Search

Background: The use of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) with a high genetic barrier to resistance, namely entecavir and tenofovir, has improved the efficacy of antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the optimal duration and dosage of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration, particularly in patients transplanted for HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection, remains controversial., Methods: We evaluated 28 patients transplanted for HBV/HDV cirrhosis. After LT, each patient received a fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA for 6 mo post-LT and then continued with long-term NA prophylaxis (entecavir: 8, tenofovir: 20 patients)., Results: During 72 mo of follow-up, reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen at low titers was observed in 1 (3.6%) patient at 33 mo after HBIG discontinuation, which became negative after a single dose of HBIG 1000 IU/L, whereas both serum HBV DNA and HDV RNA remained persistently undetectable and without any clinical or biochemical evidence of HBV/HDV recurrence., Conclusions: We showed for the first time the efficacy of a short, fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA followed by long-term NA monoprophylaxis against HBV/HDV recurrence after LT, although careful follow-up is needed after HBIG discontinuation, whereas further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study evaluated the presence of Epstein-Barr virus type 1 (EBV-1) DNA in patients living with HIV, before and after three different topical therapy protocols for oral hairy leukoplakia (OHL)., Methods: The sample consisted of five patients treated with topical solution of 25% podophyllin resin; six with 25% podophyllin resin plus 5% acyclovir cream; and four with 25% podophyllin resin plus 1% penciclovir cream. DNA was extracted from OHL scrapings and amplified by the PCR using specific primers for EBV-1 (EBNA-1)., Results: Clinical healing of OHL lesions was observed across all treatment groups over time. At baseline, EBNA-1 was detected in all OHL lesions. After treatment, OHL samples from three patients treated with 25% podophyllin resin plus 5% acyclovir cream and from one patient treated with 25% podophyllin resin plus 1% penciclovir cream exhibited negative EBNA-1 viral gene encoding. Despite the clinical resolution of OHL, 11 patients (73.3%) showed EBNA-1 positivity immediately after the lesion disappeared. Three patients (20%) treated with podophyllin resin displayed both EBNA-1 positivity and a recurrence of OHL, in contrast to no recurrence in the other two groups., Conclusions: These findings suggest potential associations between treatment formulations, EBNA-1 persistence, and the recurrence of OHL lesions., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The global burden of chronic hepatitis B remains high and the best possible treatment remains long-term viral suppression expecting cure., Methods: Total 154 patients of chronic hepatitis B (48 HBeAg positive, e + ve) treated with oral entecavir (0.5 mg/1 mg per day) were recruited from June 2007 and followed prospectively until December 2022 for persistent HBV DNA negativity, HBeAg and HBsAg loss/seroconversion and other liver and drug-related events in real-life settings., Results: The mean duration of therapy was 6.78 (2-14) years with 1364 person-years of follow-up. All patients were HBV DNA negative by 15 months and remained so until the last follow-up. As many as 16.7% lost HBeAg after eight to 13 years of therapy, but not HBsAg. The mean fall in serum HBsAg level per year was 0.158 log IU/mL, being significantly higher in e + ve patients at baseline and until two years of therapy. The decline was significant until six years in e + ve patients compared to two years in e - ve ones. None had biochemical or virological breakthrough (except eight defaulters), flares or any untoward effects. The incidence of liver-related events, hepatocellular carcinoma and death was 10.4%, 1.9% and 14.3%, respectively, and 5.2% deaths were liver-related whose predictors were presence of cirrhosis (log rank 46.5, p > 0.001) and higher HBsAg level > 4 log IU/mL (log rank 18.15, p < 0.001) at baseline., Conclusion: Long-term entecavir therapy provides additional benefits of continuous reduction of serum HBsAg levels beyond suppression of HBV DNA., (© 2023. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)

Objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of famciclovir and its metabolite penciclovir following a single dose administered orally and rectally in African elephants (Loxodonta africana)., Animals: 15 African elephants (6 males and 9 females) of various ages., Methods: Famciclovir (15 mg/kg) was administered orally or per rectum once, with at least a three-week washout period between administrations. Blood was collected at 13 different timepoints per administration for 6 elephants, occurring between February and March 2020. An additional 9 elephants were sampled at variable timepoints per administration utilizing a sparse sampling design between July 2020 and January 2021. Plasma famciclovir and penciclovir levels were measured via HPLC and fluorescence detection. Pharmacokinetic analysis was completed in the summer of 2021 using noncompartmental analysis and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling., Results: Famciclovir was not detected in any sample, suggesting complete metabolism. Key pharmacokinetic parameters for penciclovir following oral administration were time to maximum concentration (tmax; 2.12 hours), area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC; 33.93 μg·h/mL), maximum observed concentration (Cmax; 3.73 μg/mL), and absorption half-life (t1/2; 0.65 hours). Following rectal administration, the values were: tmax, 0.65 hours; AUC, 15.62 μg·h/mL; Cmax, 2.52 μg/mL; and absorption t1/2, 0.13 hours., Conclusions: Famciclovir was rapidly metabolized to penciclovir. Oral administration resulted in slower absorption but higher maximum plasma concentration and higher AUC compared to rectal administration., Clinical Relevance: African elephants administered famciclovir via oral and rectal routes resulted in measurable serum penciclovir, and these findings may be utilized by clinicians treating viral infections in this species.

Since active hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication is the key driver of hepatic necroinflammation and disease progression, the treatment aim of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to suppress HBV replication permanently to prevent hepatic decompensation, liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma and prolong survival. Currently, pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN), entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are the first-line drugs of choice. Peg-IFN therapy has been used rarely due to its subcutaneous injection and significant side effect profile. Once daily oral ETV, TDF and TAF can suppress HBV DNA profoundly but have no direct action on cccDNA of the HBV-infected hepatocytes, hence continuing long-term therapy is usually needed to maintain HBV suppression, but the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss was rarely achieved (10 year 2%). In addition, long-term NUC therapy comes with several concerns such as increasing cost, medication adherence and loss-to-follow-up. Studies, mainly from Taiwan, have shown that finite NUCs therapy of two to three years in HBeAg-negative patients is feasible, safe and has a great benefit of much increasing HBsAg loss rate up to 30%/5 year. These have led an emerging paradigm shift to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients globally. However, off-NUC relapse with hepatitis B flares may occur and have a risk of decompensation or even life-threatening outcomes. Therefore, proper monitoring, assessment, and retreatment decisions are crucial to ensure safety. Ideally, retreatment should be not too late to ensure safety and also not too early to allow further immune response for further HBsAg decline toward HBsAg loss. Assessment using combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics during hepatitis flare is better than biochemical markers alone to make a right retreatment decision. The strategy of finite NUC therapy has set a benchmark of high HBsAg loss rate to be achieved by the new anti-HBV drugs which are under preclinical or early phase study.

Herpes labialis, caused by herpes simplex virus type 1, is usually characterized by painful skin or mucosal lesions. Penciclovir (PV) tablets are found to be effective against herpes labialis but suffer from poor oral bioavailability. This study aimed to combine the benefits of PV and lavender oil (LO), which exhibits anesthetic activity, in the form of a self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) for the treatment of herpes labialis. Toward this purpose, LO (oil), Labrasol:Labrafil M1944 CS in the ratio of 6:4 (surfactant mixture), and Lauroglycol-FCC (co-surfactant, selected based on the solubility of PV) were evaluated as the independent factors using a distance quadratic mixture design. The formulation was optimized for the minimum globule size and maximum stability index and was determined to contain 14% LO, 40.5% Labrasol:Labrafil 1944 (6:4), and 45.5% Lauroglycol-FCC. The optimized PV-LO-SNEDDS was embedded in chitosan hydrogel and the resulting formulations coded by (O3) were prepared and evaluated. The rheological studies demonstrated a combined pseudoplastic and thixotropic behavior with the highest flux of PV permeation across sheep buccal mucosa. Compared to a marketed 1% PV cream, the O3 formulation exhibited a significantly higher and sustained PV release, nearly twice the PV permeability, and a relative bioavailability of 180%. Overall, results confirm that the O3 formulation can provide an efficient delivery system for PV to reach oral mucosa and subsequent prolonged PV release. Thus, the PV-LO-SNEDDS embedded oral gel is promising and can be further evaluated in clinical settings to establish its therapeutic use in herpes labialis.

