88 results on '"Graft vs Host Disease classification"'
Search Results
2. Engraftment Syndrome and Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Poonsombudlert K, Kewcharoen J, Prueksapraopong C, and Limpruttidham N
- Subjects
- Capillary Leak Syndrome classification, Capillary Leak Syndrome physiopathology, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Humans, Primary Graft Dysfunction physiopathology, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Primary Graft Dysfunction classification
- Abstract
Engraftment syndrome (ES) has been associated with the surge of neutrophils and cytokines, which is similar to the presumed underlying pathophysiology behind acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). However, there has been no meta-analysis to evaluate the association; therefore, the team attempted to verify an association between ES and aGVHD through meta-analysis. The team searched for titles of articles in MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database up until December 2018 that evaluated the association between ES and aGVHD and conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 8 studies involving a total of 1,945 participants to report the pooled odds ratio (OR) for association of ES and aGVHD. The team found a significantly increased odds of developing aGVHD in patients with ES with the pooled OR of 2.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-4.63) and an I
2 = 64.5%. In conclusion, patients with ES have significantly higher odds of developing aGVHD compared to patients without ES., (©Copyright 2020 by University Health Partners of Hawai‘i (UHP Hawai‘i).)- Published
- 2020
3. Kinetics and Risk Factors of Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Leukemia: A Long-Term Follow-Up Single-Center Study.
- Author
-
Molina B, Gonzalez Vicent M, Herrero B, Deltoro N, Ruiz J, Perez Martinez A, and Diaz MA
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Allografts, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Infant, Male, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control, Graft vs Leukemia Effect, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Leukemia mortality, Leukemia therapy
- Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment for high-risk hematological malignancies in the pediatric population, but relapse remains the leading cause of death. We analyzed risk factors associated with relapse. Data from 353 allo-HSCTs from 1989 to 2015 in our center were studied retrospectively. We performed a multivariate analysis of pre- and postransplantation variables and developed a predictive risk score for relapse using the significant factors in this training cohort. The results were confirmed in a validation cohort of 90 allo-HSCTs done in our institution from 2016 to the present. A total of 104 patients relapsed after allo-HSCT, with a relapse cumulative incidence of 31 ± 2%. In multivariate analysis, only 2 variables influenced relapse: disease phase (advanced versus early, HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.76 to 4.57; P = .001) and presence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (acute GVHD versus chronic GVHD [HR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.99 to 9.15; P = .0001] and no GVHD versus chronic GVHD [HR, 6.86; 95% CI, 3.63 to 12.97] P = .0001]. Applying the personalized risk score (0 to 3), the relapse cumulative incidence was 70 ± 5% in patients with a score of 3 (without GVHD and in the advanced phase) compared with 6 ± 4% in patients with a score of 0 (with chronic GVHD and in an early phase). This score has been verified in the validation set. With a median follow-up of 54 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival rate were 37 ± 3% and 45 ± 4%, respectively. The association of GVHD with the graft-versus-leukemia effect is clearly established in our study, and the form of GVHD associated with less relapse and the best DFS is the classical form of chronic GVHD according to the National Institutes of Health classification. The proposed relapse risk score was validated in an independent cohort and allows personalization of the prognosis., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. [Harmonization of data coding in post-transplant follow-up - "GVHD, complications and additional treatments": Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)].
- Author
-
Cornillon J, Detrait M, Karam M, Le Bars L, Meziane Y, Pereira M, Richard-Leveille S, Marion S, Leroux S, Coiteux V, Raus N, Seris S, Guyotat D, Yakoub-Agha I, and Laurent N
- Subjects
- Bone Marrow Transplantation, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy, Databases, Factual standards, France, Humans, Infections classification, Infections microbiology, Postoperative Period, Primary Graft Dysfunction classification, Societies, Medical, Time Factors, Clinical Coding standards, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Postoperative Complications classification
- Abstract
The quality of the information provided in post-transplant follow-up is necessary to obtain a coherent and exploitable database. Since the beginning of 2017, three forms (Med-B-allograft) have been available: the first month (Day 0), Day 100 (second report) and an annual follow-up report. Recommendations for follow-up were addressed in the 2014 harmonization workshop, "Harmonization of Data Coding…". However, it is sometimes difficult to determine which data to specify in ProMISe for post-transplantation. The objective of this workshop was to clarify certain situations and/or items., (Copyright © 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Impact of the 2014 NIH chronic graft-versus-host disease scoring criteria modifications assessed in a large cohort of severely affected patients.
- Author
-
Kerep AZ, Broome J, Pirsl F, Curtis LM, Steinberg SM, Mitchell SA, Cowen EW, Pichard DC, Joe GO, Comis LE, Mays JW, Datiles MB 3rd, Stratton P, Zolton J, Berger A, Hendricks J, Kenyon M, Baruffaldi J, Titarenko I, Pulanic D, Baird K, Fowler DH, Gress RE, and Pavletic SZ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Lung Diseases classification, Lung Diseases pathology, Lung Diseases physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, National Cancer Institute (U.S.), United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology, Liver Diseases classification, Liver Diseases pathology, Liver Diseases physiopathology, Severity of Illness Index
- Abstract
In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) consensus project provided diagnosis and staging criteria, based mostly on clinical experience and expert opinion. These criteria were revised in 2014, aiming to provide enhanced specificity and clarity. However, the impact of 2014 changes to the original NIH cGVHD severity scoring criteria has not been reported. In this study, 284 patients, prospectively enrolled on the National Cancer Institute's cross-sectional cGVHD natural history study, were scored using the 2005 NIH cGVHD criteria and then rescored according to the 2014 modifications. In comparing the two criteria, 2014 cGVHD global severity scoring resulted in a tendency toward being categorized as milder scores (75 vs. 72% of severe score per 2014, p = 0.0009), with a statistically significant shift in NIH liver and lung scores toward milder categories (p < 0.0001). 2005 and 2014 NIH global severity scores showed a significant association with reduced grip strength (p < 0.0001), reduced joint range of motion (p = 0.0003), and the subspecialist evaluation score (p < 0.0001). Poor survival prediction of the severe NIH lung score is also retained in the new criteria (p = 0.0012). These findings support the use of 2014 cGVHD scoring criteria in continuous efforts to develop better classification systems.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Chronic graft-versus-host disease features in double unit cord blood transplantation according to National Institutes of Health 2005 cGVHD Consensus criteria.
- Author
-
Hayashi H, Ruggeri A, Volt F, Cornelissen JJ, Socié G, Sengeloev H, Michallet M, Karakasis D, Petersen E, Cahn JY, Veelken H, Mercier M, Rohrlich PS, Rafii H, Kenzey C, Xavier E, Duarte RF, Basak GW, Rocha V, and Gluckman E
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation standards, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Humans, Liver Diseases pathology, Lung Diseases pathology, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Retrospective Studies, United States, Young Adult, Consensus, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Severity of Illness Index
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. [Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease].
- Author
-
Cho A, Just U, and Knobler R
- Subjects
- Allografts, Diagnosis, Differential, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, Intersectoral Collaboration, Photopheresis, Skin Diseases classification, Skin Diseases drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Skin Diseases diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a complex multiorgan disease, which can occur as a complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Involvement of the skin represents the most common appearance of GvHD. The role of the dermatologist is critical for diagnosis and initiation of treatment., Objectives: The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the cutaneous types of GvHD and to present the most recent data on diverse therapy options for its acute and chronic form allowing the clinician to establish a definite diagnosis and to initiate proper therapy., Materials and Methods: Possible clinical appearances and recommended criteria to assist in making the right diagnosis are presented by means of expert recommendations., Results and Conclusion: GvHD is still a complex entity whose diagnosis is often associated with challenges due to its variable presentation. Proper diagnosis and subsequent therapy is paramount for the optimal clinical outcome.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Simple, Reproducible, and Efficient Clinical Grading System for Murine Models of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease.
- Author
-
Naserian S, Leclerc M, Thiolat A, Pilon C, Le Bret C, Belkacemi Y, Maury S, Charlotte F, and Cohen JL
- Subjects
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Mice, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred DBA, Prognosis, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Severity of Illness Index
- Abstract
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) represents a challenging complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite the intensive preclinical research in the field of prevention and treatment of aGVHD, and the presence of a well-established clinical grading system to evaluate human aGVHD, such a valid tool is still lacking for the evaluation of murine aGVHD. Indeed, several scoring systems have been reported, but none of them has been properly evaluated and they all share some limitations: they incompletely reflect the disease, rely on severity stages that are distinguished by subjective assessment of clinical criteria and are not easy to discriminate, which could render evaluation more time consuming, and their reproducibility among different experimenters is uncertain. Consequently, clinical murine aGVHD description is often based merely on animal weight loss and mortality. Here, we propose a simple scoring system of aGVHD relying on the binary (yes or no) evaluation of five important visual parameters that reflect the complexity of the disease without the need to sacrifice the mice. We show that this scoring system is consistent with the gold standard histological staging of aGVHD across several donor/recipient mice combinations. This system is also a strong predictor of survival of recipient mice when used early after transplant and is highly reproducible between experimenters.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Validation of International Chronic Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Group Diagnostic Criteria as a Chronic Ocular GVHD-Specific Metric.
- Author
-
Rapoport Y, Freeman T, Koyama T, Engelhardt BG, Jagasia M, Savani BN, Tran U, and Kassim AA
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Biomarkers, Chronic Disease, Conjunctival Diseases classification, Conjunctival Diseases etiology, Dry Eye Syndromes classification, Dry Eye Syndromes etiology, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Transplantation, Homologous, Young Adult, Conjunctival Diseases diagnosis, Dry Eye Syndromes diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, International Classification of Diseases standards
- Abstract
Purpose: To validate the International Chronic Ocular GVHD Consensus Group (ICCGVHD) diagnostic criteria for chronic ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), by comparing results with comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation., Methods: A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, TN, from January 1, 2002, through April 17, 2014. A total of 344 patients were eligible for the study. Data collected include the Schirmer test score, corneal fluorescein staining, Ocular Surface Disease Index, conjunctival injection, and presence or absence of systemic GVHD. The diagnosis of chronic ocular GVHD in each participant and determination of the overall severity score were determined based on the newly proposed ICCGVHD diagnostic criteria and compared with the best clinical practice (BCP) score., Results: Chronic ocular GVHD was diagnosed in 141/344 (41%) participants, of these, 86 (61%) had complete charts. Based on the BCP score, 1.2% had none, 38.4% mild, 47.7% moderate, and 12.8% had severe chronic ocular GVHD. Based on the ICCGVHD, 34.8% had none, 59.3% mild/moderate, and 5.8% had severe chronic ocular GVHD. The clinical diagnostic stages of chronic ocular GVHD by BCP and ICCGVHD criteria had slight agreement (kappa statistic 0.187, with 95% confidence interval 0.049-0.321), with a higher correlation seen in those with severe chronic ocular GVHD., Conclusions: The newly proposed ICCGVHD diagnostic criteria can be used reproducibly for the diagnosis and determination of severity of chronic ocular GVHD. However, larger prospective studies are needed to further validate it.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Classification systems for chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Lee SJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Graft vs Host Disease classification
- Abstract
Chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clinically, chronic GVHD is a pleiotropic, multiorgan syndrome involving tissue inflammation and fibrosis that often results in permanent organ dysfunction. Chronic GVHD is fundamentally caused by replacement of the host's immune system with donor cells, although the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations suggests that patient, donor, and transplant factors modulate the phenotype. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD and determination of treatment response largely rely on clinical examination and patient interview. The 2005 and 2014 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Projects on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic GVHD standardized the terminology around chronic GVHD classification systems to ensure that a common language and procedures are being used in clinical research. This review provides a summary of these recommendations and illustrates how they are being used in clinical research and the potential for their use in clinical care., (© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Acute and chronic Graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
- Author
-
Funke VA, Moreira MC, and Vigorito AC
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the main complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, affecting about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD and its clinical manifestations are discussed in this article, as well as the new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion, as there is no proven superiority for the majority of therapies used after primary treatment has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful consultation tool for hematologists dealing with this complex transplantation procedure complication.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with newly diagnosed chronic GVHD according to NIH criteria.
- Author
-
Ayuk F, Veit R, Zabelina T, Bussmann L, Christopeit M, Alchalby H, Wolschke C, Lellek H, Bacher U, Zander AR, and Kröger N
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate trends, United States, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, National Institutes of Health (U.S.) standards
- Abstract
Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD) is the most common cause of late morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of NIH classification on outcome of patients at our center. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 5 years. Two hundred one patients with cGVHD according to NIH were included. Platelets <100,000/μl on day of diagnosis of cGvHD (HR 2.97, 95 % CI 1.7-5.3, p < 0.001), female donor (HR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.0-3.2, p = 0.05), and reduced intensity conditioning (HR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.0-3.8, p = 0.05) impacted overall survival. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was higher for patients with low vs. high platelets: 26 % (95 % CI 14-40) vs. 6 % (95 % CI 2-10), p < 0.001, and tended to be higher for female vs. male donor: 14 % (95 % CI 7-23) vs. 7 % (95 % CI 3-13), p = 0.08. Relapse tended to be higher for recipients of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) vs. myeloablative conditioning (MAC): 33 % (95 % CI 23-43) vs. 20 % (95 % CI 10-31), p = 0.06. After excluding patients with myeloma and lymphoma, IgG serum levels at diagnosis of cGvHD of 122 patients were correlated with survival. IgG levels above normal were associated with worse 2-year overall survival (OS), p = 0.04, compared to normal or low IgG levels. Platelet count at diagnosis remains the most valid prognostic factor for survival of patients with cGvHD even in the era of NIH grading. High IgG level at diagnosis of cGVHD represents a potential negative prognostic parameter that deserves further investigation.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Correlation Between Tear Film Osmolarity and the Disease Score of the International Chronic Ocular Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Consensus Group in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients.
- Author
-
Schargus M, Meyer-ter-Vehn T, Menrath J, Grigoleit GU, and Geerling G
- Subjects
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Cornea metabolism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dry Eye Syndromes diagnosis, Dry Eye Syndromes etiology, Female, Fluorescein metabolism, Fluorophotometry, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Humans, Leukemia therapy, Lymphoma therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Osmolar Concentration, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Staining and Labeling, Surveys and Questionnaires, Transplantation, Homologous, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Tears chemistry
- Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate tear film osmolarity (TFO) as a diagnostic tool for detecting chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to assess its correlation with the new international chronic ocular GVHD score., Methods: A group of 204 consecutive patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at University Hospital Wuerzburg in Germany received an ophthalmologic examination after transplantation. TFO was measured and the chronic ocular GVHD score was calculated based on the Schirmer test, corneal fluorescein staining, conjunctival injection, Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, and presence of systemic GVHD., Results: A total of 172 patients showed no chronic ocular GVHD. Of the remaining 32 patients using the international chronic ocular GVHD score, 21 were classified as "probably" and 11 as "definite" chronic ocular GVHD. TFO was positively correlated with the new chronic ocular GVHD score (P < 0.01, r = 0.35). TFO differed significantly between patients with no ocular GVHD (300 ± 16.5 mOsm/L) and definite ocular GVHD (337 ± 36 mOsm/L)-a receiver operating characteristic analysis showed high discrimination capability (area under the curve: 0.91 ± 0.04) and suggested a threshold level of the TFO value of 312 mOsm/L yielding a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 82%., Conclusions: TFO can be used for detecting chronic ocular GVHD with high sensitivity and specificity as a noninvasive objective test in addition to traditional dry eye tests. It correlates positively with the diagnostic criteria of a recently established international consensus score for diagnosing the disease.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Changes in circulating endothelial cells count could become a valuable tool in the diagnostic definition of acute graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Almici C, Skert C, Verardi R, Di Palma A, Bianchetti A, Neva A, Braga S, Malagola M, Turra A, Marini M, and Russo D
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Cell Count, Cell Separation, Endothelium, Vascular metabolism, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Transplantation Conditioning methods, Transplantation, Homologous adverse effects, Endothelial Cells cytology, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is burdened by life-threatening complications, with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) being the major cause of morbility and mortality. Recently, clinical and physiopathologic evidences showed that vascular endothelium can be a target of GvHD in the early phase and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) represent surrogate markers of endothelial damage., Methods: Using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, Raritan, NJ), CECs were counted before (T1), after conditioning regimen (T2), at engraftment (T3), at GvHD onset (T4), and after steroid treatment (T5) in 40 patients (7 Hodgkin's Disease, 13 Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia, 5 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, 8 Multiple Myeloma, 3 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, 1 Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 1 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, 2 Severe Aplastic Anemia) undergoing allo-HSCT., Results: The median CEC per milliliter at T1 was 20 (n=33, range 4-718), in comparison to a value of 2 (range, 1-14) in controls (P<0.001). At T3, CEC per milliliter were 47 (range, 16-148) in GvHD patients and 92 (range, 23-276) in patients without GvHD (P=0.006). This difference remained significant in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99; P=0.02). At GvHD onset, the relative increase of CEC counts from time of engraftment (T4 vs. T3) was 44% (range, -43% to 569%) in GvHD patients versus 0% (range, -49% to 2%) in patients without GvHD (P=0.003), being confirmed as significant in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.08; P=0.04)., Conclusion: Changes in CEC count can represent a promising marker to monitor endothelial damage in patients undergoing allo-HSCT and could become a valuable tool in the diagnostic definition of GvHD.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease of the oral mucosa according to the National Institutes of Health Consensus.
- Author
-
Santos PS, Coracin FL, Barros JC, and Gallottini MH
- Subjects
- Biopsy, Chronic Disease, Consensus, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease complications, Humans, Mouth Mucosa pathology, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), United States, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Salivary Gland Diseases pathology
- Abstract
Objective: To validate the minimal criteria of the histopathologic diagnosis of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease, based on the histopathologic classification of the National Institutes of Health and correlate them with clinical features., Methods: Forty-one specimens containing both oral mucosa and salivary glands were analyzed in slides stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The histological specimens were blindly examined by two trained pathologists using criteria recommended for the histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease proposed by the National Institutes of Health Consensus. The clinical classification of chronic graft-versus-host disease was correlated with analysis of slides., Results: Our data showed that the epithelium was involved in 39/41 specimens, presenting acanthosis (29/70.7%), exocytosis of lymphocytes (29/70.7%), thickening of basal lamina (29/70.7%), and apoptosis (15/36.6%). Connective tissue presented interstitial inflammatory infiltrate (38/92.7%). Minor salivary glands showed periductal fibrosis (38/92.7%), mixed periductal inflammatory infiltrate (32/78%), ductal ectasia (30/73.2%), lymphocytes around and into acinar units (30/73.2%), and interstitial fibrosis (29/70.7%). The most common clinical manifestations were lichenoid aspect (40/97.6%), complaints of sensitivity to oral feeding (38/92.7%), and dry mouth sensation (36/87.8%)., Conclusion: This study validated the National Institutes of Health Consensus of minimal histologic criteria for diagnosis of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease and has not found an association between the severity of clinical manifestation and the histopathological stage.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Acute graft-versus-host disease in a nonhematopoietic stem cell transplantation candidate treated with decitabine followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed peripheral blood stem cells infusion: a special entity of the disease?
- Author
-
Yuan L, Sun L, Yang L, and Jing Y
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Azacitidine therapeutic use, Combined Modality Therapy, Decitabine, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute immunology, Male, Middle Aged, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Transplantation Conditioning adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Azacitidine analogs & derivatives, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor therapeutic use, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute therapy, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: With a well-developed strategy of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis, the prognosis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients who develop aGVHD has improved considerably. Meanwhile, transfusion-associated GVHD (TA-GVHD) can be fatal. Recent advancements in immune cellular therapy are being adopted in clinical practice, although many concerns including TA-GVHD remain. This report describes a 64-year-old male non-HSCT candidate diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia who had received decitabine followed by an infusion of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-primed peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSCs) from his daughter, who carried haploidentical human leukocyte antigen. The patient developed aGVHD on the 20th day after infusion., Study Design and Methods: This study is a single case report of a non-HSCT candidate who developed skin aGVHD with mild clinical course after decitabine and G-PBSCs combination. The clinical course, chimerism, and aGVHD pathology studies are detailed., Results: Compared with conventional aGVHD in allo-HSCT recipients and TA-aGVHD, the presentation of this case followed a self-limited clinical course without marrow aplasia or severe progression. However, the patient eventually died of leukemia without a significant graft-versus-leukemia effect., Conclusion: First, the results demonstrate the existence of aGVHD in elderly non-HSCT candidates receiving adoptive cellular immune therapy. Second, aGVHD occurring under these conditions is probably a unique entity of aGVHD compared to TA-aGVHD and the conventional pattern in allo-HSCT recipients with respect to clinical course and prognosis., (© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. National Institutes of Health chronic graft-versus-host disease staging in severely affected patients: organ and global scoring correlate with established indicators of disease severity and prognosis.
- Author
-
Baird K, Steinberg SM, Grkovic L, Pulanic D, Cowen EW, Mitchell SA, Williams KM, Datiles MB, Bishop R, Bassim CW, Mays JW, Edwards D, Cole K, Avila DN, Taylor T, Urban A, Joe GO, Comis LE, Berger A, Stratton P, Zhang D, Shelhamer JH, Gea-Banacloche JC, Sportes C, Fowler DH, Gress RE, and Pavletic SZ
- Subjects
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lung immunology, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Severity of Illness Index, Skin immunology, Survival Analysis, Transplantation, Homologous, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Lung pathology, Skin pathology
- Abstract
Between 2004 and 2010, 189 adult patients were enrolled on the National Cancer Institute's cross-sectional chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) natural history study. Patients were evaluated by multiple disease scales and outcome measures, including the 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Project cGVHD severity scores. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the NIH scoring variables as determinants of disease severity in severely affected patients in efforts to standardize clinician evaluation and staging of cGVHD. Out of 189 patients enrolled, 125 met the criteria for severe cGVHD on the NIH global score, 62 of whom had moderate disease, with a median of 4 (range, 1-8) involved organs. Clinician-assigned average NIH organ score and the corresponding organ scores assigned by subspecialists were highly correlated (r = 0.64). NIH global severity scores showed significant associations with nearly all functional and quality of life outcome measures, including the Lee Symptom Scale, Short Form-36 Physical Component Scale, 2-minute walk, grip strength, range of motion, and Human Activity Profile. Joint/fascia, skin, and lung involvement affected function and quality of life most significantly and showed the greatest correlation with outcome measures. The final Cox model with factors jointly predictive for survival included the time from cGVHD diagnosis (>49 versus ≤49 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23; P = .0011), absolute eosinophil count at the time of NIH evaluation (0-0.5 versus >0.5 cells/μL, HR = 3.95; P = .0006), and NIH lung score (3 versus 0-2, HR = 11.02; P < .0001). These results demonstrate that NIH organs and global severity scores are reliable measures of cGVHD disease burden. The strong association with subspecialist evaluation suggests that NIH organ and global severity scores are appropriate for clinical and research assessments, and may serve as a surrogate for more complex subspecialist examinations. In this population of severely affected patients, NIH lung score is the strongest predictor of poor overall survival, both alone and after adjustment for other important factors., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Validation of NIH consensus criteria for diagnosis and severity-grading of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Aisa Y, Mori T, Kato J, Yamane A, Kohashi S, Kikuchi T, and Okamoto S
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Practice Guidelines as Topic, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
To validate the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for chronic GVHD, we retrospectively reviewed 143 patients who developed GVHD later than 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Their GVHD was reclassified and the severity was graded according to the criteria. Only four patients (2.8 %) could not be reclassified into any type of GVHD. In the remaining 139 patients, reclassified subtypes were late acute GVHD in 52 patients (37.4 %), classic chronic GVHD in 33 (23.7 %), and overlap syndrome in 54 (38.8 %). Of 87 patients with classic chronic GVHD or overlap syndrome, the severity was graded as mild in 21 patients (24 %), moderate in 53 (61 %), and severe in 13 (15 %). The proportions of moderate (70 %) and severe (20 %) disease were significantly higher in patients with overlap syndrome than those with classic chronic GVHD (46 and 6 %, respectively; P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses of subtypes and severity did not identify any significant prognostic values in any of the transplant outcomes, such as transplant-related mortality, overall survival, GVHD-specific survival, or discontinuation of systemic immunosuppressants. These findings suggest that the NIH consensus criteria are useful for classification of chronic GVHD, but have limited significance in predicting clinical outcomes. The validity of these criteria remains inconclusive, and future prospective studies will be required to refine them.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Rapid T-cell chimerism switch and memory T-cell expansion are associated with pre-engraftment immune reaction early after cord blood transplantation.
- Author
-
Matsuno N, Yamamoto H, Watanabe N, Uchida N, Ota H, Nishida A, Ikebe T, Ishiwata K, Nakano N, Tsuji M, Asano-Mori Y, Izutsu K, Masuoka K, Wake A, Yoneyama A, Nakauchi H, and Taniguchi S
- Subjects
- Adult, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes immunology, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes immunology, Cell Division, Cell Lineage, Flow Cytometry methods, Graft Rejection epidemiology, Graft Rejection immunology, Graft Survival, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease epidemiology, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Graft vs Host Disease immunology, Humans, Immunologic Memory, Immunosuppressive Agents pharmacology, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Lymphocyte Count, T-Lymphocyte Subsets immunology, Time Factors, Transplantation Chimera, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation statistics & numerical data
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Response and survival of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease treated by extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a retrospective study according to classical and National Institutes of Health classifications.
- Author
-
Del Fante C, Scudeller L, Viarengo G, Bernasconi P, and Perotti C
- Subjects
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Photopheresis
- Abstract
Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) classification has recently been improved by the National Institutes of Health (NIH); patients' stratification with those new criteria has implications for patients' prognosis., Study Design and Methods: To assess whether the NIH consensus classification (NCC) better predicts survival and response to extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP), and to identify variables associated with response and survival, we retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with cGVHD reclassified according to NCC treated with ECP (1997-2010) at our center. Cox regression was used in univariate and multivariate models., Results: Of the 102 patients, 64 (62.7%) had classic cGVHD, 24 (23.5%) had overlap cGVHD, and seven (6.9%) patients each had late and persistent acute GVHD. The cumulative ECP-specific follow-up was 2333.3 person-years. Response was complete in 16 (15.7%), partial in 38 (37.3%), minimal in 28 (27.5%), and absent in 20 (19.6%). Of the 22 deaths, 15 (68.2%) occurred among patients with minimal or no response (p = 0.031). The only variables associated with response were nonmyeloablative transplant (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-9.08; p = 0.009), donor lymphocyte infusion (hazard ratio, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.2-5.56; p = 0.015), and lung involvement (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.94; p = 0.038)., Conclusion: ECP is a safe and effective treatment for cGVHD and response to ECP is the only variable that influences survival. We found no correlation between response and NCC clinical subtype, number, or degree of organ involvement, except for lung, or the variables mentioned above. Prospective studies are needed to identify subsets of patients with higher probability of response., (© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Oral chronic graft-vs.-host disease characterization using the NIH scale.
- Author
-
Fassil H, Bassim CW, Mays J, Edwards D, Baird K, Steinberg SM, Williams KM, Cowen EW, Mitchell SA, Hakim FT, Taylor T, Avila D, Zhang D, Grkovic L, Datiles M, Gress RE, and Pavletic SZ
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Biomarkers blood, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Cohort Studies, Complement System Proteins analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disease Progression, Erythema diagnosis, Follow-Up Studies, Food, Forecasting, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Lichenoid Eruptions diagnosis, Middle Aged, Mouth Diseases classification, Mucocele diagnosis, Oral Ulcer diagnosis, Pain diagnosis, Serum Albumin analysis, Stomatitis diagnosis, Transplantation, Homologous, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Mouth Diseases diagnosis
- Abstract
Chronic graft-vs.-host disease (cGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Oral cGVHD is manifested by mucosal, salivary, and/or sclerotic changes that have been linked to pain and poor quality of life. Our aim was to describe the demographic, clinical, and laboratory markers of oral cGVHD in alloHSCT patients (N = 187) enrolled in a cGVHD cross-sectional study at the NIH (#NCT00331968). We propose a meaningful and reproducible measure of disease defined by a cut-off point reflecting clinical minimally detectable change (0-2 = no oral cGVHD, 3-15 = oral cGVHD) on the 15-point NIH cGVHD clinician assessment scale. Forty-four patients had oral cGVHD. Oral cGVHD was associated with a quiescent or de novo type of cGVHD onset (p = 0.05), higher cGVHD severity (p = 0.033), lower albumin (p = 0.0008), higher total complement (p = 0.012), greater bother from foods or oral ulcers and greater mouth pain, and sensitivity (p < 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression modeling with albumin, mouth pain, and total complement was 74.3% predictive of oral cGVHD and 80.2% predictive of non-oral cGVHD. We propose the use of >2 points on the NIH scale as a reproducible definition of clinically significant oral cGVHD, which may be useful in clinical settings or as eligibility criterion or as an endpoint in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Hyperacute graft-versus-host disease: histological assessment of skin biopsy specimens from 19 cases.
- Author
-
Shiohara J, Takata M, Shiohara M, Ito T, and Ishida F
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Biopsy, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease pathology
- Abstract
Background: Hyperacute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is defined as GVHD occurring within 14 days after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT)., Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of skin biopsy in assessing hyperacute GVHD., Methods: We examined 19 cases of hyperacute GVHD from a total of 134 consecutive HSCT cases at Shinshu University Hospital between 1999 and 2008., Results: Exanthemas were seen in all patients, which were mainly disseminated maculopapular erythemas, commonly present in acute GVHD as well. Most patients presented with a high fever, and a few had mild hepatic dysfunction and/or diarrhoea. The clinical grade of GVHD was 1-2 in all patients; there were no cases of clinical grades 3-4. The histological findings of skin biopsy were divided into three groups: (i) eight had grade 2 changes, characterized by diffuse vacuolization of basal cells, with dyskeratotic bodies; (ii) five had grade 1 changes, characterized by vacuolization of epidermal basal cells (all these cases were diagnosed as acute GVHD with grade 2 histological changes at subsequent biopsy); (iii) and six had no significant changes (these cases were also diagnosed as acute GVHD with grade 2 (four cases) or grade 1 (one case) histological changes on the second biopsy). Many of the patients developed acute and later chronic GVHD., Conclusion: Skin biopsy should be considered when eruption develops after HSCT even before engraftment, especially when other organ involvement is minimal. If the first skin biopsy is inconclusive, follow-up biopsy within a short time is helpful in the diagnosis of hyperacute GVHD., (© The Author(s). CED © 2012 British Association of Dermatologists.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Graft-versus-host disease: part I. Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Hymes SR, Alousi AM, and Cowen EW
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, B-Lymphocytes physiology, Chronic Disease, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease complications, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology, Humans, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease etiology
- Abstract
Approximately 25,000 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants are performed worldwide each year for a variety of malignant and non-malignant conditions. Graft-versus-host disease represents one of the most frequent complications and is a major source of long-term morbidity and mortality. Whereas acute graft-versus-host disease is induced by recognition of host tissues as foreign by immunocompetent donor cells, the pathogenesis of chronic graft-versus-host disease is not as well understood, and continues to be a major treatment challenge. Part I of this two-part series reviews the epidemiologic factors, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II discusses the topical, physical, and systemic treatment options available to patients with graft-versus-host disease., (Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease is associated with an adverse prognosis, functional impairment, and inferior patient-reported outcomes: a Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Consortium study.
- Author
-
Pidala J, Vogelsang G, Martin P, Chai X, Storer B, Pavletic S, Weisdorf DJ, Jagasia M, Cutler C, Palmer J, Jacobsohn D, Arai S, and Lee SJ
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Cohort Studies, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease epidemiology, Humans, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference proposed the term "overlap" graft-versus-host disease to describe the situation when both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease are present., Design and Methods: We examined whether the overlap subtype of graft-versus-host disease was associated with a different prognosis, functional limitations, or patient-reported outcomes compared to "classic" chronic graft-versus-host disease without any acute features., Results: Prospective data were collected from 427 patients from nine centers. Patients were classified as having overlap (n=352) or classic chronic (n=75) graft-versus-host disease based on reported organ involvement. Overlap cases had a significantly shorter median time from transplantation to cohort enrollment (P=0.01), were more likely to be incident cases (P<0.001), and had a lower platelet count at onset of the graft-versus-host disease (P<0.001). Patients with overlap graft-versus-host disease had significantly greater functional impairment measured by a 2-minute walk test, higher symptom burden and lower Human Activity Profile scores. Quality of life was similar, except patients with overlap graft-versus-host disease had worse social functioning, assessed by the Short Form-36. Multivariable analysis utilizing time-varying covariates demonstrated that the overlap subtype of graft-versus-host disease was associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.7; P=0.03) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-8.3; P=0.02) than classic chronic graft-versus-host disease., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the presence of acute features in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease is a marker of adverse prognosis, greater functional impairment, and higher symptom burden.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Acute graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Bacigalupo A
- Subjects
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Antilymphocyte Serum therapeutic use, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Humans, Graft vs Host Disease immunology, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells immunology
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Prognostic implications of the NIH consensus criteria in children with chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Lee JW, Lee DH, Jang PS, Yi MS, Chung NG, Cho B, Jeong DC, and Kim HK
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Bone Marrow Transplantation adverse effects, Child, Child, Preschool, Chronic Disease, Cohort Studies, Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic, Female, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents administration & dosage, Infant, Male, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Prognosis, Republic of Korea, Risk Factors, United States, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we analyzed a cohort of children with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) according to the NIH consensus classification (NCC) in order to observe whether global assessment at diagnosis correlates with GvHD-specific endpoints. We then studied the clinical course of these patients, specifically with regards to episodes of GvHD exacerbation requiring treatment escalation., Materials and Methods: Recipients of either allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from January 2006 to August 2008 at the Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea were evaluated for chronic GvHD, which was diagnosed according to the NCC. The course of chronic GvHD in these patients was then followed., Results: Of 59 evaluable patients, 23 developed chronic GvHD for a cumulative incidence of 39.3%. Upon multivariate analysis, previous acute GvHD (≥grade II) had a significant impact on chronic GvHD incidence. With a median duration of systemic treatment for chronic GvHD of 501 days, no significant relationship was found between initial global severity of chronic GvHD and either duration of immunosuppressive treatment or final clinical response to treatment. Fifteen patients (65%) experienced at least one episode of chronic GvHD exacerbation during the period of follow-up, with a median of four exacerbations in the subgroup of patients who experienced such events. Lung GvHD resulted in the highest number of exacerbations per diagnosed patient, followed by oral GvHD., Conclusion: Analysis of this small cohort indicates that global assessment as proposed by the NCC may have limited correlations with GvHD-specific endpoints, possibly due to the favorable response of children to treatment.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. A pilot study of reduced toxicity conditioning with BU, fludarabine and alemtuzumab before the allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in children and adolescents.
- Author
-
Styczynski J, Tallamy B, Waxman I, van de Ven C, Milone MC, Shaw LM, Harrison L, Morris E, Satwani P, Bhatia M, George D, Bradley MB, Garvin JH, Schwartz J, Baxter-Lowe LA, and Cairo MS
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Alemtuzumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Antibodies, Neoplasm, Busulfan, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Graft Survival, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation mortality, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Survival Analysis, Transplantation Chimera, Transplantation Conditioning adverse effects, Transplantation, Homologous, Vidarabine analogs & derivatives, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Transplantation Conditioning methods
- Abstract
We report the results of a pilot study of a BU-fludarabine-alemtuzumab (BFA)-reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) followed by allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (AlloHSCT) in 12 children and adolescents (<21 years) with malignant and non-malignant diseases. Stem cell sources were: two unrelated cord blood, one unrelated BM, two related and seven unrelated PBSC. Positive CD34 selection was performed in five unrelated PBSC grafts. RCT was carried out with BFA, and GVHD prophylaxis was FK506 and mycophenolate mofetil. The median time for neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 16 and 31 days, respectively. The P of developing ≥ grade II, ≥ grade III aGVHD and cGVHD was 41.6, 25 and 9%, respectively. Only 1 out of 12 developed ≥ grade III toxicity. There was one primary and no secondary graft failure. Mixed donor chimerism on day 100 and 1 year was median 99 and 96%, respectively; ≥ 90% of recipients achieved ≥ 80% donor chimerism. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in all patients was 91.7 ± 8% (100% for malignant vs. 80% for non-malignant diseases, ns). In all, 11 (91%) patients remain alive at median 2.8 (0.3-6.8) years. RTC followed by AlloHSCT, based on BFA conditioning, is feasible and tolerable in children and adolescents, and results in prompt achievement of durable mixed donor chimerism and excellent OS.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease: rationales and treatment options.
- Author
-
Chavan R and el-Azhary R
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology, Humans, Skin pathology, Skin Diseases classification, Skin Diseases diagnosis, Skin Diseases physiopathology, Treatment Outcome, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Skin Diseases therapy
- Abstract
The treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the most challenging clinical scenarios in a dermatological practice. Given the significant risk of morbidity and mortality in this patient group, it is important for a dermatologist to understand the pathophysiology of GVHD, as well as their role within a multidisciplinary practice where many immunosuppressants are prescribed. A significant proportion of the patients with GVHD will require a combination treatment regimen in order to stem the progression of their disease. In this review, the stages, type of GVHD and treatment options are reviewed for the dermatologist., (© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. [Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) - an update : Part 1: Pathophysiology, clinical features and classification of GvHD].
- Author
-
Travnik R, Beckers M, Wolff D, Holler E, Landthaler M, and Karrer S
- Subjects
- Humans, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Skin Diseases classification, Skin Diseases diagnosis
- Abstract
GvHD remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality despite new techniques for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), such as optimized conditioning regimens. Within the past ten years, the incidence of acute GvHD has remained unchanged and the incidence of chronic GvHD has even increased. The traditional classification of GvHD according to the time of clinical manifestation is now out-dated. Acute GvHD symptoms may even occur after 100 days; vice versa, primary chronic GvHD may already be observed one month after stem cell transplantation. The current classification introduced by the National Institutes of Health includes classic acute GvHD (up to 100 days), late-onset acute GvHD (after 100 days), as well as an overlap syndrome showing features of acute and chronic GvHD and classic chronic GvHD without any time limit. Diagnosis of GvHD of the skin remains difficult because of histological similarities to drug eruptions and viral exanthems. In this first part of the article the pathophysiology, classification, skin manifestations of acute and chronic GvHD and the histopathology will be presented. In a second part the prognosis, prophylaxis and therapy of GvHD will be discussed.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. [Classification of chronic graft-versus-host disease].
- Author
-
Caballero Velázquez T and Pérez Simón JA
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Humans, Multivariate Analysis, Organ Transplantation mortality, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Spain, Survival Analysis, Survival Rate, Sweden, Time Factors, Transplantation, Homologous, Treatment Outcome, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Organ Transplantation adverse effects, Terminology as Topic
- Abstract
The NIH classification intends to standardize the diagnostic criteria for chronic CVHD and to establish prognosis groups that will help to identify patient risk and thus decide on the most appropriate treatment. This study assesses the predictive value of this classification and analyzes new prognostic factors in a series of 820 patients receiving allogeneic grafts at three sites: Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, in Barcelona, and Karolinska Institutet, in Stockholm. In the univariate analysis, the classification limited/extensive, the NIH class, and the type of onset have a significant influence on overall survival and transplant-related mortality. Additionally, the overlap syndrome is associated with a shorter survival in the multivariate analysis, only the NIH class-with on HR of 2.89 (95% Cl: 1.75-4.76; p < 0.007) for mild and moderate versus severe disease-has a significant influence on survival. Excluding the NIH class, the type of onset is Identified as an independent factor for survival. Therefore, the NIH class and the type of onset are confirmed as the most significant variables. This is important in order to identify patients with a higher risk of death after transplantation, and shorter survival. On the other hand, it is a very laborious classification; for this reason it is necessary to establish the degree of involvement of lungs, skin, digestive tract, and liver, and to identify the number of organs, because these factors significantly affect survival.
- Published
- 2010
31. Reevaluation of the National Institutes of Health criteria for classification and scoring of chronic GVHD.
- Author
-
Kim DY, Lee JH, Lee JH, Kim SH, Lim SN, Kim SD, Choi Y, Lee YS, Kang YA, Kang SI, Seol M, Ryu SG, and Lee KH
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Classification, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Humans, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, National Institutes of Health (U.S.) standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic standards
- Abstract
We used the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for the diagnosis, classification and scoring of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) to reevaluate patients with cGVHD originally diagnosed using classic criteria. We retrieved data from 236 patients diagnosed with cGVHD on the basis of classic criteria. Excluding 20 'liver-alone' patients, we re-categorized 216 patients in keeping with the NIH criteria. Twenty patients were reclassified as having acute GVHD and 196 patients as having cGVHD (170 'classic chronic' (Cl-Ch) and 26 'overlap chronic' (Ov-Ch)). The 5-year GVHD-specific survival (GSS) was significantly different between the two cGVHD subtypes, specifically 87.3% for Cl-Ch vs 70.2% for Ov-Ch (P=0.006). The NIH severity criteria were effective in expecting 5-year GSS rates at both the onset (93.5, 81.3 and 79.7% (P=0.047)) and peak intensity of the disease (100, 89.7 and 78.7% (P=0.004) for the mild, moderate and severe grade, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that NIH severity criteria were independently significant prognostic factors for GSS (mild vs moderate, HR 4.35, P=0.036; mild vs severe, HR 5.25, P=0.020). Our results support the role of the NIH criteria in classifying cGVHD and in assessing the severity of the disease to predict patient prognosis of cGVHD.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Early-onset lichenoid graft-vs.-host disease: a unique variant of acute graft-vs.-host disease occurring in peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients.
- Author
-
Magro CM, Kerns MJ, Votava H, Vasil KE, Dyrsen ME, and Morrison CD
- Subjects
- Acute Disease classification, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Skin Diseases etiology, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease etiology, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Skin Diseases classification
- Abstract
Background: A complication of stem cell transplantation is chronic graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD), developing months to years after transplant; the two commonest manifestations are lichenoid GvHD and scleroderma. The purpose of this study was to characterize early-onset lichenoid GvHD., Methods: A retrospective study identified patients diagnosed with early-onset lichenoid GvHD. This diagnosis was correlated with type of transplant and concurrent or prior episodes of acute GvHD., Results: Patients in whom a sex mismatch was present between donor and recipient were included, representing a study population of 17. All received an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). All patients had biopsy proven lichenoid GvHD within 60 days or less following transplantation. All had concurrent gastrointestinal symptoms which was biopsy proven GvHD in thirteen of the cases. FISH XY studies revealed that the infiltrating lymphocytes were of donor origin in 12 of the cases, mixed in three and of host origin in two cases., Conclusions: Early-onset lichenoid GvHD is exclusive to the PBSCT setting and appears to be mediated by donor lymphocytes, reflecting the higher numbers of donor T cells encountered in PBSCT. We consider this reaction pattern a distinctive subtype of acute GvHD.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Validation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) scale for oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD).
- Author
-
Elad S, Zeevi I, Or R, Resnick IB, Dray L, and Shapira MY
- Subjects
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Graft vs Host Disease complications, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth Diseases etiology, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Oral Ulcer etiology, Pain etiology, Pain Measurement methods, Statistics as Topic, United States, Young Adult, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Mouth Diseases diagnosis, Mouth Mucosa, Oral Medicine instrumentation, Pain classification, Severity of Illness Index
- Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate the 2005-2006 National Institutes of Health (NIH) scale for patient's self-reporting and clinical manifestations of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Numerical parameters of the NIH scale were analyzed for their construct validity (correlation of the NIH scale with numerical rating scale [NRS] for pain) and internal consistency reliability (correlation between different parameters of the same scale). Categoric parameters were analyzed by comparison between severity subgroups defined by the oral manifestation (lichenoid/erythema/ulceration). Analysis included data of 75 evaluations. The total NIH score and the NRS for pain were found to be moderately correlated (r=0.449). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .718. Strong correlations were found between the total NIH score and both erythema and ulceration scores (r=0.746 and r=0.926, respectively). The difference between the 2 "severe" subgroups (ie, lichenoid and erythema/ulceration) was significant (P=.025). The difference between the moderate-erythema/ulceration subgroup and the severe-lichenoid subgroup was nonsignificant (total NIH score and NRS for pain: P=.276 and .291, respectively). The correlation between the total NIH score and the NRS for pain is only moderate. The internal consistency reliability analysis yielded good reliability, especially for erythema and ulceration. Analysis of categoric parameters suggests that the NIH scale disproportionately differentiates between moderate-erythema/ulceration and severe-lichenoid cGVHD., (Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease scoring using the NIH consensus criteria.
- Author
-
Treister NS, Stevenson K, Kim H, Woo SB, Soiffer R, and Cutler C
- Subjects
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Graft vs Host Disease complications, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Humans, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, Mouth Diseases etiology, Mouth Diseases pathology, Mucocele etiology, Mucocele pathology, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Observer Variation, Oral Ulcer etiology, Oral Ulcer pathology, Statistics as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Mouth Diseases diagnosis, Mouth Mucosa pathology, Oral Medicine instrumentation, Severity of Illness Index
- Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Oral chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) Activity Assessment Instrument is intended to be simple to use and to provide a reproducible objective measure of disease activity over time. The objective of this study was to assess inter- and intraobserver variability in the component and composite scores in patients evaluated with oral cGVHD. Twenty-four clinicians (bone marrow transplant [BMT] oncologists: BMTE, n = 16; BMT midlevel providers: BMT MLP; n = 4; and oral medicine experts [OME], n = 4), from 6 major transplant centers scored high-quality intraoral photographs of 12 patients. The same photographs were evaluated 1 week later by the same evaluators. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate intrarater reliability and interrater agreement was analyzed using a weighted kappa statistic: 0
or=0.90) and highest for ulcers (0.97, 0.85, 0.94). Although 75% of OME were comfortable with their abilities to score the cases, approximately 50% of BMTE and BMT MLP were uncomfortable. The majority felt that their evaluations were accurate; however, 84% agreed that formal training is required. Interrater variability of the oral cGVHD instrument is unacceptable for the purposes of clinical trials. Greater concordance among OME, high intrarater reliability, and participant feedback suggests that formal training may significantly decrease variability. Parallel investigations must be completed using the other organ specific instruments prior to any revision and widespread prospective utilization of these tools as research endpoints., (Copyright (c) 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) - Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Classic and overlap chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with superior outcome after extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP).
- Author
-
Jagasia MH, Savani BN, Stricklin G, Engelhardt B, Kassim A, Dixon S, Chen H, Chinratanalab W, Goodman S, Greer JP, and Schuening F
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Bilirubin blood, Chronic Disease, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft vs Host Disease blood, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematologic Neoplasms blood, Hematologic Neoplasms mortality, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Count, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Photopheresis
- Abstract
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) classification of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a significant improvement over prior classifications, and has prognostic implications. We hypothesized that the NIH classification of GVHD would predict the survival of patients with GVHD treated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP). Sixty-four patients with steroid refractory/dependent GVHD treated with ECP were studied. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-59). Progressive GVHD was seen in 39% of patients with any acute GVHD (aGVHD) (classic acute, recurrent acute, overlap) compared to 3% of patients with classic chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (P=.002). OS was superior for patients with classic cGVHD (median survival, not reached) compared to overlap GVHD (median survival, 395 days, 95% CI 101 to not reached) and aGVHD (delayed, recurrent or persistent) (median survival, 72 days, 95% CI 39-152). In univariate analyses, significant predictors of survival after ECP included GVHD subtype, bilirubin, platelet count, and steroid dose. In multivariate analyses overlap plus classic cGVHD was an independent prognostic feature predictive of superior survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.8, p=.014). This study suggests that NIH classification can predict outcome after ECP for steroid refractory/dependent GVHD.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Evaluation of NIH consensus criteria for classification of late acute and chronic GVHD.
