99 results on '"Grubmüller B"'
Search Results
2. EAU–ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer—an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees
- Author
-
Horwich, A., Babjuk, M., Bellmunt, J., Bruins, H.M., De Reijke, T.M., De Santis, M., Gillessen, S., James, N., Maclennan, S., Palou, J., Powles, T., Ribal, M.J., Shariat, S.F., Van Der Kwast, T., Xylinas, E., Agarwal, N., Arends, T., Bamias, A., Birtle, A., Black, P.C., Bochner, B.H., Bolla, M., Boormans, J.L., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Brummelhuis, I., Burger, M., Castellano, D., Cathomas, R., Chiti, A., Choudhury, A., Compérat, E., Crabb, S., Culine, S., De Bari, B., DeBlok, W., De Visschere, P.J.L., Decaestecker, K., Dimitropoulos, K., Dominguez-Escrig, J.L., Fanti, S., Fonteyne, V., Frydenberg, M., Futterer, J.J., Gakis, G., Geavlete, B., Gontero, P., Grubmüller, B., Hafeez, S., Hansel, D.E., Hartmann, A., Hayne, D., Henry, A.M., Hernandez, V., Herr, H., Herrmann, K., Hoskin, P., Huguet, J., Jereczek-Fossa, B.A., Jones, R., Kamat, A.M., Khoo, V., Kiltie, A.E., Krege, S., Ladoire, S., Lara, P.C., Leliveld, A., Linares-Espinós, E., Løgager, V., Lorch, A., Loriot, Y., Meijer, R., Carmen Mir, M., Moschini, M., Mostafid, H., Müller, A.-C., Müller, C.R., N’Dow, J., Necchi, A., Neuzillet, Y., Oddens, J.R., Oldenburg, J., Osanto, S., Oyen, W.J.G., Pacheco-Figueiredo, L., Pappot, H., Patel, M.I., Pieters, B.R., Plass, K., Remzi, M., Retz, M., Richenberg, J., Rink, M., Roghmann, F., Rosenberg, J.E., Rouprêt, M., Rouvière, O., Salembier, C., Salminen, A., Sargos, P., Sengupta, S., Sherif, A., Smeenk, R.J., Smits, A., Stenzl, A., Thalmann, G.N., Tombal, B., Turkbey, B., Vahr Lauridsen, S., Valdagni, R., Van Der Heijden, A.G., Van Poppel, H., Vartolomei, M.D., Veskimäe, E., Vilaseca, A., Vives Rivera, F.A., Wiegel, T., Wiklund, P., Williams, A., Zigeuner, R., and Witjes, J.A.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. 68Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy – diagnostic performance and impact on therapeutic decision-making
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., Baltzer, P., D’Andrea, D., Korn, S., Haug, A. R., Hacker, M., Grubmüller, K. H., Goldner, G. M., Wadsak, W., Pfaff, S., Babich, J., Seitz, C., Fajkovic, H., Susani, M., Mazal, P., Kramer, G., Shariat, S. F., and Hartenbach, Markus
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Identifying the optimal candidates for radiation therapy after salvage lymph node dissection for node-only recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Results from a multi-institutional collaboration
- Author
-
Bravi, C.A., primary, Fossati, N., additional, Gandaglia, G., additional, Motterle, G., additional, Karnes, R.J., additional, Pfister, D., additional, Heidenreich, A., additional, Kretschmer, A., additional, Stief, C., additional, Devos, G., additional, Joniau, S., additional, Van Poppel, H., additional, Osmonov, D., additional, Juenemann, K., additional, Grubmüller, B., additional, Shariat, S., additional, Nini, A., additional, Hiester, A., additional, Albers, P., additional, Tilki, D., additional, Graefen, M., additional, Gill, I.S., additional, Mottrie, A., additional, Montorsi, F., additional, and Briganti, A., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Corrigendum to ‘EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer—An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees’ [European Urology 77 (2020) 223–250](S0302283819307638)(10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035)
- Author
-
Witjes, J.A. Babjuk, M. Bellmunt, J. Bruins, H.M. De Reijke, T.M. De Santis, M. Gillessen, S. James, N. Maclennan, S. Palou, J. Powles, T. Ribal, M.J. Shariat, S.F. Van Der Kwast, T. Xylinas, E. Agarwal, N. Arends, T. Bamias, A. Birtle, A. Black, P.C. Bochner, B.H. Bolla, M. Boormans, J.L. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Brummelhuis, I. Burger, M. Castellano, D. Cathomas, R. Chiti, A. Choudhury, A. Compérat, E. Crabb, S. Culine, S. De Bari, B. De Blok, W. De Visschere, P.J.L. Decaestecker, K. Dimitropoulos, K. Dominguez-Escrig, J.L. Fanti, S. Fonteyne, V. Frydenberg, M. Futterer, J.J. Gakis, G. Geavlete, B. Gontero, P. Grubmüller, B. Hafeez, S. Hansel, D.E. Hartmann, A. Hayne, D. Henry, A.M. Hernandez, V. Herr, H. Herrmann, K. Hoskin, P. Huguet, J. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kamat, A.M. Khoo, V. Kiltie, A.E. Krege, S. Ladoire, S. Lara, P.C. Leliveld, A. Linares-Espinós, E. Løgager, V. Lorch, A. Loriot, Y. Meijer, R. Mir, M.C. Moschini, M. Mostafid, H. Müller, A.-C. Müller, C.R. N'Dow, J. Necchi, A. Neuzillet, Y. Oddens, J.R. Oldenburg, J. Osanto, S. Oyen, W.J.G. Pacheco-Figueiredo, L. Pappot, H. Patel, M.I. Pieters, B.R. Plass, K. Remzi, M. Retz, M. Richenberg, J. Rink, M. Roghmann, F. Rosenberg, J.E. Rouprêt, M. Rouvière, O. Salembier, C. Salminen, A. Sargos, P. Sengupta, S. Sherif, A. Smeenk, R.J. Smits, A. Stenzl, A. Thalmann, G.N. Tombal, B. Turkbey, B. Lauridsen, S.V. Valdagni, R. Van Der Heijden, A.G. Van Poppel, H. Vartolomei, M.D. Veskimäe, E. Vilaseca, A. Rivera, F.A.V. Wiegel, T. Wiklund, P. Willemse, P.-P.M. Williams, A. Zigeuner, R. Horwich, A.
- Abstract
The authors regret that a co-author was mistakenly missed from the authorship. The following co-author should have been included in the authorship: Peter-Paul M. Willemse Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands © 2019 European Society of Medical Oncology and European Association of Urology
- Published
- 2020
6. EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort†: Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees
- Author
-
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Der Kwast TV, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, J L De Visschere P, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, J G Oyen W, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A.
- Subjects
Consensus ,Follow-up ,education ,Bladder cancer ,Diagnosis ,Treatment ,Delphi - Abstract
Background: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. Objective: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. Design: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts prior to voting during a consensus conference. Setting: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. Participants: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), and 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). Results and limitations: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these statements, 33 (28%) achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease, and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. Conclusions: These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time when further evidence is available to guide our approach. Patient summary: This report summarises findings from an international, multistakeholder project organised by the EAU and ESMO. In this project, a steering committee identified areas of bladder cancer management where there is currently no good-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions. From this, they developed a series of proposed statements, 71 of which achieved consensus by a large group of experts in the field of bladder cancer. It is anticipated that these statements will provide further guidance to health care professionals and could help improve patient outcomes until a time when good-quality evidence is available.
