Search

Different types of macrophages (Mφ) are involved in atherogenesis, including inflammatory Mφ and foamy Mφ (FM). Our previous study demonstrated that two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) imaging of NADH and FAD autofluorescence (AF) could distinguish experimental models that mimic the different atherosclerotic Mφ types. The present study assessed whether optical differences correlated with phenotypic and functional differences, potentially guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Phenotypic differences were investigated using three-dimensional principal component analysis and multi-color flow cytometry. Functional analyses focused on cytokine production, metabolic profiles, and cellular oxidative stress, in LDL dose-dependent assays, to understand the origin of AF in the FAD spectrum and assess FM ability to transition toward an immunoregulatory phenotype and function. Phenotypic studies revealed that FM models generated with acetylated LDL (Mac) were closer to immunoregulatory Mφ, while those generated with oxidized LDL (Mox) more closely resembled inflammatory Mφ. The metabolic analysis confirmed that inflammatory Mφ primarily used glycolysis, while immunoregulatory Mφ mainly depended on mitochondrial respiration. FM models employed both pathways; however, FM models generated with high doses of modified LDL showed reduced mitochondrial respiration, particularly Mox FM. Thus, the high AF in the FAD spectrum in Mox was not linked to increased mitochondrial respiration, but correlated with the dose of oxidized LDL, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lysosomal ceroid accumulation. High FAD-like AF, ROS, and ceroid accumulation were reduced by incubation with α-tocopherol. The cytokine profiles supported the phenotypic analysis, indicating that Mox FM exhibited greater inflammatory activity than Mac FM, although both could be redirected toward immunoregulatory functions, albeit to different degrees. In conclusion, in the context of immunoregulatory therapies for atherosclerosis, it is crucial to consider FM, given their prevalence in plaques and our results, as potential targets, regardless of their inflammatory status, alongside non-foamy inflammatory Mφ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Porcine respiratory disease complex represents a major challenge for the swine industry, with swine influenza A virus (swIAV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) being major contributors. Epidemiological studies have confirmed the co-circulation of these viruses in pig herds, making swIAV-PRRSV co-infections expected. A couple of in vivo co-infection studies have reported replication interferences between these two viruses. Herein, using a reductionist in vitro model, we investigated the potential mechanisms of these in vivo interferences. We first examined the impact of swIAV on porcine alveolar macrophages (AMs) and its effects on AMs co-infection by PRRSV. This was done either in monoculture or in co-culture with respiratory tracheal epithelial cells to represent the complexity of the interactions between the viruses and their respective target cells (epithelial cells for swIAV and AMs for PRRSV). AMs were obtained either from conventional or specific pathogen-free (SPF) pigs. SwIAV replication was abortive in AMs, inducing cell death at high multiplicity of infections. In AMs from three out of four conventional animals, swIAV showed no impact on PRRSV replication. However, inhibition of PRRSV multiplication was observed in AMs from one animal, accompanied by an early increase in the expression of interferon (IFN)-I and IFN-stimulated genes. In AMs from six SPF pigs, swIAV inhibited PRRSV replication in all animals, with an early induction of antiviral genes. Co-culture experiments involving tracheal epithelial cells and AMs from either SPF or conventional pigs all showed swIAV-induced inhibition of PRRSV replication, together with early induction of antiviral genes. These findings highlight the complex interactions between swIAV and PRRSV in porcine AMs, and would suggest a role of host factors, such as sanitary status, in modulating viral propagation. Our co-culture experiments demonstrated that swIAV inhibits PRRSV replication more effectively in the presence of respiratory tracheal epithelial cells, suggesting a synergistic antiviral response between AMs and epithelial cells, consistent with in vivo experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]