Search

Background : Axitinib monotherapy obtained approval in pre-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients and recently in combination with pembrolizumab or avelumab in the first-line setting. However, patient profiles that may obtain increased benefit from this drug and its combinations still need to be identified. Patients and Methods : Retrospective multicentre analysis describing clinical characteristics associated with axitinib long-responder (LR) population by comparing two extreme-response sub-groups (progression-free survival [PFS] ≥9 months versus disease progression/refractory patients [RP]). A multivariate logistic-regression model was used to analyse clinical factors. Efficacy and safety were also analysed. Results : In total, 157 patients who received axitinib in second or subsequent line were evaluated (91 LR and 66 RP). Older age at start of axitinib and haemoglobin levels > LLN were independent predictive factors for LR in multivariate analyses. In LR patients, median (m) PFS was 18.1 months, median overall survival (OS) was 36.0 months and objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5%. In 59 LR patients receiving axitinib in second-line, mPFS was 18.7 months, mOS was 44.8 months and ORR was 43.9%. mOS was significantly longer in second line compared to subsequent lines (44.8 versus 26.5 months; P=0.009). In LR versus RP, mPFS with sunitinib in first-line was correlated with mPFS with axitinib in second-line (27.2 versus 10.9 months P Conclusions : This study confirms the long-term benefits of axitinib in a selected population, helping clinicians to select the best sequential approach and patients who could obtain a greater benefit from axitinib. Microabstract Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who may benefit most from axitinib still need to be identified. AXILONG study confirms long-term benefits in a selected population in which age at axitinib initiation and haemoglobin baseline levels were significantly associated although further validation may be required. First-line sunitinib outcomes were also correlated with prolonged response. These results might be helpful in real-life management of mRCC patients.

To review current measures for renal cancer care and develop a comprehensive and updated list of measures for their practical use in Spain. The study was developed by Fundacion ECO, a Spanish foundation aiming to improve oncology quality of care. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify measures and knowledge gaps. A scientific committee composed of nine experts reviewed the literature findings and added measures. A preliminary list of 42 measures was evaluated with the Delphi method to gather feedback from 47 medical oncology experts in Spain. Experts scored the appropriateness of the measures and ranked their priority in two consecutive online surveys. The scientific committee reviewed the Delphi results and developed the measures. A technical group from Universidad Francisco de Vitoria conducted and oversaw the Delphi method. The Delphi method led to consensus on all 42 measures. The scientific committee used a prioritisation matrix to select 25 of these measures for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer. These measures regarded structure, process, and outcome and covered general management, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and evaluation of health outcomes. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for all 25 measures, including their definition, formula, acceptable level of attainment, and rationale. This manuscript aims to provide healthcare professionals with expert- and evidence-based measures that are useful for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer in Spain and cover all aspects and stages.

e18736 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) is increasingly widespread in current clinical practice; however, little is known about its cardiovascular safety profile. The aim of this study is to identify clinical factors that are associated with increased risk of having a cardiac event (CE). Methods: we conducted a retrospective study in a single institution including patients treated with IO from 2014 to 2020. We analyzed their clinical characteristics and the CE developed during IO treatment and compared those who had a registered CE with those who had not. Results: 378 patients were analyzed. After a mean-follow up 15.9 months, we registered the following CE: ECG abnormalities 12.2%, congestive heart failure 3.4%, pulmonary embolism 1.9%, coronary syndrome 0.8%, myocarditis 0.5% and pericarditis 0.5%. The specific cardiac mortality was 0.8%. Results are shown in Table. Conclusions: In our study, elder age, history of ischemic heart disease or arrythmia, and reporting other immune-related adverse events (irAE), appear to be risk factors for developing a CE during IO treatment. Although most are well-known cardiovascular risk factors, the relationship between other irAEs and CE should be highlighted, and prospective studies are needed to delve into this hypothesis.[Table: see text]

Introduction Although increasing numbers of therapies with proven survival benefits have become available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), including radium-223, there is still a need for reliable biomarkers that provide information about clinically meaningful outcomes and treatment responses. Materials and Methods This study was a translational study that was conducted prospectively by the Spanish Oncology Genito-Urinary Group and included 45 patients with histologically confirmed mCRPC who were treated with radium-223. The primary response outcome was defined by a decline in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of > 50% from baseline or a CTC count of ≤ 5 cells/7.5 mL at cycle 3 of radium-223. We also assessed response according to prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase levels. CTCs were evaluated as prognostic factor for treatment completion with radium-223 treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were calculated for the global population and were correlated with biomarker response outcomes. Results Significantly, more patients with baseline CTC counts ≤ 5/7.5 mL, which are indicative of better prognoses, completed the 6 injections of therapy than those with CTC counts > 5 (16/22; 73% vs. 6/20; 30%, respectively; P = .012). The median overall survival was 16 months. Survival was significantly decreased in patients with baseline CTC counts > 5 cells/7.5 mL (7 months; P = .026) and baseline alkaline phosphatase levels ≥ 220 U/L (8 months; P = .028). Conclusions CTCs hold significant promise as a prognostic factor for survival and completing treatment prior to the initiation of bone-targeted radium-223 therapy. These findings may help to guide the use of radium-223 in patients with mCRPC.

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 high penetrance genes account for most hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, although other new high-moderate penetrance genes included in multigene panels have increased the genetic diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families by 50%. Multigene cancer panels provide new challenges related to increased frequency of variants of uncertain significance, new gene-specific cancer risk assessments, and clinical recommendations for carriers of mutations of new genes. Although clinical criteria for genetic testing continue to be largely based on personal and family history with around a 10% detection rate, broader criteria are being applied with a lower threshold for detecting mutations when there are therapeutic implications for patients with breast or ovarian cancer. In this regard, new models of genetic counselling and testing are being implemented following the registration of PARP inhibitors for individuals who display BRCA mutations. Massive sequencing techniques in tumor tissue is also driving a paradigm shift in genetic testing and potential identification of germline mutations. In this paper, we review the current clinical criteria for genetic testing, as well as surveillance recommendations in healthy carriers, risk reduction surgical options, and new treatment strategies in breast cancer gene-mutated carriers.

Contains fulltext : 193640.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death. RESULTS: A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P

Aim: To report results from the Spanish subset included in the radium-223 international early access program (iEAP). Patients & methods: Ninety patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases received radium-223 55 kBq/kg every 4 weeks for six cycles. Results: The median time to disease progression was 8 months and to prostate-specific antigen progression was 4 months. The percentage of patients with ≥50% confirmed declines in prostate-specific antigen was 9%. The median overall survival was 14 months. Grade 3 or 4 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 34% of patients (serious TEAEs 28%, TEAEs leading to discontinuation 27%). Conclusion: Outcomes of the Spanish subset are consistent with the iEAP. Radium-223 was generally well tolerated with no safety concerns.

Background Upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are increasingly recognized as separate malignancies. Additional insight into clinical outcomes and key prognostic factors are needed. Objectives To detail outcomes of patients with UTUCs recurring after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and to determine a risk score that predicts outcomes of patients with non–lymph node distant metastasis. Design, Setting, and Participants Chart review of all patients who had an extraurothelial recurrence after RNU for UTUC at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2009 and 2014. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis Median overall survival defined as time from chemotherapy for distant relapse to death. Prognostic relevance of performance status, hemoglobin, and receipt of cisplatin were assessed by Cox regression model. Results and Limitations A total of 102 patients were identified, 57 of whom had non–lymph node distant metastases at relapse; 45 received chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 29.8 months; median overall survival was 14.7 months. Objective response rate to any chemotherapy in the first-line setting was only 22%. Hemoglobin > 11 g/dL and receipt of cisplatin was associated with numerically longer median survival but did not reach statistical significance in univariate and multivariate analysis. Prognostic risk score scale including hemoglobin Conclusions Advanced UTUC portends a poor prognosis, and most patients cannot receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A risk score that includes anemia and receipt of cisplatin helps stratify patients with distant metastasis for inclusion into eventual clinical trials. More studies are needed to validate these findings. Patient Summary Metastatic UTUC is an aggressive disease, where anemia and ineligibility to receive cisplatin are adverse features associated with shorter survival.

