Search

BACKGROUND The end-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated intensive care patients; however, its utility in the operating room is questioned. We assessed end-expiratory occlusion test in laparotomic surgery for predicting volume expansion. METHODS Forty-six patients were included in this study: stage 1 (n = 26) with an end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds, followed by volume expansion, which consisted of 250 mL of colloid over 5 minutes and stage 2 (n = 20) with an end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds followed by volume expansion. The last 10 patients had transdiaphragmatic pressures probed. Patients with an increase in cardiac index >15% after volume expansion were responders. Pulse pressure variation, stroke volume (SV) index, and cardiac index were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were established for changes in SV and pulse pressure induced by end-expiratory occlusion test and pulse pressure variation using the responders status for volume expansion as outcome. RESULTS A total of 44 (38%) volume expansions were deemed responders. After end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds, no hemodynamic variables were significantly increased. After end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds, SV index increased in responders (37.1 ± 8.8 mL/m after end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds versus 35.7 ± 8.6 before; P < .0001). End-expiratory occlusion test could not discriminate responders from nonresponders. Only pulse pressure variation had significantly different area under the curve from that expected by chance (0.7 [0.57-0.81]; P = .002 for end-expiratory occlusion test of 15 seconds; and 0.78 [0.64-0.89]; P = .0001 for end-expiratory occlusion test of 25 seconds). After laparotomy, gastric pressure decreased significantly (4 [2.75-5] vs 2 [2-4] cm H2O; P = .0417); no difference was noticed in the transdiaphragmatic gradient. CONCLUSIONS End-expiratory occlusion test was not reliable to discriminate responders from nonresponders after volume expansion during laparotomic surgery.

Introduction: Unintended postoperative hypothermia frequently occurs upon arrival in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). As part of our quality assurance program in anesthesia, we regularly monitor the incidence of this complication through our anesthesia information management system (AIMS). In this case-controlled retrospective study, our goal was to detect the incidence of unintended severe hypothermia in our breast surgery cancer patients, and subsequently to analyze the consequence of this complication in terms postoperative cutaneous infection, as well as its impact on further complementary treatment, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis conducted through our AIMS system from 2015 through 2019, with extraction criteria based on year, type of surgery (breast), and temperature upon arrival in PACU. A tympanic temperature of less than 36 °C was considered to indicate hypothermia. Severe hypothermia was considered for patients having a temperature lower than 35.2 °C (hypothermic) (n = 80), who were paired using a propensity score analysis with a control group (normothermic) (n = 80) of other breast cancer surgery patients. Extracted data included time of surgery, sex, age, ASA status, and type and duration of the intervention. Results: The mean incidence of hypothermia was 21% from 2015 through 2019. The body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the hypothermia group before matching, 23.5 ± 4.1 vs. 26.4 ± 6.1 kg/m2 in normothermic patients (p &lt, 0.05). The hypothermia group also had significantly fewer monitoring and active warming devices. No difference was noted for wound complications. Time to complementary chemotherapy and or radiotherapy did not differ between groups (52 ± 21 days in group hypothermia vs 49 ± 22 days in the control group). Conclusion: Severe intraoperative hypothermia remains an important quality assurance issue in our breast surgery cancer patients, but we could not detect any long-term effect of hypothermia.

Objective To compare cardiac index (CI) between Proaqt/PulsioFlex® and oesophageal Doppler (OD) and the ability of the PulsioFlex® to track CI changes induced by fluid challenge and secondly to assess the impact of the time interval between two auto-calibrations of PulsioFlex® on the accuracy of the measured CI. Methods In a single hospital, 49 intermediate-risk oncologic abdominal surgery patients were included in an observational study. We measured the cardiac Index (CI) provided by OD and by the Proaqt/PulsioFlex® before and after internal calibration, which were performed randomly at specific intervals after the initial one (30, 60, 90 and 120 min). The ability to track fluid responsiveness was evaluated by measuring stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation (PPV) and CI before and after a 250 ml fluid challenge and assessed by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results The percentages of error before calibration were 51, 58, 82, 81% for 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, they were 39, 57, 65, and 54% after calibration. Trending ability is assumed by a 93% concordance rate after applying a 15% exclusion zone. The trend interchangeability rate was 13.75%. The area under the curve for fluid responsiveness measured by PPV and SVV PulsioFlex were respectively 0.67 [0.57–0.77], P Conclusions The Proaqt/Pulsioflex® system is not equivalent to OD for haemodynamic monitoring during non-vascular abdominal surgery in intermediate-risk patients. More studies are required to define the effect of the auto-calibration on the system.