- Published
- 2020
7. Supervised machine learning enables non-invasive lesion characterization in primary prostate cancer with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI
- Author
-
Papp, L., primary, Spielvogel, C. P., additional, Grubmüller, B., additional, Grahovac, M., additional, Krajnc, D., additional, Ecsedi, B., additional, Sareshgi, R. A.M., additional, Mohamad, D., additional, Hamboeck, M., additional, Rausch, I., additional, Mitterhauser, M., additional, Wadsak, W., additional, Haug, A. R., additional, Kenner, L., additional, Mazal, P., additional, Susani, M., additional, Hartenbach, S., additional, Baltzer, P., additional, Helbich, T. H., additional, Kramer, G., additional, Shariat, S.F., additional, Beyer, T., additional, Hartenbach, M., additional, and Hacker, M., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Response prediction to 7400MBq 177 Lu-PSMA-617 at 4 weeks interval in patients with metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer
- Author
-
Rasul, S, additional, Hartenbach, M, additional, Hacker, M, additional, Kretschmer-Chott, E, additional, Leisser, A, additional, Grubmüller, B, additional, Kramer, G, additional, Shariat, S, additional, Mitterhauser, M, additional, Wadsak, W, additional, and Haug, AR, additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Die immunmodulative Auswirkung der Tonsillektomie beim Nierenzellkarzinom
- Author
-
Omid, S, D'Andrea, D, Garstka, N, Fajkovic, H, Grubmüller, B, Abufaraj, M, Shariat, SF, and Remzi, M
- Subjects
ddc: 610 ,610 Medical sciences ,Medicine - Abstract
Einleitung: Es gibt immer mehr Belege dafür, dass chronische Entzündungsprozesse im Körper das Krebsrisiko erhöhen. Die langfristigen Auswirkungen einer Tonsillektomie könnte die Produktion und Regulierung von Lymphozyten beeinflussen, was wiederum in einer beeinträchtigen[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL], 45. Gemeinsame Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie und Andrologie und der Bayerischen Urologenvereinigung
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. EAU–ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer—an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees
- Author
-
Horwich, A. Babjuk, M. Bellmunt, J. Bruins, H.M. De Reijke, T.M. De Santis, M. Gillessen, S. James, N. Maclennan, S. Palou, J. Powles, T. Ribal, M.J. Shariat, S.F. Van Der Kwast, T. Xylinas, E. Agarwal, N. Arends, T. Bamias, A. Birtle, A. Black, P.C. Bochner, B.H. Bolla, M. Boormans, J.L. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Brummelhuis, I. Burger, M. Castellano, D. Cathomas, R. Chiti, A. Choudhury, A. Compérat, E. Crabb, S. Culine, S. De Bari, B. DeBlok, W. De Visschere, P.J.L. Decaestecker, K. Dimitropoulos, K. Dominguez-Escrig, J.L. Fanti, S. Fonteyne, V. Frydenberg, M. Futterer, J.J. Gakis, G. Geavlete, B. Gontero, P. Grubmüller, B. Hafeez, S. Hansel, D.E. Hartmann, A. Hayne, D. Henry, A.M. Hernandez, V. Herr, H. Herrmann, K. Hoskin, P. Huguet, J. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kamat, A.M. Khoo, V. Kiltie, A.E. Krege, S. Ladoire, S. Lara, P.C. Leliveld, A. Linares-Espinós, E. Løgager, V. Lorch, A. Loriot, Y. Meijer, R. Carmen Mir, M. Moschini, M. Mostafid, H. Müller, A.-C. Müller, C.R. N'Dow, J. Necchi, A. Neuzillet, Y. Oddens, J.R. Oldenburg, J. Osanto, S. Oyen, W.J.G. Pacheco-Figueiredo, L. Pappot, H. Patel, M.I. Pieters, B.R. Plass, K. Remzi, M. Retz, M. Richenberg, J. Rink, M. Roghmann, F. Rosenberg, J.E. Rouprêt, M. Rouvière, O. Salembier, C. Salminen, A. Sargos, P. Sengupta, S. Sherif, A. Smeenk, R.J. Smits, A. Stenzl, A. Thalmann, G.N. Tombal, B. Turkbey, B. Vahr Lauridsen, S. Valdagni, R. Van Der Heijden, A.G. Van Poppel, H. Vartolomei, M.D. Veskimäe, E. Vilaseca, A. Vives Rivera, F.A. Wiegel, T. Wiklund, P. Williams, A. Zigeuner, R. Witjes, J.A.
- Subjects
education - Abstract
Background: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. Objective: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. Design: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. Setting: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. Participants: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1–3 (disagree), 4–6 (equivocal), 7–9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). Results and limitations: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. Conclusions: These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach. © 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology
- Published
- 2019
11. EAU–ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer - an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort : under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees
- Author
-
Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, Amir, Smeenk, R J, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Der Heijden, A G, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, Witjes, J A, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, Amir, Smeenk, R J, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Der Heijden, A G, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, and Witjes, J A
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus sta
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†.
- Author
-
UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, Witjes, J A, Van Der Heijden, A G, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, Bertrand, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Poppel, H, Sherif, A, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, Smeenk, R J, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, Witjes, J A, Van Der Heijden, A G, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, Bertrand, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Poppel, H, Sherif, A, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, Smeenk, R J, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, and Sengupta, S
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus sta
- Published
- 2019
13. Vergleich der Radiotherapie mit radikaler Zystektomie in Patienten, die für eine systematische Chemotherapie nicht geeignet sind
- Author
-
D'Andrea, D, Abufaraj, M, Soria, F, Gust, K, Haitel, A, Stangl-Kremser, J, Goldner, G, Grubmüller, B, Shariat, SF, D'Andrea, D, Abufaraj, M, Soria, F, Gust, K, Haitel, A, Stangl-Kremser, J, Goldner, G, Grubmüller, B, and Shariat, SF
- Published
- 2019
14. Klinische Wertigkeit der Serum Cholinesterase in Patienten mit Urothelkarzinom des oberen Harntraktes, die mit radikaler Nephroureterektomie behandelt wurden
- Author
-
D'Andrea, D, Resch, I, Margulis, V, Karakiewicz, PI, Roupret, M, Lotan, Y, Rink, M, Abufaraj, M, Grubmüller, B, Soria, F, Shariat, SF, D'Andrea, D, Resch, I, Margulis, V, Karakiewicz, PI, Roupret, M, Lotan, Y, Rink, M, Abufaraj, M, Grubmüller, B, Soria, F, and Shariat, SF
- Published
- 2019
15. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†
- Author
-