Updated information published up to 2016 regarding major advances in renal cancer, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer is here presented. Based on an ever better understanding of the genetic and molecular alterations that govern the initial pathogenic mechanisms of tumor oncogenesis, an improvement in the characterization and treatment of urologic tumors has been achieved in the past year. According to the Cancer Genome Atlas (ATLAS) project, alterations in the MET pathway are characteristics of type 1 papillary renal cell carcinomas, and activation of NRF2-ARE pathway is associated with the biologically distinct type 2. While sunitinib and pazopanib continue to be the standard first-line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma of clear cell histology, nivolumab and cabozantinib are now the agents of choice in the second-line setting. In relation to urothelial bladder carcinoma, new potential molecular targets such as FGFR3, PI3K/AKT, RTK/RAS, CDKN2A, ARIDIA, ERBB2 have been identified. Response to adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy appears to be related to basal, luminal, and p53-like intrinsic subtypes. A phase II study with eribulin and a maintenance phase II trial with vinflunine have shown promising results. Similarly, the use of the check point inhibitors in advanced disease is likely to revolutionize the management of patients who have progressed after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In prostate cancer, seven mutually exclusive molecular subtypes have been identified by the TCGA project. Chemotherapy has been consolidated as a key treatment for castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, and abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel, and radium-223 remain standard therapeutic options for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. All this progress will undoubtedly contribute to the development of new treatments and therapeutic strategies that will improve the survival and quality of life of our patients.

[Purpose] Germline mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are identified in a significant proportion of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, but the clinical implications of these genes remain unclear. This prospective multicenter cohort study evaluated the prevalence and effect of germline DDR (gDDR) mutations on metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC) outcomes., [Patients and Methods] Unselected patients were enrolled at diagnosis of mCRPC and were screened for gDDR mutations in 107 genes. The primary aim was to assess the impact of ATM/BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 germline mutations on cause-specific survival (CSS) from diagnosis of mCRPC. Secondary aims included the association of gDDR subgroups with response outcomes for mCRPC treatments. Combined progression-free survival from the first systemic therapy (PFS) until progression on the second systemic therapy (PFS2) was also explored., [Results] We identified 68 carriers (16.2%) of 419 eligible patients, including 14 with BRCA2, eight with ATM, four with BRCA1, and none with PALB2 mutations. The study did not reach its primary end point, because the difference in CSS between ATM/BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 carriers and noncarriers was not statistically significant (23.3 v 33.2 months; P = .264). CSS was halved in germline BRCA2 (gBRCA2) carriers (17.4 v 33.2 months; P = .027), and gBRCA2 mutations were identified as an independent prognostic factor for CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.11; P = .033). Significant interactions between gBRCA2 status and treatment type (androgen signaling inhibitor v taxane therapy) were observed (CSS adjusted P = .014; PFS2 adjusted P = .005). CSS (24.0 v 17.0 months) and PFS2 (18.9 v 8.6 months) were greater in gBRCA2 carriers treated in first line with abiraterone or enzalutamide compared with taxanes. Clinical outcomes did not differ by treatment type in noncarriers., [Conclusion] gBRCA2 mutations have a deleterious impact on mCRPC outcomes that may be affected by the first line of treatment used. Determination of gBRCA2 status may be of assistance for the selection of the initial treatment in mCRPC. Nonetheless, confirmatory studies are required before these results can support a change in clinical practice., Supported by an unrestricted grant from Fundación Cris contra el cancer; three investigator awards from the Prostate Cancer Foundation (C.C.P. [2013], D.O. [2014], and E.C. [2017]); and three grants from Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (No. PI13/01287 and PI16/01565 to D.O. and No. PI15/01471 to P.L.). During the conduct of this study, E.C., D.O., P.N., and L.M.-P. were supported by grants from Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (No. JCI-2014-19129 [E.C.], No. RYC-2015-18625 [D.O.], No. SVP-2013-067937 [P.N.], No. SVP-2014-068895 [L.M.]); D.O. was also funded by a Return fellowship from Fundación Científica de la Asociación Española Contra el Cancer, 2012-2015; N.R.L. and R.L., by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (No. CM14-00200 to N.R.L. and No. CM17-00221 [R.L.]); and Y.C., by a grant from Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (No. FPU15/05126). C.C.P. was supported by a congressional-designated medical research program award (No. CMRP-PC131820).

