Search

Rationale: Long-term recovery after critical illness can be affected by post–intensive care syndrome (PICS), a significant burden, which can impact return to activities and work. There is a need for streamlined support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients in their recovery while enduring PICS symptoms. Objectives: To explore critical illness recovery from the experiences, perspectives, and beliefs of former ICU patients, their caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians to design a future rehabilitation intervention prototype to support ICU patients. Methods: This was an experience-based codesign (EBCD) study underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel framework involving ICU patients (<5 years after illness), caregivers, and multidisciplinary clinicians with current clinical experience with ICU recovery at any point along the care continuum (ICU, acute, subacute, or community settings) from two metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Two rounds of experience-based codesign workshops were held between August 2021 and February 2022. Workshop content was analyzed via a reflective thematic approach to determine themes and develop an intervention. The intervention was mapped according to the template for intervention description and replication framework. Results: Forty people participated in the codesign process: 15 ICU patients, 2 caregivers, and 23 clinicians. Fifteen major themes were identified in the experience of ICU recovery. Returning home was a key time point for change, acceptance, and adjustment, with the burden of physical limitations and mental health problems becoming apparent. Most participants expressed that PICS was poorly understood in the community, and there was a lack of support to aid recovery. Based on these results, an intervention prototype was developed with a primary goal of improving care after hospital discharge. This was further refined in the second round of workshops. A resource toolkit was deemed most acceptable to end-users, including a hospital-directed support program involving psychology and physical therapy and an accompanying digital health package. Conclusions: A critical time point for more support in the recovery journey was the transition from hospital to home. To address this, a rehabilitation prototype including a physical and psychological support intervention and supporting digital health toolkit was codesigned. The intervention package will be developed and trialed with future ICU patients and their families. Clinical trial registered with (NCT 05044221). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the ability of clinical measures collected within 72 hours of neurological insult to predict independent gait 6 and 12 months after a stroke. Patients with a confirmed stroke diagnosis were eligible for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Sitting balance, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) motor leg, NIHSS motor arm, and Motricity Index (MI) were measured within 72 hours post-stroke. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 and 12 months post-stroke to measure gait recovery. A total of 78 patients were included at baseline for analysis. At 6 and 12 months, 38% (n = 38) and 35% (n = 42) of patients used a gait aid, and 80% and 87% were independently ambulant, respectively. Sitting balance, NIHSS motor leg, and NIHSS motor arm were not significantly associated with ambulation at 6 or 12 months or with the use of a gait aid. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with independent outdoors ambulation at 6 months (p =.011). A worse MI score was significantly associated with a higher number of falls at 6 months (p <.010) but not with the need for a gait aid. The number of falls at 6 months was independently predicted by urinary incontinence post-stroke (p <.001), NIHSS leg score (p <.005), and depression and anxiety while in acute care (p <.005). Clinical bedside assessments may be less important in predicting safe, independent gait than previously thought. Urinary incontinence and poor mental health should be addressed in the hospital. Increased utilization of reperfusion techniques may alter functional recovery patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundNutrition and physical activity interventions are important components of cancer care. With an increasing demand for services, there is a need to consider flexible, easily accessible, and tailored models of care while maintaining optimal outcomes. ObjectiveThis systematic review describes and appraises the efficacy of technology-supported self-guided nutrition and physical activity interventions for people with cancer. MethodsA systematic search of multiple databases from 1973 to July 2018 was conducted for randomized and nonrandomized trials investigating technology-supported self-guided nutrition and physical activity interventions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes included behavioural, health-related, clinical, health service, or financial measures. ResultsSixteen randomized controlled trials representing 2684 participants were included. Most studies were web-based interventions (n=9) and had a 12-week follow-up duration (n=8). Seven studies assessed dietary behaviour, of which two reported a significant benefit on diet quality or fruit and vegetable intake. Fifteen studies measured physical activity behaviour, of which eight studies reported a significant improvement in muscle strength and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Four of the nine studies assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) reported a significant improvement in global HRQoL or a domain subscale. A significant improvement in fatigue was found in four of six studies. Interpretation of findings was influenced by inadequate reporting of intervention description and compliance. ConclusionsThis review identified short-term benefits of technology-supported self-guided interventions on the physical activity level and fatigue and some benefit on dietary behaviour and HRQoL in people with cancer. However, current literature demonstrates a lack of evidence for long-term benefit. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42017080346; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=80346