Search

Purpose:Patients with complex head and neck cancer benefit from preoperative education and multidisciplinary support. However, such care may not adequately address the need for advance care planning (ACP) in the preoperative setting. We evaluated the feasibility and impact of “Free Flap Fridays” (FFF), a comprehensive preoperative education program that offers recommendations to patients undergoing head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. The program is led by an interdisciplinary team comprised of social work, surgical nursing, speech and language pathology, nutrition, and specialty palliative care. Methods: This study was a quantitative, retrospective chart review analysis at an academic cancer center. We compared demographics pre- and post-surgical engagement with the interdisciplinary team, and ACP outcomes, among 48 patients who participated in FFF and 44 patients who received usual care prior to the launch of the FFF clinic. Results:Preoperative involvement of each of the five disciplines included in the interdisciplinary team increased among the intervention group. Engagement with FFF increased rates of advance care planning discussions (66.7% vs. 4.5%, pConclusions:Implementation of an interdisciplinary, preoperative clinic for patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer is feasible and leads to increased patient engagement and preoperative ACP discussions.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the 2nd leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The American Cancer Society (ACS) Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines are associated with longer survival among CRC survivors, but few report behaviors consistent with the guidelines.The Tools To Be Fit study, based on the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework, is a full factorial experimental to optimize a remotely delivered 48-week diet and physical activity intervention for non-metastatic CRC survivors. The intervention includes a core component (booklet and personal report). CRC survivors (N = 400) are additionally randomly assigned to one of 16 combinations of four candidate components, each with 2 options: 1) text messaging (on/off); 2) self-monitoring modality (digital/paper); 3) health coaching (on/off); and 4) support person coaching (on/off).Our primary outcome is adherence to the ACS guidelines after 48 weeks using a score that includes physical activity from accelerometers, dietary intake from a food frequency questionnaire, and body mass index (BMI) measured by a technician. Secondary outcomes include the ACS score after 24 weeks and score components at 24 and 48 weeks. Exploratory outcomes include adherence and change in Social Cognitive Theory constructs. We will explore moderation by sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological/behavioral factors; and change in the ACS score in relation to change in levels of insulin, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, gut microbiome structure, fatigue, depression, and sleep disturbance.The proposed study aims to inform a randomized controlled trial to determine whether an optimized intervention reduces risk of recurrence among CRC survivors.

Nutrition and physical activity are associated with prostate cancer recurrence and mortality. Few randomized controlled trials (RCT) have examined the effects of long-term exercise and diet changes on prostate cancer clinical, biological, and patient-reported outcomes.Prostate 8-II is a 4-arm RCT among 200 men with prostate cancer who chose radical prostatectomy (RP) as their primary treatment. Men are enrolled prior to RP and randomized to exercise-only, diet-only, exercise + diet, or usual care (50/arm). Participants begin their assigned intervention 0-5 weeks prior to RP and continue for 24-months following surgery. The 3 active intervention arms receive access to a web-portal and text messages, coaching calls, and other intervention resources (e.g., heart rate sensor and resistance bands and/or recipe booklet). Weekly exercise goals for the exercise intervention groups are 150 min moderate or 75 min vigorous aerobic exercise, 2 strength sessions, and 2 flexibility sessions. Diet intervention groups work with a dietitian to customize their goals (e.g., increase cruciferous vegetables, cooked tomatoes, healthy fats, fish; limit processed meats, whole milk). The primary endpoint is biochemical recurrence. Secondary endpoints include change in tumor biomarkers from biopsy to RP as well as patient-reported outcomes (e.g., quality-of-life), blood and urine biomarkers, and anthropometry at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months.This 4-arm RCT will examine the impact of change in exercise and diet (alone or in combination) on prostate cancer recurrence, biology, and quality-of-life.