In eukaryotes, the polyamine pathway generates spermidine that activates the hypusination of the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). Hypusinated-eIF5A modulates translation, elongation, termination and mitochondrial function. Evidence in model organisms like drosophila suggests that targeting polyamines synthesis might be of interest against ischemia. However, the potential of targeting eIF5A hypusination in stroke, the major therapeutic challenge specific to ischemia, is currently unknown. Using in vitro models of ischemic-related stress, we documented that GC7, a specific inhibitor of a key enzyme in the eIF5A activation pathway, affords neuronal protection. We identified the preservation of mitochondrial function and thereby the prevention of toxic ROS generation as major processes of GC7 protection. To represent a thoughtful opportunity of clinical translation, we explored whether GC7 administration reduces the infarct volume and functional deficits in an in vivo transient focal cerebral ischemia (tFCI) model in mice. A single GC7 pre- or post-treatment significantly reduces the infarct volume post-stroke. Moreover, GC7-post-treatment significantly improves mouse performance in the rotarod and Morris water-maze, highlighting beneficial effects on motor and cognitive post-stroke deficits. Our results identify the targeting of the polyamine-eIF5A-hypusine axis as a new therapeutic opportunity and new paradigm of research in stroke and ischemic diseases.

Background: Treatment cessation in chronic HBV infection may be durable in certain patient subgroups before hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. The role of serum HBV RNA in determining treatment cessation suitability has not been well-investigated., Methods: Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment was discontinued in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic HBV with serum HBsAg <200 IU/mL and fulfilling internationally recommended criteria for treatment cessation. Patients were monitored till 48 weeks with baseline and serial measurements of serum HBsAg, HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen. NUCs were resumed when HBV DNA reaches >2000 IU/mL regardless of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels., Results: 114 entecavir-treated patients (median age 58.4 years, median serum HBsAg 54.4 IU/mL) with median treatment duration of 6.7 years were recruited. The 48-week cumulative rate of HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL was 58.1%. End-of-treatment serum HBV RNA and off-treatment serial HBV RNA were both independently associated with HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL (HR 2.959, 95% CI 1.776 to 4.926, p<0.001; HR 2.278, 95% CI 1.151 to 4.525, p=0.018, respectively). Patients with HBV RNA ≥44.6 U/mL had a cumulative 48-week rate of 93.2%, while combining HBV RNA undetectability and HBsAg <10 IU/mL had a cumulative 48-week rate of 9.1%. 24 patients (38.7%) developed off-treatment ALT elevation, highest peak ALT was 1515 U/L. 8 patients (median serum HBsAg 2.6 IU/mL) developed HBsAg seroclearance., Conclusion: Serum HBV RNA measurement is essential for deciding on entecavir cessation in patients with chronic HBV, especially with low HBsAg levels. Patients can be stratified on their risk of off-treatment relapse based on both viral determinants., Trial Registration Number: NCT02738554., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GC and JG are Abbott Diagnostics employees and hold Abbott stocks. W-KS received speaker’s fees from Mylan, is an advisory board member and received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, and is an advisory board member, received speaker’s fees and researching funding from Gilead Sciences. JF is an advisory board member of Gilead Sciences. M-FY is an advisory board member and/or received research funding from AbbVie, Arbutus Biopharma, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Clear B Therapeutics, Springbank Pharmaceuticals; and received research funding from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Fujirebio Incorporation and Sysmex Corporation. The remaining authors have no conflict of interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Aspirin may reduce the risk of chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients receiving antiviral treatment. We aimed to investigate the impact of aspirin on reducing HCC risk in patients treated with first-line oral nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs; entecavir and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate)., Methods: We conducted a territorywide, retrospective cohort study in NA-treated CHB patients between 2000 and 2018 from the electronic healthcare data repository in Hong Kong. Subjects were classified into aspirin users for at least 90 days during NA treatment (aspirin group) or no aspirin or any other antiplatelet use during follow-up period (no aspirin group). Incidence rates of HCC and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in 2 groups with propensity score matching with 1:3 ratio., Results: Of 35,111 NA-treated CHB patients of mean age of 53.0 years and 61.6% men, sixty-nine (4.0%) and 1,488 (4.5%) developed HCC at a median (interquartile range) of 2.7 (1.4-4.8) years and 3.2 (1.8-6.0) years in the aspirin group and no aspirin group, respectively. A duration-dependent association between aspirin and the risk of HCC was observed (subhazard ratio [sHR] 3 months-2 years: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.92; sHR 2-5 years: 0.63; 95% CI 0.43-0.94; sHR from ≥5 years: 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.91). Patients who took aspirin for ≤2 years had significantly higher risk of GIB (sHR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.79) than those not receiving aspirin. The risk of GIB started declining with the longer use of aspirin and becoming insignificant for ≥5 years' use (sHR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.19-3.21)., Discussion: Long-term aspirin use is associated with a lower risk of HCC in a duration-dependent manner in NA-treated CHB patients without a significant increase in the risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) ("functional cure") is the optimal endpoint of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Currently available anti-HBV therapy includes nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NAs) and peginterferon-α (Peg-IFNα). Combination of NAs and Peg-IFNα, each with different mechanisms of action, is an attractive approach for treating chronic HBV infection. In earlier studies, compared with monotherapy using IFNα, combination therapy showed greater on-treatment HBV DNA suppression but no difference in the sustained response. However, responses to the combination of non-pegylated IFNα with lamivudine or adefovir were not assessed based on HBsAg quantification but were defined by normal alanine aminotransferase levels, testing negative for hepatitis B e-antigen, and low HBV DNA load over a short term. Here, we reviewed previous reports regarding the effects of combination therapy of entecavir or tenofovir with Peg-IFNα, focusing on long-term reduction in HBsAg levels. Regimens of combination therapy were classified into "simultaneous" combination ("de novo" strategy); "sequential" combination, which involved starting with one therapy followed by the other ("switch-to" strategy); "add-on" combination, which involved adding Peg-IFNα to an ongoing NAs. Some studies have shown promising results, but there is no robust evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy. Large studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies to increase the rates of HBsAg seroclearance over the long term.

It remains controversial whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is associated with different clinical outcomes for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to compare the long-term risk of ETV versus TDF on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in CHB patients from a large multi-institutional database in Taiwan. From 2011 to 2018, a total of 21,222 CHB patients receiving ETV or TDF were screened for eligibility. Patients with coinfection, preexisting cancer and less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Finally, 7248 patients (5348 and 1900 in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively) were linked to the National Cancer Registry database for the development of HCC or ICC. Propensity score matching (PSM) (2:1) analysis was used to adjust for baseline differences. The HCC incidence between two groups was not different in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.02, p = 0.078) and in the PSM population (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.65-1.06, p = 0.129). Among decompensated cirrhotic patients, a lower risk of HCC was observed in TDF group than in ETV group (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.30-0.98, p = 0.043, PSM model). There were no differences between ETV and TDF groups in the ICC incidence (HR 1.84; 95% CI 0.54-6.29, p = 0.330 in the entire population and HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.31-3.52, p = 0.954 in the PSM population, respectively). In conclusion, treatment with ETV and TDF showed a comparable long-term risk of HCC and ICC in CHB patients.

Entecavir (ETV) is widely used in the treatment of hepatitis B, but there are only a few reports about entecavir-associated thrombocytopenia, and it is considered as an immediate response and inappropriate to continue the treatment with other nucleoside analogues. Now, we report the third case, and this case was delayed response and we switched to treatment with tenofovir (TDF). There was a 66-year-old female who was infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Her platelet count decreased from 111*10 9 /L to 3*10 9 /L and was prone to gum bleeding and skin ecchymosis after she received ETV treatment for 88 days. As a treatment option, ETV was replaced by TDF immediately, frequent platelets transfusions and thrombopoietin were applied for several days, daily prednisone of 50 mg was concomitantly taken, and then platelet count improved after 10 days. She was diagnosed with entecavir-associated thrombocytopenia after analysis of the temporal relationship and exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia by blood and bone marrow examinations. Our case suggested that the platelet count should be monitored regularly in patients during ETV treatment, and it may be a feasible option to choose TDF to maintain antiviral treatment when entecavir-associated thrombocytopenia occurs.

