Search

After bariatric surgery lifelong follow-up is recommended. Evidence of the consequences and reasons for being lost to follow-up (LTFU) is sparse. In this prospective study follow-up data of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a certified obesity centre were investigated. LTFU patients were evaluated through a structured telephone interview. Overall, 573 patients (female/male 70.9%/29.1%), aged 44.1 ± 11.2 years, preoperative BMI 52.1 ± 8.4 kg/m2 underwent bariatric surgery. Out of these, 33.2% had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 74.4% had arterial hypertension. A total of 290 patients were LTFU, of those 82.1% could be reached. Baseline characteristics of patients in follow-up (IFU) and LTFU were comparable, but men were more often LTFU (p = 0.01). Reported postoperative total weight loss (%TWL) and improvements of comorbidities were comparable, but %TWL was higher in patients remaining in follow-up for at least 2 years (p = 0.013). Travel issues were mentioned as the main reason for being LTFU. A percentage of 77.6% of patients reported to regularly supplement micronutrients, while 71.0% stated regular monitoring of their micronutrient status, mostly by primary care physicians. Despite comparable reported outcomes of LTFU to IFU patients, the duration of the in-centre follow-up period affected %TWL. There is a lack of sufficient supplementation and monitoring of micronutrients in a considerable number of LTFU patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Technisches Messen is the property of De Gruyter and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background and study aims Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has become the most effective therapeutic option for upper gastrointestinal leakage. Despite its efficiency, this treatment can necessitate a long hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether additional use of an over-the-scope-clips (OTSC) closure after successful EVT can shorten leakage therapy. Patients and methods All patients treated with EVT for leakages in the upper gastrointestinal tract at our center from 2012 to 2022 were divided into two propensity matched cohorts (EVT+OTSC vs. EVT only). The EVT+OTSC patients received OSTC application at the end of successful EVT directly after removal of the last sponge. The primary endpoint was the time interval from leakage diagnosis until discharge. Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, and nutritional status at discharge. Results A total of 84 matched patients were analyzed. EVT efficacy was 100% in both groups. The time interval from leakage until discharge was significantly shorter in the EVT+OTSC vs. EVT group (33 [19-48] vs. 46 days [29-77] P = 0.004). No patient in the EVT+OTSC group required additional procedures for leakage management, whereas five (12%) in the EVT group needed additional stent placement ( P = 0.021). More patients could be discharged on sufficient oral nutrition in the EVT+OTSC group (98% vs. 60%; P < 0.001). Conclusions The addition of OTSCs after successful EVT is safe and has the potential to shorten leakage therapy, enabling earlier discharge along with better functional outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Alexander Meining is a consultant for OVESCO and co-patentholder for several devices manufactured and distributed by the company. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) improves glycemic control in individuals with severe obesity beyond the effects of weight loss alone. To identify potential underlying mechanisms, we asked how equivalent weight loss from RYGB and from chronic caloric restriction impact gut release of the metabolically beneficial cytokine interleukin-22 (Il-22)., Methods: Obese male Zucker fatty rats were randomized into sham-operated (Sham), RYGB, and sham-operated, body weight-matched to RYGB (BWM) groups. Food intake and body weight were measured regularly for 4 weeks. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed on postoperative day 27. Portal vein plasma, systemic plasma, and whole-wall samples from throughout the gut were collected on postoperative day 28. Gut Il- 22 mRNA expression was determined by real-time quantitative PCR. Plasma Il-22 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)., Results: RYGB and BWM rats had lower food intake and body weight as well as superior blood glucose clearing capability compared with Sham rats. RYGB rats also had superior blood glucose clearing capability compared with BWM rats despite having similar body weights and higher food intake. Il- 22 mRNA expression was approximately 100-fold higher specifically in the upper jejunum in RYGB rats compared with Sham rats. Il-22 protein was only detectable in portal vein (34.1 ± 9.4 pg/mL) and systemic (46.9 ± 10.5 pg/mL) plasma in RYGB rats. Area under the curve of blood glucose during the OGTT, but not food intake or body weight, negatively correlated with portal vein and systemic plasma Il-22 levels in RYGB rats., Conclusions: These results suggest that induction of gut Il-22 release might partly account for the weight loss-independent improvements in glycemic control after RYGB, and further support the use of this cytokine for the treatment of metabolic disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors.)