% decrease overall (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.96, excluding prostate cancer). Results were similar after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. This modest association does not provide strong evidence that sirolimus prevents posttransplant cancer, but it may be advantageous among kidney recipients with high cancer risk. Increased prostate cancer diagnoses may result from sirolimus effects on screen detection., (© Copyright 2014 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

A new kidney allocation system, expected to be implemented in late 2014, will characterize donors on a percent scale (0%-100%) using the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). The 20% of deceased donor kidneys with the greatest expected posttransplant longevity will be allocated first to the 20% of candidates with the best expected posttransplant survival; kidneys that are not accepted will then be offered to remaining 80% of candidates. Waiting time will start at the time of maintenance dialysis initiation (even if before listing) or at the time of listing with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or less. Under the current system, the number of candidates on the waiting list continues to increase, as each year more candidates are added than are removed. Median waiting times for adults increased from 3 years in 2003 to more than 4.5 years in 2009. Donation rates have not increased. Short-term outcomes continue to improve; death-censored graft survival at 90 days posttransplant was 97% or higher for deceased donor transplants and over 99% for living donor transplants. In 2013, 883 pediatric candidates were added to the waiting list; 65.8% of pediatric candidates on the list in 2013 underwent deceased donor transplant. Five-year graft survival was highest for living donor recipients aged younger than 11 years (89%) and lowest for deceased donor recipients aged 11 to 17 years (68%)., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Pancreas listings and transplants decreased during the past decade, most notably pancreas after kidney transplants. Center-reported outcomes of pancreas transplant across all groups, short-term and long-term, improved during the same period. Changes to the pancreas allocation system creating an efficient, uniform national system will be implemented in late 2014. Pancreas-alone and simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) candidates will form a single match-run list with priority to most SPK candidates ahead of kidney-alone candidates to decrease waiting times for SPK candidates, given their higher waitlist mortality compared with nondiabetic kidney transplant candidates. The changes are expected to eliminate local variability, providing more consistent pancreas allocation nationwide. Outcomes after pancreas transplant are challenging to interpret due to lack of a uniform definition of graft failure. Consequently, SRTR has not published data on pancreas graft failure for the past 2 years. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Pancreas Transplantation Committee is working on a definition that could provide greater validity for future outcomes analyses. Challenges in pancreas transplantation include high risk of technical failures, rejection (early and late), and surgical complications. Continued outcome improvement and innovation has never been more critical, as alternatives such as islet transplant and artificial pancreas move closer to clinical application., (© Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

For most end-stage renal disease patients, successful kidney transplant provides substantially longer survival and better quality of life than dialysis, and preemptive transplant is associated with better outcomes than transplants occurring after dialysis initiation. However, kidney transplant numbers in the us have not changed for a decade. Since 2004, the total number of candidates on the waiting list has increased annually. Median time to transplant for wait-listed adult patients increased from 2.7 years in 1998 to 4.2 years in 2008. The discard rate of deceased donor kidneys has also increased, and the annual number of living donor transplants has decreased. The number of pediatric transplants peaked at 899 in 2005, and has remained steady at approximately 750 over the past 3 years; 40.9% of pediatric candidates undergo transplant within 1 year of wait-listing. Graft survival continues to improve for both adult and pediatric recipients. Kidney transplant is one of the most cost-effective surgical interventions; however, average reimbursement for recipients with primary Medicare coverage from transplant through 1 year posttransplant was comparable to the 1-year cost of care for a dialysis patient. Rates of rehospitalization are high in the first year posttransplant; annual costs after the first year are lower., (© Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

The number of pancreas transplants has decreased over the past decade, most notably numbers of pancreas after kidney (pak) and pancreas transplant alone (pta) procedures. This decrease may be mitigated in the future when changes to national pancreas allocation policy approved by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Board of Directors in 2010 are implemented. The new policy will combine waiting lists for pak, pta, and simultaneous pancreas-kidney (spk) transplants), and give equal priority to candidates for all three procedures. This policy change may also eliminate geographic variation in waiting times caused by geographic differences in allocation policy. Deceased donor pancreas donation rates have been declining since 2005, and the donation rate remains low. The outcomes of pancreas grafts are difficult to describe due to lack of a uniform definition of graft failure in the transplant community. However long-term survival is better for spk versus pak and pta transplants. This may represent the difficulty of detecting rejection in the absence of a simultaneously transplanted kidney. The challenges of pancreas transplant are reflected in high rates of rehospitalization, most occurring within the first 6 months posttransplant. Pancreas transplant is associated with higher incidence of rejection compared with kidney transplant., (© Copyright 2013 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

