Search

Background As more transgender and gender-diverse patients undergo hysterectomy, gaps in knowledge remain about how testosterone dosing or other physiologic parameters change following surgery and how these are influenced by concomitant oophorectomy. Aim The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of testosterone dosing change after gender-affirming hysterectomy and to compare this incidence between patients who underwent oophorectomy and ovarian preservation. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study consisted of transmasculine patients who underwent hysterectomy for gender affirmation. Outcomes Outcome measures included testosterone dosing changes at least 3 months following hysterectomy, as identified by clinical documentation, as well as clinical and laboratory parameters assessed for a change after hysterectomy: free and total testosterone, estradiol, hemoglobin, hematocrit, total cholesterol, weight, and blood pressure. Results Of the 50 patients, 32 (64%) underwent bilateral oophorectomy, 10 (20%) unilateral oophorectomy, and 8 (16%) maintained both ovaries. Eight percent (n = 4) changed testosterone dosing following hysterectomy. Those who underwent bilateral oophorectomy were no more likely to change their testosterone dose than those who did not (P =.09). Those who also used menstrual suppression were 1.31 times more likely to change doses of testosterone after hysterectomy (95% CI, 1.09-1.82; P =.003). For those who had pre- and posthysterectomy laboratory and clinical values, the majority saw no clinically significant change. However, among patients who underwent bilateral oophorectomy, the calculated free testosterone increased by 90.1 ± 288.4 ng/dL (mean ± SD), and estradiol dropped by 20.2 ± 29.0 pg/mL. Clinical Implications In a field where access to care can be a significant barrier, there is unlikely to be a need for routine reassessment of testosterone dose or laboratory parameters following hysterectomy, whether or not a bilateral oophorectomy occurs. Strengths and Limitations Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature and the lack of consistent clinical laboratory testing, which resulted in limited data about any given hormonal change. The heterogeneity of our population limited the number of patients undergoing or not undergoing oophorectomy; however, it allowed our study to more truly reflect a clinical environment. Conclusion In a multisite cohort of individuals who underwent hysterectomy for gender affirmation, few patients changed testosterone dosing after surgery. In addition, dosing change was not associated with the presence or absence of bilateral oophorectomy, and most measured laboratory values remained consistent following hysterectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trans masculine people are more likely than cisgender peers to have a teen or unintended pregnancy, though little is known about the origins of these disparities. Aims: This study aimed to describe teen and unintended pregnancy experiences among trans masculine people in order to elucidate risk factors and pregnancy-related needs. Methods: As a part of the United States-based SexuaL Orientation, Gender Identity, and Pregnancy Experiences (SLOPE) study, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted between March 2017 and August 2018 with 10 trans masculine people, ages 20–59 years, who experienced a teen or unintended pregnancy. Audio-recorded interviews were professionally transcribed, then analyzed using immersion/crystallization and thematic analysis approaches. The themes were contextualized using sociodemographic survey data. Results: The four themes that were developed from participants’ narratives highlighted: 1) how trans masculine people navigated having a pregnant body (e.g., heightened gender dysphoria due to being pregnant); 2) the importance of the cultural environment in shaping experiences as a trans masculine pregnant person (e.g., pregnancy and gender-related job discrimination); 3) the development of the pregnancy over time (e.g., decision-making processes); and 4) how pregnancy (and gender identity) affected relationships with other people (e.g., adverse family of origin experiences). Discussion: This study identified a number of risk factors for teen and unintended pregnancies among trans masculine people including physical and sexual abuse as well as ineffective use of contraception. This research also identifies unique needs of this population, including: relieving gender dysphoria, combating discrimination, and ensuring people feel visible and welcome, particularly in reproductive healthcare spaces. Public health practitioners, healthcare providers, and support networks (e.g., chosen family) can be key sources of support. Attention to risk factors, unique needs, and sources of support will improve reproductive healthcare and pregnancy experiences for trans masculine people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the inclusivity of imaging centers for transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) patients and those patients' level of comfort during imaging center visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A survey of TGNB persons was developed to explore their experiences during imaging encounters. The survey was distributed via purposive snowball sampling with link sharing on social media and listservs as well as at TGNB community events and conferences during the period from January to December 2018. RESULTS. Of the 555 respondents who initiated the survey, 363 (65.4%) completed it and satisfied inclusion criteria. Of the 363, 257 (70.8%) reported having had at least one negative imaging encounter. Nearly one-third (32.4%, 116/358) had to instruct imaging facility staff about TGNB persons to receive appropriate care. Ultrasound examinations and image-guided procedures contributed to the highest rates of unexpected emotional discomfort (49.1% [109/222] and 38.1% [16/42], respectively). Noninvasive modalities also contributed to unexpected emotional discomfort, with the highest percentage of patients (23.5%) reporting emotional discomfort during MRI. Many imaging environments were considered unwelcoming toward TGNB patients, with 45.2% (164/363) of respondents noting no visible reading materials or other postings that could be considered to be affirming to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer patients and 39.1% (142/363) noting a lack of all-gender or gender-neutral restrooms. CONCLUSION. To our knowledge, our data provide the largest documentation and first quantification of the experiences of TGNB patients during imaging encounters. The data show several aspects of imaging encounters that may contribute toward negative experiences for TGNB patients, which may be improved through education of imaging personnel in TGNB cultural competency, redesign of facilities with sensitivity toward TGNB persons, and incorporation of TGNB patient feedback in the adoption of departmental policies.