Search

Background: The duration of untreated depression (DUD) might have a substantial impact on the clinical outcomes; however, there are important knowledge gaps including the effects on disability and potential differences between first-episode and recurrent episodes of depression., Methods: We recruited 121 outpatients with first episode and recurrent major depression, and conducted prospective clinical assessments over six months. Clinical outcomes included response to antidepressant therapy, remission and changes in disability., Results: Patients with a DUD of six months or shorter were more frequently young, unemployed and had higher levels of physical illnesses than those with a longer DUD (all p<0.05). A shorter DUD was associated with significantly higher odds of response at 12 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.8) and remission at 24 weeks (4.1; 95% CI: 1.6-10.5) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Changes in disability ratings were analyzed with growth curve analysis and showed steeper declines among those with a shorter DUD. The associations of DUD on clinical outcomes were evident both in patients with first-episode and recurrent depression., Limitations: Naturalistic design. Self-rated assessment of disability. Findings from subgroup analyses should be replicated in larger sample size., Conclusions: A shorter duration of untreated depression is associated with more favorable outcomes for major depression, including depression-related disability. This association seems to work both at the first and recurrent episodes, which might have direct implications for both primary and secondary prevention., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: In Italy, the reform of the mental health system in 1978 should have drastically changed the provision of care and pathways of patients seeking to obtain it. The aim of this article is to examine the current pathways to psychiatric care in Italy., Methods: We used a method developed in the World Health Organization international collaborative studies to investigate pathways to care in 15 Italian mental health centers. We recruited 420 patients with a psychiatric illness and explored the care pathways they took to reach to psychiatric services and the delays from the onset of illness to reaching psychiatric care., Results: The majority of patients (33.8%) had direct access to mental health care, whereas the others arrived to a specialist in psychiatry through general hospitals (20.3%), general practitioners (33.0%) or private practitioners (9.8%). The main diagnosis for referral was neurotic disorder (36.6%), followed by affective disorder (35.4%) and psychotic disorder (11.5%). The delay from onset of illness to psychiatric care was greater for patients with psychotic disorders than for those with affective and neurotic disorders. The most frequently prescribed treatments were pharmacotherapy (56%), psychological support (8%), and psychotherapy (7.0%); 15% of the patients received no treatment., Conclusions: Our multicenter study shows that although general practitioners and hospital doctors are still the main referral point for mental health care, a greater proportion of patients are first seen in private settings or directly reach mental health centers, compared to previous surveys conducted in Italy. However, a stronger collaboration of psychiatrists with general practitioners and psychologists is still needed., (© The Author(s) 2013.)

Background: To systematically review evidence of the effects of the duration of untreated depression on the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from Unipolar Major Depression., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence of duration of untreated depression and the effect it has on clinical outcomes in Unipolar Major Depression. Data used to this purpose were obtained from a literature search of the MEDLINE, Psychoinfo and Embase databases. Comparable data extracted from studies were entered and analysed using Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software Version 5.2., Results: Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported comparable data and were consequently used for the meta-analysis. Pooled data indicates the overall positive effect of shorter duration of untreated illness both in a patient's response to treatment (RR 1.70) and remission (RR 1.65). Other studies which were not included in the meta-analysis confirmed the importance of reducing delays in the treatment of depression in order to prevent the risk of worse outcomes and chronicity, in particular in patients presenting with a first episode of depression. Data regarding the association between the duration of untreated episode in recurrent depression and clinical outcomes are less evident., Limitations: The heterogeneity of the selected studies was cause for limitations with regard to the carrying out of adequate meta-analysis., Conclusions: There is evidence highlighting the importance of a reduced no-treatment interval for patients suffering Unipolar Depression. In particular, there is emphasis on the first episode of depression corresponding to the notion of reducing the duration of untreated illness., (© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Trial Design: This was a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial., Participants: A total of 227 patients ≥18 years old with a new onset of depressive symptoms who screened positive on the first two items of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were recruited by primary care physicians (PCPs) of eight health districts of three Italian regions from September 2009 to June 2011., Intervention: PCPs of the intervention group received a specific collaborative care program including 2 days of intensive training, implementation of a stepped care protocol, depression management toolkit and scheduled meetings with a dedicated consultant psychiatrist., Objective: The objective was to determine whether a collaborative care program for depression management in primary care leads to higher remission rate than usual PCP care., Outcomes: Outcome was clinical remission as expressed on PHQ-9 <5 at 3 months., Randomization: An independent researcher used computer-generated randomization to assign involved primary care groups to the two alternative arms., Blinding: PCPs and research personnel were not blinded., Results: The 223 PCPs enrolled recruited 227 patients (128 in collaborative care arm, 99 in the usual care arm). At 3 months (n=210), the proportion of patients who achieved remission was higher, though the difference was not statistically significant, in the collaborative care group. The effect size was of 0.11. When considering only patients with minor/major depression, collaborative care appeared to be more effective than usual care (P=.015)., Conclusions: The present intervention for managing depression in primary care, designed to be applicable to the Italian context, appears to be effective and feasible., (© 2013.)

Aims: To assess in a sample of people with mental disorders: 1) fear of crime and perceived insecurity; 2) the association between fear of crime and insecurity; 3) the incidence of crimes., Methods: Twenty-four Italian mental health centres have been invited to participate in the study from the network of the Early Career Psychiatrists' Committee of the Italian Psychiatric Association. In each participating centre, the first 20 patients consecutively accessing the mental health centre between February and April 2011 have been recruited. All patients have been assessed using validated assessment tools., Results: The final sample consists of 426 patients. They are mostly female (70.1%), with a mean age of 45 years (± 13.5), and with a good level of education. Fifty-two percent of patients have a diagnosis of mood disorders, and 37.8% on anxiety spectrum disorders. About half of the sample declares that the most prominent feeling toward life is uncertainty. Almost all patients report to have at least one big fear, with the most frequently report being: 1) loss or death of a loved one (41.2%); 2) financial constraint (28.4%); 3) physical or mental health problems (26.5%)., Discussion and Conclusions: Our results show the presence of a common sense of uncertainty among patients, probably as a result of the historical moment we are facing. It is reasonable that this attitude toward life can have a detrimental impact on patients' psychological and physical wellbeing, contributing to high levels of distress. Further studies are needed in order to clarify the possible relationship between fears, uncertainty and mental disorders.

Aim: To carry out an in-depth survey into the method of providing early intervention in schizophrenia in Italy and to evaluate the process of development of early psychosis clinical services following the pilot programme 'Programma 2000' and the publishing of Italian National Guidelines., Methods: Topic-specific national and international clinical and research programmes, alongside national guidelines, were taken into consideration in order to create an ad hoc questionnaire. A telephone survey using this questionnaire was carried out. A randomized sample of 152 mental health centres (MHCs) were involved, equal to 21.5% of all Italian MHCs., Results: The process of nationwide diffusion of early psychosis clinical services in Italy is frustratingly slow. Italian MHCs, including a specialized service for early interventions in schizophrenia, are estimated at being between 20% and 30%. Most services adopt a generalist approach and more frequently follow guidelines drawn up within the centres than Italian National Guidelines, involve few patients and provide a high variability of treatment options. The distribution of these services in Italy is not homogenous and influenced by demographic factors., Conclusion: Our data are consistent with worldwide literature showing a slow and variable implementation of early psychosis services in all nations. The main efforts to make these services diffused should be addressed to favour the process of localized adaptation to the guidelines, to demand possible and realistic implementation of the standard method, to stimulate policy endorsement and resources' allocation, and to particularly support the rural and the poorer zones., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)