Background Diet and exercise may be associated with quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer. Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered web-based behavioral intervention among men with prostate cancer. Methods We conducted a multi-site 4-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of a 3-month intervention (TrueNTH Community of Wellness). Eligibility included self-reported prostate cancer diagnosis, having a personal device that connected to the internet, age ≥18 years, and ability to read English and receive text messages and emails. Men receiving chemotherapy or radiation, or those who reported contraindications to exercise, could participate with physician clearance. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to additive intervention levels: website; website and personalized diet and exercise prescription; website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, and text messages; and website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, text messages, and 2 30-minute phone calls—one with an exercise trainer and one with a registered dietician. Primary outcomes were feasibility (accrual and attrition) and acceptability (survey data and website use). We described self-reported diet and exercise behavior at the time of enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months as secondary outcomes. Results In total, 202 men consented and were randomized between August 2017 and September 2018 (level 1: 49, level 2: 51, level 3: 50, level 4: 52). A total of 160 men completed the onboarding process and were exposed to their randomly assigned intervention (38, 38, 42, and 42 in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The follow-up rate was 82.7% (167/202) at 3 months and 77.2% (156/202) at 6 months. Participants had a median age of 70 years and were primarily White and college educated. Website visit frequency over the 3-month intervention period increased across levels (median: 2, 9, 11, and 16 visits for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Most were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention (20/39, 51%; 27/42, 64%; 23/44, 52%; and 27/42, 64% for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The percentage of men who reported being very satisfied was highest among level 4 participants (10/42, 24% vs 4/39, 10%; 5/42, 12%; and 5/44, 11% for levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Dissatisfaction was highest in level 1 (5/39, 13% vs 1/42, 2%; 3/44, 7%; and 2/42, 5% for levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively). We observed small improvements in diet and physical activity at 3 months among men in level 4 versus those in level 1. Conclusions A web-based, remotely delivered, tailored behavioral intervention for men with prostate cancer is feasible. Future studies are warranted to increase the effect of the intervention on patient behavior while maintaining sustainability and scalability as well as to design and implement interventions for more diverse populations. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013

BACKGROUND Diet and exercise may be associated with quality of life and survival in men with prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered web-based behavioral intervention among men with prostate cancer. METHODS We conducted a multi-site 4-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of a 3-month intervention (TrueNTH Community of Wellness). Eligibility included self-reported prostate cancer diagnosis, having a personal device that connected to the internet, age ≥18 years, and ability to read English and receive text messages and emails. Men receiving chemotherapy or radiation, or those who reported contraindications to exercise, could participate with physician clearance. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to additive intervention levels: website; website and personalized diet and exercise prescription; website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, and text messages; and website, personalized prescription, Fitbit, text messages, and 2 30-minute phone calls—one with an exercise trainer and one with a registered dietician. Primary outcomes were feasibility (accrual and attrition) and acceptability (survey data and website use). We described self-reported diet and exercise behavior at the time of enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months as secondary outcomes. RESULTS In total, 202 men consented and were randomized between August 2017 and September 2018 (level 1: 49, level 2: 51, level 3: 50, level 4: 52). A total of 160 men completed the onboarding process and were exposed to their randomly assigned intervention (38, 38, 42, and 42 in levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The follow-up rate was 82.7% (167/202) at 3 months and 77.2% (156/202) at 6 months. Participants had a median age of 70 years and were primarily White and college educated. Website visit frequency over the 3-month intervention period increased across levels (median: 2, 9, 11, and 16 visits for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Most were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention (20/39, 51%; 27/42, 64%; 23/44, 52%; and 27/42, 64% for levels 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). The percentage of men who reported being very satisfied was highest among level 4 participants (10/42, 24% vs 4/39, 10%; 5/42, 12%; and 5/44, 11% for levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Dissatisfaction was highest in level 1 (5/39, 13% vs 1/42, 2%; 3/44, 7%; and 2/42, 5% for levels 2, 3, and 4, respectively). We observed small improvements in diet and physical activity at 3 months among men in level 4 versus those in level 1. CONCLUSIONS A web-based, remotely delivered, tailored behavioral intervention for men with prostate cancer is feasible. Future studies are warranted to increase the effect of the intervention on patient behavior while maintaining sustainability and scalability as well as to design and implement interventions for more diverse populations. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with numerous toxicities that are potentially modifiable. We sought to evaluate the impact of participation in a multidisciplinary clinic, STAND (Supportive Therapy in Androgen Deprivation) Clinic, designed to provide individualized lifestyle modification and management of ADT-related side effects.This phase II study recruited men with prostate cancer who had started ADT6 months prior to enrollment, and in whom ADT was planned for at least 12 months following enrollment. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the STAND Clinic or usual care. Patients randomized to the STAND Clinic were provided monthly multidisciplinary assessment and counseling on exercise, nutrition, and symptom management for 12 months on a rotating schedule. Primary outcome was change from baseline to 12 months in percent body fat. Feasibility outcomes were also assessed by measuring percentage of completed visits. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline to 12 months in 3 domains: (1) metabolic impact and bone health, (2) quality of life (QOL), and (3) physical activity.A total of 25 men were randomized to STAND clinic, and 23 were randomized to usual care. The study did not meet its accrual target of 32 men in each arm and was closed early due to lack of financial support. Overall, 91% (295 of 325) of STAND clinic visits were completed. Eighteen out of the 25 patients in STAND clinic arm (72%) completed all 12 months of STAND clinic visits, and 80% (20 of 25) completed the first 6 months. For all primary and secondary outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms.Individualized and comprehensive management of ADT toxicities in a multidisciplinary clinic was well attended by patients. However, we did not find any differences in the outcomes assessed between the intervention arm and control.

BACKGROUND More than 3.1 million men in the United States are prostate cancer survivors. These men may improve their physical function, quality of life, and potentially their prognosis by adopting healthier lifestyle habits. The internet provides a scalable mechanism to deliver advice and support about improving physical activity and dietary habits, but the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based lifestyle intervention and the dose of support necessary to improve health behaviors are not yet known. OBJECTIVES The Community of Wellness is a Web-based intervention focused on supporting exercise and healthy dietary practices for men with prostate cancer. The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Community of Wellness Web portal among prostate cancer survivors by conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 4 levels of additive Web-based content and interaction with participants: Level 1 (Teaching; Control), Level 2 (Teaching + Tailoring), Level 3 (Teaching + Tailoring + Technology), and Level 4 (Teaching + Tailoring + Technology + Touch). METHODS This is a single-blinded RCT comparing 3 levels of behavioral support within the Community of Wellness Web portal intervention (Levels 2 to 4) with each other and with the control condition (Level 1). The control condition receives general static Web-based educational information only on physical activity and dietary habits, self-efficacy for behavior change, motivation for physical activity, and changes in anxiety and treatment-related side effects. We will enroll and randomize 200 men with prostate cancer equally to 4 levels of the Community of Wellness Web-based intervention for 3 months (50 men per level). Surveys will be completed by self-report at baseline, 3 months (immediately postintervention), and 6 months (3 months postintervention). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by enrollment statistics, Web-based usage metrics, and surveys at the 3-month time point. We will also conduct focus groups after the postintervention follow-up assessment in a sample of enrolled participants to evaluate elements of usability and acceptability that cannot be obtained via surveys. RESULTS Enrollment is ongoing, with 124 enrolled. Study completion (6-month follow-up) is expected by July 2019. CONCLUSIONS The goal of the study is to identify the level of support that is feasible, acceptable, promotes behavior change, and improves health in men with prostate cancer to inform future efforts to scale the program for broader reach. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03406013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03406013 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73YpDIoTX). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR PRR1-10.2196/11257