A shortage of kidneys for transplant remains a major problem for patients with end-stage renal disease. The number of candidates on the waiting list continues to increase each year, while organ donation numbers remain flat. Thus, transplant rates for adult wait-listed candidates continue to decrease. However, pretransplant mortality rates also show a decreasing trend. Many kidneys recovered for transplant are discarded, and discard rates are increasing. Living donation rates have been essentially unchanged for the past decade, despite introduction of desensitization, non-directed donations, and kidney paired donation programs. For both living and deceased donor recipients, early posttransplant results have shown ongoing improvement, driven by decreases in rates of graft failure and return to dialysis. Immunosuppressive drug use has changed little, except for the Food and Drug Administration approval of belatacept in 2011, the first approval of a maintenance immunosuppressive drug in more than a decade. Pediatric kidney transplant candidates receive priority under the Share 35 policy. The number of pediatric transplants peaked in 2005, and decreased to a low of 760 in 2011. Graft survival and short-term renal function continue to improve for pediatric recipients. Postransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is an important concern, occurring in about one-third of pediatric recipients., (© Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Numbers of pancreas transplants have been decreasing over the past decade, but outcomes continue to improve for all types: simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant, pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA). The most notable decrease occurred for PAK transplants, possibly due in part to decreases in numbers of living donor kidney transplants. The number of new candidates on the pancreas transplant waiting list has decreased steadily since 2000; only 1005 active candidates were added in 2011. Transplant rates for all pancreas transplant types reached a low in 2011 of 34.9 transplants per 100 wait-list years. Deceased donation rates have also been decreasing since 2005, but use of donation after circulatory death has been gradually increasing. The discard rate in 2011 was 27.7%, and higher for pancreata recovered from older donors. Improved outcomes during the early posttransplant period largely reflect improved donor and recipient selection and improved technical strategies. Inconsistent definitions of graft failure across reporting centers creates an ongoing challenge in the interpretation of outcome data for pancreas transplants. Rates of posttransplant re-hospitalization are high, most occurring in the first 6 months. Rejection rates are highest for PTA recipients, who also experience higher incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder., (© Copyright 2012 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

RG 12561 (dalvastatin) is a prodrug which converts to its open hydroxyacid form in the body. The Na salt of RG 12561 (RG 12561-Na) is a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway. It competitively inhibits rat liver HMG-CoA reductase with an IC50 value of 3.4 nmol/l. In the same assay, the IC50 values for other potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, lovastatin-Na and pravastatin, were 2.3 and 8.9 nmol/l, respectively. In Hep G2 liver cells, RG 12561-Na, lovastatin-Na and pravastatin inhibited cholesterol biosynthesis from radiolabeled octanoate with IC50 values of 4 and 5 nmol/l and 1.1 mumol/l, respectively. In a rat ex vivo assay, orally administered RG 12561, lovastatin and pravastatin inhibited cholesterol biosynthesis in liver slices with ED50 values of 0.9, 0.5 and 12 mg/kg, respectively. In cholestyramine-fed hamsters, RG 12561 (0.1% in food for 18 days) reduced LDL cholesterol, whereas HDL was slightly increased. The reductions in the LDL/HDL ratio for RG 12561, RG 12561-Na, lovastatin and lovastatin-Na were 35, 76, 88 and 88%, respectively. At a higher dose, RG 12561 (0.4% in food) reduced serum cholesterol, LDL and LDL/HDL by 84, 97 and 91%, respectively. In WHHL rabbits, RG 12561 and lovastatin (5 mg/kg, b.i.d., 12 days) reduced serum cholesterol by 17 and 16%, respectively. These results demonstrate that RG 12561 is a potent cholesterol-lowering agent.