Cancer, Verpleegkundig Specialisten, MS Urologische Oncologie, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, A, Smeenk, R J, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Der Heijden, A G, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, Witjes, J A, Cancer, Verpleegkundig Specialisten, MS Urologische Oncologie, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, H M, Reijke, T M De, Santis, M De, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, M J, Shariat, S F, Kwast, T Van Der, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, P C, Bochner, B H, Bolla, M, Boormans, J L, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Compérat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, Bari, B De, Blok, W De, De Visschere, P J L, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, J L, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, J J, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmüller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, D E, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, A M, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, B A, Jones, R, Kamat, A M, Khoo, V, Kiltie, A E, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, P C, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinós, E, Løgager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, M Carmen, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Müller, A-C, Müller, C R, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, J R, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, W J G, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, M I, Pieters, B R, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, J E, Rouprêt, M, Rouvière, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, A, Smeenk, R J, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, G N, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, S Vahr, Valdagni, R, Van Der Heijden, A G, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, M D, Veskimäe, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, F A Vives, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, and Witjes, J A
- Published
- 2019
16. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort:under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†
- Author
-
Horwich, A., Babjuk, M., Bellmunt, J., Bruins, H. M., Reijke, T. M.De, Santis, M. De, Gillessen, S., James, N., Maclennan, S., Palou, J., Powles, T., Ribal, M. J., Shariat, S. F., Kwast, T. Van Der, Xylinas, E., Agarwal, N., Arends, T., Bamias, A., Birtle, A., Black, P. C., Bochner, B. H., Bolla, M., Boormans, J. L., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Brummelhuis, I., Burger, M., Castellano, D., Cathomas, R., Chiti, A., Choudhury, A., Compérat, E., Crabb, S., Culine, S., Bari, B. De, Blok, W. De, De Visschere, P. J.L., Decaestecker, K., Dimitropoulos, K., Dominguez-Escrig, J. L., Fanti, S., Fonteyne, V., Frydenberg, M., Futterer, J. J., Gakis, G., Geavlete, B., Gontero, P., Grubmüller, B., Hafeez, S., Hansel, D. E., Hartmann, A., Hayne, D., Henry, A. M., Hernandez, V., Herr, H., Herrmann, K., Hoskin, P., Huguet, J., Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Jones, R., Kamat, A. M., Khoo, V., Kiltie, A. E., Krege, S., Ladoire, S., Lara, P. C., Leliveld, A., Linares-Espinós, E., Løgager, V., Lorch, A., Loriot, Y., Meijer, R., Mir, M. Carmen, Moschini, M., Mostafid, H., Müller, A. C., Müller, C. R., N'Dow, J., Necchi, A., Neuzillet, Y., Oddens, J. R., Oldenburg, J., Osanto, S., Oyen, W. J.G., Pacheco-Figueiredo, L., Pappot, H., Patel, M. I., Pieters, B. R., Plass, K., Remzi, M., Retz, M., Richenberg, J., Rink, M., Roghmann, F., Rosenberg, J. E., Rouprêt, M., Rouvière, O., Salembier, C., Salminen, A., Sargos, P., Sengupta, S., Sherif, A., Smeenk, R. J., Smits, A., Stenzl, A., Thalmann, G. N., Tombal, B., Turkbey, B., Lauridsen, S. Vahr, Valdagni, R., Van Der Heijden, A. G., Van Poppel, H., Vartolomei, M. D., Veskimäe, E., Vilaseca, A., Rivera, F. A.Vives, Wiegel, T., Wiklund, P., Williams, A., Zigeuner, R., Witjes, J. A., Horwich, A., Babjuk, M., Bellmunt, J., Bruins, H. M., Reijke, T. M.De, Santis, M. De, Gillessen, S., James, N., Maclennan, S., Palou, J., Powles, T., Ribal, M. J., Shariat, S. F., Kwast, T. Van Der, Xylinas, E., Agarwal, N., Arends, T., Bamias, A., Birtle, A., Black, P. C., Bochner, B. H., Bolla, M., Boormans, J. L., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Brummelhuis, I., Burger, M., Castellano, D., Cathomas, R., Chiti, A., Choudhury, A., Compérat, E., Crabb, S., Culine, S., Bari, B. De, Blok, W. De, De Visschere, P. J.L., Decaestecker, K., Dimitropoulos, K., Dominguez-Escrig, J. L., Fanti, S., Fonteyne, V., Frydenberg, M., Futterer, J. J., Gakis, G., Geavlete, B., Gontero, P., Grubmüller, B., Hafeez, S., Hansel, D. E., Hartmann, A., Hayne, D., Henry, A. M., Hernandez, V., Herr, H., Herrmann, K., Hoskin, P., Huguet, J., Jereczek-Fossa, B. A., Jones, R., Kamat, A. M., Khoo, V., Kiltie, A. E., Krege, S., Ladoire, S., Lara, P. C., Leliveld, A., Linares-Espinós, E., Løgager, V., Lorch, A., Loriot, Y., Meijer, R., Mir, M. Carmen, Moschini, M., Mostafid, H., Müller, A. C., Müller, C. R., N'Dow, J., Necchi, A., Neuzillet, Y., Oddens, J. R., Oldenburg, J., Osanto, S., Oyen, W. J.G., Pacheco-Figueiredo, L., Pappot, H., Patel, M. I., Pieters, B. R., Plass, K., Remzi, M., Retz, M., Richenberg, J., Rink, M., Roghmann, F., Rosenberg, J. E., Rouprêt, M., Rouvière, O., Salembier, C., Salminen, A., Sargos, P., Sengupta, S., Sherif, A., Smeenk, R. J., Smits, A., Stenzl, A., Thalmann, G. N., Tombal, B., Turkbey, B., Lauridsen, S. Vahr, Valdagni, R., Van Der Heijden, A. G., Van Poppel, H., Vartolomei, M. D., Veskimäe, E., Vilaseca, A., Rivera, F. A.Vives, Wiegel, T., Wiklund, P., Williams, A., Zigeuner, R., and Witjes, J. A.
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus
- Published
- 2019
17. Immunomodulative role of tonsillectomy in renal cell carcinoma
- Author
-
Omid, S., primary, D'Andrea, D., additional, Garstka, N., additional, Fajkovic, H., additional, Abufaraj, M., additional, Grubmüller, B., additional, Shariat, S.F., additional, and Remzi, M., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., primary, Senn, D., additional, Kramer, G., additional, Baltzer, P., additional, D’Andrea, D., additional, Eidherr, H., additional, Haug, A., additional, Wadsak, W., additional, Pfaff, S., additional, Hacker, M., additional, Shariat, S.F., additional, and Hartenbach, M., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET-parameters in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., primary, Baltzer, P., additional, D’Andrea, D., additional, Soria, F., additional, Haug, A., additional, Wadsak, W., additional, Pfaff, S., additional, Berndl, F., additional, Mitterhauser, M., additional, Balber, T., additional, Babich, J., additional, Grubmüller, K.H., additional, Seitz, C., additional, Kramer, G., additional, Hacker, M., additional, Shariat, S.F., additional, and Hartenbach, M., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Staging performance and clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET/MRI for primary diagnosed prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., primary, D’Andrea, D., additional, Hartenbach, S., additional, Baltzer, P., additional, Haug, A., additional, Hacker, M., additional, Goldner, G., additional, Seitz, C., additional, Fajkovic, H., additional, Susani, M., additional, Mazal, P., additional, Shariat, S., additional, and Hartenbach, M., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy and radical cystectomy in unfit patients with resectable urinary bladder cancer
- Author
-
D’Andrea, D., primary, Stangl-Kremser, J., additional, Goldner, G., additional, Soria, F., additional, Grubmüller, B., additional, Hermann, H., additional, Abufaraj, M., additional, Foerster, B., additional, Kimura, S., additional, and Shariat, S., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Prospective evaluation of the performance of 68Ga-PSMA 11-PET CT/MRI imaging for lymph node staging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
- Author
-
Abufaraj, M., primary, Grubmüller, B., additional, Hartenbach, M., additional, Kramer, G., additional, Haitel, A., additional, Baltzer, P., additional, Haug, A., additional, Wadsak, W., additional, Pfaff, S., additional, Briganti, A., additional, and Shariat, S.F., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Local treatment of metastasis improves oncological outcome in men with prostate cancer undergoing cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCA)
- Author
-
