Search

Background Radiotherapy and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy are accepted standard-of-care treatments for metastatic seminoma with excellent survival outcomes but with established short- and long-term morbidity. Carboplatin monotherapy may be a less toxic alternative; however early historic studies at AUC7 showed inferior outcomes. Objectives To evaluate multi-institutional data on and toxicity and longer-term survival for metastatic seminoma patients treated with the single-agent carboplatin AUC10. Methods We undertook a multi-institutional analysis incorporating all men with the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good-prognosis metastatic seminoma treated until 2018. Carboplatin AUC10 was given every 21 days. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival were noted. Variables predictive of progression were identified. Results and limitations 216 patients were treated. The three-year PFS rate was 96.5%, and five-year DSS was 98.3%. There were seven relapses, of which 5 were successfully salvaged with further chemotherapy ± surgery, and three non-seminoma–related deaths. There were no treatment-related deaths. Of 148/216 evaluable patients for toxicity, 37% and 27% suffered >/ = grade III neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Twelve percent of patients needed a platelet or blood transfusion (or both). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5%. Conclusion For metastatic seminoma, carboplatin AUC10 harbours a similar oncological efficacy to established therapies, with a low failure risk. The major acute toxicity was myelosuppression. Our study establishes carboplatin AUC10 as another standard-of-care treatment option for good-prognosis metastatic seminoma, with a potentially lower toxicity profile than other therapies.

PURPOSE Survival in stage I seminoma is almost 100%. Computed tomography (CT) surveillance is an international standard of care, avoiding adjuvant therapy. In this young population, minimizing irradiation is vital. The Trial of Imaging and Surveillance in Seminoma Testis (TRISST) assessed whether magnetic resonance images (MRIs) or a reduced scan schedule could be used without an unacceptable increase in advanced relapses. METHODS A phase III, noninferiority, factorial trial. Eligible participants had undergone orchiectomy for stage I seminoma with no adjuvant therapy planned. Random assignment was to seven CTs (6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months); seven MRIs (same schedule); three CTs (6, 18, and 36 months); or three MRIs. The primary outcome was 6-year incidence of Royal Marsden Hospital stage ≥ IIC relapse (> 5 cm), aiming to exclude increases ≥ 5.7% (from 5.7% to 11.4%) with MRI ( v CT) or three scans ( v 7); target N = 660, all contributing to both comparisons. Secondary outcomes include relapse ≥ 3 cm, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS Six hundred sixty-nine patients enrolled (35 UK centers, 2008-2014); mean tumor size was 2.9 cm, and 358 (54%) were low risk (< 4 cm, no rete testis invasion). With a median follow-up of 72 months, 82 (12%) relapsed. Stage ≥ IIC relapse was rare (10 events). Although statistically noninferior, more events occurred with three scans (nine, 2.8%) versus seven scans (one, 0.3%): 2.5% absolute increase, 90% CI (1.0 to 4.1). Only 4/9 could have potentially been detected earlier with seven scans. Noninferiority of MRI versus CT was also shown; fewer events occurred with MRI (two [0.6%] v eight [2.6%]), 1.9% decrease (–3.5 to –0.3). Per-protocol analyses confirmed noninferiority. Five-year survival was 99%, with no tumor-related deaths. CONCLUSION Surveillance is a safe management approach—advanced relapse is rare, salvage treatment successful, and outcomes excellent, regardless of imaging frequency or modality. MRI can be recommended to reduce irradiation; and no adverse impact on long-term outcomes was seen with a reduced schedule.

408 Background: Risk of radiation exposure from standard computed tomography (CT) surveillance is a major concern in the management of stage I seminoma testis patients. The TRISST randomized trial (NCT00589537) demonstrated that effective monitoring could be achieved with a reduced scan schedule or using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) instead of CT. Here, TRISST data is used to evaluate the economic consequences and health outcomes of different surveillance schedules in seminoma patients in the UK. Methods: 669 men were randomized to 4 surveillance groups undergoing 7 CTs over 5 years, 3 CTs over 3 years, 7 MRIs, or 3 MRIs of the retroperitoneum. Resource use (including investigations, scans, hospitalisations and treatment for relapse) and health outcomes data (EQ-5D 3L) on each patient were collected at baseline and over a period of 6 years after randomization. Health resources were costed using publicly available national unit costs. Within-trial mean total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated for each alternative schedule. Under the perspective of the UK health system, cost-effectiveness was evaluated using a cost per QALY gained framework. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to reflect parameter uncertainty and evaluate results robustness. Results: Since only 82 men (12%) relapsed, most health resource consumption (76%) happened during the disease-free period. Patients undergoing 7 MRIs yielded, on average, slightly higher health benefits (5.20 QALYs) but at higher costs (GBP £6,632, see table). Compared to 7 CTs, 7 MRIs was estimated to have 63% probability of being cost-effective at a system willingness to pay threshold of £20k/QALY. 3 MRIs had similar costs and benefit to 7 CTs, whereas 3CTs was more expensive than 7 CTs and 3 MRIs, providing marginal additional benefits. Conclusions: Overall, small differences exist in total costs and total QALYs between different strategies. A 7 scan MRI schedule yielded more health benefits than other strategies, but at higher costs. Considering possible capacity constraints with MRI, the reduced radiation exposure relative to CT, and non-inferiority for clinical outcomes in the primary analysis, a 3 scan MRI schedule may be the best option to replace current CT-based longer surveillance practice. Clinical trial information: NCT00589537 . [Table: see text]

Introduction Carboplatin monotherapy for metastatic seminoma at a dose of AUC-10 has shown promising activity. Three or four cycles have been given with most haematological side-effects seen with the 4th cycle. An early response might allow de-escalation of therapy. Methods Forty-eight patients with metastatic seminoma (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good prognosis) were recruited. Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning was performed before and after one cycle of carboplatin. Those with a Deauville score of 3 or less were given a total of three cycles of carboplatin, the rest received four. Results PET scanning allowed 44% to receive three cycles of carboplatin. With a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 83.5%–98.9%) were progression free. The overall survival at 2-years was 100%. Lower stage (2A and 2B) disease was significantly (P = 0.001) associated with the better metabolic response, but the association was not strong (correlation coefficient = −0.48). Over a third of the blood products given were used to support the 4th cycle. The regimen was well tolerated with a low incidence of grade III neutropenic sepsis or nausea and vomiting ( Conclusion Carboplatin AUC-10 monotherapy is effective with low toxicity. Early changes during PET scanning may allow de-escalation of therapy in high volume disease—comparison against combination therapy is warranted. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02272816 . EudraCT number 2009-009882-33.

Epithelial ovarian cancer has a very high rate of relapse after primary therapy; historically approximately 70% of patients with a complete clinical response to surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy will relapse and die of the disease. Although this number has slowly improved, cure rates remain less than 50%. As such, maintenance therapy with the aim of preventing or delaying disease relapse and the goal of improving overall survival has been the subject of intense study. Numerous earlier studies with agents ranging from radioactive phosphorus to extended frontline therapy or to monthly taxol administration demonstrated encouraging improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) only to find, disappointingly, no benefit in overall survival. In addition, the PFS advantage of maintenance therapy was associated with disconcerting side effects such that maintenance therapy was not adapted as standard of care. Studies with bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors have demonstrated a PFS advantage with a manageable side-effect profile. However, an overall survival advantage remains unclear, and the use of these approaches thus remains controversial. Furthermore, in recurrent disease, the length of chemotherapy and benefits of extended chemotherapy is unclear. Thus, additional trials assessing maintenance strategies in ovarian and other gynecologic malignancies are needed.

Background Single-agent carboplatin at area under the curve 10 (AUC10) is an effective treatment for metastatic seminoma. As far as we are aware of, there have been no studies reporting its effects on short-term quality of life. The objective was to study the efficacy, safety and tolerability, using health-related quality of life, of carboplatin AUC10 chemotherapy in patients with metastatic seminoma. Patients and methods Forty-four patients with metastatic seminoma treated at Mount Vernon Cancer Centre with carboplatin AUC10 were included in this study. Response to treatment was determined by radiological imaging (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v 1.1) and serum tumour markers. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Quality of life treatment-related toxicities were assessed during treatment at pre-chemotherapy assessments. After treatment, toxicity was assessed using a defined telephone questionnaire consisting of four questions relating to hair loss, hearing impairment, days absent from work, and neuropathy. Results At a median follow-up of 27.5 (range=4-84) months, no patient had experienced relapse. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 15 (35%) patients, nine (21%) required prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, 13 (30%) patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Commonest non-haematological toxicities were fatigue in 28 (65%) and nausea 14 (33%) patients. They were grade 1 in 82% and 92% of cases, respectively. Six out of 44 (14%) had residual tinnitus. One patient had residual grade 1 peripheral neuropathy. Ten patients continued to work throughout treatment and two patients were retired. Of the remaining patients, 16 (37%), took fewer than 5 days off work. Conclusion Carboplatin AUC10 is a safe and effective treatment for stage II/III seminoma with better health-related quality of life than experienced with combination cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In Study 19, maintenance monotherapy with olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival vs placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. METHODS: Study 19 was a randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial enrolling 265 patients who had received at least two platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and were in complete or partial response to their most recent regimen. Patients were randomised to olaparib (capsules; 400 mg bid) or placebo. We present long-term safety and final mature overall survival (OS; 79% maturity) data, from the last data cut-off (9 May 2016). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (24%) received maintenance olaparib for over 2 years; 15 (11%) did so for over 6 years. No new tolerability signals were identified with long-term treatment and adverse events were generally low grade. The incidence of discontinuations due to adverse events was low (6%). An apparent OS advantage was observed with olaparib vs placebo (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.55‒0.95, P = 0.02138) irrespective of BRCA1/2 mutation status, although the predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met. CONCLUSIONS: Study 19 showed a favourable final OS result irrespective of BRCA1/2 mutation status and unprecedented long-term benefit with maintenance olaparib for a subset of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer patients. ispartof: BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER vol:119 issue:9 pages:1075-1085 ispartof: location:England status: published

Supplemental digital content is available in the text., Aims The Medical Research Council OVO5/EORTC 55955 trial showed that patients in remission after first-line therapy for ovarian cancer did not benefit from routine measurement of CA125 during follow-up. Since the presentation of these results, we have counseled patients about the options for follow-up and provided them with an information leaflet about the trial results and the symptoms that should prompt an early appointment and CA125 measurement. We present an audit of practice after the presentation of those results. Methods The medical records of 143 consecutive patients completing first-line therapy for epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in our unit between July 2009 and December 2013 were analyzed. Results An agreed plan of CA125 follow-up was recorded in 69 (79%) of 87 eligible patients on completion of first-line therapy. No routine CA125 follow-up was selected by 55 (80%) patients, and routine CA125 follow-up was selected by 14 (20%), of whom 3 wished not to be informed of the results. CA125 levels were checked in 28 (51%) patients in the no routine CA125 follow-up group, in 26 cases because of the development of symptoms. Relapse was confirmed in 22. Median follow-up was 360 days (range, 100–836). CA125 levels were checked in all 14 patients who had requested routine CA125 follow-up. Relapse has been confirmed in 2 patients. Median follow-up was 560 days (range, 500–620). Conclusions If patients are given sufficient information about the role of routine CA125 measurements during follow-up, the majority decide against CA125 monitoring and hence, avoid these blood tests.

Objective Vascular co-option is a resistance mechanism to anti-angiogenic agents, but combinations of anti-vascular agents may overcome this resistance. We report a phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial to determine the safety and efficacy of pazopanib with fosbretabulin. Methods Eligible patients had recurrent, epithelial ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval (PFI) of 3 to 12 months. Patients were stratified according to PFI (>6 versus ≤6 months) and prior bevacizumab use. Results Twelve patients were treated in the phase 1b. Commonest grade ≥ 2 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (100%), neutropenia (50%), fatigue (50%), vomiting (50%). There was one DLT (grade 3 fatigue). The recommended phase 2 dose level was fosbretabulin 54 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 and pazopanib 600 mg once daily (od), every 28 days, which was then compared to pazopanib 800 mg od in a randomised phase 2 trial. Twenty-one patients were randomised (1:1) in the phase 2 trial. In phase 1b and phase 2, four patients treated with pazopanib and fosbretabulin developed reversible, treatment-related cardiac AEs, leading to premature discontinuation of the study. In the phase 2 trial, the median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1-not estimated) versus 3.7 months (95% CI 1.0–8.1) in favour of the experimental arm (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09–1.03, P = .06). Conclusions It remains unclear whether pazopanib with with fosbretabulin is an efficacious regimen to treat epithelial ovarian cancer. Effective cardiac risk mitigation is needed to increase the tolerability and maximize patient safety in future trials.

Background: The ICON6 trial (ISRCTN68510403) is a phase III academic-led, international, randomized, three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the addition of cediranib to chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. It investigated the use of placebo during chemotherapy and maintenance (arm A), cediranib alongside chemotherapy followed by placebo maintenance (arm B) and cediranib throughout both periods (arm C). Results of the primary comparison showed a meaningful gain in progression-free survival (time to progression or death from any cause) when comparing arm A (placebo) with arm C (cediranib). As a consequence of the positive results, AstraZeneca was engaged with the Medical Research Council trials unit to discuss regulatory submission using ICON6 as the single pivotal trial. Methods: A relatively limited level of on-site monitoring, single data entry and investigator’s local evaluation of progression were used on trial. In order to submit a license application, it was decided that (a) extensive retrospective source data verification of medical records against case report forms should be performed, (b) further quality control checks for accuracy of data entry should be performed and (c) blinded independent central review of images used to define progression should be undertaken. To assess the value of these extra activities, we summarize the impact on both efficacy and safety outcomes. Results: Data point changes were minimal; those key to the primary results had a 0.47% error rate (36/7686), and supporting data points had a 0.18% error rate (109/59,261). The impact of the source data verification and quality control processes were analyzed jointly. The conclusion drawn for the primary outcome measure of progression-free survival between arm A and arm C was unchanged. The log-rank test p-value changed only at the sixth decimal place, the hazard ratio does not change from 0.57 with the exception of a marginal change in its upper bound (0.74–0.73) and the median progression-free survival benefit from arm C remained at 2.4 months. Separately, the blinded independent central review of progression scans was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Estimates and p values varied slightly but overall demonstrated a difference in arms, which is consistent with the initial result. Some increases in toxicity were observed, though these were generally minor, with the exception of hypertension. However, none of these increases were systematically biased toward one arm. Conclusion: The conduct of this pragmatic, academic-sponsored trial was sufficient given the robustness of the results, shown by the results remaining largely unchanged following retrospective verification despite not being designed for use in a marketing authorization. The burden of such comprehensive retrospective effort required to ensure the results of ICON6 were acceptable to regulators is difficult to justify.

Background This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two distinct patient populations treated within two neighboring UK cancer centers (A and B) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods A retrospective analysis of all new stages 3 and 4 EOC patients treated between January 2013 and December 2014 was performed. The Mayo Clinic surgical complexity score (SCS) was applied. Cox regression analysis identified the impact of treatment methods on survival. Results The study identified 249 patients (127 at center A and 122 in centre B) without significant differences in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (FIGO 4, 29.7% at centers A and B), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG

374 Background: Survival after orchiectomy in stage I seminoma is almost 100%. CT surveillance is an international standard of care, and avoids adjuvant therapy. In this young population, who are unlikely to die from testicular cancer, minimizing irradiation is vital. The Trial of Imaging and Surveillance in Seminoma Testis (TRISST, NCT00589537), assessed whether CTs can safely be reduced, or replaced with MRI, without an unacceptable increase in advanced relapses. Methods: TRISST is a phase III, multicenter, non-inferiority, factorial trial. Eligible men had undergone orchiectomy for stage I seminoma with no adjuvant therapy planned. Randomization was to: 7 CTs (6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60 months (m) after randomization); 7 MRIs (same schedule); 3 CTs (6, 18, 36m); or 3 MRIs (same schedule). Follow-up was for 6 years. The primary outcome is 6-year incidence of RMH stage ≥IIC relapse, aiming to exclude an increase ≥5.7% (from 5.7% to 11.4%) with MRI (vs CT) or 3 scans (vs 7); target n=660, all contributing to both comparisons. Secondary outcomes include relapse ≥3cm, disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS). Results: 669 men enrolled from 35 UK centers (2008-2014); mean tumor size 2.9cm, 358 (54%) were low risk (≤4cm, no rete testis invasion). Median follow-up was 72m. 82 (12%) patients relapsed. Incidence of stage ≥IIC relapse was low in all groups (n=10). More events occurred with 3 scans vs 7, though non-inferior based on design criteria: 9 (2.8%) vs 1 (0.3%), 2.5% increase, 90% CI 1.0% to 4.1% (intent-to-treat, ITT). 4/9 in 3-scan arms could potentially have been detected earlier with the 7-scan schedule. Fewer events occurred with MRI vs CT: 2 (0.6%) vs 8 (2.5%), 1.9% decrease, 90% CI -3.5% to -0.3% (ITT). Per protocol results were similar. Incidence of relapse ≥3cm was 3.7%; non-inferiority was shown for both comparisons. In all groups, most relapses were detected at scheduled imaging; very few occurred beyond 3 years (5 in 558 at risk

Background: Maintenance monotherapy with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib significantly prolongs progression-free survival over placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer, with greatest benefit seen in patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm). Preservation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important during maintenance therapy; we evaluated the effect of olaparib on HRQoL in this Phase II trial (NCT00753545, Study 19). Methods: Patients received olaparib 400 mg b.i.d. (capsules) or placebo until progression. Patient-reported HRQoL and disease-related symptoms were evaluated using the FACT-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire (completed at baseline and every 28 days until progression), the FACT/NCCN Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI) and the Trial Outcome Index (TOI). TOI of the FACT-O was the primary measure. Results: Overall, 265 women were randomised to maintenance olaparib (n=136) or placebo (n=129). Compliance for HRQoL assessment was high (∼80% over time). Most patients in both arms reported a best response of ‘no change' on TOI (81%) and other HRQoL measures. There were no statistically significant differences in time to worsening or improvement rates of TOI, FOSI and FACT-O scores in the overall, BRCAm and germline BRCAm populations. Conclusions: Maintenance treatment with olaparib was well tolerated and had no adverse impact on HRQoL in this study of patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer who had responded to their most recent platinum-based therapy (partial or complete response). Interpretation of the HRQoL results in this population may differ from patients who have not responded to their most recent platinum-based therapy.

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin HeidelbergObjective: To assess surgical morbidity and mortality of maximal effort cytoreductive surgery for disseminated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in a UK tertiary center. Methods/materials: A monocentric prospective analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality was performed for all consecutive EOC patients who underwent extensive cytoreductive surgery between 01/2013 and 12/2014. Surgical complexity was assessed by the Mayo clinic surgical complexity score (SCS). Only patients with high SCS ≥5 were included in the analysis. Results: We evaluated 118 stage IIIC/IV patients, with a median age of 63 years (range 19–91); 47.5 % had ascites and 29 % a pleural effusion. Median duration of surgery was 247 min (range 100–540 min). Median surgical complexity score was 10 (range 5–15) consisting of bowel resection (71 %), stoma formation (13.6 %), diaphragmatic stripping/resection (67 %), liver/liver capsule resection (39 %), splenectomy (20 %), resection stomach/lesser sac (26.3 %), pleurectomy (17 %), coeliac trunk/subdiaphragmatic lymphadenectomy (8 %). Total macroscopic tumor clearance rate was 89 %. Major surgical complication rate was 18.6 % (n = 22), with a 28-day and 3-month mortality of 1.7 and 3.4 %, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 0.8 %; fistula/bowel perforation 3.4 %; thromboembolism 3.4 % and reoperation 4.2 %. Median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 1.7 (range 0–104) and 8 days (range 4–118), respectively. Four patients (3.3 %) failed to receive chemotherapy within the first 8 postoperative weeks. Conclusions: Maximal effort cytoreductive surgery for EOC is feasible within a UK setting with acceptable morbidity, low intestinal stoma rates and without clinically relevant delays to postoperative chemotherapy. Careful patient selection, and coordinated multidisciplinary effort appear to be the key for good outcome. Future evaluations should include quality of life analyses.

“Clinical equipoise” is defined as the genuine uncertainty by the expert medical community of the most beneficial treatment. A survey performed in 2013 by a patient support group, Ovacome, of gynaecological oncologists in the UK on ultra-radical surgery in advanced ovarian cancer has shown that there is a wide variation in surgical practice across the country. In addition, there were mixed views on the quality of published evidence justifying it’s performance, signifying a state of clinical equipoise. The survey also identified widespread insufficient infra-structural resources and lack of surgical training and skills. The majority of respondents would be prepared to undertake additional training to acquire the surgical skills and/or refer to other centres/surgeons already performing the surgery and/or recruit to surgical trials investigating ultra-radical surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

Aims Trebananib, a peptide-Fc fusion protein, inhibits angiogenesis by inhibiting binding of angiopoietin-1/2 to the receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study evaluated whether trebananib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods Women with recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-free interval ≤12 months) were randomised to intravenous PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks plus weekly intravenous trebananib 15 mg/kg or placebo. PFS was the primary end-point; key secondary end-points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Owing to PLD shortages, enrolment was paused for 13 months; the study was subsequently truncated. Results Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.0) in the trebananib arm and 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8–8.2) in the placebo arm, with a hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.68–1.24). However, because the proportional hazards assumption was not fulfilled, the standard Cox model did not provide a reliable estimate of the hazard ratio. ORR in the trebananib arm was 46% versus 21% in the placebo arm (odds ratio, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.78–6.64). Median DOR was improved (trebananib, 7.4 months [95% CI, 5.7–7.6]; placebo, 3.9 months [95% CI, 2.3–6.5]). Adverse events with a greater incidence in the trebananib arm included localised oedema (61% versus 32%), ascites (29% versus 9%) and vomiting (45% versus 33%). Conclusions Trebananib demonstrated anticancer activity in this phase 3 study, indicated by improved ORR and DOR. Median PFS was not improved. No new safety signals were identified. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01281254

Maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer. We aimed to explore the hypothesis that olaparib is most likely to benefit patients with a BRCA mutation.We present data from the second interim analysis of overall survival and a retrospective, preplanned analysis of data by BRCA mutation status from our randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study that assessed maintenance treatment with olaparib 400 mg twice daily (capsules) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and who had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system, stratified by time to progression on penultimate platinum-based regimen, response to the most recent platinum-based regimen before randomisation, and ethnic descent. The primary endpoint was PFS, analysed for the overall population and by BRCA status. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00753545.Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 136 patients were assigned to olaparib and 129 to placebo. BRCA status was known for 131 (96%) patients in the olaparib group versus 123 (95%) in the placebo group, of whom 74 (56%) versus 62 (50%) had a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or tumour BRCA mutation. Of patients with a BRCA mutation, median PFS was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (11·2 months [95% CI 8·3-not calculable] vs 4·3 months [3·0-5·4]; HR 0·18 [0·10-0·31]; p0·0001); similar findings were noted for patients with wild-type BRCA, although the difference between groups was lower (7·4 months [5·5-10·3] vs 5·5 months [3·7-5·6]; HR 0·54 [0·34-0·85]; p=0·0075). At the second interim analysis of overall survival (58% maturity), overall survival did not significantly differ between the groups (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·64-1·21]; p=0·44); similar findings were noted for patients with mutated BRCA (HR 0·73 [0·45-1·17]; p=0·19) and wild-type BRCA (HR 0·99 [0·63-1·55]; p=0·96). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib group were fatigue (in ten [7%] patients in the olaparib group vs four [3%] in the placebo group) and anaemia (seven [5%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 25 (18%) patients who received olaparib and 11 (9%) who received placebo. Tolerability was similar in patients with mutated BRCA and the overall population.These results support the hypothesis that patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation have the greatest likelihood of benefiting from olaparib treatment.AstraZeneca.

ObjectiveNew strategies are required to rapidly identify novel cytostatic agents before embarking on large randomized trials. This study investigates whether a change in rate of rise (slope) of serum CA125 from before to after starting a novel agent could be used to identify cytostatic agents. Tamoxifen was used to validate this hypothesis.MethodsAsymptomatic patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who had responded to chemotherapy were enrolled and had CA125 measurements taken every 4 weeks, then more frequently when rising. Once levels reached 4 times the upper limit of normal or nadir, they started continuous tamoxifen 20 mg daily, as well as fortnightly CA125 measurements until symptomatic progression. Because of the potentially nonlinear relationship of CA125 over time, it was felt that to enable normal approximations to be utilized a natural logarithmic standard transformation [ln(CA125)] was the most suitable to improve linearity above the common logarithmic transformation to base 10.ResultsFrom 235 recruited patients, 81 started tamoxifen and had at least 4 CA125 measurements taken before and 4 CA125 measurements taken after starting tamoxifen, respectively. The mean regression slopes from using at least 4 1n(CA125) measurements immediately before and after starting tamoxifen were 0·0149 and 0·0093 [ln(CA125)/d], respectively. This difference is statistically significant, P = 0·001. Therefore, in a future trial with a novel agent, at least as effective as tamoxifen, using this effect size, the number of evaluable patients needed, at significance level of 5% and power of 80%, is 56.ConclusionsFurther validation of this methodology is required, but there is potential to use comparison of mean regression slopes of ln(CA125) as an interim analysis measure of efficacy for novel cytostatic agents in relapsed ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumors remain potentially curable when treated with salvage chemotherapy at first relapse. In the present phase I/II study, we sought to improve on the response rate and duration of the TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin) regimen by adding gemcitabine (Gem-TIP).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were recruited after failure of first-line cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine when combined with TIP and to establish the dose intensity of the TIP drugs in this combination. The secondary objectives were the response rates, failure-free survival, and overall survival.RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 1200 mg/m2. The mean relative dose intensity was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2%-99.2%) for gemcitabine, 96% (95% CI, 92.9%-98.7%) for paclitaxel, 92% (95% CI, 84.5%-98.8%) for ifosfamide, and 94% (95% CI, 89.3%-99.0%) for cisplatin. The overall complete response rate was 50%; another 30% of the patients achieved a partial response. The 1-year failure-free survival and overall survival rates were 68% (95% CI, 43%-84%) and 89.5% (95% CI, 64%-97%), respectively.CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine can be added to TIP chemotherapy at the full dose, with manageable toxicity and no detrimental effect on the dose intensity of the TIP drugs. The response rate and duration were improved compared with those reported from the Medical Research Council TIP trial; further evaluation is warranted.

Purpose Etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) is a unique, long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor with prolonged systemic exposure to SN38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), the active metabolite of irinotecan. This randomized phase II trial investigated two dosing schedules of etirinotecan pegol in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian carcinoma. Patients and Methods A total of 71 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m2 every 14 or 21 days until progression or unacceptable adverse events (AEs). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST (version 1.0). Secondary end points included response by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria, duration of ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results The overall confirmed ORR was 20% (95% CI, 10% to 30%): 20% for once every 14 days, and 19% for once every 21 days. Median response duration was 4.1 months for once every 14 days and 4.0 months for once every 21 days. Median PFS for every 14 and every 21 days was 4.1 and 5.3 months, respectively, and median OS was 10.0 and 11.7 months, respectively. Etirinotecan pegol was well tolerated, with the most common grade 3 to 4 AEs being dehydration (24%) and diarrhea (23%). Diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and neutropenia were less frequent with the schedule of once every 21 days than with that of once every 14 days. Conclusion Both schedules of etirinotecan pegol showed activity in patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer, with encouraging ORR and PFS rates. The schedule of once every 21 days was better tolerated and had slightly longer PFS and OS rates. The treatment schedule of etirinotecan pegol 145 mg/m2 once every 21 days was selected for the expanded phase II study and is preferred for future phase III studies. These findings provide support to directly compare etirinotecan pegol versus one of the approved drugs (eg, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Background: In patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer, maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly improves progression-free survival versus placebo. We assessed the effect of maintenance olaparib on overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer, including those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (BRCAm).Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial involving 82 sites across 16 countries, patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more courses of platinum-based chemotherapy and had responded to their latest regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated sequence to receive oral maintenance olaparib (as capsules; 400 mg twice a day) or a matching placebo by an interactive voice response system. Patients were stratified by ancestry, time to progression on penultimate platinum, and response to most recent platinum. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment by the use of unique identifiers generated during randomisation. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival. In this updated analysis, we present data for overall survival, a secondary endpoint, from the third data analysis after more than 5 years’ follow-up (intention-to-treat population). We did the updated overall survival analysis, described in this Article at 77% data maturity, using a two-sided α of 0·95%. As the study was not powered to assess overall survival, this analysis should be regarded as descriptive and the p values are nominal. We analysed randomly assigned patients for overall survival and all patients who received at least one dose of treatment for safety. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00753545.Findings: Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 265 patients were randomly assigned to olaparib (n=136) or placebo (n=129). 136 patients had deleterious BRCAm. The data cutoff for this analysis was Sept 30, 2015. An overall survival advantage was seen with maintenance olaparib versus placebo in all patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·55–0·96]; nominal p=0·025, which did not meet the required threshold for statistical significance [pvs 27·8 months [24·9–33·7] for those treated with placebo), and in patients with BRCAm (HR 0·62 [95% CI 0·41–0·94] nominal p=0·025; 34·9 months [95% CI 29·2–54·6] vs 30·2 months [23·1–40·7]). The overall survival data in patients with BRCA wild-type were HR 0·83 (95% CI 0·55–1·24, nominal p=0·37; 24·5 months [19·8–35·0] for those treated with olaparib vs 26·6 months [23·1–32·5] for those treated with placebo). 11 (15%) of 74 patients with BRCAm received maintenance olaparib for 5 years or more. Overall, common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib and placebo groups were fatigue (11 [8%] of 136 patients vs four [3%] of 128) and anaemia (eight [6%] vs one [1%]). 30 (22%) of 136 patients in the olaparib group and 11 (9%) of 128 patients in the placebo group reported serious adverse events. In patients treated for 2 years or more, adverse events in the olaparib and placebo groups included low-grade nausea (24 [75%] of 32 patients vs two [40%] of five), fatigue (18 [56%] of 32 vs two [40%] of five), vomiting (12 [38%] of 32 vs zero), and anaemia (eight [25%] of 32 vs one [20%] of five); generally, events were initially reported during the first 2 years of treatment.Interpretation: Despite not reaching statistical significance, patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy appeared to have longer overall survival, supporting the reported progression-free survival benefit. Clinically useful long-term exposure to olaparib was seen with no new safety signals. Taken together, these data support both the long-term clinical benefit and tolerability of maintenance olaparib in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer.FundingAstraZeneca.

SummaryBackgroundAngiogenesis is a validated clinical target in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cediranib is an oral antiangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1–3 inhibitor that has shown antitumour activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. We assessed efficacy and safety of cediranib in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and as continued maintenance treatment in patients with first relapse of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.MethodsIn this randomised, three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer at 63 centres in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Spain, and the UK. Participants received up to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (once every 3 weeks) then entered a maintenance phase. Participants were randomly allocated (2:3:3), with five stratification factors and in alternating blocks, to receive placebo alongside chemotherapy and then placebo only maintenance (arm A; reference), cediranib 20 mg once-daily alongside chemotherapy then placebo only maintenance (arm B; concurrent), or cediranib 20 mg once-daily alongside chemotherapy then cediranib 20 mg once-daily maintenance (arm C; maintenance). Patients continued treatment to progression or excessive toxic effects. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival between arms A and C. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the allocated study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00532194; the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN68510403; and ANZ Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN1261000016003.FindingsWe randomly assigned 486 women between Nov 13, 2007, and Dec 23, 2011; results presented are for 456 patients randomly assigned subsequent to the 30mg safety phase. During a median of 19·5 months (IQR 14–26) follow-up, 113 (96%) of 118 women assigned to arm A and 141 (86%) of 164 assigned to arm C had disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 10·4–11·7) in arm C and 8·7 months (7·7–9·4) in arm A (hazard ratio 0·56, 0·44–0·72, p

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Testicular cancer is a chemosensitive disease. Treatment with primary chemotherapy leads to eradication of metastatic disease and high cure rates. Completion orchidectomy is usually performed after primary chemotherapy with viable tumour and teratoma often identified in the orchidectomy specimen. The need for completion orchidectomy in patients with a complete response to systemic chemotherapy is uncertain. The present study confirms the discordance in pathology in patients undergoing simultaneous orchidectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Viable tumour is frequently present in the testis despite tumour-free RPLNs. These findings support the need for completion orchidectomy as part of the management for advanced testicular germ cell cancer. OBJECTIVE • To determine the differential response to systemic chemotherapy in patients undergoing simultaneous orchidectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS • Patients who underwent simultaneous RPLND and orchidectomy after chemotherapy were identified from our clinical databases. • Postoperative pathological findings and patient characteristics were reviewed. RESULTS • In all, 42 patients were identified. • After chemotherapy, necrosis, teratoma and cancer were identified in 25 (59.5%), 14 (33.3%) and three (7.1%) RPLN specimens and 15 (35.7%), 15 (35.7%) and 12 (28.6%) orchidectomy specimens respectively. • Of the 25 patients with necrotic RPLN specimens 12 (48.0%) had active disease within the orchidectomy specimen (eight invasive cancer and four mature teratoma). • The overall histological discordance rate was 38.1%. Findings in the orchidectomy specimens were more aggressive than those in the RPLN specimens (i.e. cancer worse than teratoma, which is worse than necrosis) in 33.3%. CONCLUSIONS • There is significant disparity between orchidectomy and RPLND findings with viable tumour appearing frequently in the testis despite tumour-free RPLNs. • These findings support completion orchidectomy as part of advanced testicular germ cell treatment.

Purpose: Preclinical studies show that OXi4503 (combretastatin A1 diphosphate, CA1P) is more potent than other clinically evaluated vascular-disrupting agents. Experimental Design: Escalating doses of OXi4503 were given intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days to patients with advanced solid tumors. Results: Doses were escalated in single-patient cohorts from 0.06 to 1.92 mg/m2, then expanded cohorts to 15.4 mg/m2 in 43 patients. Common adverse drug reactions were hypertension, tumor pain, anemia, lymphopenia, and easily controllable nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Five patients experienced different drug-related dose-limiting toxicities, atrial fibrillation, increased troponin, blurred vision, diplopia, and tumor lysis. Prophylactic amlodipine failed to prevent adverse events. Pharmacokinetics showed dose-dependent linear increases in peak plasma concentrations and area under the curve value of OXi4503. One partial response was seen in a heavily pretreated patient with ovarian cancer. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI confirmed a dose effect and showed significant antivascular effects in 10 of 13 patients treated at doses of 11 mg/m2 or higher. Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose was 8.5 mg/m2 but escalation to 14 mg/m2 was possible with only temporary reversible cerebrovascular toxicity by excluding hypertensive patients. As a tumor response was seen at 14 mg/m2 and maximum tumor perfusion reductions were seen at doses of 11 mg/m2 or higher, the recommended phase II dose is from 11 to 14 mg/m2. Clin Cancer Res; 18(5); 1415–25. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose Inhibiting angiogenesis is one of the most promising avenues for new therapies for ovarian cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel agent, BIBF 1120, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, after chemotherapy for relapsed disease. Patients and Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II trial in 83 patients who had just completed chemotherapy for relapsed ovarian cancer, with evidence of response, but at high risk of further early recurrence. The patients were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy using BIBF 1120 250 mg or placebo, twice per day, continuously for 36 weeks. End points were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and overall survival. Results Thirty-six–week PFS rates were 16.3% and 5.0% in the BIBF 1120 and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.02; P = .06). Four patients continued on BIBF 1120, including two patients for another year or more. The proportion of patients with any grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar between the groups (34.9% for BIBF 1120 v 27.5% for placebo; P = .49; mostly grade 3). However, more patients on BIBF 1120 experienced diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting (mainly grade 1 or 2 and no grade 4). There was a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity in patients on BIBF 1120 (51.2%) compared with patients on placebo (7.5%; P < .001), but this was rarely of clinical significance, and patients continued with the trial treatment. A single-level dose reduction to 150 mg was made in 15 patients, all on active drug. Conclusion BIBF 1120 is well tolerated and associated with a potential improvement in PFS. The observed treatment effect is sufficient to justify further study within a large phase III trial.

Purpose Initial results of a randomized trial comparing carboplatin with radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma found carboplatin had a noninferior relapse-free rate (RFR) and had reduced contralateral germ cell tumors (GCTs) in the short-term. Updated results with a median follow-up of 6.5 years are now reported. Patients and Methods Random assignment was between RT and one infusion of carboplatin dosed at 7 × (glomerular filtration rate + 25) on the basis of EDTA (n = 357) and 90% of this dose if determined on the basis of creatinine clearance (n = 202). The trial was powered to exclude a doubling in RFRs assuming a 96-97% 2-year RFR after radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], approximately 2.0). Results Overall, 1,447 patients were randomly assigned in a 3-to-5 ratio (carboplatin, n = 573; RT, n = 904). RFRs at 5 years were 94.7% for carboplatin and 96.0% for RT (RT-C 90% CI, 0.7% to 3.5%; HR, 1.25; 90% CI, 0.83 to 1.89). One death as a result of seminoma (in RT arm) occurred. Patients receiving at least 99% of the 7 × AUC dose had a 5-year RFR of 96.1% (95% CI, 93.4% to 97.7%) compared with 92.6% (95% CI, 88.0% to 95.5%) in those who received lower doses (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24 to 1.07; P = .08). There was a clear reduction in the rate of contralateral GCTs (carboplatin, n = 2; RT, n = 15; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.95; P = .03), and elevated pretreatment follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (> 12 IU/L) was a strong predictor (HR, 8.57; 95% CI, 1.82 to 40.38). Conclusion These updated results confirm the noninferiority of single dose carboplatin (at 7 × AUC dose) versus RT in terms of RFR and establish a statistically significant reduction in the medium term of risk of second GCT produced by this treatment.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies in the United States. Although the prevalence of ovarian cancer when compared with other neoplasms is low, with an estimated 21,550 new cases in 2009, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease, with projected 5-year relative survival rates of 31%. Early detection is a clinically relevant goal for the optimal management of patients with ovarian cancer. Attempts to develop valuable screening strategies and incorporate preventive measures are ongoing. Frontline management of ovarian cancer involves primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based combination chemotherapy and up to 80% of women with advanced disease achieve an objective response and 10%-20% are cured with this regimen; nevertheless, disease recurrence is inevitable in most patients. Multiple strategies including the inclusion of effective targeted therapies upfront and the incorporation of maintenance regimens are being investigated to improve frontline response rates. Currently, the choice of treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer is based on the disease-free interval from completion of first-line platinum-based therapy; several platinum and non-platinum agents are used in the recurrent setting with equivalent efficacy outcomes. The roles of targeted therapies, secondary cytoreductive surgery, and rising cancer antigen 125 levels in the treatment of recurrent disease are being delineated. Clearly, there is a need to identify novel agents and personalized strategies that will improve clinical outcomes in this disease. It is likely that a better understanding of the molecular changes in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer will pave the way for more effective therapeutic options. This summary highlights current challenges in the management of ovarian cancer and outlines expert perspectives, key questions, and future directions.

Background: The potential of gemcitabine to interact with carboplatin was explored in a phase II trial in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were sampled after drug administration to measure DNA interstrand cross-link formation and repair. Patients and Methods: Forty patients received carboplatin target area under concentration-time curve (AUC 4) followed by gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 with a second dose of gemcitabine on day 8. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained in 12 patients before and at intervals during the first cycle of chemotherapy. DNA cross-link formation and repair (unhooking) were measured by the single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay following ex vivo incubation. Results: The global response rate was 47% (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors rate, 29%; CA125 rate, 63%). Delays in treatment were seen in 24% of cycles largely due to myelosuppression; 15% of day 8 administration was omitted. Peak carboplatin-induced DNA cross-linking was seen by 24 hours. Significant reduction was seen in the repair of in vivo carboplatin-induced DNA cross-links following administration of gemcitabine. Conclusion: An enhanced activity of carboplatin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer may be due to synergy with gemcitabine through inhibition of repair of DNA cross-links. Future studies should explore coadministration of these drugs, as this may be a more effective schedule. Clin Cancer Res; 16(19); 4899–905. ©2010 AACR.

Background: We have conducted a series of four feasibility studies in stage Ic-IV ovarian cancer exploring six sequential first-line schedules with the same entry criteria in a total of 339 patients. Here we present the results of the sixth study, and an analysis of the overall series. Methods: In this trial patients received 4 cycles of carboplatin AUC 7 every 3 weeks, followed by 4 cycles of concurrent paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 1) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. The primary end-point of the trial was feasibility of administering all cycles of planned chemotherapy to >60% of patients. Results: Fifty-four patients were recruited to the trial between June 05 and June 06. A total of 40 (74.1%) patients received all 8 cycles of treatment. Reasons for early discontinuation included toxicity (n = 8) and disease progression (n = 4). The overall response rate was 73.7%, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months with a median follow-up of 24 months. A comparative analysis of all six regimens from the SCOTROC series suggests that the sequential schedule in which paclitaxel was given weekly (median PFS 19.5 m) is most effective.(1) Conclusion: The sequential schedule explored in this trial is feasible, but comparative efficacy analysis suggests that trials involving weekly paclitaxel should be prioritised for further study. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

558 Background: We studied the efficacy, safety and tolerability of dose dense Carboplatin AUC10 chemotherapy and explored the HRQoL (health-related quality of life) in metastatic seminoma patients receiving this regimen. Methods: 46 patients with metastatic seminoma treated with Carboplatin AUC10 were identified in our centre. Carboplatin dosing at AUC 10 was used and calculated based on Calvert formula and EDTA clearance. Treatment was administered as a single dose every 21 days for 3 or 4 cycles. Response to treatment was determined by radiological imaging and serum tumour markers. Toxicities were evaluated using the CTCAE Version 4.0. Quality of life (QOL) and long-term treatment related toxicities were assessed post treatment using a self-designed telephonic questionnaire consisting of 4 questions about toxicity, which included- hair loss, hearing impairment, days absence from work and neuropathy. Results: Clinical characteristics are as follows: median age 44 (range 26-77), 34 patients had stage II and 12 stage III seminoma; average dose of carboplatin administered was 1240mg per cycle. 4.3% patients received 2, 87% 3 and 8.7.% 4 cycles of chemotherapy. 93% of patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 4 (all stage IIC) patients required a fourth cycle of chemotherapy, 2 undergoing RPLND and 2 watchful waiting. There was no disease relapse at median follow-up of 27.5 (range 4-84) months. 13 patients (28%) had grade 3 and 2 (4%) grade 4 neutropenia, thirteen (28%) grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, Nine (19.5%) patients required prophylactic filgrastim. Commonest non-heamatological toxicities were fatigue in 28 (50%) and nausea 14(28%) patients. QOL data was available for 35/46 (76%) of patients. 40/46 (87%) patients had no residual tinnitus, one had residual grade 1 peripheral neuropathy. Eight patients continued to work throughout treatment, 16(45%) took < 5 days off work during chemotherapy, 4 took 5 to 21 days, 13 > 21 days, two were retired. Conclusions: Carbo AUC10 is a safe and effective treatment. Our results suggest the lack of negative impact of Carbo AUC10 on short and intermediate QOL without compromising treatment outcomes.

Objective The unique characteristics of cancer, particularly issues involving the use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, present special challenges in the development of cancer drugs. In response, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has partnered with the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Association for Cancer Research, and the American Society of Hematology to conduct public workshops evaluating potential endpoints for drug approvals for the most common tumor types. Methods A workshop evaluating potential endpoints in ovarian cancer drug research was held in Bethesda, Maryland, in April 2006. Invited experts presented research findings and discussed endpoints in trials of drugs for treatment of Stage III and IV ovarian cancer. Results The panel responded to specific questions from FDA, discussing use of progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival and use of CA-125 levels as an indicator of response. Panel members also addressed endpoints in first-line therapy, second-line and subsequent therapy, and maintenance therapy. Conclusion Expert commentary provided by panel members will inform FDA's draft guidance on clinical endpoints for cancer drug approvals and will be discussed at meetings of the FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee. FDA intends to develop a set of principles that can be used to define efficacy standards for drugs used to treat ovarian and other cancers.

In most women who have been treated for ovarian cancer, serum concentrations of the tumour marker cancer antigen (CA)-125 will serially rise on average 4 months before they develop symptoms or signs of relapse. Whether or not early reintroduction of treatment produces a survival advantage is unclear. Although a high chance exists that tumour response can be achieved with chemotherapy, complete cure of these patients is rarely possible. Potential advantages of early treatment of relapse include delaying cancer-related symptoms; psychological reassurance; and, possibly, improved survival. Potential disadvantages include loss of time without treatment and the associated toxic effects. Patients should be counselled on these advantages and disadvantages before deciding whether to have their CA-125 concentrations routinely measured during follow-up. In this review, we make suggestions, on the basis of the extent and duration of response to previous treatment, as to how to manage patients once their CA-125 concentrations start rising. Our suggestions range from close observation if scans are clear to various chemotherapy regimens, hormonal treatment, and surgery. Asymptomatic patients with rising CA-125 concentrations provide an ideal group in which to test new investigational agents that might have potential as maintenance treatment.

BACKGROUND Maintenance treatment with the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza) in Study 19 (study number, D0810C00019; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00753545) significantly improved progression-free survival in comparison with a placebo for patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA1/2 mutation (BRCAm), but an interim analysis revealed no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. However, 23% of the patients receiving the placebo switched to a PARP inhibitor after progression. To investigate whether this had a confounding effect on OS, this article reports an exploratory post hoc analysis that excluded all patients from sites where 1 or more placebo patients received postprogression PARP inhibitor treatment. METHODS In Study 19, 136 of the 265 patients receiving olaparib or a placebo had a BRCAm. Sixteen patients treated at 11 of the 82 investigational sites received a PARP inhibitor after progression; these sites were excluded from this analysis, and 97 BRCAm patients at 50 sites were included. OS was assessed with a Cox proportional hazards model analogous to the primary study analysis. A supporting rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model analysis was undertaken for all 136 BRCAm patients. RESULTS The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.97) for the 97 BRCAm patients, whereas for the interim OS analysis with all 136 BRCAm patients, it was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.45-1.17). The supportive RPSFT analysis HR was approximately 0.66. CONCLUSIONS The numerical improvement in the OS HR suggests that in Study 19, postprogression PARP inhibitor treatment had a confounding influence on the interim OS analysis for BRCAm patients. There is a degree of uncertainty due to the small sample size and the lack of data maturity. Cancer 2016;122:1844–52. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Purpose Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors are rare and knowledge about prognostic parameters currently is limited. This study was undertaken to evaluate long-term outcome of patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) after chemotherapy and to assess prognostic parameters. Patients and Methods A total of 113 patients with stage IC to IV MOGCTs were included into this retrospective study. Patients were treated at two large regional cancer centers between 1977 and 2003. Results Ten-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 82% and 81%, respectively. A total of 20 patients experienced relapse, all within the first 8 years. Outcome after relapse was poor, with only 10% of patients achieving long-term survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that initial stage of disease (relative risk [RR], 5.96; 95% CI, 3.47 to 10.22; P = .03) and elevation of serum markers β-human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha-fetoprotein (RR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.40 to 10.9; P = .009) were significant predictors of overall survival, whereas age at diagnosis was of no prognostic value. Conclusion This is the first study to identify stage and tumor markers as prognostic parameters for patients with MOGCTs. This might help to select patients for risk-adapted treatment. There is need for improvement of therapeutic strategies after relapse.

CA125 is currently the most widely used tumor marker for ovarian epithelial cancer. The aim of this article is to provide guidelines for the routine clinical use of CA125 in patients with ovarian cancer. Due to lack of sensitivity for stage I disease and lack of specificity, CA125 is of little value in the detection of early ovarian cancer. At present, therefore, CA125, either alone or in combination with other modalities, cannot be recommended for screening for ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women outside the context of a randomized controlled trial. Preoperative levels in postmenopausal women, however, may aid the differentiation of benign and malignant pelvic masses. Serial levels during chemotherapy for ovarian cancer are useful for assessing response to treatment. Although serial monitoring following initial chemotherapy can lead to the early detection of recurrent disease, the clinical value of this lead-time is unclear. CA125 is the ovarian cancer marker against which new markers for this malignancy should be judged.

Vascular and angiogenic processes provide an important target for novel cancer therapeutics. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is being used increasingly to noninvasively monitor the action of these therapeutics in early-stage clinical trials. This publication reports the outcome of a workshop that considered the methodology and design of magnetic resonance studies, recommending how this new tool might best be used.\ud \ud \ud

The objective was to assess the long-term survival (5-15 years) in 463 women, with stages IIb-IV epithelial carcinoma of the ovary and to compare their survival with that of a normal population matched for age and sex. Statistical analysis of 463 women, with stages IIb-IV epithelial cancer of the ovary, who were participants in two consecutive North Thames Ovary Group randomized trials, which took place between 1985 and 1994, was performed. The median follow-up period was 10.5 years. The women were treated with debulking surgery, where possible, and adjuvant platinum chemotherapy. One of the randomized groups in the first North Thames trial also received total abdominal radiotherapy. Survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were assessed. Prognostic factors for long-term survival were determined using a mathematical model to separate early effects from late effects. The ratio of observed to expected deaths compared to the normal population was calculated. Overall survival at 5 years was 21% (95% confidence intervals 17.5-25%), at 10 years was 13.5% (95% confidence intervals 10.5-17%), and at 15 years was 12% (95% confidence intervals 9-16%). The important prognostic factors for long-term survival were disease-free or minimal residual disease (a single remaining deposit2 cm) at initial surgery with tumor grade 1 and good performance status. Compared with the normal population (1995 data), the ratio of observed to expected deaths after start of chemotherapy at 5 years was 14.1 (P0.001 Fisher's exact test), at 9-10 years 4.9 (P = 0.0033, Fisher's exact test), while in the 11- to 15-year period it had dropped to 2.75 (P = 0.090, Fisher's exact test), which was not significantly different. Patients with advanced cancer of the ovary, who survive 11 years or longer, have a life expectancy which is very similar to that of a normal population of women of the same age. Women with advanced ovarian cancer have an improved chance of long-term survival following treatment if they present with minimal residual disease after primary surgical debulking, grade 1 tumors, and good performance status.

Remarkable progress has been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the molecular, cellular, and tissue processes involved in precancer and cancer (neoplastic) progression. Nonetheless, the development of effective and safe therapies for the prevention and treatment of cancer remains

Purpose In experimental systems, interference with coagulation can affect tumor biology. Furthermore, it has been suggested that low molecular weight heparin therapy may prolong survival in patients with cancer. The primary aim of this study was to assess survival at 1 year of patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced malignancy (N = 385) were randomly assigned to receive either a once-daily subcutaneous injection of dalteparin (5,000 IU), a low molecular weight heparin, or placebo for 1 year. Results The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years after randomization for patients receiving dalteparin were 46%, 27%, and 21%, respectively, compared with 41%, 18%, and 12%, respectively, for patients receiving placebo (P = .19). In an analysis not specified a priori, survival was examined in a subgroup of patients (dalteparin, n = 55; and placebo, n = 47) who had a better prognosis and who were alive 17 months after randomization. In these patients, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 2 and 3 years from randomization were significantly improved for patients receiving dalteparin versus placebo (78% v 55% and 60% v 36%, respectively, P = .03). The rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism were 2.4% and 3.3% for dalteparin and placebo, respectively, with bleeding rates of 4.7% and 2.7%, respectively. Conclusion Dalteparin administration did not significantly improve 1-year survival rates in patients with advanced malignancy. However, the observed improved survival in a subgroup of patients with a better prognosis suggests a potential modifying effect of dalteparin on tumor biology.

Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are offered chemotherapy (CT) with the aim of improving survival and palliating symptoms. Due to the toxicity of therapy and expense particularly of biological therapy, treatment should only be continued if it is known to be effective. This requires regular monitoring during therapy to determine whether the cancer is responding or progressing. Providing patients are tolerating the therapy, it would normally be continued for a specified number of cycles or until it was shown to be ineffective. RECIST criteria, which rely upon serial measurements of tumour size by radiological imaging, are routinely used in clinical trials to define whether a tumour is responding if there is a decrease of ≥30% in unidimensional measurements, or progressing if ≥20% increase in unidimensional measurements, or development of new lesions [1]. There is great interest in determining whether CA125 is as reliable as RECIST in monitoring ovarian cancer as ovarian cancer can be difficult to accurately image and a blood test can be repeated more frequently than scans [2]. The Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) agreed criteria based on serial changes in CA125 levels that could be used in clinical trials to define progression-free survival (PFS) after treatment of first line or recurrent disease, and to define response to treatment of recurrent disease [3]. The GCIG stated that there were no data to validate whether CA125 should be used to define response or progression in patients on maintenance or consolidation therapy. Lindemann et al. [4] have now retrospectively analysed the GCIG definition for progression in the Aurelia trial. This trial compared CT alone versus chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV-CT) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). To validate the use of CA125, the GCIG have previously analysed an end point such as response or PFS, and determined whether a similar trial result would have been found if PFS had been measured using either RECIST or CA125. In the original Aurelia publication, the objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST alone in 287 patients was 11.8% versus 27.3% for CT and BEV-CT, respectively (P = 0.001) and according to GCIG CA125 criteria alone in 297 patients was 11.6% with CT versus 31.8% with BEV-CT (P < 0.001), indicating a consistent ORR response irrespective of the assessment method used [5]. The primary objective of the study by Lindemann et al. was to assess concordance between a modification of the GCIG CA 125 criteria and RECIST-defined progressive disease (PD), but not to validate the use of the GCIG CA125 criteria. This was not possible as they could not compare PFS according to RECIST with PFS according to CA125 criteria between the CT and BEV-CT arms in the Aurelia trial, as CA 125 results were not collected after RECIST-defined PD and 40% of patients in the CT arm received bevacizumab on progression. There were 218 patients with RECIST-defined PD and sufficient CA125 values out of 361 patients entered into Aurelia. Only 94 (42%) patients had concordant RECIST and CA125 PFS status, with a further 56 (26%) patients having rising CA125 levels which were not classified as PD by GCIG criteria. Patients without RECIST PD were excluded from formal analysis, but interestingly, 37 of 52 (71%) of those excluded patients who progressed had a CA125 confirmed progression. RECIST requires a 20% increase in unidimensional diameter while GCIG require a 50% increase in CA125 values to classify a patient's tumour as progressing. One would therefore expect some patients with 50% decrease in CA125, and some patients to have >20% increase in unidimensional diameter but

Purpose: Combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) is a novel vascular targeting agent. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) studies were performed to examine changes in parameters related to blood flow and vascular permeability in tumor and normal tissue after CA4P treatment. Materials and Methods: Changes in kinetic DCE-MRI parameters (transfer constant [Ktrans] and area under contrast medium-time curve [AUC]) over 24 hours after treatment with CA4P were measured in 18 patients in a phase I trial and compared with those obtained in the rat P22 carcinosarcoma model, using the same imaging technique. Rats were treated with 30 mg/kg of CA4P; patients received escalating doses from 5 to 114 mg/m2. Results: A similar pattern and time course of change in tumor and normal tissue parameters was seen in rats and humans. Rat tumor Ktrans was reduced by 64% 6 hours after treatment with CA4P (30 mg/kg). No significant reductions in kidney or muscle parameters were seen. Significant reductions were seen in tumor Ktrans in six of 16 patients treated at ≥ 52 mg/m2, with a significant group mean reduction of 37% and 29% at 4 and 24 hours, respectively, after treatment. The mean reduction in tumor initial area under the gadolinium–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid concentration-time curve (AUC) was 33% and 18%, respectively, at these times. No reduction was seen in muscle Ktrans or in kidney AUC in group analysis of the clinical data. Conclusion: CA4P acutely reduces Ktrans in human as well as rat tumors at well-tolerated doses, with no significant changes in kidney or muscle, providing proof of principle that this drug has tumor antivascular activity in rats and humans.