Background: Monoprophylaxis with third-generation nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) can be safely adopted in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, liver transplantation (LT) patients after at least 6 months of HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg)+NA. We investigated the efficacy of earlier initiation of post-LT entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF) monoprophylaxis., Methods: Between September 2011 and January 2017, all consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive transplanted patients were scheduled to receive HBIg with ETV or TDF for a period related to the risk for HBV reinfection: 1. low-risk patients (HBeAg-negative and HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL before LT) were due to withdraw from HBIg once HBsAg had become negative after a minimum of 7 days of HBIg+NA; 2. high-risk patients were due to receive HBIg for at least 6 months, after which they continued with third-generation NA monotherapy, only., Results: Twenty patients with a median interquartile range (IQR) follow-up of 46 (64-39) months were enrolled in the study (40% receiving ETV, 60% receiving TDF). Two low-risk patients refused early HBIg withdrawal and were therefore treated and analyzed along with the high-risk group. Eventually, there were 2 groups: group A, which included 12 low-risk patients, and group B, which included 8 patients (six high-risk, 2 low-risk). After transplantation, group A and B patients received HBIg+NA for a median (IQR) time of 7 (9-7) days and 9 (13-5) months, respectively. All 20 recipients demonstrated HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL and stable graft function during follow-up. Two patients (10%), 1 from each group, had HBsAg relapse. Notably, both patients who relapsed had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed before LT and showed very low levels (< 0.25 IU/mL) of HBsAg after recurrence., Conclusion: In low-risk HBsAg-positive recipients, HBIg may be safely discontinued within 2 weeks of LT and replaced by ETV or TDF monotherapy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Direct comparison of the clinical outcomes between nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) discontinuation versus NA continuation has not been performed in patients with chronic hepatitis B who achieved HBsAg-seroclearance. Whether NA discontinuation was as safe as NA continuation after NA-induced surface antigen of HBV (HBsAg) seroclearance was investigated in the present study., Designs: This multicentre study included 276 patients from 16 hospitals in Korea who achieved NA-induced HBsAg seroclearance: 131 (47.5%) discontinued NA treatment within 6 months after HBsAg seroclearance (NA discontinuation group) and 145 (52.5%) continued NA treatment (NA continuation group). Primary endpoint was HBsAg reversion and secondary endpoints included serum HBV DNA redetection and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Results: During follow-up (median=26.9 months, IQR=12.2-49.2 months), 10 patients (3.6%) experienced HBsAg reversion, 6 (2.2%) showed HBV DNA redetection and 8 (2.9%) developed HCC. Compared with NA continuation, NA discontinuation was not associated with HBsAg reversion in both univariable (HR=0.45, 95% CI=0.12 to 1.76, log-rank p=0.24) and multivariable analyses (adjusted HR=0.65, 95% CI=0.16 to 2.59, p=0.54). The cumulative probabilities of HBsAg reversion at 1, 3 and 5 years were 0.8%, 2.3% and 5.0% in the NA discontinuation group, and 1.5%, 6.3% and 8.4% in the NA continuation group, respectively. NA discontinuation was not associated with higher risk of either HBV redetection (HR=0.83, 95% CI=0.16 to 4.16, log-rank p=0.82) or HCC development (HR=0.53, 95% CI=0.12 to 2.23, log-rank p=0.38)., Conclusion: The discontinuation of NA was not associated with a higher risk of either HBsAg reversion, serum HBV DNA redetection or HCC development compared with NA continuation among patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance with NA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SUK reports receiving grants from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Science and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals; JWJ reports receiving research grants from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals and lecture fees from Abbie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Science and MSD Korea, and serving as an advisory board member of Abbie, Gilead Science and MSD Korea; Y-SL reports receiving research grants from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Gilead Science, and serving as an advisory board member of Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Gilead Science; HWL reports receiving lecture fee from Abbie, Chongkundang Pharmaceuticals, Dong-A ST Pharmaceuticals, Ildong Pharmaceuticals and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals; JHK, lecture fee from Abbie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Science, and MSD Korea; SWL reports receiving research grants from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Abbie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bukwang Pharmaceuticals, Daewoong Pharmaceuticals, MSD Korea and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, and serving as an advisory board member of Eisai and Gilead Science; JYJ reports receiving research grants from Bukwang and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bukwang Pharmaceuticals, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Celltrion, Daewoong Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Science and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals; YJK reports receiving research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, JW Creagene, Bukwang Pharmaceuticals, Handok Pharmaceuticals, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Yuhan Pharmaceuticals and Pharmaking, and lecture fees from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Science, MSD Korea, Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, Samil Pharmaceuticals, CJ Pharmaceuticals, Bukwang Pharmaceuticals and Handok Pharmaceuticals; J-HY reports receiving research grant from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Bukwang Pharmaceuticals and Daewoong Pharmaceuticals, and J-HL reports receiving lecture fees from GreenCross Cell, Daewoong Pharmaceuticals and Gilead Korea., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Context: Fuzheng Huayu recipe (FZHY) combined with entecavir (ETV) is used to treat the cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Objective: To investigate the effect of FZHY on ETV pharmacokinetics under different conditions. Materials and methods: A model of liver fibrosis was created by intraperitoneal injection of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN; 10 μg/kg) for 4 weeks in Wistar rats. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the blood concentration of ETV. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of ETV (0.9 mg/kg) were investigated after co-administration with FZHY (0.55 g/kg) at certain time intervals in normal and model rats. Results: The analytical method for ETV was validated at 0.5-50 μg/L with a correlation coefficient = 0.9996, lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 μg/L and mean accuracy of 104.18 ± 9.46%. Compared with the ETV-N group, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the EF-2 group did not change significantly, but that of the EF-0 group decreased in C max to 27.38 μg/L, in AUC 0- t from 323.84 to 236.67 μg/h/L, and a delay in T max from 0.75 to 6.00 h; that of the EF-0 group presented a decrease in C max of 61.92%, delay in t 1/2 of 2.45 h and delay in T max of 2.92 h. The t 1/2e and V d / F of ETV were increased significantly to 8.01 h and 24.38 L/kg in the ETV-M group. Conclusions: The effects of FZHY on ETV pharmacokinetics were diminished with an increase of interval time. The best time to administer both drugs is >2 h apart.

