Search

Designing nanoparticles with desired properties is a challenging endeavor, due to the large combinatorial space and complex structure–function relationships. High throughput methodologies and machine learning approaches are attractive and emergent strategies to accelerate nanoparticle composition design. To date, how to combine nanoparticle formulation, screening, and computational decision-making into a single effective workflow is underexplored. In this study, we showcase the integration of three key technologies, namely microfluidic-based formulation, high content imaging, and active machine learning. As a case study, we apply our approach for designing PLGA-PEG nanoparticles with high uptake in human breast cancer cells. Starting from a small set of nanoparticles for model training, our approach led to an increase in uptake from ∼5-fold to ∼15-fold in only two machine learning guided iterations, taking one week each. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these three technologies have been successfully integrated to optimize a biological response through nanoparticle composition. Our results underscore the potential of the proposed platform for rapid and unbiased nanoparticle optimization.

Developments in computational omics technologies have provided new means to access the hidden diversity of natural products, unearthing new potential for drug discovery. In parallel, artificial intelligence approaches such as machine learning have led to exciting developments in the computational drug design field, facilitating biological activity prediction and de novo drug design for molecular targets of interest. Here, we describe current and future synergies between these developments to effectively identify drug candidates from the plethora of molecules produced by nature. We also discuss how to address key challenges in realizing the potential of these synergies, such as the need for high-quality datasets to train deep learning algorithms and appropriate strategies for algorithm validation.|Advances in computational omics technologies are enabling access to the hidden diversity of natural products, and artificial intelligence approaches are facilitating key steps in harnessing the therapeutic potential of such compounds, including biological activity prediction. This article discusses synergies between these fields to effectively identify drug candidates from the plethora of molecules produced by nature, and how to address the challenges in realizing the potential of these synergies.

Generative neural networks trained on SMILES can design innovative bioactive molecules de novo. These so-called chemical language models (CLMs) have typically been trained on tens of template molecules for fine-tuning. However, it is challenging to apply CLM to orphan targets with few known ligands. We have fine-tuned a CLM with a single potent Nurr1 agonist as template in a fragment-augmented fashion and obtained novel Nurr1 agonists using sampling frequency for design prioritization. Nanomolar potency and binding affinity of the top-ranking design and its structural novelty compared to available Nurr1 ligands highlight its value as an early chemical tool and as a lead for Nurr1 agonist development, as well as the applicability of CLM in very low-data scenarios.

Academic and pharmaceutical industry research are both key for progresses in the field of molecular machine learning. Despite common open research questions and long-term goals, the nature and scope of investigations typically differ between academia and industry. Herein, we highlight the opportunities that machine learning models offer to accelerate and improve compound selection. All parts of the model life cycle are discussed, including data preparation, model building, validation, and deployment. Main challenges in molecular machine learning as well as differences between academia and industry are highlighted. Furthermore, application aspects in the design-make-test-analyze cycle are discussed. We close with strategies that could improve collaboration between academic and industrial institutions and will advance the field even further.

Barcoding of nano- and micro-particles allows distinguishing multiple targets at the same time within a complex mixture and is emerging as a powerful tool to increase the throughput of many assays. Fluorescent barcoding is one of the most used strategies, where microparticles are labeled with dyes and classified based on fluorescence color, intensity, or other features. Microparticles are ideal targets due to their relative ease of detection, manufacturing, and higher homogeneity. Barcoding is considerably more challenging in the case of nanoparticles (NPs), where their small size results in a lower signal and greater heterogeneity. This is a significant limitation since many bioassays require the use of nano-sized carriers. In this study, we introduce a machine-learning-assisted workflow to write, read, and classify barcoded PLGA-PEG NPs at a single-particle level. This procedure is based on the encapsulation of fluorescent markers without modifying their physicochemical properties (writing), the optimization of their confocal imaging (reading), and the implementation of a machine learning-based barcode reader (classification). We found nanoparticle heterogeneity as one of the main factors that challenges barcode separation, and that information extracted from the dyes' nanoscale confinement effects (such as Förster Resonance Energy Transfer, FRET) can aid barcode identification. Moreover, we provide a guide to reaching the optimal trade-off between the number of simultaneous barcodes and classification accuracy supporting the use of this workflow for a variety of bioassays.

Multitask learning allows to model multiple tasks simultaneously through information sharing. In the context of quantitative structure activity relationships and computational toxicology, multitask learning is gaining more and more interest, owed to its potential to improve the predictive performance of underrepresented tasks and to predict the multi-property profile of molecules. In this chapter, after introducing the multitask problem formulation, we present a hands-on tutorial on multitask neural networks.