Search

Summary A mixed stand of red oak (Quercus rubra) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica) on a compacted and acidified sandy loam soil was harvested and reforested with ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in 1992. The ecosystem restoration trial in this newly established ash plantation included 180 trees and was set up in a block design with 4 blocks, 3 experimental groups per block and 15 trees per experimental group. Experimental groups were: (1) application of P, K, Ca and Mg fertiliser to the planting pit; (2) combined application of fertiliser and earthworms to the planting pit; and (3) a control without additional restoration measures. Fertiliser application consisted of 500g dolomite, 100g Thomas slags and 100g kieserite; earthworm introduction consisted of 40 individuals, being 20 anecics (Lumbricus terrestris L. and Nicodrilus longus Ude) and 20 endogeics (Aporrectodea caliginosa Sav., Aporrectodea rosea Sav. and Allolobophora limicola Michaelsen). Tree growth was monitored annually. The control trees failed to grow and died after two years. Excellent growth was found for treated trees, and treatment-related growth patterns were observed: fertilised trees grew faster than fertilised trees with earthworms during the first two years, with the trend reversed from year 4 onwards. Although this trend suggested that introduced earthworms provided a more sustained response to fertiliser, this was not conclusively confirmed by an evaluation of 24 trees 10 years after planting (based on nutrient concentration in above-ground biomass and soil, litter biomass, earthworm biomass, and aggregate stability of organic particles in the soil); although statistically significant differences were found between treated and untreated plots, differences between fertilised plots with and without earthworms were not significant. Endogeic earthworms recolonised most fertilised plots, with or without earthworm introduction. Anecic earthworms did not colonize any plots. Although our findings suggest that earthworm introduction might contribute to a sustained fertiliser response in ash trees, more experiments are needed to demonstrate the precise role of earthworm introduction as part of integrated forest soil restoration.

A mixed stand of red oak (Quercus rubra) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica) on a compacted and acidified sandy loam soil was harvested and reforested with ash (Fraxinus excelsior in 1992. The ecosystem restoration trial in this newly established ash plantation included 180 trees and was set up in a block design with 4 blocks, 3 experimental groups per block and 15 trees per experimental group. Experimental groups were: (1) application of P, K, Ca and Mg fertiliser to the planting pit; (2) combined application of fertiliser and earthworms to the planting pit; and (3) a control without additional restoration measures. Fertiliser application consisted of 500 g dolomite, 100g Thomas slags and 100g kieserite; earthworm introduction consisted of 40 individuals, being 20 anecics (Lumbricus terrestris L. and Nicodrilus longus Ude) and 20 endogeics (Aporrectodea caliginosa Sav., Aporrectodea rosea Sav. and Allolobophora limicola Michaelsen). Tree growth was monitored annually. The control trees failed to grow and died after two years. Excellent growth was found for treated trees, and treatment-related growth patterns were observed: fertilised trees grew faster than fertilised trees with earthworms during the first two years, with the trend reversed from year 4 onwards. Although this trend suggested that introduced earthworms provided a more sustained response to fertiliser, this was not conclusively confirmed by an evaluation of 24 trees 10 years after planting (based on nutrient concentration in above-ground biomass and soil, litter biomass, earthworm biomass, and aggregate stability of organic particles in the soil); although statistically significant differences were found between treated and untreated plots, differences between fertilised plots with and without earthworms were not significant. Endogeic earthworms recolonised most fertilised plots, with or without earthworm introduction. Anecic earthworms did not colonize any plots. Although our findings suggest that earthworm introduction might contribute to a sustained fertiliser response in ash trees, more experiments are needed to demonstrate the precise role of earthworm introduction as part of integrated forest soil restoration.