Backgrounds Procedures for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) prevention are mostly based on identification of the risk factors before administering antiemetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the extended use of antiemetic on the PONV in the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Methods Two separate 4-year periods (2007-2010, P1, and (2015-2018, P2) were evaluated. During P1, the protocol consisted of dexamethasone and droperidol for patients with a locally adapted high PONV score, followed by ondansetron for rescue in the PACU. For Period 2, dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) were administered in patients under general or regional anesthesia, or sedation longer than 30 minutes, while droperidol (1.25 mg) in rescue was injected in cases of PONV in the PACU. An Anesthesia Information Management System was used to evaluate the intensity score of PONV (1 to 5), putative compliance, sedation, and perioperative opioid consumption upon arrival in the PACU. Results A total of 27,602 patients were assessed in P1 and 36,100 in P2. The administration of dexamethasone and ondansetron increased several fold (p < 0.0001). The high PONV scores were more improved in P2 than in P1, with scores (3+4+5) for P1 vs. P2, p < 0.0001. Overall, 99.7% of the patients in P2 were asymptomatic at discharge. Morphine consumption decreased from 6.9±1.5 mg in P1 to 3.5 ± 1.5 mg in P2 (p < 0.0001). Discussion The extension of pharmacological prevention of PONV was associated with a decrease in the intensity of severe PONV. However, uncertainty regarding confounding factors should not be ignored. IRB nº 92012/33465

To compare cardiac index (CI) between Proaqt/PulsioFlexIn a single hospital, 49 intermediate-risk oncologic abdominal surgery patients were included in an observational study. We measured the cardiac Index (CI) provided by OD and by the Proaqt/PulsioFlexThe percentages of error before calibration were 51, 58, 82, 81% for 30, 60, 90 and 120min, they were 39, 57, 65, and 54% after calibration. Trending ability is assumed by a 93% concordance rate after applying a 15% exclusion zone. The trend interchangeability rate was 13.75%. The area under the curve for fluid responsiveness measured by PPV and SVV PulsioFlex were respectively 0.67 [0.57-0.77], P0.01 and 0.75 [0.47-0.66], which was not clinically relevant.The Proaqt/Pulsioflex

Background Patients undergoing free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer may develop free flap complications. In the perioperative period, haemoglobin content and oxygen tissue saturation (StO2) measured directly on the free flap reflect peripheral tissue oxygenation. However, in this type of surgery, StO2 cannot always be applied directly or proximate to the free flap. The aim of this study was to assess the possible value of StO2 measured at the thenar eminence and other 24 hour perioperative factors on free flap complications. Methods Inclusion criteria corresponded to patients with head and neck cancer with free flap surgery in whom direct StO2 could not be monitored on the flap nor in its peripheral area. Patient characteristics and intraoperative data, such as haemoglobin and fluid management, were prospectively collected. StO2 was measured remotely on the thenar eminence. Data were collected for 24 hours and free flap complications were recorded for up to 15 days after surgery. Patients were thereafter classified into two groups: with or without free flap complications and the data were compared in consequence. Results Forty consecutive patients were prospectively included. Ten patients had postoperative free flap complications and were compared to the 30 other patients without complications. The haemoglobin level at the reperfusion of the flap: (AUC 0.80 [0.65–0.91], threshold 9.9 g/dL, P Conclusion In head and neck complex oncologic reconstructive surgery, haemoglobin and BMI were the most sensitive tools for predicting postoperative free flap complications, while thenar eminence StO2 was not.

Background Preoperative screening includes clinical examination and tests. Systematic prescription leads to excessive tests. We conducted an observational retrospective study to assess the success of implementing a protocol-guided prescription procedure for preoperative tests (PTs). We compared the number of PTs prescribed for scheduled surgery before and after the implementation of local guidelines with a specific method. Methods Local guidelines for prescribing PTs based on the French Society of Anaesthesia's recommendations were developed, validated by the anaesthesia team and actively implemented. The implementation procedure was complex and based on the application of sociologic concepts to facilitate PT prescriptions in accordance with the protocol. All PTs (except for children and emergency surgeries) prescribed over a one-week observation period were analysed before and after protocol implementation, respectively in 2011 and 2013. Results Two hundred and ninety-two patient files were analysed: 157 in 2011 and 135 in 2013. Ninety-one percent of the prescriptions were in accordance with the recommendations in 2013. Excessive prescribing decreased significantly after the implementation of recommendations (7.1% versus 20.7%, P Conclusion We observed excellent adherence to the prescription protocol for PTs. The method used to implement the protocol was successful. A future evaluation should be undertaken to confirm these results over the long-term.

Background The learning curve cumulative sum (LC-CUSUM) test is an innovative tool that allows quantitative monitoring of individual medical performance during the learning process by determining when a predefined acceptable level of performance is reached. This study used the LC-CUSUM test to monitor the learning process and failure rate of anesthesia residents training for specific subspecialty anesthesia procedures. Methods The study included 490 tracheal punctures (TP) for jet ventilation, 340 thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) procedures, and 246 fiberoptic nasal intubations (FONI) performed by 18 residents during their single 6-month rotation. Results Overall, 27 (14–52), 19 (5–41), and 14 (6–33) TP, TEA, and FONI procedures were performed, respectively, by each resident. In total, 2 of 18 residents achieved an acceptable failure rate for TEA according to the literature and 4 of 18 achieved an acceptable failure rate for FONI, while none of the residents attained an acceptable rate for TP. Conclusions A single 6-month rotation in a reference teaching center may not be sufficient to train residents to perform specific or sub-specialty procedures as required. A regional learning network may be useful. More patient-based data are necessary to conduct a risk adjustment analysis for such specific procedures.

Anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used a part of quality assurance program to improve patient care, however erroneous or missing data entries may lead to misinterpretation. This study assesses the accuracy of information extracted for six consecutive years from a database linked to an automatic anesthesia record-keeping system. An observational study was conducted on a database linked AIMS system. The database was filled in real time during surgical/anesthesia procedure and in the post-anesthesia care unit. The following items: name of the anesthetist, duration of anesthesia, duration of monitoring, ventilatory status upon arrival in postoperative care unit, pain scores, nausea and vomiting scores, pain medication (morphine) and anti nausea and vomiting drug consumption (ondansetron) were extracted and analysed in order to determine exhaustivity (percentage of missing data) and accuracy of the database. The analysis covered 55,946 anaesthetic procedures. The rate of missing data was initially high upon installation but decreased over time. It was limited to 5 % after 3 years for items such as start of anesthesia or name of the anesthetist. However exhaustivity/completeness of some other variable, such as nausea and vomiting started as low as 50 % to reach 20 % at 2008. After cross analysing pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting scores with related medication consumption, (morphine and ondansetron) we conclude that missing data was due to omission of a zero score rather than human error. The follow-up of quality assurance program may use data from AIMS provided that missing or erroneous values be mentioned and their impact on calculations accurately analysed.

Introduction La litterature internationale recommande l’abandon de la prescription systematique d’examens complementaires pre-interventionnels au profit d’une prescription limitee, raisonnee et basee sur des signes d’appel cliniques ou anamnestique [1] , [2] . Un audit des prescriptions des examens preoperatoires en vue d’une chirurgie programmee a ete realise au sein de notre etablissement base sur les recommandations formalisees d’experts (RFE) de la Societe francaise d’anesthesie et de reanimation (SFAR) et adapte aux chirurgies pratiquees. L’objectif de cette etude etait de comparer les prescriptions preoperatoires d’examens complementaires en vue d’une chirurgie programmee et leur cout avant et apres la mise en place de recommandations locales. Materiel et methodes Tous les patients hospitalises dans notre structure signaient un consentement eclaire d’utilisation des donnees medicales a leur admission. Un protocole de prescription d’examens preoperatoires decoulant du referentiel de la SFAR etait elabore, valide par tous les membres de l’equipe d’anesthesie de l’etablissement et mis en place. Une analyse retrospective de l’ensemble des examens preoperatoires prescrits pendant une semaine representative de l’activite chirurgicale avant et apres mise en place du protocole, respectivement en 2011 et 2013, a ete effectuee. Les patients pediatriques et devant subir une intervention en urgence n’ont pas ete inclus. L’analyse comparative des donnees qualitatives a ete realisee avec des tests de type Fisher ou Chi2 selon le cas. Les resultats sont presentes en nombre de patients et pourcentage. Une analyse comparative du cout des prescriptions par exces a ete realisee sur la base du cout unitaire de chaque examen communique par les laboratoires de notre etablissement. Resultats Deux cent quatre-vingt douze dossiers ont ete analyses ; 157 en 2011 et 135 en 2013. 91 % des prescriptions etaient conformes aux recommandations en 2013 contre 77 % en 2011. La prescription d’examen par exces apres mise en place des recommandations etait de 7,1 % en 2013 contre 20,7 % en 2011 (p Tableau 1 ). Discussion Dans cette etude les mesures de mise en place du protocole local base sur un referentiel national ont permis une diminution significative du nombre et du cout des prescriptions d’examens preoperatoires. Une etude multicentrique serait necessaire afin de confirmer les resultats de cette etude et permettrait de juger de l’impact economique de la mise en place du referentiel.

BACKGROUND: Spectral entropy is an electroencephalogram-based monitoring technique with a frequency band enlarged to include the electromyogram spectrum, which is intended to help to assess analgesia. Although its correlation with hypnosis has been shown, its performance during a noxious stimulation and the influence of neuromuscular blockade have not been described. METHODS: In this prospective, open, multicenter study, 105 patients received propofol then remifentanil target-controlled infusion for induction of anesthesia, with randomized remifentanil targets ranging from 2 to 8 ng/mL. Half of the patients received neuromuscular blockade. Intubation and incision were used as standard noxious stimulations, motor or hemodynamic responses were recorded, and spectral entropy values before and after stimulations were compared between responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: No difference was found in response entropy (RE), state entropy (SE), or (RE SE) between patients with or without hemodynamic response to stimulations. Patients with motor response to intubation had higher values of RE, SE, and (RE SE) both before and after the intubation than patients with no response. These results were confirmed by a prediction probability analysis, showing a significant but weak predictive value of entropy for motor response only. CONCLUSIONS: Entropy predicted a motor response to noxious stimulations but not a hemodynamic response, which limits its usefulness for assessing the analgesic component of anesthesia in paralyzed patients. High values (RE 55) before the stimulation should be avoided in order to decrease the risk of motor response, but lower values might not prevent this response when the opioid concentration is insufficient, despite an adequate hypnosis. (Anesth Analg 2008;106:152‐9)