Search

El artículo analiza las políticas públicas y los programas gubernamentales relacionados a la gestión urbana en la ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina y sus periferias. Asuntos relatados incluyen cuestiones ambientales, redes de transporte, y la gestión de los puertos. También presenta información sobre la infraestructura de servicios en la región y los sectores de la población.

El artículo describe la propuesta educativa del Programa Escuela Taller de la Secretaría de Cultura, Subsecretaría de Patrimonio Cultural de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. El programa contribuye a la revalorización del oficio de artesano, a la inserción laboral de los beneficiados y a la rehabilitación y conservación del patrimonio edilicio del casco histórico de la ciudad.

Background: Balance and gait impairments increase fall rate and injury in people with neurological disorders(PwND). The modified Dynamic Gait Index(mDGI) is a scale assessing dynamic balance during walking, however its ability in identifying Fallers and Recurrent Fallers has not been studied.Research Question: To evaluate mDGI's ability in identifying retrospective Fallers and Recurrent Fallers establishing cut-off scores for its use in clinical practice.Method: In this cross-sectional study, the number of retrospective falls and mDGI scores were collected. PwND were categorised as Non-Fallers or Fallers (falls≥1) and as Recurrent Fallers(falls≥2) or Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers(falls<2) according to their number of retrospective falls over two months. Two generalised linear logistic models were developed using a machine learning method to detect Fallers (Model 1) and Recurrent Fallers (Model 2) based on mDGI scores. ROC curves were used to identify mDGI cut-off scores to distinguish between different fall categories.Results: 58 PwND (mean ± standard deviation age: 63.4 ± 12 years) including 28 people with Multiple Sclerosis, 15 people with Parkinson's disease and 15 people with Stroke were analysed. The mDGI score(median (IQR)) for Non-Fallers, Fallers, Recurrent Fallers and Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers was respectively 50(22), 37(22), 26.5(20.25) and 46.5(20.5)points. The cut-off to identify Fallers from Non-Fallers was 49 points(sensitivity:100 %, specificity:50 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off: 53.2 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off: 0%, AUC:0.68), while 29 points(sensitivity:60 %, specificity:79 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off:52.1 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off:16.1 %, AUC:0.70) was the best cut-off to identify Recurrent Fallers.Significance: People with mDGI score>49 points have low or minimal fall risk, while people with mDGI score≤49 points should be further investigated with other scales before starting a balance-focused rehabilitation intervention. People scoring ≤29 points on the mDGI scale may need a fall prevention intervention, regardless of the results of other balance clinical measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI) has not yet been determined for People with Neurological Disorders (PwND).Research Question: To establish the MCID of the mDGI to determine clinically meaningful improvement in balance and gait in PwND.Methods: In this longitudinal study from a randomised clinical trial, 55 participants both in and outpatients with neurological disorders, received fifteen 40-minute rehabilitation sessions. Inpatients received daily treatments over a period of three weeks while outpatients received three treatments/week over a period of five weeks. An anchor-based method using percentage rating of improvement in balance (Activities Balance Confidence scale, ABC) was used to determine the MCID of mDGI. The MCID was defined as the minimum change in mDGI total score (post - pre intervention) that was needed to perceive at least a 10 % improvement on the ABC scale. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to define the cut-off for the optimal MCID of the mDGI discriminating between improved and not improved participants.Results: The MCID of the mDGI total score was 6 points and Area under the Curve was 0.64. For the mDGI time sub-scores the MCID was 2 points and Area under the Curve was 0.6.Significance: The MCID of balance and gait improvement measured by mDGI was prudently establish at ≥7 points, meaning that this is the minimum improvement score PwND need to get to perceive a clinically relevant change in their balance and gait confidence. These reference values can be a tool incorporated into clinicians daily practice to interpret mDGI change scores helping to determine whether the intervention is effective; to develop clinical tailored intervention goals and to establish meaningful perceived change in PwND. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]