Search

The transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2 bind differentially to three octamer binding sequences corresponding to the octamer binding site from the H2B promoter [ATGCTAATAA], a simple TAATGARAT motif, found in herpes simplex virus IE4/5 genes [GCGGTAATGAGAT], and a perfect consensus overlapping octamer/TAATGARAT motif [ATGCTAATGAGAT]. By comparing the effects of protein kinase A, protein kinase C and casein kinase 2 in vitro on the binding of Oct-1 and Oct-2 to the three motifs, we show that the actions of these kinases regulate Oct-1 and Oct-2 DNA binding independently of each other in a binding-site-specific manner. Inhibition of cellular phosphatases also regulate Oct-1 and Oct-2 DNA binding in a binding-site-specific manner. Both kinase and phosphatase activity are important for regulating the DNA binding activity of Oct-1 and Oct-2 because, in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors, protein kinase A attenuates the binding of both Oct-1 and Oct-2 to the octamer binding site but enhances binding when phosphatase inhibitors are omitted. Thus the DNA specificity of Oct-1 and Oct-2 can be regulated in vitro by the action of different kinases.

The mechanisms that regulate ubiquitin-mediated degradation of proteins such as the mitotic cyclins at defined stages of the cell cycle are poorly understood. The initial step in the conjugation of ubiquitin to substrate proteins involves the activation of ubiquitin by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1. Previously we have described the subcellular localization of this enzyme to both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. In the present study, we have used the 1C5 anti-E1 monoclonal antibody in immunofluorescent-microscopy and subcellular-fractionation techniques to examine the distribution of E1 during the HeLa cell cycle. E1 is both cytoskeletal and nuclear during the G1-phase. As the cells progress into S-phase, E1 is exclusively cytoskeletal and has a perinuclear distribution. During G2-phase, E1 reappears in the nucleus before breakdown of the nuclear envelope. In mitotic cells, E1 localizes to both the mitotic spindle and the cytosol, but is absent from the chromosomes. Immunoblot analysis reveals multiple forms of E1 in HeLa whole cell extract. This heterogeneity is not a result of polyubiquitination and may represent inactive pools of E1. Only the characteristic E1 doublet is able to activate ubiquitin. Cell-fractionation studies reveal a differential distribution of specific E1 isoforms throughout the cell cycle. Therefore we propose that the subcellular localization of E1 may play a role in regulating cell-cycle-dependent conjugation of ubiquitin to target proteins.

Ubiquitin, a 76-amino acid protein, is covalently attached to abnormal and short-lived proteins, thus marking them for ATP-dependent proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. Ubiquitin is found within the cytoplasm, nucleus, microvilli, autophagic vacuoles, and lysosomes. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1, catalyzes the first step in ubiquitin conjugation. To date, very little is known about the subcellular distribution of this enzyme. We have utilized immunofluorescence and immunoblotting to examine the cellular distribution of E1 in several eukaryotic cell lines, including HeLa, smooth muscle A7r5, choriocarcinoma BeWo, Pt K1, and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) E36. E1 was identified in both cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments in all cell lines examined. However, the relative abundance within these compartments differed markedly between the cell lines. Even within a single cell line, nuclear distribution was not uniform, and certain cells demonstrated an absence of nuclear staining. E1 resides predominantly within the nucleus in BeWo. In contrast, its distribution in CHO and Pt K1 cells is mainly cytoplasmic. Within the cytoplasm, three pools of E1 were identified by double-label immunofluorescence. The first of these colocalized with phalloidin, indicating association of E1 with actin filaments. A second cytoplasmic pool colocalized with tubulin and was predominantly perinuclear in its distribution. The third pool associated with intermediate filaments. This suggests that E1 is associated with all three components of the cytoskeleton. The distribution of E1 was unaltered in a mutant line of CHO E36 designated ts20, in which the E1 can be thermally inactivated. The variable distribution of E1 among cell lines, including its apparent cytoskeletal association, suggests pleiotropic functions of this enzyme and the ubiquitin-conjugating system.

In this study we have investigated the effect that interleukin 1 (IL-1) has on cell surface IL-1 receptor expression in the murine thymoma cell line, EL4 6.1. These cells express IL-1 receptors with both high affinity (Kd = 65 pM, 986 receptors/cell) and low affinity (Kd = 14.5 nM, 10,417 receptors/cell). The high- and low-affinity receptors are indistinguishable by crosslinking studies performed at both high and low ligand concentrations. However, the two affinity states could be functionally distinguished on the basis of their internalization of ligand. Receptor-mediated endocytosis was dependent upon the concentration of ligand bound to the cells. In the presence of low IL-1 concentrations receptor-mediated endocytosis was slow, whereas at high IL-1 concentrations, endocytosis was more rapid. Furthermore, receptor-mediated endocytosis of IL-1 did not result in downregulation of surface IL-1 receptors. Indeed, both kinetic and equilibrium binding studies revealed that pre-incubation of cells with IL-1 alpha resulted in an acute upregulation of 125IL-1 alpha binding to high affinity surface receptors in a time and energy dependent manner. Examination of the association kinetics suggested that increased binding was not attributable to positive co-operativity of the high affinity IL-1 receptor, but was due to increasing IL-1 receptor number. This observation was confirmed by equilibrium binding studies. Moreover, receptor numbers were not enhanced by de novo synthesis, nor release of receptors from an intracellular pool. The observed increases in surface ligand binding were most probably due to conversion of the surface pool of low affinity receptors into high affinity receptors.

Kallikrein released during superfusion of rat, monkey and human kidney cortical slices was mainly in the inactive form. Arginine vasopressin and the nonpressor synthetic analogue des-amino-D-arginine vasopressin increased the release of inactive kallikrein to a similar extent in all species. No detectable change in active kallikrein release occurred. These results suggest a role for the kallikrein-kinin system in the regulation of the hydro-osmotic effect of arginine vasopressin.