1. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications in 2-part vs. 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures treated using an intramedullary nail designed to capture the tuberosities
- Author
-
B. Gage Griswold, MD, Benjamin W. Sears, MD, Libby A. Mauter, MSPT, Mallory A. Boyd, MS, and Armodios M. Hatzidakis, MD
- Subjects
Proximal humerus fracture ,Proximal humeral nail ,Fracture ,Shoulder trauma ,Third-generation humeral nail ,Outcomes ,Orthopedic surgery ,RD701-811 ,Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,RC925-935 - Abstract
Background: Intramedullary nail fixation for proximal humerus fractures has been shown to provide satisfactory results. The quality of reduction correlates with clinical outcomes, the rate of complications, avascular necrosis, and postoperative loss of fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of 2-part proximal humerus fractures compared to 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures. Methods: A single-center retrospective review was carried out of patients who underwent an intramedullary nail for a proximal humerus fracture by one of three surgeons between the years of 2009 and 2022, and who had a minimum of 12-months follow-up. Fracture pattern, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, satisfaction, pain score, range of motion, and complications were recorded. The mechanism of injury (high energy vs. low energy), method of reduction (open vs. percutaneous), and evidence of radiographic healing were assessed. A P value of
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF