Search

IntroductionPatients with cardiogenic shock (CS) are at a high risk of developing infectious complications; however, their early detection is difficult, mainly due to a frequently occurring noninfectious inflammatory response, which accompanies an extensive myocardial infarction (MI) or a postcardiac arrest syndrome. The goal of our prospective study was to describe infectious complications in CS and the immune/inflammatory response based on a serial measurement of several blood-based inflammatory biomarkers.MethodsEighty patients with CS were evaluated and their infections were monitored. Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, pentraxin 3, presepsin) were measured seven times per week. The control groups consisted of 11 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction without CS and without infection, and 22 patients in septic shock.ResultsInfection was diagnosed in 46.3% of patients with CS; 16 patients developed an infection within 48 h. Respiratory infection was most common, occurring in 33 out of 37 patients. Infection was a significant or even the main reason of death only in 3.8% of all patients with CS, and we did not find statistically significant difference in 3-month mortality between group of patients with CS with and without infection. There was no statistically significant prolongation of the duration of mechanical ventilation associated with infection. Strong inflammatory response is often in patients with CS due to MI, but we found no significant difference in the course of the inflammatory response expressed by evaluated biomarkers in patients with CS with and without infection. We found a strong relationship between the elevated inflammatory markers (sampled at 12 h) and the 3-month mortality: the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic ranged between 0.683 and 0.875.ConclusionThe prevalence of infection in patients with CS was 46.3%, and respiratory tract infections were the most common type. Infections did not prolong statistically significantly the duration of mechanical ventilation and did not increase the prevalence of hospital mortality in this high-risk CS population. CS due to acute myocardial infarction was accompanied by a strong and highly variable inflammatory response, but it did not reach the intensity of the inflammatory response observed in patients with septic shock. An extensive immune/inflammatory response in patients with CS is linked to a poor prognosis.

Background. Pre-infarction unstable angina pectoris (UAP) can be considered ischemic preconditioning. The aim of this study was to compare short and long term outcomes in patients with or without pre-infarction UAP and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods. 593 patients with STEMI (388 without and 205 with UAP) were evaluated. Levels of biomarkers (troponin I, BNP, NT-ProBNP, neopterin, endoglin and pentraxin-3) at hospital admission and 24 h after STEMI onset were assessed. Echocardiography was undertaken on the fourth day after MI and after 12 months. The median follow-up was 37 months. Results. We found no significant differences in sex, age or risk factors for atherosclerosis between the UAP and non-UAP group. As the median time from the onset of chest pain to admission was significantly longer in the UAP group (228 min vs 258 min; P=0.009), we used a propensity score to obtain comparable matched groups for use in further analyses. The levels of NT-proBNP were significantly higher on admission and after 24 hours in the UAP group. Left ventricular functions according to invasive and echocardiographic parameters were entirely comparable at hospitalization and after 12 months. No differences were found in severity index of acute heart failure during hospitalization. The incidence of major acute coronary events during follow-up was comparable for the groups. Conclusions. In patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, pre-infarction UAP has no beneficial clinical effect during hospitalization or during long-term follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]