Search

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to identify health or health belief factors associated with mammography attendance or with self-initiated medical help-seeking for breast cancer symptoms among women in Europe., Methods: Five databases were searched for articles published between 2005 and 2018. Meta-analyses were conducted for 13 factors related to screening attendance and two factors associated with help-seeking behaviour. Where there were too few studies to include in the meta-analysis, a narrative synthesis was undertaken., Results: Sixty-five studies were included. Never having had cervical screening (d = -.72, p < .001) and higher perceived barriers to mammography (d = -.40, p < .001) were associated with lower levels of screening attendance. Possessing health insurance (d = .49, p < .001), greater perceived benefits (d = .31, p < .001) and motivation (d = .36, p = .003) towards screening, and higher perceived seriousness (d = .24, p = .019) and susceptibility (d = .20, p = .024) towards breast cancer were associated with a higher level of screening attendance. Presenting with a non-lump symptom was associated with a longer time to presentation (d = .32, p < .001). The narrative synthesis revealed that previous benign breast disease was associated with a higher level of screening attendance but with a longer time to presentation., Conclusions: The review identified key similarities in factors associated with screening and help-seeking behaviours which offer scope for combined interventions aimed at women that target both behaviours. Furthermore, the review highlighted that fewer studies have focused on help-seeking behaviour, despite two thirds of breast cancer cases being self-detected. Future research should further examine predictors of help-seeking behaviour including a focus on modifiable factors, such as BMI, and physical activity., (© 2019 The British Psychological Society.)

At esophagectomy, cancer patients may be malnourished. Nutrition administered central venously is associated with complications, potentially negating nutritional benefits. We aimed to determine the safety of nutrition administered by the peripheral parenteral route (PPN) and record changes in nutritional and surgical outcome. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed by a single experienced surgeon. Consecutive patients received either 7 days of PPN perioperatively (n = 16) or oral diet reintroduction on the fourth postoperative day (n = 11). Mortality, complications, measures of body composition, protein metabolism, and biochemistry were assessed. Thirty-day mortality was 0% and 18% in the PPN and standard group, respectively. By the 90th day, mortality had increased to 36% in the standard group (P < 0.05). Perioperative PPN can be administered safely in cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. This form of nutritional support merits further examination by larger, multicenter studies to confirm or refute the observations made in this pilot study.

Background: The duration of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens has decreased to 1 week with cure rates of over 90%. This can be attributed to the use of triple drug regimens including potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion and clarithromycin. There is no theoretical reason why shorter regimens should not be possible., Aim: To compare two 3-day, low-dose, twice daily regimens with 1 week of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. (OCM) METHODS: Outpatients referred for gastroscopy were screened by biopsy urease test. H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., tri-potassium dicitrato bismuthate one tablet b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 3 days (LTdbCA), or ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for 3 days (RbcCA) or omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. for 1 week (OCM). They were not pre-treated with a gastric acid inhibitor. After 8 weeks, H. pylori status was assessed by 13C urea breath test., Results: 974 out of 1114 patients referred for gastroscopy were screened by biopsy urease test. 140 patients were not screened either because they were anticoagulated or for technical reasons. 334 patients were H. pylori-positive: 154 were excluded mostly because of allergy to penicillin and personal reasons but 180 were randomized to treatment All regimens were well tolerated. For LTdbCA (n=60), RbcCA (n=59), and OCM (n=61) the H. pylori cure rates (95% CI) were 23% (12-34), 14% (5-23) and 87% (79-95), respectively, using intention-to-treat analysis and 25% (14-36), 15% (6-24) and 88% (80-96), respectively, if analysed per protocol. OCM was significantly superior to LTdbCA and RbcCA (P < 0.001) but there was no significant difference between regimens LTdbCA and RbcCA., Conclusions: OCM is an extremely effective H. pylori eradication regimen. The 3-day regimens tested both have poor cure rates. Pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor, higher doses or more frequent dosing may be necessary to increase the cure rate of short duration regimens. However, this could make them less acceptable than the H. pylori eradication regimens currently available.

Objective: To associate Helicobacter pylori-associated antibodies with clinical disease in groups of patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, oesophageal adenocarcinoma and normal mucosa., Design: Prospective observational sero-epidemiology study. Identification of consecutive in-patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, oesophageal adenocarcinoma and normal mucosa. Analyses of sera for antibodies to whole H. pylori, Cag A and Vac A antigens using ELISA and Western blot. Statistical analyses., Setting: Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry, a district general hospital that serves a population of 350,000., Participants: Consecutive in-patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcer (n = 31), gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 31), oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 40) and normal mucosa (n = 46)., Main Outcome Measures: A profile of antibodies was constructed for each patient group and between-group comparisons were made. A logistic regression model determined the H. pylori-associated antibody that could best predict a patient's diagnosis. A discriminatory power for each antibody was calculated., Results: Whole H. pylori, Cag A and Vac A antibodies are found more commonly in duodenal ulcer patients when compared to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (P < 0.003) and normal mucosa patients (P < 0.015). Similarly, gastric adenocarcinoma patients have antibodies to whole H. pylori, Cag A and Vac A more frequently than oesophageal adenocarcinoma (P< 0.002) and normal mucosa patients (P < 0.006). Vac A antibodies discriminate between duodenal ulcer/gastric adenocarcinoma and oesophageal adenocarcinoma/normal mucosa patients (odds ratio 5.56, log likelihood -90.06, P < 0.001) more effectively than Cag A antibodies (odds ratio 4.17, log likelihood -91.88, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Similar profiles of H. pylori-associated antibodies are seen in patients with duodenal ulcer and gastric adenocarcinoma, confirming that virulent H. pylori are involved in the pathogenesis of both diseases. Antibodies to Vac A could be used to identify patients at increased risk of developing H. pylori-associated disease.

Background: Amongst the low-dose H2-receptor antagonists available for the self-medication of dyspepsia, both famotidine 10 mg and cimetidine 200 mg have been shown to raise intragastric pH, but there is a delay after ingestion before significant effects can be demonstrated. A new effervescent preparation of cimetidine 200 mg releases an acid buffer which has a more rapid effect on intragastric pH., Aim: To investigate the relative abilities of low-dose famotidine and effervescent cimetidine to raise intragastric pH after a single postprandial evening dose., Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects (12 men, 12 women, median age 32 years) completed a three-period crossover trial of famotidine 10 mg, effervescent cimetidine 200 mg and placebo. After a standard meal was given at 18.30 h to subjects fasted for 5.5 h, drug or placebo was given at 19.30 h. Intragastric pH was recorded with combined glass electrodes from 18.00 to 07.30 h by digital recorders., Results: Over the 12 h post-dose period the mean area under the pH/time curve (AUC) after famotidine 10 mg was 3.73, after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent 2.79, and after placebo 2.07. Over the same period the median pH and percentage of time that recordings were above pH 3 were 3.45 and 52.5 after famotidine 10 mg, 2.40 and 33.8 after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent, and 1.68 and 15.9 after placebo. Both active treatments were significantly different from placebo by each measure (P < 0.001), and famotidine 10 mg was significantly more effective than cimetidine 200 mg effervescent by each measure over the 0-12 h period (P < 0.001). Comparisons of mean AUCs for each 15 min period after dosing showed that decrease in acidity was significantly greater after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent than after famotidine 10 mg for the first 60 min. In the later post-dose period only famotidine 10 mg raised pH for all time points to 12 h, whilst the effect of effervescent cimetidine 200 mg was detectable to = 8 h., Conclusions: Inhibition of gastric acidity over the 12 h post-dose period was significantly greater and endured longer after famotidine 10 mg than after effervescent cimetidine 200 mg, but for the 60 min period immediately after dosing the effect on intragastric pH was significant following effervescent cimetidine 200 mg but not famotidine 10 mg. This suggests effervescent formulations of H2-receptor antagonists with an acid buffer have a more rapid effect on intragastric pH than film-coated tablets.

Aim: To compare the inhibitory effects of over-the-counter doses of famotidine or ranitidine on nocturnal intragastric acidity in a placebo-controlled study., Methods: Twelve-hour intragastric acidity was measured simultaneously in 24 healthy subjects who ate a standard meal at 18.30 h and were dosed (at 19.30 h) with either famotidine 10 mg, ranitidine 75 mg or placebo in a balanced three-period crossover design. Five-millilitre aliquots of gastric juice were aspirated half-hourly 0-3 h post-dose, and then hourly until the end of the study. pH was measured with a glass electrode. Integrated pH (area under the curve (AUC) of the pH-time curve) was calculated for the intervals 0-12 h and 9-12 h post-dose. Statistical analysis was by ANOVA., Results: In the 0-12 h post-dose period, when the 24 subjects were dosed with placebo, mean AUC was 2.12, increasing by 75% to 3.70 with famotidine (P < 0.001) and by 81% to 3.83 with ranitidine (P < 0.001). In the 9-12 h post-dose period, when the subjects were dosed with placebo, mean AUC was 2.13, increasing by 91% to 4.07 with famotidine (P < 0.001) and by 79% to 3.82 with ranitidine (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the pH-raising effects of famotidine and ranitidine in both periods., Conclusions: Famotidine and ranitidine in over-the-counter doses have a similar, sustained, effect on post-prandial nocturnal intragastric acidity in healthy subjects lasting up to 12 h after oral dosing.

Background: Despite the widespread use of over-the-counter H2-receptor antagonists little is known about their duration of action on human gastric acid secretion. There are studies reporting inhibitory effects for up to 9 h post-dose but few data beyond this period., Methods: Profiles of 20-h intragastric acidity were measured simultaneously in 24 healthy subjects who were dosed (at 12.30 h) with either ranitidine 75 mg, cimetidine 200 mg or placebo in a three-way crossover study, according to a standard protocol. Five-millilitre aliquots of gastric juice were aspirated half-hourly during the day (0-10 h post-dose) and hourly overnight (10-20 h post-dose). pH was measured to three decimal places with a glass electrode. Weighted intragastric acidity (AUC/time) was calculated for both day- and night-times using 2.5-h intervals during the day and 5-h intervals at night. Statistical analysis was by ANOVA., Results: The results are expressed as mean weighted intragastric acidity (mmol/L). (i) Daytime (0-10 h post-dose): when dosed with placebo the weighted intragastric acidity was 31.03, decreasing to 10.37 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) and 16.23 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) when treated with ranitidine and cimetidine, respectively. Ranitidine inhibited weighted intragastric acidity to a greater degree than cimetidine (P < 0.001) during this period. (ii) Night-time (10-20 h post-dose): when dosed with placebo the weighted intragastric acidity was 21.36 decreasing to 16.65 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) when dosed with ranitidine and remaining unchanged at 20.03 (P = 0.886 vs. placebo) when dosed with cimetidine. Ranitidine inhibited weighted intragastric acidity to a greater degree than cimetidine (P = 0.010) during this period. A sub-analysis of the two 5-h intervals showed that compared to placebo, ranitidine inhibited weighted intragastric acidity significantly in the 10-15 h period. However, its effect in the 15-20 h period did not differ from placebo., Conclusions: In healthy subjects, the inhibitory effect of ranitidine 75 mg on intragastric acidity can be detected 10-15 h after an oral dose. By contrast, the inhibitory effect of cimetidine 200 mg seems to be restricted to the first 10 h.

Background: There are no published comparative studies on the effect of low-dose H2-antagonists on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion., Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects were dosed with either famotidine 10 mg, ranitidine 75 mg or placebo in a balanced three-period cross-over design. The subjects were studied in groups of 12, simultaneously, under identical controlled environmental conditions. Gastric juice was aspirated in 15-min aliquots during sub-maximal (0.6 microgram.h/kg) intravenous pentagastrin stimulation in the third and fourth hours (early period) and the eighth and ninth hours (late period) after oral dosing. The hydrogen ion (H+) content of gastric juice was measured ex vivo, by titrating to pH7 known volumes of gastric aspirate against 0.1 M sodium hydroxide, using a versatile microprocessor-controlled auto-titration unit. Gastric acid output during the period of interest was calculated by adding the hydrogen ion content of 15-min aliquots collected during that period. The geometric mean of the cumulative pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid output during the early and late periods was determined for the subjects dosed with either famotidine, ranitidine or placebo. Comparisons were performed by ANOVA., Results: During the early period (2-4 h post-dose), When the subjects were given placebo, mean gastric acid output was 46.6 mmol, decreasing by 76% to 11.3 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with famotidine and by 76% to 11.1 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with ranitidine. During the late period (7-9 h post-dose), when the subjects were dosed with placebo, mean gastric acid output was 41.2 mmol, decreasing by 38% to 25.7 mmol (P < 0.001) when treated with famotidine and by 27% to 30.0 mmol (P = 0.007) when treated with ranitidine. The difference between the inhibitory effects of famotidine and ranitidine on gastric acid output were non-significant during either period., Conclusions: Low-dose famotidine and ranitidine, intended for over-the-counter use, inhibit stimulated gastric acid secretion profoundly in the third and fourth hours after an oral dose. Modest effects are still detectable up to 9 h after dosing.

Lymphocytes appear as a diffuse infiltrate within the epicardium in the second trimester of intrauterine life, and can be found there throughout adult life. Aggregates are found in some individuals, and are strongly associated with the presence of old myocardial infarction.