- Author
-
Vigorito AC, Campregher PV, Storer BE, Carpenter PA, Moravec CK, Kiem HP, Fero ML, Warren EH, Lee SJ, Appelbaum FR, Martin PJ, and Flowers ME
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Humans, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Time Factors, United States, Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic, Graft vs Host Disease classification, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Historically, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) beyond 100 days after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was called chronic GVHD, even if the clinical manifestations were indistinguishable from acute GVHD. In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored a consensus conference that proposed new criteria for diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD for clinical trials. According to the consensus criteria, clinical manifestations rather than time after transplantation should be used in clinical trials to distinguish chronic GVHD from late acute GVHD, which includes persistent, recurrent, or late-onset acute GVHD. We evaluated major outcomes according to the presence or absence of NIH criteria for chronic GVHD in a retrospective study of 740 patients diagnosed with historically defined chronic GVHD after allogeneic HCT between 1994 and 2000. The presence or absence of NIH criteria for chronic GVHD showed no statistically significant association with survival, risks of nonrelapse mortality or recurrent malignancy, or duration of systemic treatment. Antecedent late acute GVHD was associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality and prolonged treatment among patients with NIH chronic GVHD. Our results support the consensus recommendation that, with appropriate stratification, clinical trials can include patients with late acute GVHD as well as those with NIH chronic GVHD.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Emerging drugs for acute graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Khaled Y, Reddy P, and Krijanovski O
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Clinical Trials as Topic, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Humans, Salvage Therapy trends, Drugs, Investigational therapeutic use, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Transplantation, Homologous adverse effects
- Abstract
The number of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantations (HCT) continues to increase. More than 15,000 allogeneic transplantations are performed annually. The graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect during allogeneic HCT effectively eradicates many hematological malignancies. The development of novel strategies that use donor leukocyte infusions, nonmyeloablative conditioning and umbilical cord blood transplantation have helped expand the indications for allogeneic HCT over the past several years, especially among older patients. Yet the major complication of allogeneic HCT, graft-versus-host disease, remains lethal and limits wider application of allogeneic HCT. In this article, we review current practice and recent advances made in prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Clinical utility of rituximab in chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Bates JS, Engemann AM, and Hammond JM
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived, B-Lymphocytes immunology, Chronic Disease classification, Chronic Disease drug therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Resistance, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease immunology, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Rituximab, Steroids therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Transplantation Conditioning
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of rituximab in the clinical management of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)., Data Sources: Literature was accessed through MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1990-September 2008), both indexed and nonindexed citations, using the terms rituximab, graft-versus-host disease, monoclonal antibodies, and CD20. In addition, reference citations from the publications identified were reviewed., Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles discussing rituximab as a therapeutic option in the treatment of GVHD that were published in English and enrolled human study participants were evaluated., Data Synthesis: Rituximab is a genetically engineered chimeric murine monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD20 differentiation antigen found on B-lymphocytes. GVHD is the leading cause of procedural-related morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurs in up to 70% of individuals undergoing HSCT, and approximately 40% of those patients are refractory to conventional T-lymphocyte-directed therapies. Limited treatments are available for individuals with steroid-refractory cGVHD. Rituximab therapy in individuals with extensive cGVHD has demonstrated clinical efficacy with manageable toxicities in retrospective and prospective studies., Conclusions: Available data suggest that rituximab is a treatment option for patients with extensive steroid-refractory cGVHD. Rituximab may be particularly effective for individuals with steroid-refractory cGVHD manifesting as thrombocytopenia or with sclerodermatous, cutaneous, and rheumatologic involvement.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. The NIH consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease: far more than just another classification.
- Author
-
Socié G
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Humans, Time Factors, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, National Institutes of Health (U.S.) standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Feasibility of NIH consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Cho BS, Min CK, Eom KS, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Lee S, Cho SG, Kim DW, Lee JW, Min WS, and Kim CC
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Classification, Female, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Transplantation, Homologous, United States, Graft vs Host Disease classification, National Institutes of Health (U.S.) standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic standards
- Abstract
To assess the applicability of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria (NCC) for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), 211 patients who developed GVHD more than 100 days after allogeneic transplantation were reclassified using NCC. Classifications were: late acute GVHD (44 patients, 21%), overlap syndrome (64 patients, 30%) and classic cGVHD (103 patients, 49%). Classic cGVHD and overlap syndrome patients (n=167) were graded using both the revised Seattle criteria (RSC) and NIH global scoring (NGS). Twenty-three patients (14%) had mild, 81 (48%) had moderate and 63 (38%) had severe cGVHD. After a median follow-up of 46 months (range 5-71 months), the 4-year GVHD-specific survival was not significantly different among the different subtypes of NCC. Among patients with late acute GVHD, however, the pattern of acute GVHD onset (late, persistent or recurrent) was significantly different with respect to GVHD-specific survival. Among patients with overlap syndrome and classic cGVHD, multivariate analysis showed that NGS as well as RSC were useful in predicting survival and discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy despite of more detailed grouping. Our study indicates that NCC is applicable. The clinical impact of NIH types and NGS should be verified through prospective studies.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: challenges in prevention, science, and supportive care.
- Author
-
Joseph RW, Couriel DR, and Komanduri KV
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease complications, Graft vs Host Disease epidemiology, Humans, Incidence, Risk Factors, Transplantation, Homologous, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Abstract
Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) remains one of the most significant complications affecting the quality of life of long-term survivors of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Recent advancements in SCT, including the adoption of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens and improvements in inpatient supportive care, have yielded dramatic reductions in early mortality and led to the expanding use of allogeneic SCT in a broader range of patients, including the elderly. In turn, this development has resulted in a growing number of SCT survivors who remain free of their underlying malignancies but who require care for long-term complications, including cGVHD. cGVHD may have protean manifestations and may pose unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. To address inconsistencies in the diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care of cGVHD, experts within the SCT community have worked to develop consensus guidelines; these efforts have yielded more precise definitions and will facilitate more uniform clinical trials. With an increase in SCT survivorship, the management of patients with cGVHD is performed as a partnership between SCT physicians and primary oncologists. This review is designed to help general oncologists understand the current state of cGVHD, including its pathogenesis and treatment. The review places particular emphasis on general principles governing the optimal supportive management of cGVHD and examines recent consensus recommendations regarding its diagnosis and management by organ system.
- Published
- 2008
42. Beclometasone dipropionate: a topically active corticosteroid for the treatment of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Díez-Campelo M, Sánchez-Guijo FM, and Pérez-Simón JA
- Subjects
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones chemistry, Beclomethasone chemistry, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Tolerance, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Beclomethasone therapeutic use, Gastrointestinal Tract drug effects, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the most severe complications following allogeneic transplantation and the involvement of the gut has been associated with increased mortality and a poorer response to transplant. The use of systemic corticosteroids remains the standard first-line treatment, despite their severe secondary effects., Objective: Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) is a topically active corticosteroid with low absorption into the systemic circulation, which minimises many of the deleterious side effects associated with systemic corticosteroids., Methods/results: Phase II and III trials evaluating the efficacy of BDP were reviewed. In the Phase II trials, 77% of patients with gastrointestinal GVHD who received BDP as a single agent responded and 50% did not require systemic corticosteroids, thus avoiding prolonged exposure to prednisone. Randomised trials demonstrated that BDP is safe and effective in treating acute gastrointestinal GVHD when used with a short induction course of prednisone, reducing the risk of GVHD treatment failure by > 60% and reducing mortality one year after randomisation by 45%., Conclusion: These results provide a particularly strong rationale for the incorporation of steroid-sparing regimens such as oral BDP in acute GVHD treatment.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Eczematoid graft-vs-host disease.
- Author
-
Cook-Norris RH and Weenig RH
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Dermatitis, Exfoliative drug therapy, Eczema drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease pathology, Humans, PUVA Therapy, Dermatitis, Exfoliative pathology, Eczema pathology, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Impact of graft-versus-host disease on survival.
- Author
-
Pasquini MC
- Subjects
- Disease-Free Survival, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Survival Analysis, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Transplantation, Homologous adverse effects
- Abstract
Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is potentially curative treatment for malignant and non-malignant diseases. The development and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is strongly related with post-transplant outcomes. GVHD may at the same time improve survival by decreasing the risk of disease relapse and increase non-relapse mortality by causing organ failure and predisposing the recipient to life-threatening infections. Currently available classifications attempt to separate GVHD into subgroups according to their risk of post-transplant death. The heterogeneity of both acute and chronic GVHD is a major barrier for a clear recognition of these subgroups. Multiple organ involvement and severity of organ dysfunction are the hallmarks of GVHD classifications. The development of GVHD is also predicted by a number of factors related to GVHD prophylaxis, donor type, degree of HLA matching, graft source, and conditioning regimen intensity. These factors not only affect the development of GVHD, they may independently be associated with survival. Modulation of GVHD risk factors can decrease the risk or severity of GVHD but does not universally result in an improvement in survival. Additional risk factors present after the onset of GVHD - including thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, previous acute GVHD, extensive skin involvement, among others - further increase the risk for GVHD-related mortality. Recognition of such key factors assists in determining a population with high-risk GVHD that would benefit from up-front experimental therapies in the context of clinical trials.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Prevention and treatment of acute GvHD.