Due to a technical issue, the family name of the author.

e18751 Background: In the last years, Immunotherapy (IT) has emerged as a standard treatment in an increasing number of tumors. This type of treatment has a specific toxicity profile which is clearly different from chemotherapy, known as an Immuno-related Adverse Event (AEir). We know the data from clinical trials, but little about the incidence and impact of this EAir in our clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out including all patients from our institution (HUPHM in Madrid) who had received IT, either in monotherapy or in combination between January 2014 and December 2019. A total of 279 patients were included and data were collected between January and July 2020, guaranteeing a minimum 6-month follow-up after receiving the first dose of immunotherapy. The toxicities found were classified into four categories: pulmonary, digestive, endocrine and others, and have been graded according to CTCEA v.5 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event) published in November 2017 and analyzed according to drug and tumor. Results: The most frequent diagnoses in our patients were: 60% lung carcinoma, 15% melanoma, 8% kidney carcinoma, and 6% bladder carcinoma. 76% of the patients received IT as first or second line in a metastatic context, 6% in the initial stage (clinical trials) and the rest in more advanced lines of treatment (3 or more). 67% received anti-PD1 drug, 6% anti-PDL1, 4% anti-CTL4 monotherapy, 10% a combination of several IT drugs, and 14% an IT combination and chemotherapy. 45% of the total presented EAir (16% grade I, 14% grade II, 11% grade III and 4% grade IV). 1/5 of the patients had manifestations in more than one organ. The incidence of the different toxicities in our population was listed in the table below. These patients reported 8% dermatological toxicities, 6% had renal toxicity (most of them grade III or IV), only 2% had arthralgia or myalgia, and 3% asthenia. Combined IT treatment had significantly higher rates of pneumonitis, colitis, and endocrine toxicities. These differences were not observed between the monotherapy treatment and the combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Conclusions: Immunotherapy has represented an important advance in oncology, achieving long survivals in a growing group of tumors. Immunotherapy has a unique toxicity profile that is very different from chemotherapy and with which we must become familiar. Most of the adverse events are mild and if they are diagnosed early and with the appropriate treatment, maintenance of IT is possible. Severe toxicity (III-IV) means in most cases the suspension of treatment, compromising its efficacy. Therefore, we must learn to recognize these toxicities early and apply the recommended treatments as soon as possible.[Table: see text]

