Search

Introduction: Since 21 February 2020, the day that the first Italian COVID-19 case was identified, the organizational and regulatory conditions for ocular tissue donation have undergone numerous changes in order to guarantee safety and quality. Herewith we report the key responses of the procurement programme to these challenges., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the ocular tissue procured between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2021 is reported., Results: 9224 ocular tissues were procured during the study period (weekly average: 100 ± 21 tissues, mean ± SD; down to 97 ± 24, if only 2020 is considered). During the first wave, the weekly average reached 80 ± 24 tissues, a significant reduction if compared to the first 8 weeks of the year (124 ± 22 tissues/week, p<0.001), falling to 67 ± 15 tissues/week during the lock-down period. Considering the ocular tissues collected in the Veneto Region alone, the weekly mean was 68 ± 20, a reduction when compared to the first 8 weeks of the year (102 ± 23, p<0.001), arriving at 58 ± 15 tissues/week during the lock-down period. The percentage of healthcare professionals who tested positive during the first wave was on average 12% of the positive cases in the whole country, and equal to 18% in the Veneto Region alone. During the second wave, the mean weekly recovery of ocular tissue was 91 ± 15 and 77 ± 15 in the Veneto Region, compared to positive cases of healthcare professionals of 4% across Italy and in the Veneto Region. During the third wave, the overall weekly mean recovery rate was 107 ± 14, and 87 ± 13 in the Veneto Region, with only 1% of positive cases among healthcare professionals in Italy and in the Veneto Region., Conclusions: The most dramatic decrease of ocular tissue recovery occurred during the first wave of COVID-19, notwithstanding the lower number of infected people. This phenomenon can be attributed to different factors: a high percentage of positive cases and/or contacts among potential donors; the number of infections among healthcare professionals, favoured by the lack of personal protection equipement and the still partial knowledge of the disease; the exclusion of donors with bilateral pneumonia. Subsequently, the system was better organized with the assimilation of new knowledge about the virus, overcoming the initial fears about transmission and thus guaranteeing the resumption and maintenance of donations., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To assess to which extent the COVID-19 pandemic affected corneal transplantation by virtue of donor selection algorithms in different European countries., Design: Survey., Setting: 110 eye banks in 26 European countries., Participants: 64 eye banks covering 95% of European corneal transplantation activity., Interventions: A questionnaire listing the number of corneas procured and distributed from February to May 2018-2020 was circulated to eye banks., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the number of corneal procurements. Additional outcomes were national algorithms for donor selection, classified according to their stringency (donors with COVID-19 history, suspected for COVID-19, asymptomatic, PCR testing) and the pandemic severity in each country. We calculated Spearman's correlation coefficient to determine, two by two, the relationship between the 3-month decline in eye banking activity (procurement), the stringency of donor selection algorithm and the grading of pandemic severity (cases and deaths). A partial correlation was run to determine the relationship between decline and stringency while controlling for pandemic severity., Results: Procurements decreased by 38%, 68% and 41%, respectively, in March, April and May 2020 compared with the mean of the previous 2 years, while grafts decreased, respectively, by 28%, 68% and 56% corresponding to 3866 untreated patients in 3 months. Significant disparities between countries and the decrease in activity correlated with stringency in donor selection independent of pandemic severity., Conclusions: Our data demonstrate significant differences between countries regarding donor screening algorithms based on precautionary principles and, consequently, a decrease in the donor pool, already constrained by a long list of contraindications. Fundamental studies are needed to determine the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by corneal transplantation and guide evidence-based recommendations for donor selection to justify their substantial medical and economic impact., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)