Purpose: A phase I trial was performed with combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P), a novel tubulin-binding agent that has been shown to rapidly reduce blood flow in animal tumors. Patients and Methods: The drug was delivered by a 10-minute weekly infusion for 3 weeks followed by a week gap, with intrapatient dose escalation. Dose escalation was accomplished by doubling until grade 2 toxicity was seen. The starting dose was 5 mg/m2. Results: Thirty-four patients received 167 infusions. CA4P was rapidly converted to the active combretastatin A4 (CA4), which was further metabolized to the glucuronide. CA4 area under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.169 at 5 mg/m2 to 3.29 μmol • h/L at 114 mg/m2. The mean CA4 AUC in eight patients at 68 mg/m2 was 2.33 μmol • h/L compared with 5.8 μmol • h/L at 25 mg/kg (the lowest effective dose) in the mouse. The only toxicity that possibly was related to the drug dose up to 40 mg/m2 was tumor pain. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible ataxia at 114 mg/m2, vasovagal syncope and motor neuropathy at 88 mg/m2, and fatal ischemia in previously irradiated bowel at 52 mg/m2. Other drug-related grade 2 or higher toxicities seen in more than one patient were pain, lymphopenia, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, hypertension, hypotension, vomiting, visual disturbance, and dyspnea. One patient at 68 mg/m2 had improvement in liver metastases of adrenocortical carcinoma. Conclusion: CA4P was well tolerated in 14 of 16 patients at 52 or 68 mg/m2; these are doses at which tumor blood flow reduction has been recorded.

PURPOSE: 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) causes vascular shutdown in preclinical models. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed in the phase I trials to examine changes related to blood flow and permeability in tumor and muscle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients treated with DMXAA from 500 to 4,900 mg/m2 had DCE-MRI examinations before and after treatment. The maximum gradient, the maximum enhancement, and the area under the signal-intensity–time curve (AUC) over the first 90 seconds were calculated for each pixel in regions of interest (ROIs) in muscle and tumor, and the median value for each ROI was obtained. Changes after treatment were compared with 95% limits of agreement for an individual and for groups using data from our reproducibility study. RESULTS: Nine of 16 patients had significant reductions in AUC 24 hours after the first dose of DMXAA, and eight of 11 patients had reductions of up to 66% in AUC 24 hours after the last dose. Mean reductions in gradient, enhancement, and AUC were 25%, 18%, and 31%, respectively, 24 hours after the last dose, significantly greater than the 95% limits of change for a group of 11 patients. Enhancement and AUC in muscle 24 hours after the first dose were significantly reduced, but no significant changes were seen 24 hours after the last dose. CONCLUSION: DMXAA significantly reduces DCE-MRI parameters related to tumor blood flow, over a wide dose range, consistent with the reported tumor vascular targeting activity. Further clinical evaluation of DMXAA is warranted.

PURPOSE: We have simplified the treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in order to reduce the number of patients exposed to potentially carcinogenic chemotherapy. Patients who score 0 to 8 on the Charing Cross scoring system are classified as low-risk and receive methotrexate (MTX) and folinic acid (FA), whereas those who score higher than 8 are classified as high-risk and receive the etoposide, methotrexate, and dactinomycin (EMA)/cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2000, 485 women with GTD were commenced on MTX/FA at Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom. If patients developed MTX resistance or toxicity, treatment was altered according to the level of beta human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If serum hCG was ≤ 100 IU/L, patients received dactinomycin; if hCG was greater than 100 IU/L, patients received EMA/CO. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 4.7 years. Overall survival was 100% and the relapse rate was 3.3% (16 of 485 patients). hCG values normalized in 324 (66.8%) of 485 patients with MTX alone, whereas 161 (33.2%) of 485 patients required a change in treatment, 11 because of MTX toxicity and 150 because of MTX resistance. Sixty-seven patients changed to dactinomycin, of whom 58 achieved normal hCG values, and nine required third-line chemotherapy with EMA/CO. hCG values normalized in 93 (98.9%) of 94 patients who changed directly to EMA/CO from MTX. CONCLUSION: Single-agent dactinomycin has activity in patients with low-risk GTD who develop MTX resistance and whose hCG is low. Simplifying the stratification of GTD into two classes (low- and high-risk) does not compromise overall outcome and may reduce the risk of second tumors.

The anti-vascular effects of the tubulin binding agent, disodium combretastatin A-4 3-O-phosphate (CA-4-P), have been investigated in the rat P22 carcinosarcoma by measurements of radiolabelled iodoantipyrine uptake and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The iodoantipyrine estimates of absolute tumour blood flow showed a reduction from 0.35 to 0.04 ml g−1 min−1 6 h after 10 mg kg−1 CA-4-P and to

5506 Background: ICON6 is a three-arm double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of cediranib in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (NCT00532194). The primary analysis (Ledermann et al Lancet 2016) showed a significant (p < 0.0001), 2.3 month extension in progression-free survival (PFS) using cediranib with chemotherapy and as maintenance compared to chemotherapy and placebo. We present the final overall survival (OS) results. Methods: The trial was originally designed to recruit 2000 patients with OS as the primary endpoint. AstraZeneca discontinued cediranib development in Sep 2011, leading to an unplanned redesign prior to analysis. The sample size was reduced and primary outcome became PFS, comparing two arms, placebo (A) to cediranib given with chemotherapy and as maintenance (C). In arm B cediranib was given with chemotherapy followed by placebo maintenance. Analysis of PFS was performed on a sample size of 456 patients receiving a 20mg dose of cediranib. At the primary analysis, 52% patients had died; this mature OS analysis was performed after 85% patients died. Results: The OS analysis was performed at a median 25.6 months follow up; 102/118 (86%) died in A and 140/164 (85%) in C. In A the median survival was 19.9 months (95% CI: 17.4, 26.5) and in C 27.3 months (24.8, 33.0). Using the logrank test the Hazard Ratio estimate was 0.85 (0.66, 1.10) in favour of cediranib (p = 0.21). Evidence of non-proportionality of the survival curves was observed (p = 0.0029), so we measured the Restricted Mean Survival Time as an alternative to the median. Over 6 years, there was a 4.8 month (-0.1, 9.8) increase in time to death in C compared to A, from 29.4 to 34.2 months. The mean for arm B (32.0 months) was consistent with a benefit of increased use of cediranib. Conclusions: Cediranib has demonstrated a significant effect in increasing PFS. The mature survival analysis (85%) shows an improvement in median OS of 7.4 months, and an incremental benefit with increased cediranib use. The previously published significant PFS benefit coupled with the increase in OS highlights the potential value of cediranib in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Further exploration of cediranib in this setting is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT00532194.

Overview: Biologicals have made a major impact in the management of several cancers, but have hitherto had a negligible impact in ovarian cancer. Fortunately, ovarian cancer has been much more sensitive to cytotoxic chemotherapy than many cancers, so treatments were still available. However, improvements are required as more than 80% of patients who present with advanced ovarian cancer eventually will die as a result of their disease. The antiangiogenic antibody bevacizumab and the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib have recently been shown to improve progression-free survival of patients with ovarian cancer with better hazard ratios in certain groups than have been seen previously.