Search

PurposeTo analyze outcomes of posterior urethroplasty following pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) and to determine risk factors for surgical complexity and success.MethodsPatients who underwent posterior urethroplasty following PFUI were identified in the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database. Demographics, injury patterns, management strategies, and prior interventions were evaluated. Risk factors for surgical failure and the impact of ancillary urethral lengthening maneuvers (corporal splitting, pubectomy and supracrural rerouting) were evaluated.ResultsOf the 436 posterior urethroplasties identified, 122 were following PFUI. 83 (68%) patients were acutely managed with suprapubic tubes, while 39 (32%) underwent early endoscopic realignment. 16 (13%) patients underwent pelvic artery embolization in the acute setting. 116 cases (95%) were completed via a perineal approach, while 6 (5%) were performed via an abdominoperineal approach. The need for one or more ancillary maneuvers to gain urethral length occurred in 4 (36%) patients. Of these, 44 (36%) received corporal splitting, 16 (13%) partial or complete pubectomy, and 2 (2%) supracrural rerouting. Younger patients, those with longer distraction defects, and those with a history of angioembolization were more likely to require ancillary maneuvers. 111 patients (91%) did not require repeat intervention during follow-up. Angioembolization (p = 0.03) and longer distraction defects (p = 0.01) were associated with failure.ConclusionsPosterior urethroplasty provides excellent success rates for patients following PFUI. Pelvic angioembolization and increased defect length are associated with increased surgical complexity and risk of failure. Surgeons should be prepared to implement ancillary maneuvers when indicated to achieve a tension-free anastomosis.

Purpose: The introduction of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has revolutionized the treatment of Peyronie's disease. The efficacy of this therapy has been well demonstrated and the safety profile is favorable. However, post-injection complications are poorly characterized and management of these complications lacks standardization. Methods: This review includes literature published in English and indexed in the PubMed®, Embase® or Google Scholar™ databases. What follows is a synopsis of relevant articles, including original research studies, in an attempt to better define CCH complications and their respective management strategies. Results: Adverse effects of therapy are common but generally self-limiting. Penile pain and edema are expected events, and most patients experience hematologic sequelae (bleeding, hematoma, ecchymosis, etc.). The intervention rate for penile hematoma is low. Penile fracture is a morbid complication of therapy that is rare and may be challenging to diagnose given the frequency with which pronounced bruising and swelling are encountered. Imaging is a useful adjunct in situations of diagnostic uncertainty. Alternative injection protocols have been evaluated to limit the cost and morbidity of CCH therapy. Clinical efficacy of these protocols is promising, but prospective evaluation is lacking. Conclusions: No standardized protocols exist for management of post-injection complications of CCH therapy. The majority of these complications are managed conservatively, but suspected penile fracture should be carefully evaluated and imaging employed when needed. Future prospective studies of alternative injection protocols are warranted to decrease morbidity while maintaining efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]