Search

Abstract Introduction Cancer remains a leading cause of death globally, with patients frequently experiencing malnutrition due to both the disease and its treatment, which negatively affects their quality of life and treatment outcomes. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) provide a noninvasive solution to improve nutritional status, but poor patient adherence limits their effectiveness. Studies on ONS adherence vary in their definitions and assessment tools, creating inconsistencies. A scoping review is essential to synthesize these studies and establish a foundation for future research and clinical practice. Method We systematically searched six databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, up to August 2024. Our criteria focused on oncology patients, ONS interventions, and outcomes related to adherence definitions, assessment methods, and adherence rates. Results 37 studies from 2005 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Definitions of ONS adherence and assessment methods vary widely, with the most common definition being the ratio of actual intake to the recommended amount. The assessment tools included self-reported ONS diaries, and MMAS scores, among others. Adherence rates also vary significantly, with some studies reporting a decline in adherence over time. Conclusion The lack of standardized definitions and assessment methods for ONS adherence across studies hinders comparability. Future research should focus on developing standardized, comprehensive adherence assessment tools that incorporate both quantitative and qualitative data. This would allow for a better understanding of adherence factors and enable more targeted interventions to improve long-term adherence in cancer patients.

Objective: To find a viable alternative to reduce the number of doses required for the patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and to improve efficacy and patient compliance. Methods: In this study, we used ginger oil, a phytochemical with potential therapeutic properties, to prepare ginger oil patches. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to quantify the main active component of ginger oil, 6-gingerol. Transdermal absorption experiments were conducted to optimize the various pressure-sensitive adhesives and permeation enhancers, including their type and concentration. Subsequently, the ginger oil patches were optimized and subjected to content determination and property evaluations. A PTSD mouse model was established using the foot-shock method. The therapeutic effect of ginger oil patches on PTSD was assessed through pathological sections, behavioral tests, and the evaluation of biomarkers such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and melatonin (MT). Results: The results demonstrated that ginger oil patches exerted therapeutic effects against PTSD by inhibiting inflammatory responses and modulating MT and BDNF levels. Pharmacokinetic experiments revealed that ginger oil patches maintained a stable blood drug concentration for at least one day, addressing the rapid metabolism drawback of 6-gingerol and enhancing its therapeutic efficacy. Conclusions: Ginger oil can be prepared as a transdermal drug patch that meets these requirements, and the bioavailability of the prepared patch is better than that of oral administration. It can improve PTSD with good patient compliance and ease of administration. Therefore, it is a promising therapeutic formulation for the treatment of PTSD.

Objectives To develop a model of in-hospital mortality using medical record front page (MRFP) data and assess its validity in case-mix standardisation by comparison with a model developed using the complete medical record data.Design A nationally representative retrospective study.Setting Representative hospitals in China, covering 161 hospitals in modelling cohort and 156 hospitals in validation cohort.Participants Representative patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction. 8370 patients in modelling cohort and 9704 patients in validation cohort.Primary outcome measures In-hospital mortality, which was defined explicitly as death that occurred during hospitalisation, and the hospital-level risk standardised mortality rate (RSMR).Results A total of 14 variables were included in the model predicting in-hospital mortality based on MRFP data, with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 among modelling cohort and 0.79 among validation cohort. The median of absolute difference between the hospital RSMR predicted by hierarchical generalised linear models established based on MRFP data and complete medical record data, which was built as ‘reference model’, was 0.08% (10th and 90th percentiles: −1.8% and 1.6%). In the regression model comparing the RSMR between two models, the slope and intercept of the regression equation is 0.90 and 0.007 in modelling cohort, while 0.85 and 0.010 in validation cohort, which indicated that the evaluation capability from two models were very similar.Conclusions The models based on MRFP data showed good discrimination and calibration capability, as well as similar risk prediction effect in comparison with the model based on complete medical record data, which proved that MRFP data could be suitable for risk adjustment in hospital performance measurement.