- Author
-
Messina C, Faraci M, de Fazio V, Dini G, Calò MP, and Calore E
- Subjects
- Child, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Humans, Steroids therapeutic use, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Tacrolimus therapeutic use, Transplantation, Homologous, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha antagonists & inhibitors, Graft vs Host Disease drug therapy, Graft vs Host Disease prevention & control, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use
- Abstract
GvHD remains a source of significant morbidity and mortality in the setting of allogeneic haematopoietic SCT. Improving outcomes in stem cell transplant recipients requires additional therapeutic modalities for GvHD, especially for patients who fail to respond to initial therapy with steroids. Moreover, while the absence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) is associated with a higher risk of relapse of the underlying malignant disease, severe aGvHD usually induces the occurrence of life-threatening complications such as severe infections. This article summarizes the current state of aGvHD prophylaxis and treatment.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Diagnosis and manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
- Author
-
Filipovich AH
- Subjects
- Chronic Disease, Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Graft vs Host Disease physiopathology
- Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an immunoregulatory post-transplant disorder which shares features of autoimmunity and immunodeficiency. This chapter describes the major recommendations of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus process on chronic GVHD conducted in 2004 and 2005 with respect to new guidelines for the diagnosis and staging of GVHD. Acute and chronic GVHD were redefined to emphasize the central importance of distinct diagnostic manifestations differentiating the two entities, rather than time of onset post-transplant. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires, at a minimum, the presence of at least one diagnostic clinical sign of chronic GVHD or the presence of at least one distinctive clinical manifestation confirmed by biopsy or other relevant tests in the same or another organ. Diagnostic criteria include signs and symptoms which are sufficient alone to establish the diagnosis of chronic GVHD. They can involve the skin and appendages, mouth, eyes, female genitalia, esophagus, lungs, and connective tissues. The NIH consensus project also generated a chronic GVHD scoring system and suggestions for overall grading of severity of chronic GVHD. The expectation is that the provisional guidelines described here will be widely used and refined with additional observer experience.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study.
- Author
-
Le Blanc K, Frassoni F, Ball L, Locatelli F, Roelofs H, Lewis I, Lanino E, Sundberg B, Bernardo ME, Remberger M, Dini G, Egeler RM, Bacigalupo A, Fibbe W, and Ringdén O
- Subjects
- Adult, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease mortality, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Immunotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms therapy, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Transplantation Conditioning methods, Transplantation, Homologous, Treatment Outcome, Graft vs Host Disease therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
- Abstract
Background: Severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic transplantation with haemopoietic stem cells. Mesenchymal stem cells modulate immune responses in vitro and in vivo. We aimed to assess whether mesenchymal stem cells could ameliorate GVHD after haemopoietic-stem-cell transplantation., Methods: Patients with steroid-resistant, severe, acute GVHD were treated with mesenchymal stem cells, derived with the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation ex-vivo expansion procedure, in a multicentre, phase II experimental study. We recorded response, transplantation-related deaths, and other adverse events for up to 60 months' follow-up from infusion of the cells., Findings: Between October, 2001, and January, 2007, 55 patients were treated. The median dose of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells was 1.4x10(6) (min-max range 0.4-9x10(6)) cells per kg bodyweight. 27 patients received one dose, 22 received two doses, and six three to five doses of cells obtained from HLA-identical sibling donors (n=5), haploidentical donors (n=18), and third-party HLA-mismatched donors (n=69). 30 patients had a complete response and nine showed improvement. No patients had side-effects during or immediately after infusions of mesenchymal stem cells. Response rate was not related to donor HLA-match. Three patients had recurrent malignant disease and one developed de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia of recipient origin. Complete responders had lower transplantation-related mortality 1 year after infusion than did patients with partial or no response (11 [37%] of 30 vs 18 [72%] of 25; p=0.002) and higher overall survival 2 years after haemopoietic-stem-cell transplantation (16 [53%] of 30 vs four [16%] of 25; p=0.018)., Interpretation: Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells expanded in vitro, irrespective of the donor, might be an effective therapy for patients with steroid-resistant, acute GVHD.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T cell depletion for treatment of hematological malignancies in children.
- Author
-
Liu D, Huang X, Liu K, Xu L, Chen H, Han W, Chen Y, Zhang X, and Jiang Q
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cytomegalovirus Infections prevention & control, Follow-Up Studies, Ganciclovir therapeutic use, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease epidemiology, Haploidy, Hematologic Neoplasms immunology, Humans, Leukemia classification, Leukemia therapy, Tissue Donors, Tissue and Organ Harvesting methods, Transplantation Conditioning methods, Hematologic Neoplasms therapy, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation methods, Lymphocyte Depletion methods, T-Lymphocytes immunology
- Abstract
To investigate the efficacy and safety of haploidentical (from family member donors) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for children. 42 children under 14 yrs old with hematological malignancies underwent haploidentical HSCT. Outcomes were analyzed. Thirty-three children were classified as high-risk candidates. Of 42 patient/donor pairs, 4 (9.5%) were mismatched in 2 HLA loci, 15 (35.7%) in 3 loci, and 23 (54.8%) in 4 loci. Follow-ups were performed for a median of 1110 (449-1959) days after transplantation. All patients achieved stable engraftments. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of grade 2-4 was 57.2%, and that of grade 3-4 was 13.8%. The cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was 56.7% for total and 29.5% for extensive. Twenty-seven patients survived with a 3-yr probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS), 57.3+/-8%, 18 of them were in the high-risk group. Fifteen patients died, 4 from infection, 7 from relapse of leukemia, 2 from heart failure, one from severe aGVHD, and one from lymphoproliferative disorders. The results encourage extending haploidentical HSCT without T cell depletion treatments to children with an indication for transplantation.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease--implementation of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria for Clinical Trials.
- Author
-
Griffith LM, Pavletic SZ, Lee SJ, Martin PJ, Schultz KR, and Vogelsang GB
- Subjects
- Clinical Trials as Topic standards, Graft vs Host Disease classification, Graft vs Host Disease diagnosis, Humans, Leukemia etiology, Leukemia therapy, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Research, United States, Graft vs Host Disease therapy
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Clinical characteristics of chronic graft-versus-host disease following umbilical cord blood transplantation for adults.
- Author
-
Sugimoto K, Narimatsu H, Kawase T, Iida H, Watanabe M, Kohno A, Kuwatsuka Y, Uchida T, Hamaguchi M, Terakura S, Naoe T, Matsuo K, Murata M, Sawa M, Miyamura K, and Morishita Y
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Graft vs Tumor Effect, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation adverse effects, Graft vs Host Disease classification
- Abstract
Chronic GVHD is a significant complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; however, the clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD following cord blood transplantation (CBT) in adults have not been well described. Between March 2001 and November 2005, a total of 77 patients underwent CBT at eight transplantation centers of the Nagoya Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Of 77 patients, 29 survived without graft failure or progression of underlying diseases for at least 100 days after transplantation. The median age of the 29 patients was 42 years (range, 18-67 years). Seven patients developed chronic GVHD (extensive, n=4; limited, n=3) disease. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD 1 year after day 100 was 24% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11-41%), and the organs involved were the skin (n=6), oral cavity (n=4), liver (n=1) and gastrointestinal tract (n=1). In three patients, chronic GVHD was resolved with supportive care. The remaining four were successfully treated with additional immunosuppressive therapy. Event-free survival rates of the 29 patients with and without chronic GVHD 3 years after day 100 were 83 (95% CI, 27-97%) and 36% (95% CI, 17-56%), respectively (P=0.047). These results suggest that chronic GVHD following CBT is mild and has a graft-versus-malignancy effect.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.