Search

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) heavily pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes. Methods In this single-arm, phase II study, patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes as second- to fifth chemotherapy received PLD (Duomeisu®, generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome) 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion of six cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. Results Of 44 enrolled patients (median age, 53.5 years; range, 34–69), 41 and 36 were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively. In total, 59.1% (26/44) of patients had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, 86.4% (38/44) had visceral disease, and 63.6% (28/44) had liver metastases. Median PFS was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3–4.1) and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI 12.1–17.9). ORR, DCR, and CBR were 16.7%, 63.9%, and 36.1%, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (53.7%), fatigue (46.3%), and neutropenia (41.5%), with no grade 4/5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AEs were neutropenia (7.3%) and fatigue (4.9%). Patients experienced palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia (24.4%, 2.4% grade 3), stomatitis (19.5%, 7.3% grade 2), and alopecia (7.3%). One patient displayed a left ventricular ejection fraction decline of 11.4% from baseline after five cycles of PLD therapy. Conclusion PLD (Duomeisu®) 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was effective and well-tolerated in patients with HER2-negative MBC heavily pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes, revealing a potentially viable treatment option for this population. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900022568.

Proxalutamide is a novel second-generation non-steroidal androgen receptor (AR) antagonist. This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of proxalutamide in patients with AR-positive metastatic breast cancer (ARIn this open-label, dose-expansion, multicentre phase Ib trial, patients with ARForty-five patients with three median lines (range, 1-13) prior systemic therapy were enrolled (cohort A, n = 30; cohort B, n = 15). Among 39 evaluable patients, DCR at 8 and 16 weeks was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-39.4%), with 26.9% in cohort A and 23.1% in cohort B. No patient achieved partial response or complete response. Proxalutamide 200 mg/day was determined as RP2D. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 19.6% (95% CI, 10.2-37.5%). In the triple-negative subgroup, DCR at 8 weeks was 38.5%, with median PFS of 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.8-NA) in those who achieved response at 8 weeks (n = 5). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were aspartate aminotransferase increase (8.9%) and γ-glutamyltransferase increase (8.9%). By biomarker analysis, patients with moderate AR expression of IHC (26%-75%), PIK3CA pathogenic mutations, or60 ng/ml cell-free DNA yield showed longer PFS.Proxalutamide showed promising anti-tumour activity with good tolerability in patients with heavily pretreated ARThis clinical study was prospectively registered at chinadrugtrials.org.cn (Identifier: CTR20170757) and clinical trials.gov (Identifier: NCT04103853).

Primers used for validating somatic SNVs

Primers used for SV validation experiments

Somatic mutations validated by Sanger sequencing

Summary of the WGS mapping data

Summary of demographic and clinical data for 15 sequenced cancer cases.

Gastric cancer and esophageal cancer are the second and sixth leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Multiple genomic alterations underlying gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have been identified, but the full spectrum of genomic structural variations and mutations have yet to be uncovered. Here, we report the results of whole-genome sequencing of 30 samples comprising tumor and blood from 15 patients, four of whom presented with ESCC, seven with gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), and four with gastric noncardia adenocarcinoma. Analyses revealed that an A>C mutation was common in GCA, and in addition to the preferential nucleotide sequence of A located 5 prime to the mutation as noted in previous studies, we found enrichment of T in the 5 prime base. The A>C mutations in GCA suggested that oxidation of guanine may be a potential mechanism underlying cancer mutagenesis. Furthermore, we identified genes with mutations in gastric cancer and ESCC, including well-known cancer genes, TP53, JAK3, BRCA2, FGF2, FBXW7, MSH3, PTCH, NF1, ERBB2, and CHEK2, and potentially novel cancer-associated genes, KISS1R, AMH, MNX1, WNK2, and PRKRIR. Finally, we identified recurrent chromosome alterations in at least 30% of tumors in genes, including MACROD2, FHIT, and PARK2 that were often intragenic deletions. These structural alterations were validated using the The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Our studies provide new insights into understanding the genomic landscape, genome instability, and mutation profile underlying gastric cancer and ESCC development. Cancer Res; 76(7); 1714–23. ©2016 AACR.

Summary of somatic SVs

It has legends for the supplementary tables.

Summary of agreement between SNP5 and CGI data

IVA disease analysis report

Objective To explore the applications of 3-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) double-volume reconstruction technique (DVRT) in endovascular embolization for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm. Methods A cohort of 112 patients with a total of 127 intracranial aneurysms admitted to the neurosurgery department from June 2018 to October 2019 were selected. Cerebrovascular angiographies were performed after admission. Patients were divided into observation group (56 of 112) and control group (56 of 112) randomly when endovascular embolization was performed. Individuals in the control group were treated with 2D-DSA technique, and patients in the observation group were treated with 3D-DSA DVRT. The Raymond method was used to determine the degree of embolism. Results There was no significant difference in sex, blood pressure, cerebral atherosclerosis, aneurysm site or size, contrast agent dosage, x-ray dose, or surgical cost between the 2 groups. There was no postoperative recurrence in the observation group. However, the recurrence rate in the control group is 10.7% (6 of 56). Postoperative thrombosis occurred in 1 case (1 of 56, 1.8%) in the observation group and 7 cases (7 of 56, 12.5%) in the control group. No postoperative cerebral infarction was recorded in the observation group, while 5 cases (8.9%, 5 of 56) in the control group presented with postoperative cerebral infarction. Conclusions 3D-DVRT for intracranial aneurysm embolization provides the best working angle, clearly shows the process of aneurysm embolization and its relationship with peripheral vessels, and reduces the occurrence of surgical complications including postoperative recurrence, thrombosis, and cerebral infarction.

Purpose To evaluate GT0918, a 2nd-generation AR antagonist, for its AR down-regulation activity among breast cancer patients. Methods The effect of GT0918 on AR protein expression was evaluated in AR expression breast cancer cells and in breast cancer xenograft model. A 3 + 3 phase I dose-escalation study was launched in Peking University Cancer Hospital. The endpoints included dose finding, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Results GT0918 was demonstrated to effectively suppress the expression of AR protein and the growth of AR-positive breast cancer tumors in mouse xenograft tumor models. All patients treated with GT0918 were at a QD dose-escalation of five dose levels from 100 to 500 mg. The most common treatment-related AEs of any grade were asthenia, anemia, decreased appetite, increased blood cholesterol, increased blood triglycerides, decreased white blood cell count, and increased low-density lipoprotein. Grade 3 AEs were fatigue (2 of 18, 11.1%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (1 of 18, 5.6%), alanine aminotransferase increase (1 of 18, 5.6%), and neutrophil count decrease (1 of 18, 5.6%). Clinical benefit rate (CBR) in 16 weeks was 23.1% (3/13). Among 7 AR-positive patients, 6 can evaluate efficacy, and 2 completed 23.5- and 25-cycle treatment, respectively (as of 2020/1/20). PK parameters showed a fast absorption profile of GT0918 in the single-dose study. GT0918 and its major metabolite reached steady-state serum concentration levels at day 21 after multiple dosing. Conclusion GT0918 can effectively inhibit AR-positive breast cancer tumor growth. GT0918 was demonstrated well tolerated with a favorable PK profile. The suitable dose of GT0918 was 500 mg QD and may provide clinical benefits for AR-positive mBC.

To explore the efficacy and safety of palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in advanced breast cancer (ABC). We conducted a retrospective study involving patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC who received palbociclib combined with ET in the first- to third-line at three centers in China between January 2018 and October 2020. A total of 151 patients were included in this study. The median age of the patients at palbociclib initiation was 56 years (range 30-86 years) with a median follow-up of 10.9 months (range 2.0-41.2 months). Among these patients, 88 patients received palbociclib combined with ET as first-line therapy, and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 19.8 months and an objective response rate (ORR) of 40.9%, meanwhile, in the first-line setting, 62 patients received palbociclib at an initial dose of 125 mg, achieving a mPFS of 20.9 months and an ORR of 46.8%. There were 39 and 24 patients who received palbociclib combined with ET as second- and third-line therapy, the mPFS were 10.0 months and 6.1 months, respectively. The most common and serious adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia and neutropenia. A total of 64 patients (42.4%) underwent palbociclib dose reduction due to AEs. Palbociclib combined with ET is an effective therapeutic regimen for HR+/HER2- ABC, particularly in the first-line setting with palbociclib initial dose of 125 mg, and AEs were manageable.

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) count have prognostic role for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). No clear biomarkers can guide selection of chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET) in 1st-line setting of hormone-receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HRWe consecutively collected the data of 53 HRThe median CTC count of the 53 patients was 2 (range, 0-18). The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients in the CTC count2 group and the CTC count ≥2 group were similar. The patients with a CTC count2 had a significantly longer PFS than those with a CTC count ≥2 (P=0.005, hazard ratio =4.138, 12.1The present study showed that CTC count determined by the Pep@MNP system confirmed the prognostic value in the HR

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer (BC) may develop locoregional recurrence alone or with distant metastases. Results of previous studies discussing the benefit of local surgery among patients with chest wall disease were controversial. Whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence survival outcome is still a question. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrence involving the chest wall who did or did not undergo surgical reduction after previous treatment of the primary BC to explore the role of surgical reduction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed BC patients with chest wall as the first recurrent/metastatic site selected between January 2012 and December 2018 to explore whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence OS. Clinicopathological data, including age at initial diagnosis, TNM stage, the pathological parameters, and treatment were recorded and analyzed. OS was primarily described using the Kaplan-Meier estimator for each group, with the statistical significance between groups being tested by the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 22–73 years) were analyzed. Chest wall as the only site of recurrence occurred in 139 patients (70.2%), and the other 59 (29.8%) patients had other metastatic sites. There were 88 patients who underwent surgical reduction for chest wall recurrence. The median OS was significantly longer for the patients who had chest wall disease reduction than for those who did not {194.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 140.4–247.9 months] vs. 102.7 months (95% CI: 79.7–125.7 months), respectively, P=0.001}. From multivariate analysis, surgical reduction was an independent factor significantly influenced OS (HR =0.52, 95% CI: 0.33–0.81, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses showed that OS was statistically longer in the chest wall disease surgical reduction group than in the no reduction group with respect to hormone receptor (HR) negative (−), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (−), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), disease-free survival (DFS) >24 months, and chest wall disease only. CONCLUSIONS: BC patients with chest wall recurrence could benefit from surgical reduction with a prolonged OS. In a certain selected group, surgical reduction may be warranted.

Background: Androgen receptor (AR) blocker has become an increased interest in the treatment of BC, in which about 60-80% patients showed AR positive. However, currently no AR blocker has been approved in mBC. GT0918 is a new chemical entity of AR blocker with possible AR down-regulation. This study is an open-label, single-center, dose escalation phase I trial to assess GT0918 in mBC female patients who have progressed after systemic treatments in China. The primary objectives are to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The secondary objectives are to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GT0918 with single and multiple dosage applications. (CTR20170757) Methods: Patients (pts) with historically confirmed mBC who had progressed after either chemotherapy, hormonal or targeted therapy, or could not tolerate currently standard therapies were eligible. With the starting dose at 100 mg of GT0918, the decision of dose escalation in the 3+3 design was based on the safety and tolerability assessments. GT0918 was administered orally once, followed by a 7-day off-treatment period for single dose PK analysis of drug elimination. Then GT0918 oral administration was resumed once daily for 28 consecutive days and multiple dose PK analysis was assessed at the end of first cycle (28 days). The first 28-days on treatment (cycle 1) was defined as DLT period. Pts manifesting an objective response or stable disease and likely to have clinical benefit from continued treatment were continued on GT0918 thereafter until they experienced one of following events of intolerable toxicities, disease progression or withdrew consent. Results: 18 pts were enrolled and treated with GT0918 since 9/6/2017 as defined in protocol at five dose levels: 100 mg (n = 3), 200 mg (n = 4), 300 mg (n = 4), 400 mg (n = 4) and 500 mg (n = 3) (as to 7/2/2019). All pts progressed more than two lines of therapies with 83.3% (15/18) pts were treated ≥3rd lines. Out of 6 confirmed AR positive pts, two (33.3%) at 300 mg cohort had finished 17 and 19 cycles individually and continue treatment (as 7/2/19). No DLT was observed and MTD has not been reached. GT0918 related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2 as per CTCAE v4.03, including fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypercholesterolemia, increased LDL, nausea, loss of appetite, increased ALT, increase of weight loss, constipation and thrombocytopenia. PK profile analysis showed that in the single-dose study, GT0918 showed a fast absorption profile. In the multiple-dose study, the steady-state serum concentration level of GT0918 and its main metabolite were attained at 21 days. Conclusions: Proxalutamide (GT0918) administrated orally once a day is well tolerated in late-stage pts. No DLT has occurred at maximum dose 500 mg. Pts with AR positive biomarker could have better clinical outcomes with GT0918 treatment. GT0918 and its main metabolite exhibited a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile over the dose range from 100mg to 500 mg. An expanded/phase Ib in AR positive mBC pts has launched in China to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and safety of GT0918. 200 mg and 300 mg were selected for dose expansion. Citation Format: Huiping Li, Ran Ran, Guohong Song, Hanfang Jiang, Ruyan Zhang, Yaxin Liu, Luping Meng, Phoebe Zhang, Ke Chen, Qiaoxia Zhou, Karl Zhou, Youzhi Tong. Evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of proxalutamide (GT0918), a potent androgen receptor (AR) blocker, in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC): Phase I dose escalation trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-17-05.

Background: Angiogenesis is a key mechanism of tumour growth. Apatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and blocks downstream signalling and inhibiting tumour angiogenesis. It was approved in China to treat gastric cancer in October 2014. However, as breast cancer with a chest wall metastasis (CWM) has rich vascular distribution, whether Apatinib is also effective for breast cancer with a chest wall metastasis remains unknown. Therefore, we designed this clinical study to address this question. Method: The trial involved four centres in China from September 2016 to July 2019. It enrolled patients (pts) who were diagnosed of HER2 negative breast cancer with CWM and experienced first line or could not afford standard treatment. The patients were given Apatinib 500mg/day (single or combined with endocrine therapy if hormone receptor positive (HR+)) until progression or side effect not tolerated. Each patient had at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1.This study was approved by ethics committee at the Ethics Committee of Beijing Cancer Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent. The trial was also Register to clinicaltrial.gov ( NCT02878057). Results: 30 pts were enrolled in the study with a median age of 50 (range 35-69) years old. Among the 30 pts, there were 23 ER positive pts (76.7%). 17 pts (56.7%) had more than 2 sites of metastasis, and 5 pts had invasive metastasis (16.6%). 15 pts (50%) were multi pre-treated. The response of 19 pts (63.3%) could be evaluated, and the overall response rate was 57.9% (no CR, 11 cases reached PR, 2 in HR-, 9 in HR+). and the median PFS was 8.6 months (range 0.5-29.5; 95% CI 0.0-18.7). The tumour in chest wall shrunk obviously. Side effects also existed. 15 pts (50%) had hypertension (grade 3: 6.7%); 10 pts (33.3%) had proteinuria (grade 3: 20%); 4 pts (13.3%) had fatigue (grade 3: 3.3%); 3 pts (10%) had bilirubin increase (grade 3: 6.7%). 8 pts discontinued the treatment due to side effects and 3 due to personal reasons. The Apatinib dose was reduced from 500mg to 250mg for most pts 18/30 (60%), and some pts took 500 mg and 250 mg every other day 10/30 (33.3). Conclusion: Apatinib was effective for pts with chest wall metastasis and pts could benefit from longer PFS. However, the side effects should be pay more attention from start on apatinib treatment. Citation Format: Huiping Li, Cuizhi Geng, Guohong Song, Hanfang Jiang, Zhongshen Tong, Junlan Yang, Ran Ran, Ruyan Zhang, Yaxin Liu, Xinyu Gui, Maorong Wei, Lu Xue. Apatinib in the treatment of HER-2 negative advanced breast cancer with chest wall metastasis multicenter phase II clinical study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-40.

Background: Fulvestrant 500mg has been proved better efficacy in breast cancer with hormone receptor positive (HR+),and then become an optional strategy for primary or second line treatment of HR+ positive metastasis breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this real world study, we retrospectively analyzed the patients with HR+ HER 2 negative MBC who received fulvestrant 500mg treatment at Beijing cancer hospital during January 2015 to December 2018. Clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were investigated. Results: There were 306 patients enrolled, median age was 48.7(range 20-75) years, median line of fulvestrant was 2.11(range 1-6), 68.3%(209/306) patients were involved with visceral metastasis. The CBR was 68.6%, median PFS was 8.41m (95%CI: 7.079m-9.743m, range 0.89m-80.16m). Among the patients received fulvestrant at the first line, the PFS was 10.55m(95%CI:6.46m-14.64m, range 0.92m-34.3m). The median OS hasn’t been obtained. In subgroup analysis, the patients without liver metastasis(12.49m vs. 4.60m, p4, 12.65m vs. 7.72m vs. 3.98m respectively, p2 lines, 14.06m vs. 7.79m vs. 3.52m respectively, p Conclusions: Fulvestrant was an effective and safe regimen in endocrine therapy for hormone receptor positive HER2 negative MBC. The patients who were in first line treatment, absence of liver metastasis and small tumor burden might be more benefit from fulvestrant. Corresponding authors: Huiping Li, huipingli2012@hotmail.com; Guohong Song, songguohong918@hotmail.com, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100142, China Citation Format: Wen Lei, Huiping Li, Guohong Song, Ruyan Zhang, Ran Ran, Ying Yan. Efficacy observation of 306 patients with fulvestrant 500mg treatment in hormone-receptor positive HER2 negative metastasis breast cancer, a real world study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-20.

Objective To compare the efficacy of platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens as first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the relationship between their efficacy and BRCA gene status. Methods Retrospectively analyze clinical data of 220 patients diagnosed pathologically with advanced TNBC and treated at the Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2013 to 2018 and evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy. A total of 114 patients had BRCA1/2 gene tested by next generation sequencing (NGS) using peripheral blood, and we analyzed the correlation between their efficacy and BRCA1/2 gene status. Results Non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPCT) was administered to 129 and platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) to 91 study patients. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were not statistically different between NPCT and PBCT groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 and 22.5 months for PBCT and NPCT group, respectively [P=0.090, hazard ratios (HR)=0.703]. BRCA status was assessed in 114 patients, 14 of whom had deleterious germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) mutations (seven in each group). In PBCT group, the CBR was 85.7% and 35.1% for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.039). The median PFS were 14.9 and 5.3 months and median OS were 26.5 and 15.5 months for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.001, P=0.161, respectively). Patients in PBCT group had significantly greater rates of grade 3-4 anemia (5.5%vs. 0%) and thrombocytopenia (8.8% vs. 0%), whereas palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12.4% vs. 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (8.6% vs. 1.1%) occurred more frequently in NPCT group. Conclusions Platinum-based regimens are more effective in patients with deleterious gBRCA mutations, but no difference in patients without BRCA gene mutations, so non-platinum is an option in patients without BRCA gene mutations considering the toxicity and side effect. And we recommend that patients with advanced TNBC should have BRCA gene test.

Objective Fluzoparib (SHR3162) is a novel, potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP)1, 2 inhibitor that showed anti-tumor activity in xenograft models. We conducted a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion (D-Esc and D-Ex) trial in patients with advanced solid cancer. Methods This was a 3+3 phase I D-Esc trial with a 3-level D-Ex at 5 hospitals in China. Eligible patients for D-Esc had advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies, and D-Ex enrolled patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Fluzoparib was administered orally once or twice daily (bid) at 11 dose levels from 10 to 400 mg/d. Endpoints included dose-finding, safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Results Seventy-nine patients were enrolled from March, 2015 to January, 2018 [OC (47, 59.5%); breast cancer (BC) (16, 20.3%); colorectal cancer (8, 10.1%), other tumors (8, 10.1%)]; 48 patients were treated in the D-Esc arm and 31 in the D-Ex arm. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 150 mg bid, with a half-life of 9.14 h. Grade 3/4 adverse events included anemia (7.6%) and neutropenia (5.1%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 30% (3/10) in patients with platinum-sensitive OC and 7.7% (1/13) in patients with BC. Among patients treated with fluzoparib ≥120 mg/d, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.2 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.8-9.3] months in OC, 9.3 (95% CI, 7.2-9.3) months in platinum-sensitive OC, and 3.5 (range, 2.0-28.0) months in BC. In patients with germline BC susceptibility gene mutation (gBRCA Mut) (11/43 OC; 2/16 BC), mPFS was 8.9 months for OC (range, 1.0-23.2; 95% CI, 1.0-16.8) and 14 and 28 months for BC (those two patients both also had somaticBRCA Mut). Conclusions The MTD of fluzoparib was 150 mg bid in advanced solid malignancies. Fluzoparib demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity in BC and OC, particularly in BRCA Mut and platinum-sensitive OC.

Background: Fulvestrant 500mg has proved its clinical effectiveness in previous trials as primary or second line treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2˗) post-menopausal advanced breast cancer. This real-world study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Fulvestrant in HR+/HER2˗ Chinese advanced breast cancer patients. Method: HR+/HER2˗ advanced breast cancer patients who received Fulvestrant 500mg from January 2015 to December 2018 in Beijing Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. Progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) of Fulvestrant were investigated. Result: In total 303 enrolled patients [median age was 51 years (range: 21-82)], 255 (84.2%) patients were at postmenopausal status at the start of Fulvestrant treatment and 264 patients (87.1%) had advanced breast cancer. The median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 14.1 months (10.1-18.0) for the first-line, 11.2 months (2.2-20.3) for the second-line and 6.7 months (4.8-8.5) for ≥third-line of Fulvestrant. The ORR and CBR were 3.8% and 86.8% for the first-line, 5.5% and 75.4% for the second-line, 1.1% and 61.1% for ≥third-line of Fulvestrant. The multivariate subgroup analyses showed, PFS was significantly longer for the patients with light tumor burden, less palliative chemotherapy before Fulvestrant and long disease-free interval. For patients receiving Fulvestrant after palliative chemotherapy, the median PFS was numerically greater in maintenance treatment group than those who progressed after chemotherapy. Only 5.0% of patients (15/303) experienced adverse events and majority were grade 1-2. The most common adverse event was headache and palpitation, with merely one patient had severe adverse event (pulmonary embolism). Conclusion: Fulvestrant is an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment regimen in endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2˗ metastatic breast cancer. Light tumor burden, less palliative chemotherapy before Fulvestrant and long disease-free survival (DFS) might be the ideal condition of Fulvestrant treatment. Fulvestrant can be effective for premenopausal patients with drug-induced menopause. Patients of different luminal subtypes can benefit from Fulvestrant. For patients with visceral metastases, presence of liver metastases rather than lung metastases was poor prognostic factor. Fulvestrant may also be considered as a maintenance treatment after first-line palliative chemotherapy.

Purpose To construct, validate and preclinically evaluate a novel HER2 target agent Al18F-AEEA-HER2-BCH affibody (Al18F-HER2-BCH), and perform a pilot clinical translational study in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Methods In preclinical study, the HER2 target specificity were verified using HER2-positive and HER2-negative cells and mice models. In clinical study, we enrolled 14 HER2-positive breast cancer patients (7 newly diagnosed patients and 7 relapsing metastatic patients) and one HER2-negative breast cancer patients. The safety were observed and lesion detection ability was compared with 18F-FDG in 14 HER2-positive breast cancer patients (NCT04547309). All patients injected with 222±18.5 MBq Al18F-HER2-BCH and scanned at 2 h and 4 h, and received standard 18F-FDG PET/CT scan within 7 d. Results In preclinical study, the Kd value of Al18F-HER2-BCH was 25.5±2.53 nM. Micro-PET imaging of Al18F-HER2-BCH showed significantly higher tumor uptake in HER2-positive NCI-N87 models than in HER2-negative MDA-MB-231 models (12.2±1.08 ID%/g vs 1.25 ± 0.25 ID%/g, p < 0.0001). In clinical study, for the 7 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, Al18F-HER2-BCH depicted more primary lesions than 18F-FDG (9 vs 6), with higher tumor/breast (T/B) ratio (17.9±13.2 vs 5.4±3.4, p18F-HER2-BCH detected more metastatic lymph nodes than 18F-FDG (20 vs 7) with higher uptake (SUVmax, 6.42±3.84 vs 5.1±1.06). For the 7 relapsed metastatic patients, Al18F-HER2-BCH presented better metastases detection ability than 18F-FDG (93 vs 45), especially lymph node (39 vs 23), bone (39 vs 21), and liver metastases (30 vs 3). Compared with 18F-FDG, Al18F-HER2-BCH upstaged 5/7 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and detected more distant metastases in 4/7 relapsed patients.Conclusions The findings described here demonstrated that Al18F-HER2-BCH had high affinity and target specificity, and it was feasible to detect HER2-positive lesions in primary and metastatic breast cancer patients.

Penetrating brain injury (PBI) is a rare trauma that presents as a difficult and serious surgical emergency for neurosurgeons in clinical practice. Our patient was admitted with a PBI caused by a tire explosion, which is an extremely rare cause of injury.We report a case of a 28-year-old male patient who suffered a PBI when a tire exploded while it was being inflated with a high-pressure air pump.The patient was diagnosed with PBI presenting with multiple comminuted skull fractures, massive bone fragments with foreign bodies penetrating the underlying brain tissue of the top right frontal bone, multiple cerebral contusions, and intracranial hematoma.Emergency combined multidisciplinary surgery was performed for the removal of the fragmented bone pieces, hematoma, and foreign bodies; decompression of the debridement flap; reconstruction of the anterior skull base; and repair of the dura mater.The patient was successfully resuscitated and discharged 1 month later and is now recovering well.Patients with PBI are critically ill. Therefore, timely, targeted examinations and appropriate multidisciplinary interventions through a green channel play a key role in assessing the condition, developing protocols, and preventing complications.

ImportanceUnderstanding the detailed symptom spectrum of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) could facilitate shared decision-making and promote early intervention.ObjectiveTo compare the symptom spectrum of patient-reported CIPN associated with nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, and docetaxel treatments among patients with breast cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at 9 medical centers across China from 2019 to 2021. Participants included hospitalized women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, assessed with overlap propensity score weighting. Data were analyzed from from December 2021 to May 2022.ExposuresTreatment with nab-paclitaxel–, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based regimens.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPatient-reported CIPN on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire: CIPN 20-item instruments, consisting of sensory, motor, and autonomic scales. Multiple regression models were adjusted for baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.ResultsOf 1234 participants, the mean (SD) age was 50.9 (10.4) years, and 295 patients (23.9%) received nab-paclitaxel, 514 patients (41.7%) received paclitaxel, and 425 patients (34.4%) received docetaxel. The nab-paclitaxel group mostly reported numbness in hands or feet related to sensory symptoms (83 patients [81.4%]), while the paclitaxel and docetaxel groups reported mainly motor (eg, weakness in legs: 60 patients [47.2%] in the paclitaxel group; 52 patients [44.4%] in the docetaxel group) and autonomic (eg, blurred vision: 58 patients [45.7%] in the paclitaxel group; 51 patients [43.6%] in the docetaxel group) symptoms. Patients reported motor symptoms earlier than sensory abnormalities, with a median of 0.4 (95% CI, 0.4-2.3) weeks in the nab-paclitaxel group, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-3.4) weeks in the paclitaxel group, and 5.6 (95% CI, 3.1-6.1) weeks in the docetaxel group. After overlap propensity score weighting and compared with the nab-paclitaxel group, the risks of patient-reported CIPN were lower in the paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41-0.87]; P = .008) and the docetaxel (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.45-0.94]; P = .02) groups. Similarly, patients who received paclitaxel (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.64]; P P P = .15; docetaxel: HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.47-1.01]; P = .05) and/or autonomic (paclitaxel: HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.68-1.49]; P = .98; docetaxel: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.59-1.30]; P = .52) symptoms was not lower than that in the nab-paclitaxel group.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of women with invasive breast cancer, nab-paclitaxel was associated with more severe CIPN than either paclitaxel or docetaxel. In addition to sensory symptoms, the risk of motor and autonomic abnormalities was not low among these 3 taxanes, and patients-reported motor symptoms even earlier than sensory symptoms. These findings may facilitate early detection and intervention for CIPN in taxane treatments for breast cancer.

Objective Breast cancer (BC) with chest wall metastasis (CWM) usually shows rich neovascularization. This trial explored the clinical effect of apatinib on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced BC involving CWM. Methods This trial involved four centers in China and was conducted from September 2016 to March 2020. Patients received apatinib 500 mg/d [either alone or with endocrine therapy if hormone receptor-positive (HR+)] until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Results We evaluated 26 patients for efficacy. The median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 [range: 2.0-28.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.1-8.3] months and 18 (range: 3-55; 95% CI: 12.9-23.1) months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 42.3% (11/26), and the disease-control rate was 76.9% (20/26). In the subgroup analysis, HR+ patients compared with HR-negative patients had significantly improved mPFS of 7.0 (95% CI: 2.2-11.8) monthsvs. 2.3 (95% CI: 1.2-3.4) months, respectively (P=0.001); and mPFS in patients without or with chest wall radiotherapy was 6.4 (95% CI: 1.6-19.5) monthsvs. 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3-4.6) months, respectively (P=0.041). In the multivariate analysis, HR+ status was the only independent predictive factor for favorable PFS (P=0.014). Conclusions Apatinib was highly effective for BC patients with CWM, especially when combined with endocrine therapy. PFS improved significantly in patients with HR+ status who did not receive chest wall radiotherapy. However, adverse events were serious and should be carefully monitored from the beginning of apatinib treatment.

e13050 Background: This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different nab-paclitaxel dose schedule in patients with HER-2 negative recurrent/metastatic breast cancer in order to find a more suitable treatment option for Chinese patients. Methods: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized, phase II trial. Eligible female patients with HER-2 negative recurrent/metastatic breast cancer and up to 2 lines of prior chemotherapy regardless of any endocrine therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, every 21 days, 3-week group) or nab-paclitaxel (125mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, 15, every 28 days, 4-week group) until progressive disease or completion of 6-8 cycles of treatment. After completing 6-8 cycles, if the efficacy evaluation is CR, PR or SD, the investigator can decide whether to carry out maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are ORR, OS and safety. Results: Between March 2019 and July 2021, 104 patients with HER-2 negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to treatment (3-week group, n = 51; 4-week group, n = 53). Median follow-up was 16.4 and 15.8 months. In the 3-week and 4-week groups, respectively, 39 (76.5%) and 42 (79.2%) patients had HR positive disease and 37 (72.5%) and 43 (81.1%) patients had visceral metastasis. In two groups, respectively, 30 (58.8%) and 20 (37.7%) patients didn’t receive prior endocrine therapy. 20 (39.2%) and 32 (60.4%) patients had received 1 to 3 lines of prior endocrine therapy. 30 (58.8%) patients of 3-week group and 30 (56.6%) patients of 4-week group were enrolled at first-line chemotherapy, and 13 (25.5%) of 3-week group patients and 16 (30.2%) patients of 4-week group were enrolled at second-line chemotherapy, as third-line chemotherapy there were only 8 (15.7%) in 3-week group and 7 (13.2%) in 4-week group. Among all patients, 33 (64.7%) in the 3-week group and 16 (30.2%) in the 4-week group had received 6-8 cycles according to the regimen of study, and 32 (97.0%) of 3-week group and 15 (93.8%) of 4-week group patients who finished the regimen choose to receive maintenance treatment (endocrine or chemotherapy).In two groups, respectively, median PFS was 9.6 months and 7.5 months (HR 0.905; 95%CI 0.569-1.440) and ORR were 50.0% (23/46) and 46.9% (23/49) in the evaluable population. Median OS was 22.5 months in the 3-week group and has not yet been reached for the 4-week group. According to NCI-CTCAE V5.0, 3-week group vs 4-week group respectively, the grade 3-4 adverse events (≥2 patients) were neutropenia (13.7% vs 34.0%), leukopenia (7.8% vs 17.0%) and peripheral neurotoxicity (0 vs 3.8%). Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that compared with the 4-week regimen, the 3-week regimen of nab-paclitaxel seems to be more suitable and adaptable for Chinese patients with advanced breast cancer. This study is still in follow-up and updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04192331.

Background The role of peripheral blood lymphocyte (pBL) in breast cancer has long been studied. However, the predictive role of pBL in advanced breast cancer (ABC) is poorly understood. Methods A total of 303 patients with ABC were consecutively recruited at our center between January 2015 and September 2019. At baseline, pBL subtypes were detected in all patients with 229 blood samples available for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection. pBL was analyzed through flow cytometry. ctDNA-based gene mutations were detected using next generation sequencing. The cutoff value of pCTL was estimated by X-tile software. Progression free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox hazard proportion regression model, with difference detection by log-rank test. Results Median follow-up time of the study was 21.0 months. The median age of diagnosis was 52.0 years. Among the pBL subtypes, only pCTL level was found predictive for PFS in the HER2+ patients whom received anti-HER2 therapy (13.1 vs. 5.6 months, P = 0.001). However, the predictive role of pCTL was not found in HR-positive (P = 0.716) and TNBC (P = 0.202). pCTL high associated with suppressive immune indictors including lower CD4/CD8 ratio (P = 0.004) and high level of Treg cell (P = 0.004). High occurrence of FGFR1 amplification which has been reported as immune suppressor was also found in HER2+ patients with pCTL high (22.2% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.048). Conclusions Higher pCTLs level associated with shorter PFS and FGFR1 mutation in HER2+ ABC patients., Highlights • High pCTL level predicts shorter first-line PFS in HER2+ patients receiving anti-HER2 based regimens. • The predictive role of pCTL level found in HER2+ patients was not applicable in HR+ and TNBC patients. • High level of pCTL was associated with immunosuppressive status and FGFR1 mutations in HER2+ breast cancer patients.

Objective To compare the efficacy of platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens as first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the relationship between their efficacy and BRCA gene status. Methods Retrospectively analyze clinical data of 220 patients diagnosed pathologically with advanced TNBC and treated at the Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2013 to 2018 and evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy. A total of 114 patients had BRCA1/2 gene tested by next generation sequencing (NGS) using peripheral blood, and we analyzed the correlation between their efficacy and BRCA1/2 gene status. Results Non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPCT) was administered to 129 and platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) to 91 study patients. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were not statistically different between NPCT and PBCT groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 and 22.5 months for PBCT and NPCT group, respectively [P=0.090, hazard ratios (HR)=0.703]. BRCA status was assessed in 114 patients, 14 of whom had deleterious germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) mutations (seven in each group). In PBCT group, the CBR was 85.7% and 35.1% for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.039). The median PFS were 14.9 and 5.3 months and median OS were 26.5 and 15.5 months for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.001, P=0.161, respectively). Patients in PBCT group had significantly greater rates of grade 3−4 anemia (5.5%vs. 0%) and thrombocytopenia (8.8% vs. 0%), whereas palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12.4% vs. 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (8.6% vs. 1.1%) occurred more frequently in NPCT group. Conclusions Platinum-based regimens are more effective in patients with deleterious gBRCA mutations, but no difference in patients without BRCA gene mutations, so non-platinum is an option in patients without BRCA gene mutations considering the toxicity and side effect. And we recommend that patients with advanced TNBC should have BRCA gene test.

Background: More than 30% of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers are resistant to primary hormone therapy, and about 40% that initially respond to hormone therapy eventually acquire resistance. Although the mechanisms of hormone therapy resistance remain unclear, aberrant DNA methylation has been implicated in oncogenesis and drug resistance. Purpose: We investigated the relationship between methylome variations in circulating tumor DNA and exemestane resistance, to track hormone therapy efficacy. Methods: We prospectively recruited 16 patients who were receiving first-line therapy in our center. All patients received exemestane-based hormone therapy after enrollment. We collected blood samples at baseline, first follow-up (after 2 therapeutic cycles) and at detection of disease progression. Disease that progressed within 6 months under exemestane treatment was considered exemestane resistance but was considered relatively exemestane-sensitive otherwise. We obtained circulating tumor DNA-derived methylomes using the whole-genome bisulfide sequencing method. Methylation calling was done by BISMARK software; differentially methylated regions for exemestane resistance were calculated afterward. Results: Median follow-up for the 16 patients was 19.0 months. We found 7 exemestane resistance-related differentially methylated regions, located in different chromosomes, with both significantly different methylation density and methylation ratio. Baseline methylation density and methylation ratio of chromosome 6 [32400000-32599999] were both high in exemestane resistance. High baseline methylation ratios of chromosome 3 [67800000-67999999] ( P = .013), chromosome 3 [140200000-140399999] ( P = .037), and chromosome 12 [101200000-101399999] ( P = .026) could also predict exemestane resistance. During exemestane treatment, synchronized changes in methylation density and methylation ratio in chromosome 6 [32400000-32599999] could accurately stratify patients in terms of progression-free survival ( P = .000033). Cutoff values of methylation density and methylation ratio for chromosome 6 [149600000-149799999] were 0.066 and 0.076, respectively. Conclusion: Methylation change in chromosome 6 [149600000-149799999] is an ideal predictor of exemestane resistance with great clinical potential.

Aim We aimed to clarify tumor features and prognosis of pregnancy‐associated breast cancer (PABC) among Chinese women. Methods PABC was defined as breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or within a year after delivery. Patients with PABC were selected from breast cancer cases of women ≤45 years treated at our institution between December 2012 and December 2017, and one non‐PABC control was matched for stage, age, and year of diagnosis for each case. Results Forty‐one women with PABC were identified (22 diagnosed during pregnancy and 19 within 1 year of delivery). There were significantly more progesterone receptor (PR)‐ and triple‐negative tumors in the PABC (56.1% and 24.4%, respectively) than in the non‐PABC group (31.7% and 4.9%, respectively) (P = .045 and .026, respectively). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity was the same in both groups (31.7%). Median disease‐free survival (DFS) was 29.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5‐51.5 months) in the PABC and 40.9 months (95% CI, 22.8‐58.8 months) in the non‐PABC group (P = .167). Median overall survival (OS) was 82.8 months in the PABC (95% CI, 39.3‐126.5 months) versus 80.1 months (95% CI, 56.7‐103.6 months) in the non‐PABC group (P = .131). Conclusion Histological features were similar in both groups, except that PR‐ and triple‐negative tumors were more frequent in the PABC group. Survival analyses show similar OS for patients with PABC and non‐PABC. DFS tended to be shorter in the PABC group; however, this difference was not statistically significant., After matching PABC cases with non‐PABC cases for stage and age (±1 year), as well as year of diagnosis secondarily (±1 year),on survival analysis, the median DFS tended to be shorter in women with PABC than in non‐PABC; however, this difference was not statistically significant and the median OS of the two groups were almost the same.