TPS5093 Background: Men with mCRPC often receive sequential NAH (abiraterone and enzalutamide) despite reported cross-resistance, indicating a need for further life-prolonging options for progressive disease after prior NAH. Ra-223 is a targeted alpha therapy approved for mCRPC with symptomatic bone metastases based on the phase 3 ALSYMPCA study, in which it demonstrated significantly increased overall survival (OS), reduced symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) risk, improved quality of life, and reduced treatment-emergent adverse event rates vs placebo. As life-prolonging therapy is increasingly used in hormone-sensitive settings, this study has been designed to assess Ra-223 outcomes in patients with mCRPC that progressed after prior treatment with NAH and docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or mCRPC. Methods: This study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, international ethical and good clinical practice guidelines, and local laws and regulations, with institutional review board/ethics committee approval at each site and written informed consent from patients before participation. This trial is registered with EudraCT: 2019-000476-42. Participants must be ≥18 years old, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1; they must have mCRPC that progressed on/after ≥3 months of NAH for mHSPC or mCRPC and ≥2 cycles of docetaxel unless they refused or were ineligible, with ≥2 bone metastases on bone scan, no visceral metastases, and a worst pain score ≥1 on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Patients are randomized 1:1 to Ra-223 or NAH: Ra-223 55 kBq/kg intravenously every 4 weeks for 6 cycles or until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent if earlier; or abiraterone 1000 mg + prednisone 10 mg daily (if prior enzalutamide) or enzalutamide 160 mg daily (if prior abiraterone) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal of consent. NAH dosing may be modified to manage adverse events. Patients must use luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs, if not surgically castrated, and bone health agents (bisphosphonates or denosumab) throughout the study. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints are time to first SSE, radiologic progression-free survival, time to pain progression, adverse events, fracture incidence, and time to deterioration in quality of life (FACT-P total score). Using a test with a two-sided alpha of 0.05, 90% power, and randomization ratio of 1:1, approximately 508 events are required to detect a 33% increase in OS with Ra-223 vs NAH, assuming a median OS of 10 months with NAH. The expected study duration is 55 months, with a target of 696 patients to be randomized. The first patient was enrolled on November 9, 2020; 5 patients have been randomized and 2 have started treatment to date. Clinical trial information: 2019-000476-42.

Aim: We aimed to identify SNPs associated with cabazitaxel toxicity and response within a Phase II clinical trial using this compound in advanced transitional cell carcinoma after progression to a platinum-based regimen. Patients & methods: Eleven SNPs in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2C8, ABCB1 and TUBB1 were genotyped in 45 patients. Results: CYP3A5 rs776746 A allele was associated with protection against gastrointestinal toxicity (odds ratio: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.007–0.63, p = 0.018) and with reduced progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7–15.1, p = 0.0038, multivariable analysis). ABCB1 SNPs were associated with total number of grade 3–4 toxicity events (p-values of 0.009, 0.041 and 0.043, respectively). Conclusion: Polymorphisms in CYP3A5 and ABCB1 may define a subset of patients with different cabazitaxel toxicity and efficacy and therefore could be used as markers for treatment optimization.

220 Background: The ECO Foundation (Excellence and Quality in Oncology) proposes to establish a set of healthcare quality measures (including indicators and standards) for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of renal cancer in Spain which all healthcare professionals involved can assume, being suitable for implementation in the continuous improvement process of our healthcare system. Methods: a) International literature review on the quality of healthcare in renal cancer; b) multidisciplinary driving group (9 oncologists with expertise in renal cancer plus 2 methodologists) to identify and choose possible quality measures to be applied in Spain; c) global evaluation of the relevance of these measures through experts’ consensus (Delphi modified by a stratified state panel, n = 55 oncologists specialized in renal cancer); d) selection of definitive measures, according to their feasibility and efficiency (information provided/effort in obtaining it) using a quantitative online priority grid; e) standard wording of the chosen measures: definition, indicator, sources of information, exclusions, clarifications, categorization and acceptable standard. Results: The nominal group proposed 43 quality measures for the Delphi panel. Consensus agreement rate = 84.5% (47/55). The professional consensus was reached on 40 measures (4 structural, 33 in healthcare procedures and 3 in clinical results). Therefore, there is a high level of consensus (93%) among Spanish oncologists who specialize in renal cancer on the content of the healthcare quality measures in the management of renal cancer. The final measures were chosen using a high confidence level (95%) in the unanimity of the experts (oncologists in the driving group) for prioritization depending on the feasibility and efficiency in the healthcare system. