Search

Introduction: The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with urothelial cancer, melanoma, and NSCLC. Whether this association exists in patients with SCLC is currently unknown. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the relationship between irAEs and immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. To account for the lead-time bias resulting from the time-dependent nature of irAEs, the development of irAEs was considered as a time-varying covariate in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Of the 183 patients treated with immunotherapy, 73 (39.9%) experienced at least one irAE. A total of 42 patients (22.9%) had grade 1 to 2 irAEs, whereas 31 patients (16.9%) had grade 3 to 4 irAEs. The median time of onset to the first irAE was 24 days (interquartile range: 14–55). The baseline clinicopathologic features were well-balanced between patients with and without irAEs. At a median follow-up of 24 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0–31.6), the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the irAE group than the non-irAE group (3.8 versus 1.3 mo, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival was also significantly longer among patients with irAEs than patients without irAEs (13.8 versus 2.9 mo, p < 0.0001). When analyzed as a time-varying covariate, the development of irAEs was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.44 [95% CI: 0.29–0.66], p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32–0.71], p < 0.001) in multivariate models. Conclusions: The development of irAEs is associated with improved clinical outcomes for immunotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC.

Introduction: Despite initial benefit, virtually all patients suffering from EGFR-mutant NSCLC experience acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), driven by multiple mechanisms. Recent reports have identified oncogenic kinase fusions as off-target resistance mechanisms; however, these alterations have been rarely investigated at EGFR TKIs progression. Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (N = 62) with tissue and plasma biopsies at EGFR TKI progression between January 2015 and June 2019, at a French hospital and optionally before progression, were identified from the prospective MATCH-R study (NCT02517892). Postprogression biopsy samples were analyzed for gene fusions using targeted gene panel sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and comparative genomic hybridization array. Results: Six gene fusions were detected in tumor progression biopsies under an EGFR TKI from 62 consecutive patients (9.7%) with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Among 31 patients progressing to first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs, one (3%) had an Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 2–GRB2 associated binding protein 1 (EIF4G2-GAB1) fusion. Among 31 patients progressing to the third-generation osimertinib, five (16%) presented oncogene fusions of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3–transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 (FGFR3-TACC3) (n = 2), kinesin family member 5B–Ret proto-oncogene (KIF5B-RET) (n = 1), striatin–anaplastic lymphoma kinase (STRN-ALK) (n = 1), and zinc finger DHHC-Type palmitoyltransferase 20–Thr790Met (ZDHHC20-BRAF) (n = 1) transcripts. Out of two patients that received osimertinib at first-line, one acquired an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion at progression. In all patients, fusions co-occurred with the original activating EGFR mutation; however, among four patients with an acquired T790M mutation, three (75%) lost the T790M mutation. Conclusions: Oncogenic fusions at the time of EGFR TKI resistance were identified at a relatively high frequency, mainly after the third-generation TKI osimertinib. Patients progressing to EGFR TKIs may have a new opportunity for targeted therapy when oncogenic fusions are identified.