Background: It is unclear whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir differ in their association with risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and previous meta-analyses have shown conflicting conclusions with substantial heterogeneity. We aimed to analyse the updated data and elucidate the source of heterogeneity., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for relevant studies with time-to-event data for incident hepatocellular carcinoma occurring in patients with chronic hepatitis B who received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or entecavir monotherapy with follow-up of at least 1 year. Studies published between Jan 1, 2006, and April 17, 2020, and abstracts from international conferences in 2018 and 2019 were included. We pooled covariate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for hepatocellular carcinoma using a random-effects model, assessed heterogeneity among included studies using the I 2 statistic and Cochran's Q test, and identified the source of heterogeneity using prespecified subgroup analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, ID CRD42020176513., Findings: 31 studies involving 119 053 patients were analysed. The 5-year cumulative incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma was 5·97% (95% CI 5·81-6·13, 28 studies) for entecavir and 3·06% (2·86-3·26, 13 studies) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in studies with unmatched populations (p<0·0001). For all eight studies matched by propensity score, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 3·44% (95% CI 3·08-3·80) for entecavir and 3·39% (2·94-3·83) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (p=0·87). Analysis of 14 comparative studies with covariate adjustment found that tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir had similar risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (primary outcome); adjusted HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·73-1·07; p=0·20), although heterogeneity was significant (I 2 =56·4%, p=0·0038). In a subgroup analysis for hospital-based clinical cohorts, there was no difference in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence between the two regimens (adjusted HR 1·03, 95% CI 0·88-1·21; I 2 =0%). However, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with entecavir in administrative database research (adjusted HR 0·67, 0·59-0·76; I 2 =0%)., Interpretation: Our study found no significant difference between tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in their association with incident hepatocellular carcinoma. We suggest that treatment should be guided by patient tolerability and affordability rather than whether one drug is more effective than the other., Funding: Supported in part by E-DA Hospital (EDAHP 106008; EDAHP 103046)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Over 257 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected with the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are the first-line treatment option for most patients. Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are both potent, safe antiviral agents, have a high barrier to resistance, and are now off patent. They effectively suppress HBV replication to reduce the risk of cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment is continued long-term in most patients, as NA therapy rarely induces HBsAg loss or functional cure. Two diverging paradigms in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B have recently emerged. First, the public health focussed "treat-all" strategy, advocating for early and lifelong antiviral therapy to minimise the risk of HCC as well as the risk of HBV transmission. In LMICs, this strategy may be cost saving compared to monitoring off treatment. Second, the concept of "stopping" NA therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative disease after long-term viral suppression, a personalised treatment strategy aiming for long-term immune control and even HBsAg loss off treatment. In this manuscript, we will briefly review the current standard of care approach to the management of hepatitis B, before discussing emerging evidence to support both the "treat-all" strategy, as well as the "stop" strategy, and how they may both have a role in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Introduction: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major worldwide public health concern. Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV) is a new promising treatment for CHB. However, long-term efficacy and safety have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of the study is to determine the antiviral efficacy and safety of BSV treatment over a 144-week duration (BSV-BSV) in comparison with those of a sequential treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) followed by a 96-week duration BSV administration (TDF-BSV)., Methods: After 48 weeks of a double-blind comparison between BSV and TDF treatments, patients continued the open-label BSV study. We evaluated antiviral efficacy and drug safety up to 144 weeks for BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups. The primary endpoint was a virological response (hepatitis B virus DNA < 69 IU/mL)., Results: Among the 197 patients enrolled, 170 and 158 patients entered the second-year and third-year open-label phase extensional study, respectively, whereas 153 patients completed the 144-week follow-up. The virological response rate over the 144-week period was 87.7% and 92.1% in BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups, respectively (P = 0.36). The rates of ALT normalization and HBeAg seroconversion were similar between the groups. No drug-resistant mutations to BSV were noted. Bone mineral density and renal function were well preserved in the BSV-BSV group and were significantly improved after switching therapy in TDF-BSV patients., Discussion: This extensional study of a phase 3 trial (NCT01937806) suggests that BSV treatment is efficacious and safe for long-term use in treatment-naïve and TDF-experienced patients with CHB.

Objectives: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and can put patients at high risk of death from cirrhosis and liver cancer. However, CHB can be treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nucleos(t)ide analogues for the treatment of CHB patients., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Direct comparison meta-analyses and network meta-analysis (NMA) were carried out., Results: Thirty-six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, the nucleos(t)ide analogues were all effective in HBeAg seroconversion, HBeAg loss, and achieving undetectable HBV DNA. Telbivudine was associated with higher HBeAg seroconversion compared with entecavir. For HBeAg loss rate and proportion of achieving undetectable HBV DNA, tenofovir ranked as the best. Entecavir might be the most potent in the normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The nucleos(t)ide analogues did not have higher serious adverse events rate as compared with placebo., Conclusion: The nucleos(t)ide analogues are all effective for HBeAg seroconversion, HBeAg loss, undetectable HBV DNA, and most are effective for ALT normalization in adults with CHB. RCTs of multi-center, low risk of bias, and long-term follow-up are still needed.

Background: PURPOSE: The study compared the incidence and predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within and beyond year 5 of entecavir (ETV) therapy., Methods: The study enrolled 1397 CHB patients who were naïve to nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment and had received ETV monotherapy for more than 12 months., Results: The cumulative incidences of HCC at 3, 5, and 10 years of ETV treatment were 4%, 9.1%, and 15.8%, respectively. In the entire cohort, the annual incidence rates of HCC were 2.28% within the first 5 years and 1.34% within 5-10 years of therapy. The incidences of HCC did not differ significantly within and beyond 5 years of ETV therapy (p = 0.53), including patients with cirrhosis (p = 0.85) and without cirrhosis (p = 0.47). At year 5 of treatment, the multivariate analysis showed that the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were independent risk factors for HCC development beyond year 5. The 10-year cumulative incidences of HCC beyond year 5 in the high-risk group (FIB-4 > 2.20 and AFP > 3.21 ng/mL) and low-risk group (FIB-4 ≤ 2.20 and AFP ≤ 3.21 ng/mL) were 48.7% and 0%, respectively. APA-B score at 12 months and year 5 had a higher C-index for the prediction of HCC beyond year 5 than the PAGE-B at baseline and year 5 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.039, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: The HCC incidence tended to decrease but did not change significantly within and beyond 5 years of ETV therapy. The FIB-4 index and AFP levels at year 5 were predictive of HCC development beyond year 5 of ETV therapy.