Heidenreich, A., primary, Fossati, N., additional, Karnes, J., additional, Shariat, S., additional, Pfister, D., additional, Montorsi, F., additional, Soligo, M., additional, Grubmüller, B., additional, and Briganti, A., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Lokal begrenztes Prostatakarzinom
- Author
-
Grubmüller B
- Subjects
Prostatakarzinom ,Lymphknotenrezidiv ,Urocyclicum ,Bestrahlung ,Salvage-Therapie ,lcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,lcsh:RC870-923 ,Prostatektomie - Published
- 2016
25. Prostatakarzinom Diagnostik und Active Surveillance
- Author
-
Grubmüller B
- Subjects
PSA ,Prostatakarzinom ,Prostatabiopsie ,Urocyclicum ,active surveillance ,lcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology ,lcsh:RC870-923 - Published
- 2016
26. 68 Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET/CT and PET/MRI in patients with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment for clinically non-metastatic prostate cancer – detection and impact on therapeutic management
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., primary, Baltzer, P., additional, D’Andrea, D., additional, Korn, S., additional, Haug, A.R., additional, Hacker, M., additional, Grubmüller, K.H., additional, Goldner, G.M., additional, Seitz, C., additional, Fajkovic, H., additional, Susani, M., additional, Mazal, P., additional, Kramer, G., additional, Shariat, S.F., additional, and Hartenbach, M., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. 36 - Immunomodulative role of tonsillectomy in renal cell carcinoma
- Author
-
Omid, S., D'Andrea, D., Garstka, N., Fajkovic, H., Abufaraj, M., Grubmüller, B., Shariat, S.F., and Remzi, M.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. 526 - Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., Senn, D., Kramer, G., Baltzer, P., D’Andrea, D., Eidherr, H., Haug, A., Wadsak, W., Pfaff, S., Hacker, M., Shariat, S.F., and Hartenbach, M.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. 923 - Staging performance and clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET/MRI for primary diagnosed prostate cancer
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., D’Andrea, D., Hartenbach, S., Baltzer, P., Haug, A., Hacker, M., Goldner, G., Seitz, C., Fajkovic, H., Susani, M., Mazal, P., Shariat, S., and Hartenbach, M.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. 408 - Local treatment of metastasis improves oncological outcome in men with prostate cancer undergoing cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCA)
- Author
-
Heidenreich, A., Fossati, N., Karnes, J., Shariat, S., Pfister, D., Montorsi, F., Soligo, M., Grubmüller, B., and Briganti, A.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. 405 - Prospective evaluation of the performance of 68Ga-PSMA 11-PET CT/MRI imaging for lymph node staging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
- Author
-
Abufaraj, M., Grubmüller, B., Hartenbach, M., Kramer, G., Haitel, A., Baltzer, P., Haug, A., Wadsak, W., Pfaff, S., Briganti, A., and Shariat, S.F.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. 97 - Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy and radical cystectomy in unfit patients with resectable urinary bladder cancer
- Author
-
D’Andrea, D., Stangl-Kremser, J., Goldner, G., Soria, F., Grubmüller, B., Hermann, H., Abufaraj, M., Foerster, B., Kimura, S., and Shariat, S.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET imaging in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy - diagnostic performance and impact on therapeutic decision-making.
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., Baltzer, P., D’Andrea, D., Korn, S., Haug, A. R., Hacker, M., Grubmüller, K. H., Goldner, G. M., Wadsak, W., Pfaff, S., Babich, J., Seitz, C., Fajkovic, H., Susani, M., Mazal, P., Kramer, G., Shariat, S. F., and Hartenbach, Markus
- Subjects
- *
CANCER relapse , *POSITRON emission tomography , *PROSTATECTOMY , *PROSTATE-specific antigen , *PROSTATE cancer , *DIFFUSION magnetic resonance imaging , *DIAGNOSIS - Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of [Ga]Ga-PSMA conjugate 11 positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) in the early detection of metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically non-metastatic prostate cancer, to compare it to CT/MRI alone and to assess its impact on further therapeutic decisions. Material and methods: We retrospectively assessed 117 consecutive hormone-naïve BCR patients who had Ga-PSMA 11 PET/CT ( n = 46) or PET/MRI ( n = 71) between May 2014 and January 2017. BCR was defined as two PSA rises above 0.2 ng/ml. Two dedicated uro-oncological imaging experts (radiology/nuclear medicine) reviewed separately all images. All results were presented in a blinded sequential fashion to a multidisciplinary tumorboard in order to assess the influence of PSMA-PET imaging on decision-making. Results: The median time from RP to BCR was 36 months (IQR 16-72). Overall, 69 (59%) patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Median PSA level at the time of imaging was 1.04 ng/ml (IQR 0.58-1.87). PSMA-positive lesions were detected in 100 (85.5%) patients. Detection rates were 65% for a PSA value of 0.2 to <0.5 ng/ml, 85.7% for 0.5 to <1, 85.7% for 1 to <2 and 100% for ≥2. PSMA-positive lesions could be confirmed by either histology (16%), PSA decrease in metastasis-directed radiotherapy (45%) or additional information in diffusion-weighted imaging when PET/MRI was performed (18%) in 79% of patients. PSMA-PET detected lesions in 67 patients (57.3%) who had no suspicious correlates according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria on MRI or CT. PSMA-PET changed therapeutic decisions in 74.6% of these 67 patients ( p < 0.001), with 86% of them being considered for metastases-directed therapies. Conclusions: We confirm the high performance of PSMA-PET imaging for the detection of disease recurrence sites in patients with BCR after RP, even at relatively low PSA levels. Moreover, it adds significant information to standard CT/MRI, changing treatment strategies in a significant number of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. 68 - 68Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET/CT and PET/MRI in patients with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment for clinically non-metastatic prostate cancer – detection and impact on therapeutic management
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., Baltzer, P., D’Andrea, D., Korn, S., Haug, A.R., Hacker, M., Grubmüller, K.H., Goldner, G.M., Seitz, C., Fajkovic, H., Susani, M., Mazal, P., Kramer, G., Shariat, S.F., and Hartenbach, M.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Response prediction to 7400MBq177 Lu-PSMA-617 at 4 weeks interval in patients with metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Rasul, S, Hartenbach, M, Hacker, M, Kretschmer-Chott, E, Leisser, A, Grubmüller, B, Kramer, G, Shariat, S, Mitterhauser, M, Wadsak, W, and Haug, AR
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Response prediction to 7400MBq 177 Lu-PSMA-617 at 4 weeks interval in patients with metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer
- Author
-
Rasul, S, Hartenbach, M, Hacker, M, Kretschmer-Chott, E, Leisser, A, Grubmüller, B, Kramer, G, Shariat, S, Mitterhauser, M, Wadsak, W, and Haug, AR
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. 1 - Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET-parameters in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Grubmüller, B., Baltzer, P., D'Andrea, D., Soria, F., Haug, A., Wadsak, W., Pfaff, S., Berndl, F., Mitterhauser, M., Balber, T., Babich, J., Grubmüller, K.H., Seitz, C., Kramer, G., Hacker, M., Shariat, S.F., and Hartenbach, M.
- Subjects
- *
CASTRATION-resistant prostate cancer , *CANCER hormone therapy , *PROSTATE , *CASTRATION - Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort
- Author
-
Antoine G. van der Heijden, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Joost L. Boormans, Bogdan Geavlete, Iris Brummelhuis, Andrew K. Williams, Christoph R. Müller, Susanne Vahr Lauridsen, Arturo Chiti, Manish I. Patel, Jonathan E. Rosenberg, Baris Turkbey, Carl Salembier, Thomas Wiegel, Anja Lorch, Valérie Fonteyne, Willem de Blok, Evanguelos Xylinas, Antti Salminen, Ann Henry, Karin Plass, Amir Sherif, Hugh Mostafid, Peter Wiklund, Erik Veskimäe, Hein Van Poppel, Max Bürger, Juan Palou, J. Domínguez-Escrig, Karel Decaestecker, Morgan Rouprêt, Helle Pappot, Paul Sargos, Berardino De Bari, Riccardo Valdagni, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo, Jorge Huguet, Silke Gillessen, Olivier Rouvière, Maria J. Ribal, Yann Neuzillet, Richard Cathomas, Shaista Hafeez, Robert Jan Smeenk, Mark Frydenberg, Marek Babjuk, Antoni Vilaseca, Maria De Santis, Jonathan Richenberg, Annemarie Leliveld, Tom J.H. Arends, Shomik Sengupta, Vibeke Løgager, Harry W. Herr, Wim J.G. Oyen, Ananya Choudhury, Nicholas D. James, Susanne Osanto, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Vincent Khoo, A. Müller, Neeraj Agarwal, Pieter De Visschere, Bradley R. Pieters, Alberto Briganti, Robert Jones, Peter C. Black, Alberto Bossi, H. Maxim Bruins, Richard P. Meijer, Bertrand Tombal, Ken Herrmann, Donna E. Hansel, M. Carmen Mir, Stéphane Culine, J. Alfred Witjes, Virginia Hernández, Joaquim Bellmunt, Arnulf Stenzl, Eva Compérat, Alan Horwich, Alison Birtle, Jorg R. Oddens, Bernhard Grubmüller, Margitta Retz, Sylvain Ladoire, Marco Moschini, Aristotle Bamias, Simon J. Crabb, Michel Bolla, Theo H. van der Kwast, Steven MacLennan, Michael Rink, Anita Smits, Yohann Loriot, Estefania Linares-Espinós, James N'Dow, Theo M. de Reijke, Thomas Powles, Jurgen J. Fütterer, Arndt Hartmann, Daniel Castellano, Mesut Remzi, Paolo Gontero, Dickon Hayne, Anne E. Kiltie, Richard Zigeuner, Georgios Gakis, Franklin A. Vives Rivera, Stefano Fanti, Susanne Krege, Pedro C. Lara, Mihai Dorin Vartolomei, Ashish M. Kamat, Jan Oldenburg, Peter Hoskin, Andrea Necchi, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, George N. Thalmann, Bernard H. Bochner, Florian Roghmann, Horwich, A, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, Hm, De Reijke, Tm, De Santis, M, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, Mj, Shariat, Sf, Van der Kwast, T, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, Pc, Bochner, Bh, Bolla, M, Boormans, Jl, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Comperat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, De Bari, B, De Blok, W, De Visschere, Pjl, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, Jl, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, Jj, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmuller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, De, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, Am, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, Ba, Jones, R, Kamat, Am, Khoo, V, Kiltie, Ae, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, Pc, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinos, E, Logager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, Mc, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Muller, Ac, Muller, Cr, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, Jr, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, Wjg, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, Mi, Pieters, Br, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, Je, Roupret, M, Rouviere, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, A, Smeenk, Rj, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, Gn, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, Sv, Valdagni, R, Van der Heijden, Ag, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, Md, Veskimae, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, Fav, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, Witjes, Ja, Radiation Oncology, Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA., Universidade do Minho, APH - Personalized Medicine, APH - Quality of Care, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Urology, Radiotherapy, UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, and Pathology
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Delphi Technique ,diagnosis ,International Cooperation ,Medicina Básica [Ciências Médicas] ,Delphi method ,Medizin ,CISPLATIN-INELIGIBLE PATIENTS ,Medical Oncology ,Delphi ,0302 clinical medicine ,PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,consensu ,follow-up ,SINGLE-ARM ,Medicine ,Statistical analysis ,Multi stakeholder ,TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA ,Societies, Medical ,computer.programming_language ,treatment ,Consensus conference ,Hematology ,3. Good health ,Europe ,diagnosi ,Oncology ,Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 15] ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Ciências Médicas::Medicina Básica ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,TUMOR RESPONSE ,Special article ,bladder cancer ,RADICAL CYSTECTOMY ,LYMPHOCYTE RATIO ,medicine.medical_specialty ,METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA ,Urology ,Urinary Bladder ,education ,Rare cancers Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 9] ,LONG-TERM-SURVIVAL ,03 medical and health sciences ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Stakeholder Participation ,Urological cancers Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 15] ,Journal Article ,Humans ,Oligometastatic disease ,Neoplasm Staging ,Science & Technology ,Bladder cancer ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,030104 developmental biology ,Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ,consensus ,Family medicine ,business ,computer - Abstract
Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. Background: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. Objective: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. Design: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. Setting: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. Participants: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1–3 (disagree), 4–6 (equivocal), 7–9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as 70% agreement and 15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). Results and limitations: Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. Conclusions: These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach, The authors would like to thank Peter E. Clark from Atrium Health, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA, for his contribution to the Delphi survey. Angela Corstorphine of Kstorfin Medical Communications Ltd provided medical writing support with the preparation of this manuscript; this support was funded jointly by EAU and ESMO.
- Published
- 2019
39. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer
- Author
-
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Comperat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmuller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinos E, Logager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Muller AC, Muller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Roupret M, Rouviere O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Van der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimae E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A, Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Der Kwast TV, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, J L De Visschere P, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, J G Oyen W, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Der Heijden AGV, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A., UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, Witjes, Ja, Babjuk, M, Bellmunt, J, Bruins, Hm, De Reijke, Tm, De Santis, M, Gillessen, S, James, N, Maclennan, S, Palou, J, Powles, T, Ribal, Mj, Shariat, Sf, Van der Kwast, T, Xylinas, E, Agarwal, N, Arends, T, Bamias, A, Birtle, A, Black, Pc, Bochner, Bh, Bolla, M, Boormans, Jl, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Brummelhuis, I, Burger, M, Castellano, D, Cathomas, R, Chiti, A, Choudhury, A, Comperat, E, Crabb, S, Culine, S, De Bari, B, De Blok, W, De Visschere, Pjl, Decaestecker, K, Dimitropoulos, K, Dominguez-Escrig, Jl, Fanti, S, Fonteyne, V, Frydenberg, M, Futterer, Jj, Gakis, G, Geavlete, B, Gontero, P, Grubmuller, B, Hafeez, S, Hansel, De, Hartmann, A, Hayne, D, Henry, Am, Hernandez, V, Herr, H, Herrmann, K, Hoskin, P, Huguet, J, Jereczek-Fossa, Ba, Jones, R, Kamat, Am, Khoo, V, Kiltie, Ae, Krege, S, Ladoire, S, Lara, Pc, Leliveld, A, Linares-Espinos, E, Logager, V, Lorch, A, Loriot, Y, Meijer, R, Mir, Mc, Moschini, M, Mostafid, H, Muller, Ac, Muller, Cr, N'Dow, J, Necchi, A, Neuzillet, Y, Oddens, Jr, Oldenburg, J, Osanto, S, Oyen, Wjg, Pacheco-Figueiredo, L, Pappot, H, Patel, Mi, Pieters, Br, Plass, K, Remzi, M, Retz, M, Richenberg, J, Rink, M, Roghmann, F, Rosenberg, Je, Roupret, M, Rouviere, O, Salembier, C, Salminen, A, Sargos, P, Sengupta, S, Sherif, A, Smeenk, Rj, Smits, A, Stenzl, A, Thalmann, Gn, Tombal, B, Turkbey, B, Lauridsen, Sv, Valdagni, R, Van der Heijden, Ag, Van Poppel, H, Vartolomei, Md, Veskimae, E, Vilaseca, A, Rivera, Fav, Wiegel, T, Wiklund, P, Williams, A, Zigeuner, R, and Horwich, A
- Subjects
Treatment ,Consensus ,Follow-up ,education ,Bladder cancer ,Diagnosis ,Consensu ,Delphi ,Diagnosi - Abstract
Background: Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial.Objective: To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management.Design: A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts prior to voting during a consensus conference.Setting: Online Delphi survey and consensus conference.Participants: The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), and 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as >= 70% agreement and
- Published
- 2020
40. A novel assessment of whole-mount Gleason grading in prostate cancer to identify candidates for radical prostatectomy: a machine learning-based multiomics study.
- Author
-
Ning J, Spielvogel CP, Haberl D, Trachtova K, Stoiber S, Rasul S, Bystry V, Wasinger G, Baltzer P, Gurnhofer E, Timelthaler G, Schlederer M, Papp L, Schachner H, Helbich T, Hartenbach M, Grubmüller B, Shariat SF, Hacker M, Haug A, and Kenner L
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Prospective Studies, Pilot Projects, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Genomics methods, Multiomics, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Machine Learning, Prostatectomy methods, Neoplasm Grading
- Abstract
Purpose : This study aims to assess whole-mount Gleason grading (GG) in prostate cancer (PCa) accurately using a multiomics machine learning (ML) model and to compare its performance with biopsy-proven GG (bxGG) assessment. Materials and Methods : A total of 146 patients with PCa recruited in a pilot study of a prospective clinical trial (NCT02659527) were retrospectively included in the side study, all of whom underwent
68 Ga-PSMA-11 integrated positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance (MR) before radical prostatectomy (RP) between May 2014 and April 2020. To establish a multiomics ML model, we quantified PET radiomics features, pathway-level genomics features from whole exome sequencing, and pathomics features derived from immunohistochemical staining of 11 biomarkers. Based on the multiomics dataset, five ML models were established and validated using 100-fold Monte Carlo cross-validation. Results : Among five ML models, the random forest (RF) model performed best in terms of the area under the curve (AUC). Compared to bxGG assessment alone, the RF model was superior in terms of AUC (0.87 vs 0.75), specificity (0.72 vs 0.61), positive predictive value (0.79 vs 0.75), and accuracy (0.78 vs 0.77) and showed slightly decreased sensitivity (0.83 vs 0.89) and negative predictive value (0.80 vs 0.81). Among the feature categories, bxGG was identified as the most important feature, followed by pathomics, clinical, radiomics and genomics features. The three important individual features were bxGG, PSA staining and one intensity-related radiomics feature. Conclusion : The findings demonstrate a superior assessment of the developed multiomics-based ML model in whole-mount GG compared to the current clinical baseline of bxGG. This enables personalized patient management by identifying high-risk PCa patients for RP., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (© The author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Comparison of discovery rates and prognostic utility of [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA in prostate cancer-a cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Kluge K, Einspieler H, Haberl D, Spielvogel C, Amereller D, Egger G, Kramer G, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Hacker M, Kenner L, and Haug A
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Prognosis, Oligopeptides, Cross-Sectional Studies, Middle Aged, Gallium Radioisotopes, Gallium Isotopes, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Prostatic Neoplasms genetics, Prostatic Neoplasms blood, Edetic Acid analogs & derivatives, Circulating Tumor DNA blood, Circulating Tumor DNA genetics
- Abstract
Background: Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron-emission tomography (PET) enable minimal-invasive prostate cancer (PCa) detection and survival prognostication. The present study aims to compare their tumor discovery abilities and prognostic values., Methods: One hundred thirty men with confirmed PCa (70.5 ± 8.0 years) who underwent [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (184.8 ± 19.7 MBq) imaging and plasma sample collection (March 2019-August 2021) were included. Plasma-extracted cell-free DNA was subjected to whole-genome-based ctDNA analysis. PSMA-positive tumor lesions were delineated and their quantitative parameters extracted. ctDNA and PSMA PET/CT discovery rates were compared, and the prognostic value for overall survival (OS) was evaluated., Results: PSMA PET discovery rates according to castration status and PSA ranges did differ significantly (P = 0.013, P < 0.001), while ctDNA discovery rates did not (P = 0.311, P = 0.123). ctDNA discovery rates differed between localized and metastatic disease (P = 0.013). Correlations between ctDNA concentrations and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were significant in all (r = 0.42, P < 0.001) and castration-resistant (r = 0.65, P < 0.001), however not in hormone-sensitive patients (r = 0.15, P = 0.249). PSMA-TV and ctDNA levels were associated with survival outcomes in the Logrank (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.0023, P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: These findings suggest that PSMA PET imaging outperforms ctDNA analysis in detecting prostate cancer across the whole spectrum of disease, while both modalities are independently highly prognostic for survival outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Assessment of PSMA Expression of Healthy Organs in Different Stages of Prostate Cancer Using [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET Examinations.
- Author
-
Einspieler H, Kluge K, Haberl D, Schatz K, Nics L, Schmitl S, Geist BK, Spielvogel CP, Grubmüller B, Baltzer PAT, Kramer G, Shariat SF, Hacker M, and Rasul S
- Abstract
The efficacy of radioligand therapy (RLT) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is currently being investigated for its application in patients with early-stage prostate cancer (PCa). However, little is known about PSMA expression in healthy organs in this cohort. Collectively, 202 [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography (PET) scans from 152 patients were studied. Of these, 102 PET scans were from patients with primary PCa and hormone-sensitive biochemically recurrent PCa and 50 PET scans were from patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) before and after three cycles of [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT. PSMA-standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured in multiple organs and PSMA-total tumor volume (PSMA-TTV) was determined in all cohorts. The measured PET parameters of the different cohorts were normalized to the bloodpool and compared using t- or Mann-Whitney U tests. Patients with early-stage PCa had lower PSMA-TTVs (10.39 mL vs. 462.42 mL, p < 0.001) and showed different SUVs in the thyroid, submandibular glands, heart, liver, kidneys, intestine, testes and bone marrow compared to patients with advanced CRPC, with all tests showing p < 0.05. Despite the differences in the PSMA-TTV of patients with mCRPC before and after [177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-RLT (462.42 mL vs. 276.29 mL, p = 0.023), no significant organ differences in PET parameters were detected. These suggest different degrees of PSMA-ligand binding among patients with different stages of PCa that could influence radiotoxicity during earlier stages of disease in different organs when PSMA-RLT is administered.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Clinical parameters for the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in patients with negative PSMA-PET.
- Author
-
Huebner NA, Wasinger G, Rajwa P, Resch I, Korn S, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Prüger L, Rauschmeier A, Seitz C, Comperat E, Shariat SF, and Grubmüller B
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis diagnostic imaging, Lymphatic Metastasis pathology, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Lymph Node Excision, Lymph Nodes pathology, Gallium Radioisotopes, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: Depending on the risk of LN metastasis ePLND at RP is recommended. As ePLND has potential side effects, and diagnostics have improved substantially, our objective was to evaluate the performance of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a contemporary cohort with preoperative negative PSMA-PET., Methods: Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP), undergoing RP and ePND at our center with preoperative negative [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were included. The Accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using ROC analysis. The association of clinical parameters with the presence of LN metastasis was assessed using logistic regression. Specimen of prostate and LNs in patients with false negative PSMA-PET were additionally stained for AR and PSMA expression and assessed by IHC., Results: The study included 108 patients, 28% intermediate- and 72% high-risk. Twelve patients harbored occult LN metastasis. Accuracy of the nomogram was 0.62. [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed a NPV of 89%. IHC showed expression of PSMA and AR in the primary and LN metastasis in all patients. On logistic regression analysis only DRE (OR 2.72; 95%CI 1.01-7.35; P = 0.05) and percentage of cores with significant CaP (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.02) showed a significant association with LN metastasis., Conclusion: The currently used nomogram is suboptimal in detecting patients with occult LNM. While the cut-off value to perform ePLND can be increased slightly following a negative PSMA-PET scan, more accurate methods of identifying these patients are needed. Whether ePLND can have a therapeutic benefit, as opposed to a diagnostic only, needs to be re-evaluated in the PSMA-PET era., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Examining the Relationship and Prognostic Significance of Cell-Free DNA Levels and the PSMA-Positive Tumor Volume in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective-Prospective [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Study.
