Search

In the field of biodiversity conservation, there is a growing need for research to translate to real-world impacts. Currently there exists a gap between research outcomes and on the ground action, commonly referred to as the knowledgeaction gap. Previous research has focused on identifying the causes of the gap, but less research has focused on how to bridge it. We conducted an online survey with conservation researchers and practitioners to identify barriers in the science-to application pipeline and to understand how potential solutions would need to account for their information needs and workflows. Through a qualitative analysis of the open-ended survey responses, we found that information about tools and approaches to address conservation challenges is needed, but decision makers also need information to help them account for context specific barriers and opportunities. Solution-specific information alone, however, is often insufficient for practitioners, who also require the resource capacity and capable personnel to work with that information. Word of mouth and scholarly databases are the most common ways of learning about new tools and techniques, but lack of time, funding and personnel are barriers to implementing them. In addition, respondents identified a need for increased engagement with the conservation social sciences. We argue that a usercentered design approach should underpin any proposed solution to the gap and suggest that an online tool could be one effective solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Birds can be unintentionally injured or killed by mammal traps. Unfortunately, some birds in Hawai‘i, including puaiohi (Myadestes palmeri), and in New Zealand, have been killed by the widely used Goodnature® A24 rat-stoat self-resetting trap (A24s) during rodent control. To help address this problem, we conducted two sets of aviary trials using (1) barriers and (2) existing A24 excluders with red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus), European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), and a single puaiohi. We conducted barrier trials to inform future bird excluder designs by establishing the minimum gap-height beneath a barrier that blackbirds and starlings successfully overcome. During barrier trials, starlings defeated barriers significantly lower (≥ 1.9 cm) than blackbirds (≥ 2.9 cm). We then presented disarmed A24s with no excluder or with one of two excluders (plastic Goodnature, 11 cm length; and metal mesh, 10 cm, or 15–17 cm length for puaiohi) to each bird species. We placed the A24s and excluders low (11–25 cm trap height, 0–10 cm excluder height) and high (50–83 cm trap height, 37–72 cm excluder height) above ground to test bird entry abilities at trap heights used by land managers to control rodents. During the A24 excluder trials, all three bird species entered the trap at low or high heights with no excluder, confirming bird risk of injury when excluders aren’t used. Excluders greatly decreased entry into A24s by blackbirds and puaiohi, but not by starlings. Plastic and metal excluders prevented puaiohi entry at low height only. Based on our trials and recent field uses, the plastic excluder performed best for excluding all three bird species if placed so the lower edge of the excluder is 0–2 cm above ground. However, plastic and metal excluders can clog with dead rodents when positioned low. Future trials aiming to exclude all small birds from A24s while maintaining trap efficacy against target rodents should consider new excluder designs incorporating the 1.9–2.9 cm gap-height thresholds. When deciding whether to use excluders and appropriate trap heights, managers need to consider both the risk of non-target injuries or deaths and the impact of potentially decreasing trap efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While marine hermit crabs are well known for being omnivorous filter feeders, less is known about the role they may play as active carrion scavengers in intertidal ecosystems. Prior studies have revealed that intertidal hermit crabs can be attracted to chemical cues from predated gastropods. Yet their attraction is usually assumed to be driven primarily by the availability of new shells rather than by food. We conducted field experiments to assess hermit crabs' potential role as generalist carrion scavengers on the California Coast, examining their speed of attraction and the size of the aggregations they formed in response to chemical cues from freshly smashed gastropods and mussels, both of which indicated available carrion. Compared to all other marine species, hermit crabs (Pagurus samuelis, P. hirsutiusculus, and P. granosimanus) were the fastest to arrive at the provisioning sites. Hermit crabs also dominated the provisioning sites, accumulating in the largest numbers, with aggregations of up to 20 individuals, which outcompeted all other scavengers for carrion. Notably, hermit crabs arrived equally quickly for both smashed gastropod and mussel, even though the latter does not offer suitable shells for hermit crabs and even though the former only yields shell-related chemical cues over time frames longer than our experiments. These results thus suggest that shell availability is not the only, or even the primary, reason marine intertidal hermit crabs aggregate at carrion sites; they also aggregate to forage, thereby playing an important role as active carrion scavengers in intertidal ecosystems. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00227-015-2639-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users., Author(s): Mark E. Laidre[sup.1] [sup.2] , Alison L. Greggor[sup.1] [sup.3] Author Affiliations: (1) Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA (2) Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, [...]

Birds can be unintentionally injured or killed by mammal traps. Unfortunately, some birds in Hawai'i, including puaiohi (Myadestes palmeri), and in New Zealand, have been killed by the widely used Goodnature® A24 rat-stoat self-resetting trap (A24s) during rodent control. To help address this problem, we conducted two sets of aviary trials using (1) barriers and (2) existing A24 excluders with red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus), European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), and a single puaiohi. We conducted barrier trials to inform future bird excluder designs by establishing the minimum gap-height beneath a barrier that blackbirds and starlings successfully overcome. During barrier trials, starlings defeated barriers significantly lower (= 1.9 cm) than blackbirds (= 2.9 cm). We then presented disarmed A24s with no excluder or with one of two excluders (plastic Goodnature, 11 cm length; and metal mesh, 10 cm, or 15-17 cm length for puaiohi) to each bird species. We placed the A24s and excluders low (11-25 cm trap height, 0-10 cm excluder height) and high (50-83 cm trap height, 37-72 cm excluder height) above ground to test bird entry abilities at trap heights used by land managers to control rodents. During the A24 excluder trials, all three bird species entered the trap at low or high heights with no excluder, confirming bird risk of injury when excluders aren't used. Excluders greatly decreased entry into A24s by blackbirds and puaiohi, but not by starlings. Plastic and metal excluders prevented puaiohi entry at low height only. Based on our trials and recent field uses, the plastic excluder performed best for excluding all three bird species if placed so the lower edge of the excluder is 0-2 cm above ground. However, plastic and metal excluders can clog with dead rodents when positioned low. Future trials aiming to exclude all small birds from A24s while maintaining trap efficacy against target rodents should consider new excluder designs incorporating the 1.9-2.9 cm gap-height thresholds. When deciding whether to use excluders and appropriate trap heights, managers need to consider both the risk of non-target injuries or deaths and the impact of potentially decreasing trap efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]