Background and Aims: ARC-520, the first an RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic, was designed to reduce all RNA transcripts derived from covalently closed circular DNA, leading to a reduction in viral antigens and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA., Approach and Results: We aimed to evaluate the depth of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline in response to multiple doses of ARC-520 compared to placebo (PBO) in two randomized, multicenter studies in nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NUC)-experienced patients with hepatitis B early antigen (HBeAg)-negative (E-neg) or HBeAg-positive (E-pos) disease. A total of 58 E-neg and 32 E-pos patients were enrolled and received four monthly doses of PBO (n = 20 E-neg, 11 E-pos), 1 mg/kg ARC-520 (n = 17 E-neg, 10 E-pos), or 2 mg/kg ARC-520 (n = 21 E-neg, 11 E-pos) concomitantly with NUC. HBsAg change from baseline to 30 days after the last ARC-520 dose were compared to PBO. Both E-neg and E-pos high-dose groups significantly reduced HBsAg compared to PBO, with mean reductions of 0.38 and 0.54 log IU/mL, respectively. HBsAg reductions persisted for approximately 85 days and >85 days after the last dose in E-neg and E-pos patients, respectively. The low-dose groups did not reach statistical significance in either study. E-pos patients showed a dose-dependent reduction in HBeAg from baseline. Mean maximum reduction was 0.23 and 0.69 log Paul Ehrlich IUs/mL in the low-dose and high dose ARC-520 groups respectively. ARC-520 was well tolerated, with only two serious adverse events of pyrexia possibly related to study drug observed., Conclusions: ARC-520 was active in both E-neg and E-pos, NUC-experienced HBV patients; but absolute HBsAg reductions were moderate, possibly due to expression of HBsAg from integrated HBV DNA, indicating the need for RNAi therapeutics that can target viral transcripts regardless of origin., (© 2019 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Not all treatment-naïve patients receiving entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy can achieve complete virological response, and many factors may be related with the outcome of partial virological response. This study aimed to determine whether the manner of drug administration affects the antiviral efficacy of ETV/TDF monotherapy. All eligible patients were divided into complete or partial response cohorts based on their virological response following 24-week therapy. Factors related with partial response were evaluated. Patients with partial response were further grouped depending on whether they later adjusted the manner of drug administration, and the antiviral efficacy was compared between the two groups during prolonged treatment. A total of 518 patients were enrolled. Suboptimal drug administration (OR 77.511, P = .000), positive-HBeAg (OR 3.191, P = .000) and ETV treatment (OR 2.537, P = .001) were identified as independent risk factors for partial response. Among patients with partial response, 213 were in the adjusted group and 76 were in the unadjusted group. The percentages of patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA (78.9% vs 31.6%, P < .001) and with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (88.7% vs 68.4%, P < .001) were both higher in the adjusted group than that in unadjusted group following a further 6-month therapy. In conclusion, the manner of drug administration is an important factor influencing the efficacy of ETV/TDF therapy, and optimal drug administration manner can help to increase antiviral efficacy and rescue patients with partial response., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may develop in patients with chronic hepatitis (CHB) even after 5 years of oral therapy and cannot be easily predicted. We assessed predictors of HCC development and the need for HCC surveillance in this setting., Methods: Of 1,951 adult Caucasians with CHB included in the PAGE-B cohort, 1,427 (73%) had completed >5 years of follow-up under therapy without developing HCC by year 5. Median follow-up was 8.4 years from treatment onset. Points-based risk scores were developed to predict HCC risk after year 5., Results: In years 5-12, HCC was diagnosed in 33/1,427 (2.3%) patients with cumulative incidences of 2.4%, 3.2% and 3.8% at 8, 10 and 12 years, respectively. Older age or age >50 years, baseline cirrhosis and liver stiffness (LSM) ≥12 kPa at year 5 were independently associated with increased HCC risk. The HCC incidence was lower in non-cirrhotics than cirrhotics at baseline with year-5 LSM <12; among cirrhotics at baseline, it was lower in those with year-5 LSM <12 than ≥12 kPa. CAGE-B score was based on age at year 5 and baseline cirrhosis in relation to LSM at year 5 and SAGE-B score was based only on age and LSM at year 5 (c-index = 0.809-0.814, 0.805-0.806 after bootstrap validation). Both scores offered 100% negative predictive values for HCC development in their low risk groups., Conclusions: In Caucasians with CHB, the HCC risk after the first 5 years of antiviral therapy depends on age, baseline cirrhosis status and LSM at year 5. CAGE-B and particularly SAGE-B represent simple and reliable risk scores for HCC prediction and surveillance beyond year 5 of therapy., Lay Summary: In Caucasians with chronic hepatitis B, the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after the first 5 years of entecavir or tenofovir therapy depends on age, baseline cirrhosis status and liver stiffness at year 5, which can provide simple and reliable risk scores for hepatocellular carcinoma prediction and surveillance beyond year 5. In patients with cirrhosis at baseline, liver stiffness <12 kPa at year 5 is associated with lower HCC risk, but surveillance may be still required., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest GV Papatheodoridis: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dicerna, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Spring Bank; research grants Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead. V Sypsa: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Gilead; research grants from Abbvie, Gilead. GN Dalekos: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bayer, Genkyotex, Gilead, Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; research grants from Abbvie, Gilead. C Yurdaydin: speaker's bureau and/or advisor for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, Roche; research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. F van Boemmel: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche; research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Siemens; consultant for Abbvie, Gilead, Roche. M Buti: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Arbutus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Glaxo Smith-Kleine, Merck, Roche, Spring Bank. JL Calleja: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie , Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck. H Chi: Nothing to declare. J Goulis: advisor/lecturer for Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche; research grant from Gilead. S Manolakopoulos: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche; research grants from Abbvie, Gilead. A Loglio: advisor/lecturer for Gilead, MYR Pharma. T Voulgaris: Nothing to declare. N Gatselis: Nothing to declare. O Keskın: Nothing to declare. R Veelken: Nothing to declare. M Lopez-Gomez: Nothing to declare. BE Hansen: Nothing to declare. S Savvidou: Nothing to declare. A Kourikou: Nothing to declare. I Vlachogiannakos: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche. K Galanis: Nothing to declare. R Idilman: Nothing to declare. R Esteban: advisor/lecturer for Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis. HLA Janssen: consultant for and grants from AbbVie, Arbutus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck, Roche, Vir Biotechnology Inc., Viroclinics. T Berg: advisor/consultant/lecturer for Abbvie, Alexion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Vertex; Research support from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Novartis and Roche. P Lampertico: speaking bureau/advisor for Abbvie, Eiger, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck/Merck Sharp & Dohme, MYR Pharma, Roche. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The renal protective effect of telbivudine (LdT) was verified by a previous meta-analysis. It was left unclear, however if this effect offsets the associated risk of virological breakthrough in hepatitis B e-antigen-negative (HBeAg-) patients receiving chemotherapy (C/T).Records of 260 HBeAg-, non-cirrhotic cancer patients undergoing systemic C/T with prophylactic LdT or entecavir (ETV) were retrospectively investigated. The investigation was conducted 6 months after completion of C/T, patient death from cancer, or antiviral modification. Treatment duration, outcome, change of renal function, and reason for antiviral modification were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of virological breakthrough during prophylaxis C/T and the change in renal function.Of the 126 HBeAg- patients treated with LdT, 3 (2.38%) experienced HBV virological breakthroughs, whereas none of the patients treated with ETV (P = .07) did. The estimated glomerular filtration rate for the patients treated with LdT was essentially unaltered, decreasing only slightly from 87.5 ± 23.1 to 87.3 ± 21.3 ml/minute/1.73 m (P = .55), while the rate for the ETV-treated patients was significantly lowered from 95.7 ± 32.2 to 85.5 ± 85.7 ml/minute/1.73 m (P = .0009).The absolute risk reduction ARR is 27.8% - 21.2% = 6.6%, comparing ETV with LdT for reduction of renal function impairment and the absolute risk increase for virological breakthrough during C/T, the absolute risk increase (ARI) is 2.38% - 0% = 2.38%. The overall likelihood of being helped over being harmed was 2.77. With careful selection of patients with the criteria of HBeAg-status and non-hematologic cancer, it is feasible that telbivudine raise lower probability of virological breakthroughs during prophylaxis treatment.

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is associated with complications and adverse outcomes in patients with clinically resolved HBV infection who are seronegative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag), and seropositive for hepatitis B core antibody (HBc Ab) and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (HBs Ab) before kidney transplantation (KT)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 52 patients with resolved HBV infection who were HBV-DNA negative. HBV-DNA after KT was evaluated, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation and outcomes were monitored. We defined HBV reactivation as seropositivity for HBV-DNA at or above the minimal detection level of 1.0 log IU/mL and treated preemptively (using entecavir) when the HBV-DNA level was at or above 1.3 log IU/mL, in accordance with the Japanese Guidelines for HBV treatment., Results: Among the 52 patients, the mean age was 57.2 ± 10.8 years. The median HBc Ab titer was 12.8 (interquartile range, 4.6-42.6) cutoff index, and five (9.6%) cases of HBV reactivation occurred. No patients developed graft loss and died due to HBV reactivation. Statistical analysis showed that age and HBc Ab titer were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation (P = .037 and P = .042, respectively). No significant differences were found between graft survival and the presence or absence of HBV reactivation., Conclusion: These results suggest that HBc Ab titer and age could be significant risk factors for HBV reactivation. Resolution of HBV infection did not appear to be associated with patient or graft survival, regardless of whether HBV reactivation occurred, when following our preemptive strategy., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy and TDF + entecavir (ETV) combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with the partial virological response (PVR) to ETV., Methods: CHB patients with PVR to ETV were switched to TDF monotherapy or TDF + ETV combination therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was a virological response (VR), and the secondary efficacy outcomes were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. The primary safety outcomes were changes in serum creatinine and serum phosphorus levels., Results: A total of 143 patients were investigated, including 63 patients in the TDF monotherapy group and 80 patients in the TDF + ETV combination therapy group. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The median age of patients was 44.5 years, and 76.2% of them were male. The VR rate in TDF + ETV group was higher than that of the TDF group at 48 weeks (88.8% vs 71.4%; P = .009). At 48 weeks, the HBeAg seroconversion rate of TDF + ETV group was higher than that of the TDF group (30% vs 15.9%; P = .049). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with elevated ALT in the TDF group and TDF + ETV group at 48 weeks (9.5% vs 7.5%; P = .665). After adjusting the treatment regimen, serum creatinine levels increased slightly and serum phosphorus level decreased slightly in both groups., Conclusions: TDF + ETV combination therapy for 48 weeks had a higher VR rate than TDF monotherapy in CHB patients with PVR to ETV., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The significance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) from entecavir (ETV) to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) is uncertain. The subjects of this study were 159 patients with HBV who received treatment with ETV followed by TAF. Among these patients, serial changes in the HBV marker levels were monitored in 92 patients in whom the serum HBsAg levels were ≥100 IU/mL during the 48-week period immediately before and after the switching. A questionnaire survey for medication compliance was performed in 127 patients. The serum HBsAg levels (log IU/mL) decreased by 0.041 during the ETV treatment period and by 0.068 during the TAF administration period. The degree of reduction was higher during the TAF administration period than during the ETV administration period in patients without cirrhosis (P = .030), patients with genotype B HBV (P = .014), and patients with undetectable serum HBcrAg (P = .038). Multivariate analysis revealed the HBV genotype (B vs C; odds ratio, 3.400; P = .025) and serum aspartate aminotransferase level (every 1+; 1.111; P = .015) at the time of switching as factors influencing the treatment efficacy. Thirty-six patients (28%) responded that the number of days that they forgot to take the drug decreased after the drug switching, and 77 patients (61%) reported feeling satisfied with the drug switching. Switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used from ETV to TAF may be useful in the treatment of patients with HBV infection, as it is associated with both a decrease in the serum HBsAg level and improvement of the medication compliance., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The population of HBV infection with family history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the high risk group for the development of HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the de novo combination therapy including pegylated-interferon α-2a (PEG-IFNα-2a) and entecavir (ETV) in this high risk population. The study recruited 58 Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg)-Positive CHB patients patients with HBV-DNA > 10 7  IU/mL, genotype B or C and HCC family history and were treated for 48 weeks. Patients without HBeAg loss at the 48th week were 40 patients and extended the combination therapy to 96 weeks. All patients were followed up to 120 weeks. The rate of HBeAg loss and HBsAg loss was 12/40(30.0%) and 2/40(5.0%) at week 120 respectively. When logistic regression analysis was used to identify viables of HBeAg loss, HBV-DNA levels <20 IU/mL at week 48 was found to have a 6.02 fold increased probability (95% CI = 1.17-30.40, P = .03) of HBeAg loss. Patients with HBV-DNA levels <20 IU/mL at week 48 had a high probability of HBeAg loss 8/17(47.1%), HBsAg loss 2/17(11.8%), compared to 4/23(17.4%), 0/23(0%) in patients with HBV-DNA ≥ 20 IU/mL. Combination therapy for 96 weeks was well tolerated. During the combination therapy, low-level viremia during treatment is reversely associated with response. The combination therapy of PEG-IFNα and ETV was suggested to extend to 96 weeks when HBV-DNA was completed suppressed at week 48., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The use of polymers as excipients for drug delivery has afforded stable formulations that reliably control the release of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). While many materials are available and used, few polymers exhibit the numerous advantages, including amorphous characteristics, noninflammatory properties, and resorbable degradation products, like those of poly(ester urea)s (PEUs). Furthermore, stability issues that arise in various APIs can make formulation optimization difficult. Herein, a series of PEUs were synthesized that vary by the fraction of l-phenylalanine monomer incorporated into the copolymerization. The various PEUs and entecavir monohydrate were dry-mixed at different weight percentages (15, 30, and 50%). Filaments of the PEU formulations were extruded and analyzed quantitatively for drug loading and content uniformity by using μ-CT and UPLC analysis. Drug dissolution profiles from filament segments were monitored over a 4-week period and ultimately showed that the controlled release of entecavir was influenced by the incorporation of the l-phenylalanine within the polymer.

Data remains limited about the optimal nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) while treated with glucocorticoids because of kidney diseases. We aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term antiviral therapy with telbivudine (LdT) and entecavir (ETV) in this specific population. In this prospective randomized controlled study, a total of 60 patients with both kidney diseases and chronic hepatitis B were randomly divided into LdT group and ETV group. We analyzed changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), variation in HBV DNA, seroconversion of hepatitis B e antigen (HbeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). During the 18 month follow-up period, serum HBV DNA load was decreased significantly at 3, 6, 12, 18 months, compared to the pre-treatment value in both LdT and ETV cohorts. No patients achieved HBeAg loss-seroconversion or HBsAg loss-seroconversion with ETV therapy whilst one patient experienced HBeAg and HBsAg loss-seroconversion with LdT therapy. No significant changes in eGFR were seen in patients with ETV therapy compared to baseline. However, eGFR increased 7.43, 18.97 mL/min/1.73m 2 , respectively at 12 and 18 months in LdT group and the changes were significant compared to baseline. Further analysis also demonstrated that eGFR significantly improved 11.8, 23.25 mL/min/1.73m 2 at 12 and 18 months in LdT group for patients with impaired renal function. LdT is superior to ETV in patients with chronic hepatitis B and kidney diseases because of the renal protection it confers by increasing eGFR., (© 2019 International Society for Apheresis, Japanese Society for Apheresis, and Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy.)

A platform capable of specifically delivering an antiviral drug to the liver infected with hepatitis B is a major concern in hepatology. Vaccination has had a major effect on decreasing the emerging numbers of new cases of infection. However, the total elimination of the hepatitis B virus from the body requires prolonged therapy. In this work, we aimed to target the liver macrophages with lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LPH), combining the merit of polymeric nanoparticles and lipid vesicles. The hydrophilic antiviral drug, entecavir (E), loaded LPH nanoparticles were optimized and physicochemically characterized. A modulated lipidic corona, as well as, an additional coat with vitamin E were used to extend the drug release enhance the macrophage uptake. The selected vitamin E coated LPH nanoparticles enriched with lecithin-glyceryl monostearate lipid shell exhibited high entrapment for E (80.47%), a size ≤ 200 nm for liver passive targeting, extended release over one week, proven serum stability, retained stability after refrigeration storage for 6 months. Upon macrophage uptake in vitro assessment, the presented formulation displayed promising traits, enhancing the cellular retention in J774 macrophages cells. In vivo and antiviral activity futuristic studies would help in the potential application of the ELPH in hepatitis B control., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background & Aims: There have been conflicting results from studies comparing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs those treated with entecavir. We compared the effects of TDF vs entecavir on HCC risk in a large cohort of patients with chronic HBV infection in China., Methods: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive adults with chronic HBV infection who initially received treatment with entecavir or TDF, for at least 6 months, from January 2008 through June 2018. Patients who had cancers or liver transplantation before or within the first 6 months of treatment were excluded. Propensity score weighting and 1:5 matching were used to balance the clinical characteristics between the 2 groups. Fine-Gray model was used to adjust for competing risk of death and liver transplantation., Results: We analyzed data from 29,350 patients (mean age, 52.9 ± 13.2 years; 18,685 men [63.7%]); 1309 were first treated with TDF (4.5%) and 28,041 were first treated with entecavir (95.5%). TDF-treated patients were younger (mean age, 43.2 years vs 53.4 years) and a lower proportion had cirrhosis (38 patients [2.9%] vs 3822 patients treated with entecavir [13.6%]). At a median follow-up time of 3.6 years after treatment began (interquartile range, 1.7-5.0 years), 8 TDF-treated patients (0.6%) and 1386 entecavir-treated patients (4.9%) developed HCC. Patients' clinical characteristics were comparable after propensity score weighting. TDF treatment was associated with a lower risk of HCC than entecavir treatment after propensity score weighting (weighted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.80; P = .013) and 1:5 matching (weighted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.84; P = .016)., Conclusions: In a retrospective analysis of 29,350 patients with chronic HBV infection in China, treatment with TDF was associated with a lower risk of HCC than treatment with entecavir, over a median follow-up time of 3.6 years., (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Controversy exists on whether tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is superior to entecavir (ETV) in lowering the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. This meta-analysis was performed to clarify this issue with critical clinical and methodological considerations., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to Oct 28, 2019. Randomized control trials and observational studies reporting the impact of TDF and ETV on the risk of HCC in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) were eligible. Risk ratios (RRs) calculated with cumulative incidence rate and/or annual incidence rate, or hazard ratio (HR) were pooled using random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the potential impact of between-study level and within-study level factors., Results: A total of 32 studies with 78,136 CHB patients were included. Overall cumulative incidence rate of HCC was lower in TDF group than ETV group (3.07% vs. 5.25%; RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72). However, this difference was not statistically significant in pooled results of hazard ratio (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.73-1.04) and RR calculated with annual incidence rate (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.67-1.16). Potential confounding factors at between-study level included prior nucleos(t)ide usage, disease stage at baseline and region of study. More importantly, at within-study level, disparity in follow-up duration between TDF and ETV groups may impact the result, usually favoring a treatment with shorter follow-up duration., Conclusions: Compared with ETV, TDF treatment tended to have a lower overall cumulative incidence rate of HCC. However, disparity in follow-up duration may be a key factor to influence the result.