- Author
-
Kluge K, Einspieler H, Haberl D, Spielvogel C, Stoiber S, Vraka C, Papp L, Wunsch S, Egger G, Kramer G, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Hacker M, Kenner L, and Haug A
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Gallium Radioisotopes, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tumor Burden, Prospective Studies, Gallium Isotopes, Biomarkers, Hormones, Edetic Acid, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant diagnostic imaging, Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
- Abstract
Functional imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands has emerged as the standard imaging method for prostate cancer (PCA). In parallel, the analysis of blood-derived, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been shown to be a promising quantitative biomarker of PCA aggressiveness and patient outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship and prognostic value of cfDNA concentrations and the PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) in men with PCA undergoing [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Methods: We recruited 148 men with histologically proven PCA (mean age, 70.7 ± 7.7 y) who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (184.9 ± 18.9 MBq) and blood sampling between March 2019 and August 2021. Among these, 74 (50.0%) had hormone-sensitive PCA and 74 (50.0%) had castration-resistant PCA (CRPC). All patients provided written informed consent before blood sample collection and imaging. The cfDNA was extracted and quantified, and PSMA-expressing tumor lesions were delineated to extract the PSMA-TVs. The Spearman coefficient assessed correlations between PSMA-TV and cfDNA concentrations and cfDNA's relation with clinical parameters. The Kruskal-Wallis test examined the mean cfDNA concentration differences based on PSMA-TV quartiles for significantly correlated patient groups. Log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analyses evaluated the prognostic significance of high and low cfDNA and PSMA-TV levels for overall survival. Results: Weak positive correlations were found between cfDNA concentration and PSMA-TV in the overall group ( r = 0.16, P = 0.049) and the CRPC group ( r = 0.31, P = 0.007) but not in hormone-sensitive PCA patients ( r = -0.024, P = 0.837). In the CRPC cohort, cfDNA concentrations significantly differed between PSMA-TV quartiles 4 and 1 ( P = 0.002) and between quartiles 4 and 2 ( P = 0.016). Survival outcomes were associated with PSMA-TV ( P < 0.0001, P = 0.004) but not cfDNA ( P = 0.174, P = 0.12), as per the log-rank and Cox regression analysis. Conclusion: These findings suggest that cfDNA might serve as a biomarker of advanced, aggressive CRPC but does not reliably reflect total tumor burden or prognosis. In comparison, [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT provides a highly granular and prognostic assessment of tumor burden across the spectrum of PCA disease progression., (© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Antihormonal-Treatment Status Affects 68 Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET Biodistribution in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Kluge K, Haberl D, Einspieler H, Rasul S, Gutschmayer S, Kenner L, Kramer G, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Haug A, and Hacker M
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Tissue Distribution, Retrospective Studies, Androgen Antagonists therapeutic use, Ligands, Gallium Radioisotopes, Edetic Acid, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is known to influence the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression of prostate cancer, potentially complicating the interpretation of PSMA ligand PET findings and affecting PSMA radioligand therapy. However, the impact of ADT on PSMA ligand biodistribution in nontumorous organs is not well understood. Methods: Men ( n = 112) with histologically proven prostate cancer who underwent
68 Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC (68 Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT between November 2015 and July 2021 at the Medical University Vienna with known ADT status were retrospectively recruited. Fifty-six patients were on gonadotropin-releasing hormone-interfering ADT at the time of imaging (ADT group), whereas 56 patients with no history of ADT served as a control group. Physiologically PSMA-expressing organs (salivary glands, kidneys, liver, and spleen) were delineated, and their uptake was compared according to their data distributions. Multivariate regression analysis assessed the relationship between renal, hepatic, splenic, and salivary gland uptake and the explanatory variables metabolic tumor volume, glomerular filtration rate, and ADT status. Results: ADT was associated with lower levels of PSMA uptake in the kidneys (SUVmean : Δ[ADT - control] = -7.89; 95% CI, -10.73 to -5.04; P < 0.001), liver (SUVpeak : Δ[ADT - control] = -2.3; 95% CI, -5.72 to -0.93; P = 0.003), spleen (SUVpeak : Δ[ADT - control] = -1.27; 95% CI, -3.61 to -0.16; P = 0.033), and salivary glands (SUVmean : Δ[ADT - control] = -1.04; 95% CI, -2.48 to -0.13; P = 0.027). In a multivariate analysis, ADT was found to be associated with lower renal (SUVmean : β = -7.95; 95% CI, -11.06 to -4.84; P < 0.0001), hepatic (SUVpeak : β = -7.85; 95% CI, -11.78 to -3.91; P < 0.0001), splenic (SUVpeak : β = -5.83; 95% CI, -9.95 to -1.7; P = 0.006), and salivary gland (SUVmean : β = -1.47; 95% CI, -2.76 to -0.17; P = 0.027) uptake. A higher glomerular filtration rate was associated with a higher renal SUVmean (β = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.26; P = 0.0034). Conclusion: These findings suggest that ADT systemically modulates PSMA expression, which may have implications for treatment-optimizing and side-effect-minimizing strategies for PSMA radioligand therapies, particularly those using more potent225 Ac-labeled PSMA conjugates., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Consecutive Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) and Antigen Receptor (AR) PET Imaging Shows Positive Correlation with AR and PSMA Protein Expression in Primary Hormone-Naïve Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Al Jalali V, Wasinger G, Rasul S, Grubmüller B, Wulkersdorfer B, Balber T, Mitterhauser M, Simon J, Hacker M, Shariat S, Egger G, and Zeitlinger M
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Prostate pathology, Prospective Studies, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Edetic Acid metabolism, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Gallium Radioisotopes, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
The present study was carried out to investigate whether PET imaging can be used as a potential substitute for immunohistochemical analysis of tumor samples in prostate cancer (PC) patients. Correlation between imaging signals of 2 PET tracers and the corresponding target structures was assessed. The first tracer was [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen)-HBED-CC ( N , N '-bis [2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine- N , N '-diacetic acid) [68 Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC ([68 Ga]PSMA), which is already implemented in clinical routines. The second tracer was 16β-[18 F]fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (16β-[18 F]FDHT), which binds to the androgen receptor (AR). The AR is particularly interesting in PC, because AR expression status and its shift during therapy might directly influence patient care. Methods: This prospective, explorative clinical study included 10 newly diagnosed PC patients. Each patient underwent [68 Ga]PSMA PET/MRI and [18 F]FDHT PET/MRI scans before prostatectomy. Cancer SUVs were determined and related to background SUVs. After prostatectomy, tumor tissue was sampled, and AR and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression was determined. AR and PSMA expression was evaluated quantitatively with the open-source bioimage analysis software QuPath and with a 4-tier rating system. Correlation between imaging signals and marker expression was statistically assessed. Results: For [18 F]FDHT, the SUVmax /SUVbackground ratio showed a significant, strong correlation ( r = 0.72; P = 0.019) with the AR optical density of the correlating tissue sample. The correlation between PSMA optical density and the [68 Ga]PSMA SUVmax /SUVbackground ratio was not significant ( P = 0.061), yet a positive correlation trend could be observed ( r = 0.61). SUVmax /SUVbackground ratios were higher for [68 Ga]PSMA (mean ± SD, 34.9 ± 24.8) than for [18 F]FDHT (4.8 ± 1.2). In line with these findings, the tumor detection rates were 90% for the [68 Ga]PSMA PET scan but only 40% for the [18 F]FDHT PET scan. The 4-tier rating of PSMA staining intensity yielded very homogeneous results, with values of 3+ for most subjects (90%). AR staining was rated as 1+ in 2 patients (20%), 2+ in 4 patients (40%), and 3+ in 4 patients (40%). Conclusion: [18 F]FDHT PET may be useful for monitoring AR expression and alterations in AR expression during treatment of PC patients. This approach may facilitate early detection of treatment resistance and allows for adaptation of therapy to prevent cancer progression. [18 F]FDHT PET is inferior to [68 Ga]PSMA PET for primary PC diagnosis, but the correlation between [68 Ga]PSMA SUVs and PSMA expression is weaker than that between [18 F]FDHT and the AR., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. [One clip too many].
- Author
-
Felsner M and Grubmüller B
- Subjects
- Humans, Kidney, Surgical Instruments, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Hydronephrosis etiology, Urinary Diversion instrumentation, Colonoscopy adverse effects
- Abstract
A patient with a Mainz II pouch due to muscle invasive bladder cancer presented to our urology department with de novo hydronephrosis on the left kidney after a regular colonoscopy. In the course of diagnostic workup, it was found that the neo-ostia were removed and clipped as a "polyp". Via rendezvous technique of antegrade ureterenoscopy and colonoscopy after nephrostomy placement urine outflow was successfully reconstituted by inserting a biliary stent into the left neo-ostium, which consolidated after stent removal as a permanent state., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Dual-Tracer PET-MRI-Derived Imaging Biomarkers for Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Grubmüller B, Huebner NA, Rasul S, Clauser P, Pötsch N, Grubmüller KH, Hacker M, Hartenbach S, Shariat SF, Hartenbach M, and Baltzer P
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Retrospective Studies, Prospective Studies, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography methods, Positron-Emission Tomography, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if imaging biomarkers derived from 3-Tesla dual-tracer [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine (FMC) and [
68 Ga]Ga-PSMAHBED-CC conjugate 11 (PSMA)-positron emission tomography can adequately predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC)., Methods: We assessed 77 biopsy-proven PC patients who underwent 3T dual-tracer PET/mpMRI followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2014 and 2017. We performed a retrospective lesion-based analysis of all cancer foci and compared it to whole-mount histopathology of the RP specimen. The primary aim was to investigate the pretherapeutic role of the imaging biomarkers FMC- and PSMA-maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) for the prediction of csPC and to compare it to the mpMRI-methods and PI-RADS score., Results: Overall, we identified 104 cancer foci, 69 were clinically significant (66.3%) and 35 were clinically insignificant (33.7%). We found that the combined FMC+PSMA SUVmax were the only significant parameters ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.049) for the prediction of csPC. ROC analysis showed an AUC for the prediction of csPC of 0.695 for PI-RADS scoring (95% CI 0.591 to 0.786), 0.792 for FMC SUVmax (95% CI 0.696 to 0.869), 0.852 for FMC+PSMA SUVmax (95% CI 0.764 to 0.917), and 0.852 for the multivariable CHAID model (95% CI 0.763 to 0.916). Comparing the AUCs, we found that FMC+PSMA SUVmax and the multivariable model were significantly more accurate for the prediction of csPC compared to PI-RADS scoring ( p = 0.0123, p = 0.0253, respectively)., Conclusions: Combined FMC+PSMA SUVmax seems to be a reliable parameter for the prediction of csPC and might overcome the limitations of PI-RADS scoring. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm these promising preliminary results.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Response to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients presenting with only lymph node metastases.
- Author
-
Zisser L, Yu J, Oszwald A, Wollenweber T, Kretschmer-Chott E, Grubmüller B, Kramer G, Shariat SF, Mitterhauser M, Vraka C, Hacker M, Haug AR, and Rasul S
- Subjects
- Dipeptides therapeutic use, Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring therapeutic use, Humans, Lutetium therapeutic use, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Radioisotopes, Retrospective Studies, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant pathology
- Abstract
Objective: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is a promising therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and offers a survival benefit particularly to patients with only lymph node metastases. We therefore sought to evaluate the clinical outcome of this therapy in such a cohort., Methods: Of all prostate cancer patients admitted to our department between September 2015 and March 2019 to receive 1-4 courses of PSMA-RLT (each course consisted of three cycles of highly standardized PSMA-RLT every 4 weeks), only 10 consecutive men were found to have nodal metastases only and were analyzed retrospectively., Results: Nine out of 10 patients responded to their first PSMA-RLT course with a mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of 71.8 ± 25.2%, seven of them demonstrated a PSA decline of ≥50%. Collectively, seven of eight patients responded to further PSMA-RLT courses with a total PSA reduction of 59.8 ± 30.0%, five of which showed a PSA reduction of ≥50%. One patient experienced complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 85 weeks (range 14-255 weeks) and median overall survival was not reached during the median observation time of 209 weeks (30-298 weeks). Univariate Cox-regression identified initial PSA decline as the only predictive parameter for progression-free survival ( P = 0.047)., Conclusion: mCRPC patients with only lymph node metastases showed favorable survival and excellent response to PSMA-RLT, leading to transient partial remission of the disease in most of them., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Combining PSA and PET features to select candidates for salvage lymph node dissection in recurrent prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Bravi CA, Heidenreich A, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Cucchiara V, Osmonov D, Juenemann KP, Karnes RJ, Kretschmer A, Buchner A, Stief C, Hiester A, Albers P, Devos G, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, Grubmüller B, Shariat S, Tilki D, Graefen M, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Briganti A, and Pfister D
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between pre-operative PSA value,
68 Ga-prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) PET performance and oncologic outcomes after salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (PCa)., Patients and Methods: The study included 164 patients diagnosed with ≤2 pelvic lymph-node recurrence(s) of PCa documented on68 Ga-PSMA PET scan and treated with pelvic ± retroperitoneal sLND at 11 high-volume centres between 2012 and 2019. Pathologic findings were correlated to PSA values at time of sLND, categorized in early (<0.5 ng/ml), low (0.5-0.99 ng/ml), moderate (1-1.5 ng/ml) and high (>1.5 ng/ml). Clinical recurrence (CR)-free survival after sLND was calculated using multivariable analyses and plotted over pre-operative PSA value., Results: Median [interquartile range (IQR)] PSA at sLND was 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) ng/ml, and 131 (80%) patients had one positive spot at PET scan. All patients received pelvic sLND, whereas 91 (55%) men received also retroperitoneal dissection. Median (IQR) number of node removed was 15 (6, 28). The rate of positive pathology increased as a function of pre-operative PSA value, with highest rates for patients with pre-operative PSA > 1.5 ng/ml (pelvic-only sLNDs: 84%; pelvic + retroperitoneal sLNDs: 90%). After sLND, PSA ≤ 0.3 ng/ml was detected in 67 (41%) men. On multivariable analyses, pre-operative PSA was associated with PSA response ( p < 0.0001). There were 51 CRs after sLND. After adjusting for confounders, we found a significant, non-linear relationship between PSA level at sLND and the 12-month CR-free survival ( p < 0.0001), with the highest probability of freedom from CR for patients who received sLND at PSA level ≥1 ng/ml., Conclusions: In case of PET-detected nodal recurrences amenable to sLND, salvage surgery was associated with the highest short-term oncologic outcomes when performed in men with PSA ≥ 1 ng/ml. Awaiting confirmatory data from prospective trials, these findings may help physicians to optimize the timing for68 Ga-PSMA PET in biochemical recurrent PCa., (© 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.