Search

Introduction Patients with chronic rhinitis suffer from postnasal drip (PND) but this symptom is not well addressed. Nasal endoscopy may aid in identifying PND. Well described endoscopic features of PND are presence of secretions in the posterior nasal cavity, diffuse erythema, and hemorrhagic spots in the nasopharynx, but these have not been formally studied. Objectives The present study aims to assess the association of nasal endoscopic features with PND among rhinitis patients. This will guide clinicians to interpret the nasal endoscopic findings appropriately. Methods Adults (≥ 18 years old) with chronic rhinitis were consecutively recruited at an Otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic in a tertiary referral center. The patients were grouped into either "Rhinitis with PND" or "Rhinitis only." The endoscopic features of PND were scored as: Secretions in the posterior nasal cavity (yes/no), erythema in the nasopharynx (none, roof only, diffuse), hemorrhagic spots (yes/no), then were compared between groups. Results There were 98 patients included (age 32.32 ± 11.33 years old, 61.2% female, 61.2% PND). Presence of secretions in the posterior nasal cavity was associated with PND ("Rhinitis with PND" versus "Rhinitis only," 78.3 versus 55.3; p = 0.02; Odds ratio: 2.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–7.32). Diffuse erythema of the nasopharynx was more frequent in "rhinitis only" compared with those with PND (76.3 versus 53.3%; p = 0.02). Hemorrhagic spots were equally present in both groups (11.7 versus 18.4%; p = 0.35). Conclusion Presence of secretions in the posterior nasal cavity may indicate bothersome PND among patients with rhinitis. Diffuse erythema of the nasopharynx and hemorrhagic spots are a nonspecific sign of inflammation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parotid lymphoepithelial carcinoma is extremely rare, and makes up only 0.4% of cases among the anaplastic variant of salivary gland carcinoma. We present a 63-year-old man who had progressive enlarging right neck swelling for one year. He sought treatment in another centre and underwent superficial parotidectomy, following an ultrasound assessment of the mass that was suggestive of a benign parotid tumour. There was no fine needle aspiration cytology or other radiological imaging performed prior to the surgery. However, the surgeon encountered difficulty intraoperatively and abandoned the surgery. The incisional biopsy of the tumour was reported as lymphoepithelial carcinoma. He then presented to us with the progression of the residual parotid malignant tumour. CT and MRI showed a locally aggressive parotid tumour that had infiltrated the subcutaneous tissue, external auditory canal, facial nerve, and multiple ipsilateral metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Subsequently, the patient underwent total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice, lateral temporal bone resection and ipsilateral modified radical neck dissection. The surgical site defect was reconstructed with anterolateral thigh myocutaneous free flap. Concurrent static facial reanimation with fascia lata sling was performed. The patient received adjuvant chemoradiation following the surgery. The extent of the local infiltration by the tumour and the resulting surgery could have been reduced if the tumour had been properly assessed and excised at the initial stage. A complete preoperative assessment of a parotid mass is essential to avoid misdiagnosis, unexpected intraoperative finding and delay in definitive treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]