We report a case of HBV reactivation following belatacept treatment in a patient who underwent kidney transplantation in 2015 for HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN). Human immunodeficiency virus viral load was undetectable prior to transplantation, and CD4+ lymphocyte count was greater than 300/mL. Baseline HBV serology at transplantation was HBsAg negative, anti-HBcAb positive, anti-HBsAb 312 UI/L, and HBeAg negative/anti-HBeAb positive. Liver function tests were normal, and viral DNA was undetectable. Two years later, the patient presented with severe acute hepatitis after a progressive disappearance of anti-HbsAb, quickly followed by HBV reactivation. Immunosuppressive treatment was drastically reduced, and treatment with entecavir was started. The outcome was favorable, and HBV DNA became undetectable after 9 weeks of treatment. This is the first report of acute hepatitis related to HBV reactivation in a kidney transplant recipient treated with belatacept. The risk for HBV reactivation in patients treated with belatacept should not be underestimated, especially in those with resolved HBV infection., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Potent nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC), such as entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, are able to suppress HBV DNA to undetectable level. These agents have no direct action on cccDNA, which is a very stable template for HBV production, hence long-term or even life-long NUC therapy is required in HBeAg-negative patients to maintain HBV suppression and to achieve the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss. However, there are concerns of indefinite or life-long NUC therapy, including drug resistance, financial burden, adherence and willingness for indefinite long-term NUC therapy. Patients lost to follow-up and hence, not monitored may risk severe relapse that may deteriorate to hepatic decompensation or even hepatic failure. This Review integrated the cumulated evidence and assessed the strategy of finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients which was first tried in early 2000s. Earlier Asian findings that 2-year NUC therapy is feasible and safe have founded APASL stopping rule for patients on NUC therapy over 2-3 years since 2008. Subsequent studies have supported the strategy of finite NUC therapy, which has finally been accepted as an option by American and European liver associations since 2016. More recent studies have further shown greatly increased HBsAg loss rate (up to 5-year 39%) after stopping NUC therapy. The cumulated evidence has shown that the paradigm shift from indefinite long-term therapy to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients is emerging. More studies are needed to fine-tuning the strategy including research for the optimal duration of consolidation therapy, timing to stop and to start re-treatment.

Objective: To compare the 2-year efficacy and safety of combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) to that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in treatment of patients with adefovir drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Methods: HBeAg-positive CHB patients (n = 100) with adefovir-resistance (rtA181T/V and/or rtN236T) were enrolled. Patients were treated with either ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV 10 mg per day (n = 52) or TDF 300 mg per day (n = 48) for 48 weeks. Tests for liver and kidney function, Serum Phosphorus, HBV serum markers, HBV DNA load and ultrasonography of liver were performed every 3 months. Student's t-test and χ 2 test were used to compare the efficacy, side effects in the two groups. Results: Fifty-two patients in ETV + ADV group and forty-eight patients in TDF group were followed-up for 96 weeks. HBV DNA undetectable rate were 76.9% versus 81.3% (P = 0.631) at week 48, and 92.3% versus 95.8% (P = 0.679) at week 96 in ETV + ADV combination therapy and TDF monotherapy group respectively. Serum ALT normalized rate were 84.6% versus 87.5% (P = 0.777) at week 48, and 92.3% versus 95.8% (P = 0.679) at week 96 in ETV+ADV combination therapy and TDF monotherapy group respectively. But the level of serum Phosphorus was significantly lower in ETV + ADV combination therapy group compare with TDF monotherapy group (1.13 ±0.15 versus 1.22 ±0.16, P = 0.004) at week 96. Conclusion: Both ETV + ADV combination therapy and TDF monotherapy provided effective treatments in chronic hepatitis B with adefovir-resistant. However, it was associated with poor serological responses up to week 96. The long term treatment of hepatitis B with ETV (0.5 mg/day) combination of ADV (10 mg/day) can potentially cause hypophosphatemia and renal impairment, so regular monitoring of serum phosphate, serum creatinine and evaluation of eGFR is needed.

Background & Aims: To evaluate virological breakthrough (VBT) and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving entecavir (ETV) treatment., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital and a total of 228 HBeAg-positive CHB patients treated with ETV for more than 48 weeks were enrolled. Clinical outcome measures included HBeAg seroclearance, maintained virological response and the development of HCC., Results: During a median follow-up period of 197 weeks, VBT developed in 26 (11.4%) patients (VBT group), and the other 202 patients without VBT (non-VBT group). The overall cumulative rate of HBeAg seroclearance in the VBT group and non-VBT group were 23.1% and 23.8%, 27.1% and 37.9%, 27.1% and 55.1%, 27.1% and 74.1%, 27.1% and 76.7% from week 48 to 240, respectively(p = 0.013). The cumulative probability of maintained virological responses from week 48 to 240 were 7.69% and 21.78%, 7.69% in the VBT groups and 36.85%, 7.69% and 51.68%, 7.69% and 64.97%, 7.69% and 72.1% in the non-VBT groups, respectively (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001) and virological response at week 24 (p = 0.005) were independently associated with VBT. Cox regression analysis showed that cirrhosis had carried the highest risk for HCC (HR = 4.99, CI = 1.14-21.81, p = 0.033). Subgroup survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method showed that patients with VBT had higher incidence of developing HCC than without VBT in cirrhotic patients (50% (95%CI = 1-99%) vs 9% (95% CI = 1-9%); p = 0.048)., Conclusions: VBT was associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including a low probability of HBeAg seroclearance, failure to achieve maintained virological responses, and a risk of developing HCC. Patients, particularly with cirrhosis, who had experienced VBT during ETV treatment, more likely developed HCC., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein (M2BP) has been identified as a predictor for the response of interferon α (IFN-α) in patients with viral hepatitis. However, whether serum glycosylation isomer of M2BP (M2BPGi) was associated with the regression of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during IFN-α add-on therapy is still unknown. CHB patients were treated with entecavir for 26 weeks followed by entecavir plus pegylated IFN-α for 52 weeks. Liver biopsies were taken at baseline and treatment week 78. The regression of fibrosis was identified according to Ishak standard or Ishak plus Progressive-Indeterminate-Regressive (P-I-R) standard. Serum M2BPGi and liver function tests were measured at baseline and every 26 weeks of treatment. A total of 72 CHB patients were included in the present study. Serum M2BPGi was correlated with fibrosis and necroinflammation both at baseline and week 78. If Ishak standard was used as the reference, only the percent change of M2BPGi at week 52 from week 26 (Δ%M2BPGi 26w-52W ) was independently associated with fibrosis regression at treatment week 78, the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of Δ%M2BPGi 26w-52W for predicting fibrosis regression was 0.705. As for Ishak plus P-I-R standard, the AUROC of the predictive model for fibrosis regression (0.896*M2BPGi 52W  + 0.363*necroinflammation score 0w  + 2.051*Ishak score 0w  - 4.489) was 0.888. These data indicated that dynamic changes of serum M2BPGi were associated with fibrosis regression in CHB patients on IFN-α add-on therapy., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background & Aims: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy has displayed non-inferior efficacy to TDF plus entecavir (ETV) combination therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistant to ETV and/or adefovir (ADV). Nonetheless, the virologic response rate was suboptimal in patients receiving up to 144 weeks of TDF monotherapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of TDF monotherapy given for up to 240 weeks., Methods: One trial enrolled patients with ETV resistance without ADV resistance (n = 90), and another trial included patients with ADV resistance (n = 102). Most patients (91.2%) also had lamivudine resistance. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive TDF monotherapy or TDF + ETV combination therapy for 48 weeks, and then TDF monotherapy until week 240. We compared efficacy between the studies and safety in the pooled population at 240 weeks., Results: At week 240, the proportion of patients with serum HBV DNA <15 IU/ml was not significantly different between the ETV and ADV resistance groups in the full analysis set (84.4% vs. 73.5%; p = 0.07), which was significantly different by on-treatment analysis (92.7% vs. 79.8%; p = 0.02). Virologic blips associated with poor medication adherence occurred in 7 patients throughout the 240 weeks. None developed additional HBV resistance mutations. Among the 170 HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients at baseline, 12 (7.1%) achieved HBeAg seroconversion at week 240. None achieved HBV surface antigen seroclearance. Significant decreases from baseline were observed at week 240 in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (-3.21 ml/min/1.73 m 2 by the CKD-EPI equation, p <0.001) and bone mineral density (g/cm 2 ) at the femur (-2.48%, p <0.001)., Conclusions: Up to 240 weeks of TDF monotherapy provided an increasing virologic response rate in heavily pretreated patients with HBV resistant to ETV and/or ADV. However, it was associated with poor serological responses and decreasing renal function and bone mineral density. (ClinicalTrials.gov No, NCT01639066 and NCT01639092)., Lay Summary: In patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus resistant to multiple drugs including lamivudine, entecavir, and/or adefovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy showed non-inferior efficacy compared with the combination therapy of TDF plus entecavir. Nonetheless, short-term TDF monotherapy was associated with suboptimal virologic response, and its long-term safety was uncertain. This study displayed that 240 weeks of TDF monotherapy provided a virologic response in most of those patients, but it was associated with poor serological responses and decreasing renal function and bone mineral density., (Copyright © 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The optimal management strategy for children with immune-tolerant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains unknown. The purpose of this clinical trial was to determine the safety and efficacy of therapy with entecavir and peginterferon in a group of children in the immune-tolerant phase of HBV infection. Children with immune-tolerant features of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) received entecavir once-daily in a dose of 0.015 mg/kg (0.5 mg maximum) for 48 weeks; peginterferon alfa-2a (180 µg/1.73m 2 subcutaneously) once-weekly was added at the end of week 8 and continued until week 48. The primary endpoint was lack of detectable hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) with HBV DNA levels ≤1,000 IU/mL 48 weeks after stopping therapy. Sixty children (75% female), median age 10.9 (range, 3.4-17.9) years, were enrolled. All were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBeAg and had high levels of HBV DNA with normal or minimally elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Fifty-five children completed the entire 48-week course of therapy. At 48 weeks after treatment ended (week 96), 2 children (3%) achieved the primary endpoint and were also HBsAg negative and anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibody (anti-HBs) positive. One child was HBeAg positive but HBsAg negative at week 60; another was HBeAg negative but HBsAg positive at week 72, which were their last clinic visits. In the remaining children, serum ALT and HBV DNA levels at week 96 were similar to baseline. Thirty-seven children experienced adverse events (AEs), and 1 had a serious AE (SAE). Conclusion: The combination of entecavir and peginterferon for up to 48 weeks rarely led to loss of HBeAg with sustained suppression of HBV DNA levels in children in the immune-tolerant phase of HBV infection, and treatment was associated with frequent AEs., (© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: There are currently no FDA-approved biological or chemical drugs for the treatment of HBV-related liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. Some Chinese patent medicines have proven to be effective in this area., Objective: The network meta-analysis (NMA) is to evaluate whether entecavir combined with Chinese patent medicine, such as "fuzhenghuayu capsules," "anluohuaxian pills," "fufangbiejiaruangan tablets," shows superior efficiency compared with entecavir alone for the treatment of chronic HBV-related liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. To evaluate which Chinese patent medicine is the most effective at improving liver fibrosis or cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B-infected patients?, Methods: Registration of protocol: the protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (identification number: CRD42018112547). We will search PubMed, EMbase, Medline, Cochrane, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or "prospective cohort studies" of "fuzhenghuayu capsules," "anluohuaxian pills," "fufangbiejiaruangan tablets" respectively combined with entecavir in the treatment of chronic HBV-related liver fibrosis or cirrhosis from their inception to September 30, 2018. R 3.3.3 and GeMTC 0.14.3 software will be used for data analysis.

