Search

INTRODUCTION: High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations. METHODS: Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard. RESULTS: Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Background: Gastroparesis, defined by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical outlet obstruction, is a frequent neuropathic complication of diabetes mellitus, and effective treatments are lacking. Prucalopride is a pan‐gut prokinetic with selective agonist effects on serotonin 5‐HT4 receptors in the gut. This study aimed to assess the effect of prucalopride 4 mg daily on Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), meal‐related symptom score (MRSS), and gastric emptying rate in diabetic or connective tissue disease (CTD)‐related gastroparesis patients. Methods: This was a double‐blind crossover trial of four‐week treatment periods with prucalopride or placebo divided by two weeks of washout. GSCI, MRSS, gastric emptying scintigraphy, PAGI‐SYM, and PAGI‐QoL were assessed at baseline and the end of each treatment period. Daily bowel movement (BM) frequency and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded in each period. Key Results: Fifteen gastroparesis patients (13 diabetic, 2 CTD) were enrolled. GCSI scores were lower than baseline but not different between treatment arms. MRSS scores over time or cumulative score were not significantly different between groups. Gastric emptying was more rapid in the prucalopride treatment period, with mean four‐hour meal retention of 22 ± 6% in PRU period vs 40 ± 9% in the placebo period (P = 0.05). Weekly BM frequency was significantly higher in prucalopride than placebo periods (10.5 ± 1.8 vs 7.5 ± 0.8, P < 0.0001). Perception of weight loss was higher in patients on prucalopride. Analysis of diabetic gastroparesis (n = 13) population did not change the conclusions. Conclusion and Inference: Prucalopride at 4 mg accelerates gastric emptying and bowel movement frequency but does not appear to ameliorate gastroparesis or meal‐related symptoms in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims The pathophysiology of jackhammer esophagus (JE) remains unknown but may be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease or medication use. We aim to determine if pathologic acid exposure or the use of specific classes of medications (based on the mechanism of action) is associated with JE. Methods High-resolution manometry (HRM) studies from November 2013 to March 2019 with a diagnosis of JE were identified and compared to symptomatic control patients with normal HRM. Esophageal acid exposure and medication use were compared between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to look for predictors of mean distal contractile integral. Results Forty-two JE and 127 control patients were included in the study. Twenty-two (52%) JE and 82 (65%) control patients underwent both HRM and ambulatory pH monitoring. Two (9%) JE patients and 14 (17%) of controls had evidence of abnormal acid exposure (DeMeester score > 14.7); this difference was not significant (P = 0.290). Thirty-six (86%) JE and 127 (100%) control patients had complete medication lists. Significantly more JE patients were on long-acting beta agonists (LABA) (JE = 5, control = 4; P = 0.026) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) (JE = 5, control = 3; P = 0.014). Regular opioids (ß = 0.298, P = 0.042), CCB (ß = 0.308, P = 0.035), and inhaled anticholinergics (ß = 0.361, P = 0.049) predicted mean distal contractile integral (R2 = 0.082, F = 4.8; P = 0.003). Conclusions Pathologic acid exposure does not appear to be associated with JE. JE patients had increased CCB and LABA use. The unexpected finding of increased LABA use warrants more investigation and may provide support for a cholinergic etiology of JE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]