Search

Simple Summary: A study conducted across 19 Italian Radiation Oncology centers examined 41,039 cancer patients undergoing or scheduled for anticancer treatment between February 2020 and May 2021. The study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on treatment schedules and patient outcomes. Among the cohort, 123 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during treatment (group A), and 99 were diagnosed before treatment initiation (group B). The overall COVID-19 incidence was 0.54%, including 0.30% in group A. Severe COVID-19 developed in 60 patients, and 45 died due to the infection (incidence of 0.15% and 0.11%, respectively). Treatment delays or suspensions were common, with 37.4% of group A requiring temporary suspension, 32.5% definitive suspension and 37 patients continuing treatment while positive. In group B, 53.5% faced delays, and 20.2% had definitive suspensions. Most of the patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis in our cohort recovered and completed their treatment; nonetheless, the attributable death rate after confirmed infection was 20.27%. With adequate preventive measures, radiation oncology could continue safely during the pandemic, resulting in a low incidence of severe outcomes and mortality. Methods and materials: Patients with ongoing or planned anticancer treatment at 19 Italian Radiation Oncology centers were included in the study retrospectively from 3 February 2020 to 31 December 2020 and prospectively from 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2021. Anonymized data were processed through a specific website and database. Antineoplastic treatment characteristics and timing and outcomes of COVID-19 and its impact on radiotherapy or systemic therapy were described. Results: The retrieved cohort included 41,039 patients that received treatment or were planned for therapy in the study period. Overall, 123 patients had a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis during antineoplastic treatment (group A) and 99 patients before treatment start (group B). The incidence of COVID-19 across the whole cohort in the index period was 0.54% (groups A + B) and 0.30% considering only group A. A total of 60 patients developed severe COVID-19, and a total of 45 patients died as a consequence of the infection (incidence of 0.15% and 0.11%, respectively). Nonetheless, mortality among COVID-19 patients was high, with an attributable death rate after confirmed infection of 20.27%. Among the 123 patients in group A, 37.4% required temporary treatment suspension, 32.5% definitive suspension and 37 patients continued treatment while positive. As for the 99 patients in group B, 53.5% experienced temporary delay, 20.2% experienced definitive treatment suspension and 26.3% had no delay. Conclusions: Most of the patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis in our cohort recovered and completed their treatment; nonetheless, the attributable death rate after confirmed infection was 20.27%, and mortality was high among cancer patients with severe COVID-19 presentation. The global incidence of death due to COVID-19 or severe COVID-19 was low and decreased over time. Radiation oncology activity could be safely continued during the COVID-19 pandemic with the adoption of adequate preventive measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare malignancy of the head and neck and is a heterogenous tumor both histologically and clinically; its prolonged asymptomatic clinical course often leads to a delayed diagnosis. Moreover, the risk of local and distant recurrence also years after primary treatment is high. In this setting, the ability to stratify patients' prognosis is crucial to better identify patients at risk of recurrence. This article explores a radiomics and clinical model to evaluate the Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) in patients with AdCC. Background/Objectives: Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. This study aims to stratify patients Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) using a combined model of clinical and radiomic features from preoperative MRI. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with primary AdCC who underwent surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Segmentations were manually performed by two head and neck radiologists. Radiomic features were extracted using the 3D Slicer software. Descriptive statistics was performed. A Survival Random Forest model was employed to select which radiological feature predict RFS. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed using clinical, radiological variables or both. Synthetic data augmentation was applied to address the small sample size and improve model robustness. Models were validated on real data and compared using the C-index and Prediction Error Curves (PEC). Results: Three Cox models were developed: one with clinical features (C-index = 0.67), one with radiomic features (C-index = 0.68), and one combining both (C-index = 0.77). The combined clinical-radiomic model had the highest predictive accuracy and outperformed models based on clinical or radiomic features. The combined model also exhibited the lowest mean Brier score in PEC analysis, indicating better predictive performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrate that a combined radiomic-clinical model can predict RFS in AdCC patients. This model may provide clinicians a valuable tool in patient's management and may aid in personalized treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To retrospectively investigate the prognostic role of baseline 18F‐FDG PET/CT in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the paranasal sinuses. Methods: Clinical features and PET/CT semiquantitative parameters of 49 patients were collected. Anova and Kruskall–Wallis tests were used to assess the relationship between these parameters. Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate analysis were performed to search for independent prognostic factors for progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Mean PFS was 29.95 months (SD 29.36) with relapse/progression of disease occurring in 18 patients; mean OS was 33.40 (SD 27.78) months with death occurring in 15 patients. Presence of nodal metastasis (14 subjects) was correlated with standardize uptake value (SUV) max, SUVmean, SUV/blood‐pool ratio, SUV/liver ratio, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis. SUVmax, SUVmean, and presence of nodal metastasis resulted as independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: 18F‐FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters confirmed their prognostic role for SCC of paranasal sinuses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had an overwhelming impact on healthcare worldwide. Outstandingly, the aftermath on neoplastic patients is still largely unknown, and only isolated cases of COVID-19 during radiotherapy have been published. We will report the two-months experience of our Department, set in Lombardy "red-zone".Methods: Data of 402 cancer patients undergoing active treatment from February 24 to April 24, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed; several indicators of the Department functioning were also analyzed.Results: Dedicated measures allowed an overall limited reduction of the workload. Decrease of radiotherapy treatment number reached 17%, while the number of administration of systemic treatment and follow up evaluations kept constant. Conversely, new treatment planning faced substantial decline. Considering the patients, infection rate was 3.23% (13/402) and mortality 1.24% (5/402). Median age of COVID-19 patients was 69.7 years, the large majority were male and smokers (84.6%); lung cancer was the most common tumor type (61.5%), 84.6% of subjects were stage III-IV and 92.3% had comorbidities. Remarkably, 92.3% of the cases were detected before March 24. Globally, only 2.5% of ongoing treatments were suspended due to suspect or confirmed COVID-19 and 46.2% of positive patients carried on radiotherapy without interruption. Considering only the last month, infection rate among patients undergoing treatment precipitated to 0.43% (1/232) and no new contagions were reported within our staff.Conclusions: Although mortality rate in COVID-19 cancer patients is elevated, our results support the feasibility and safety of continuing anticancer treatment during SARS-Cov-2 pandemic by endorsing consistent preventive measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Advances in therapy have resulted in improved cure rates and an increasing number of long-term Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) survivors. However, radiotherapy (RT)-related late effects are still a significant issue, particularly for younger patients with mediastinal disease (secondary cancers, heart diseases). In many Centers, technological evolution has substantially changed RT planning and delivery. This consensus document aims to analyze the current knowledge of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) for mediastinal HL and formulate practical recommendations based on scientific evidence and expert opinions.Methods: A dedicated working group was set up within the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) Radiotherapy Committee in May 2018. After a first meeting, the group adopted a dedicated platform to share retrieved articles and other material. Two group coordinators redacted a first document draft, that was further discussed and finalized in two subsequent meetings. Topics of interest were: 1) Published data comparing 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT 2) dose objectives for the organs at risk 3) IGRT protocols and motion management.Results: Data review showed that IMRT might allow for an essential reduction in the high-dose regions for all different thoracic OAR. As very few studies included specific dose constraints for lungs and breasts, the low-dose component for these OAR resulted slightly higher with IMRT vs. 3D-CRT, depending on the technique used. We propose a set of dose objectives for the heart, breasts, lungs, and thyroid. The use of IGRT is advised for margin reduction without specific indications, such as the use of breath-holding techniques. An individual approach, including comparative planning and considering different risk factors for late morbidity, is recommended for each patient.Conclusions: As HL therapy continues to evolve, with an emphasis on treatment reduction, radiation oncologists should use at best all the available tools to minimize the dose to organs at risk and optimize treatment plans. This document provides indications on the use of IMRT/IGRT based on expert consensus, providing a basis for clinical implementation and future development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticancer treatment efficacy is limited by the development of refractory tumor cells characterized by increased expression and activity of mechanisms promoting survival, proliferation, and metastatic spread. The present review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of the anthelmintic mebendazole (MBZ) as a repurposed drug in oncology with a focus on cells resistant to approved therapies, including so called "cancer stem cells". Mebendazole meets many of the characteristics desirable for a repurposed drug: good and proven toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics allowing to reach therapeutic concentrations at disease site, ease of administration and low price. Several in vitro studies suggest that MBZ inhibits a wide range of factors involved in tumor progression such as tubulin polymerization, angiogenesis, pro-survival pathways, matrix metalloproteinases, and multi-drug resistance protein transporters. Mebendazole not only exhibits direct cytotoxic activity, but also synergizes with ionizing radiations and different chemotherapeutic agents and stimulates antitumoral immune response. In vivo, MBZ treatment as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy led to the reduction or complete arrest of tumor growth, marked decrease of metastatic spread, and improvement of survival. Further investigations are warranted to confirm the clinical anti-neoplastic activity of MBZ and its safety in combination with other drugs in a clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although radiotherapy plays a fundamental role in the management of intermediate/high/very high-risk non-metastatic prostatic cancer (IHR-nmPca), there is still no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy in this setting. Remarkably, the role of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) is still highly controversial. The PROspective multicenter observational study on Elective Pelvic nodes Irradiation (PRO-EPI) was designed to provide "real life" data regarding the patterns of care for IHR-nmPca. Forty-three Italian Radiation Oncology centers participated in the PROspective multicenter observational study on Elective Pelvic nodes Irradiation (PRO-EPI) project, with 1029 patients enrolled. In this preliminary analysis, we longitudinally evaluated the impact of Elective Nodal Irradiation (ENI) and radiotherapy features on toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Six months follow-up data were available for 913 patients and 12 months data for 762 patients. Elective Nodal Irradiation was given to 506 patients (48.9%). Volumetric Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) was adopted in more than 77% of patients and Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) in 84.4%. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered to the majority of patients (68.3%), and it was associated to ENI in 408 cases (81.1%). Toxicity was mostly mild and reversible and IGRT resulted in a significant reduction of rectal toxicity, although a non-significant trend toward increased urinary toxicity was observed. No statistically significant differences in QoL and toxicity were seen in patients treated with or without ENI. The adoption of IGRT is widespread and increasing and could reduce treatment toxicity. ENI is not yet the standard treatment, but it is performed in a growing fraction of cases and not resulting into an increase in toxicity or in a deterioration of QoL. Further analyses are needed to clarify the long-term toxicity profile and the impact of ENI on survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Guerini, Noale, Mortellaro, Lisi, Bruni, Santini, Muto, Ferrera, Cossali, Morelli, PRO-EPI study group, Magrini, Spiazzi and Buglione.)