Background and Aim: Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LTx) has been reduced since the application of the combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs), the optimum regimen to prevent HBV recurrence with LTx favorable outcome is still not clear., Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NUCs prophylaxis (±HBIG) against HBV recurrence after LTx., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort-longitudinal study on 44 HBV-related post-LTx patients on anti-HBV prophylactic therapy. They included the entecavir (ETV)-based (n=34, 30 males) and the other NUC-based (n=10, 7 males) groups±HBIG., Results: The median age was 63.5 (60-70) years in ETV and 62.5 (55-65) years in other NUCs groups. The mean follow-up duration was 6.09±1.83 years in ETV-based group and 6.3±1.89 years in other NUCs-based group. The mean ETV duration was 3.47±3.04 years. In ETV+HBIG patients, none of them developed HBV recurrence throughout the ±8 years. In the 14 patients on ETV+other NUC+HBIG, four developed HBsAg positive and then transformed to HbsAb positive at the end of ±8 years without hepatitis or detectable HBV-DNA. Liver graft function showed nonsignificant difference for ETV-based patients, in comparison with other NUC groups (P=0.09). With subdivision, the graft function was maintained significantly better in ETV+HBIG or other NUCs+HBIG (P=0.04) groups. None of our patients reported NUCs-related complications or adverse effects., Conclusion: ETV and other NUCs were effective and safe as a long-term prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after LTx, leading to a good graft function. HBsAg temporally reappeared in a minority of patients, where all showed HBsAb seroconversion without detectable HBV-DNA or clinical hepatitis.

To avoid severe exacerbations in the load of hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a consequence of discontinuous use of anti-HBV drugs, entecavir (ETV), the first-line anti-HBV drug, was primally formulated as extended-release poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres in the present study. Because ETV is slightly soluble in water and in some other organic solvents used for microsphere preparation, methods for solid-microencapsulation were employed to fabricate the ETV microspheres. The optimized microspheres were evaluated for their morphology, particle size, drug loading, in vitro drug release, and in vivo pharmacokinetics in rats. The optimized formulation was found to have a mean particle size of 86 µm and drug loading of 13%. Differential scanning calorimetry and powder X-ray diffraction indicated that ETV existed in crystal, amorphous, and molecular states in the microspheres. In vitro and in vivo release revealed that the dissolution of ETV dominated the release process. The morphology of the microspheres and changes in the morphology during in vitro release were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. The novel ETV-MS described in this study should have great potential for clinical use as an alternative treatment against HBV., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) can be triggered by reactivation of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) are now the most potent antiviral agents for CHB. This study aimed to compare the short-term safety and efficacy of TDF with ETV in the treatment of ACLF due to reactivation of CHB [hepatitis B virus (HBV)-ACLF]., Patients and Methods: In total, 67 consecutive patients with HBV-ACLF were divided into TDF group (n=32) receiving daily TDF (300 mg/d) and ETV group (n=35) receiving daily ETV (0.5 mg/d). They were prospectively followed-up and the primary endpoint was overall survival at 3 months., Results: At 2 weeks, the TDF group had significantly higher HBV-DNA reduction (P=0.003), lower HBV-DNA level (P=0.001), higher rate of HBV-DNA undetectbility (P=0.007), lower Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP; P=0.003), and model for end-stage liver disease (P=0.002) scores than the ETV group. At 3 months, HBV-DNA was undetectable in all survived patients; CTP (P=0.970) and model for end-stage liver disease (P=0.192) scores were comparable between the 2 groups, but markedly lower than at baseline (P<0.01); the TDF group had significantly higher cumulative survival rate than the ETV group (P=0.025). The white blood cell count (hazard ratio, 2.726; 95% confidence interval, 2.691-7.897; P=0.000), and HBV-DNA reduction (hazard ratio, 0.266; 95% confidence interval, 0.033-0.629; P=0.013) at 2 weeks were independent predictors for mortality. Both drugs were well tolerated., Conclusions: The short-term efficacy of TDF was superior to ETV for the treatment of HBV-ACLF. The white blood cell count and HBV-DNA reduction at 2 weeks were independent predictors for mortality at 3 months.

Background and Study Aims: The aim of this study was to enlighten the controversy about the renal safety of entecavir, tenofovir, and telbivudine treatments in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients by comparing these treatments in real-world conditions., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 104 treatment-naive patients with CHB monoinfection into our study. Patients were treated with entecavir monotherapy (n=38), tenofovir monotherapy (n=35), or telbivudine monotherapy (n=31). We then compared and statistically analyzed the effects of these drugs on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a 24-month follow-up period., Results: In the entecavir group, time-dependent change in eGFR was not statistically significant (p = 0.357). There was a statistically significant increase in eGFR in the telbivudine group at 12 months (p<0.001) and at 24 months (p<0.001) and, in contrast, a statistically significant decrease in the tenofovir group at 12 months (p<0.001) and at 24 months (p<0.001). There was no significant relationship between entecavir and eGFR change (p = 0.763). We found that tenofovir and telbivudine were independent predictors of eGFR change (decrease in eGFR, p<0.001 and increase in eGFR, p = 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: We recommend close follow-up of renal functions, especially for patients treated with tenofovir. Telbivudine was superior to the other drugs in terms of renal function. We conclude that an individualized therapy program considering treatment efficacy and side effects is the best option for patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, (© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.)