204 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is associated with numerous metabolic toxicities that are potentially modifiable. We sought to evaluate the impact of participation in a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) designed to provide individualized lifestyle modification and management of ADT-related side effects. Methods: This phase II study recruited men with prostate cancer who had started ADT < 6 months prior to enrollment, and in whom ADT was planned for at least 12 months following enrollment. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the MDC or standard of care (SOC). Patients randomized to the MDC were provided monthly multidisciplinary assessment and counseling on exercise, nutrition, and symptom management for 12 months on a rotating schedule. Endpoints included feasibility endpoints (proportion of visits completed), and efficacy endpoints, including mean change from baseline to 12 months in blood pressure (BP), weight, waist circumference, percent body fat, hemoglobin A1C (HbgA1C), insulin resistance, and fasting lipids. Results: 25 men were randomized to MDC, and 23 were randomized to SOC. Overall 91% (295/325) of MDC visits were completed. 72% (18/25) of patients completed all 12 months of MDC, and 80% (20/25) completed the first 6 months. Compared to SOC, patients in the MDC arm had a trend towards more favorable mean percent change from baseline to 12-month follow up in systolic BP (6.5% vs. 10.3%), diastolic BP (-3.9% vs.10.0%), waist circumference (2.5% vs. 4.0%), HbA1C (-2.4% vs. -1.7%), insulin resistance (0.5% vs. 1.9%), and fasting lipids (total cholesterol: 7.0% vs. 21.8%; LDL: -2.9% vs. 7.6%; triglyceride: 15.5% vs. 37.2%). Conclusions: Individualized and comprehensive management of toxicities of ADT in a multidisciplinary clinic is feasible, and appears to provide some benefit over SOC. Larger randomized studies are warranted to investigate whether this intervention will provide lasting benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02168062.

153 Background: Chemohormonal therapy is standard of care for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) patients (pts) but is associated with significant adverse effects and negative metabolic changes. We performed a pilot study to investigate whether participation in a multi-disciplinary clinic to mitigate adverse effects of treatment is feasible. Methods: Pts with recently diagnosed mPC who were planning to start or had recently started chemohormonal therapy were prospectively enrolled in a multi-disciplinary clinic that included individualized monthly counseling from a physical therapist, oncology dietitian, and palliative care specialist on a rotating basis for 12 months. Patients were assessed quarterly for changes in % body fat, weight, serum levels of 25-OH vitamin D, fasting lipids/glucose/insulin, and quality of life (QOL). DXA bone density scans were performed at baseline and end of 12 months. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of scheduled visits. Results: 7 pts were enrolled between September 2015 and June 2016. All patients had extensive disease ( > 4 bone metastases and/or visceral metastases) at the time of study entry, and all 7 patients completed six cycles of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, and remained on hormone therapy for the duration of study. The percentage of completed visits was 98% (54/55 planned visits). The percentage of completed assessments including QOL questionnaires was 81%. No skeletal-related complications were observed. Median percent increase from baseline in body weight and % body fat was 3.51% and 20%, respectively. Four of the seven patients had osteopenia at baseline. Patient reported satisfaction was high and positive impact on psychosocial well-being was observed. Conclusions: Participation in a multi-disciplinary clinic by men receiving intensive chemohormonal therapy for metastatic prostate cancer was feasible. Patients are at risk for adverse metabolic and bone toxicity with therapy, underscoring the potential positive impact of a multi-disciplinary clinic. A randomized study to detect objective improvements in health outcomes is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02168062.

218 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases the risk of numerous metabolic toxicities, including weight and body fat gain, insulin resistance, and osteoporosis. Many of these toxicities can be mitigated with lifestyle changes and monitoring of cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors, however, these are not routinely implemented in clinical practice. We designed a pilot study to evaluate whether a structured multidisciplinary (multi-D) clinic can lessen the metabolic impact of ADT. Methods: Patients who started ADT within the past 6 months were enrolled in the year-long multi-D clinic consisting of monthly face-to-face visits and individualized counseling from registered dietitian, certified exercise physiologist, and symptom management specialist, and assessment of weight, body mass index, percent body fat, fasting glucose, lipids, and hemoglobin A1c on an every 3 month schedule. The primary endpoint for this pilot study was the patient adherence rate to the clinic visit schedule, with a targeted goal of greater than 80%. Secondary endpoints included maximal percent change from baseline in metabolic parameters as outlined above. Results: 22 patients were enrolled between November 2013 and May 2014. Participation in the multi-D clinic was high, with a 95% adherence rate to the clinic schedule. The mean maximal percent change from baseline in metabolic parameters is shown below in the Table. Conclusions: Conducting a multi-D clinic for men receiving ADT was feasible, with an adherence rate of over 90%. The metabolic impact of ADT during the 12-month clinic participation was minimal and compares favorably to historical controls, but may be due to selection bias. A randomized phase 2 study comparing multi-D clinic to usual standard of care is ongoing to validate these findings. [Table: see text]