Search

Background: Intracoronary provocation testing with acetylcholine (ACh) is crucial for the diagnosis of functional coronary alterations in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries., Aims: Our intention was to assess the safety and predictive value for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients presenting with ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) or with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)., Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive INOCA or MINOCA patients undergoing intracoronary ACh provocation testing., Results: A total of 317 patients were enrolled: 174 (54.9%) with INOCA and 143 (45.1%) with MINOCA. Of these, 185 patients (58.4%) had a positive response to the ACh test. Complications during ACh provocative testing were all mild and transient and occurred in 29 (9.1%) patients, with no difference between patients with positive or negative responses to ACh testing, nor between INOCA and MINOCA patients. A history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, moderate/severe diastolic dysfunction and a higher QT dispersion at baseline electrocardiogram were independent predictors of complications. MACCE occurred in 30 patients (9.5%) during a median follow-up of 22 months. The incidence of MACCE was higher among patients with a positive ACh test (24 [13.0%] vs 6 [4.5%], p=0.017), and a positive ACh test was an independent predictor of MACCE., Conclusions: ACh provocation testing is associated with a low risk of mild and transient complications, with a similar prevalence in both INOCA and MINOCA patients. Importantly, ACh provocation testing can help to identify patients at higher risk of future clinical events, suggesting a net clinical benefit derived from its use in this clinical setting.

Objectives: We assessed the relationship between exposure to air pollutants and mechanisms of coronary instability evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Background: Air pollution is an emerging key player in determining the residual risk of coronary events. However, pathophysiological mechanisms linking air pollution and coronary events have been not adequately investigated., Methods: Patients with ACS undergoing OCT imaging were retrospectively selected. Mechanism of culprit lesion instability was classified as plaque rupture (PR) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) by OCT, and the presence of macrophage infiltrates (MØI) and thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) at the culprit site was also assessed. Based on each case's home address, exposure to several pollutants was evaluated, including particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), PM10, and carbon monoxide (CO). Only patients with >2 years of available data on air pollution exposure prior to ACS were enrolled., Results: We included 126 patients (median age: 67.0 years of age; IQR: 55.5-76.0; 97 male patients [77.0%]). Sixty-six patients (52.4%) had PR as the mechanism of plaque instability. Patients with PR were exposed to significantly higher PM2.5 levels than to IFC, and PM2.5 was independently associated with PR (odds ratio: 1.194; 95% CI: 1.036 to 1.377; P = 0.015). Moreover, exposure to higher levels of PM2.5 was independently associated with the presence of TCFA and of MØI at the culprit site. Interestingly, PM2.5, PM10, and Co levels were positively and significantly correlated with serum levels of C-reactive protein., Conclusions: We provide novel insights into the missing link between air pollution and increased risk of coronary events. In particular, exposure to higher concentrations of air pollutants is associated with the presence of vulnerable plaque features and with plaque rupture as a mechanism of coronary instability. An enhanced systemic and plaque inflammatory activation may explain these findings., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Over the past few months, health systems worldwide have been put to the test with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Even though the leading clinical manifestations of the SARS-CoV-2 infection involve the respiratory tract, there is a non-negligible risk of systemic involvement leading to the onset of multi-organ failure with fatal consequences. Since the onset of COVID-19, patients with underlying cardiovascular disease have been at increased risk of poor clinical outcomes with higher death rates. Moreover, the occurrence of new-onset cardiac complications is not uncommon among patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Of importance, a significant portion of COVID-19 patients present with myocardial injury. Herein, the authors discuss the mechanisms leading to myocardial and microvascular injury in SARS-CoV-2 infection and their clinical implications., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2020, Radcliffe Cardiology.)

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents the reperfusion strategy of choice for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. However, despite the restoration of epicardial flow, primary PCI may not determine an effective reperfusion of myocardial tissue due to the occurrence of microvascular obstruction. This phenomenon also known as "no-reflow" may occur in 30-60% of patients treated with primary PCI. Of importance, no-reflow attenuates the benefit of reperfusion therapy and is associated with a poor clinical outcome in terms of adverse ventricular remodeling, heart failure and mortality. The pathophysiology of no-reflow is complex and multiple players may be involved. Indeed, distal embolization, ischemia-reperfusion injury and an individual predisposition to microvascular dysfunction synergically interact to determine the occurrence of no-reflow. In this review, we will analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms, the diagnostic tools and the main therapeutic targets of no-reflow, with particular attention to the most recent acquisitions in this field.

Background: Coronary vasomotor dysfunction represents an important mechanism responsible for myocardial ischaemia in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The use of invasive provocative tests allows identifying patients with epicardial or microvascular spasm. Of note, clinical characteristics associated with the occurrence of epicardial or microvascular spasm have still not completely clarified., Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischaemia/necrosis with evidence of non-obstructive CAD and undergoing intracoronary provocative test for suspected vasomotor dysfunction. Patients with a positive provocative test were enrolled. Clinical, echocardiographic and angiographic characteristics of patients were evaluated according to the pattern of vasomotor dysfunction (epicardial vs. microvascular spasm). We included 120 patients [68 patients with stable angina and 52 patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)]. In particular, 77 (64.2%) patients had a provocative test positive for epicardial spasm and 43 (35.8%) patients for microvascular spasm. Patients with epicardial spasm were more frequently males, smokers, had higher rates of diffuse coronary atherosclerosis at angiography and more frequently presented with MINOCA. On the other hand, patients with microvascular spasm presented more frequently diastolic dysfunction. At multivariate logistic regression analysis male sex, smoking, and diffuse coronary atherosclerosis were independent predictors for the occurrence of epicardial spasm., Conclusions: Our study showed that specific clinical features are associated with different responses to intracoronary provocative test. Epicardial spasm is more frequent in males and in MINOCA patients, whereas microvascular spasm is more frequent in patients with stable angina and is associated with diastolic dysfunction.

Aims: Functional alterations of epicardial coronary arteries or coronary microcirculation represent a frequent cause of myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We aimed at assessing the prognostic value of intracoronary provocative tests in patients presenting with MINOCA and in which other causes of MINOCA have been excluded., Methods and Results: We prospectively evaluated patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA, excluding patients with aetiologies other than suspected coronary vasomotor abnormalities. Immediately after coronary angiography, an invasive provocative test using acetylcholine or ergonovine was performed. The incidence of death from any cause, cardiac death, and recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was assessed at follow-up. We also assessed angina status using Seattle Angina Questionnaires (SAQ). We enrolled 80 consecutive patients [mean age 63.0 ± 10.7 years, 40 (50%) male]. Provocative test was positive in 37 (46.2%) patients without any complication. Among patients with a positive test, epicardial spasm was detected in 24 (64.9%) patients and microvascular spasm in 13 (35.1%) patients. After a median follow-up of 36.0 (range 12.0-60.0) months, patients with a positive test had a significantly higher occurrence of death from any cause [12 (32.4%) vs. 2 (4.7%); P = 0.002], cardiac death [7 (18.9%) vs. 0 (0.0%); P = 0.005], and readmission for ACS [10 (27.0%) vs. 3 (7.0%); P = 0.015] as well as a worse angina status as assessed by SAQ [Seattle score: 88.0 (33.0-100.0) vs. 100.0 (44.0-100.0); P = 0.001] when compared with patients with a negative test., Conclusions: We demonstrate that in patients presenting with MINOCA and suspected coronary vasomotor abnormalities, a positive provocative test for spasm is safe and identifies a high-risk subset of patients., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)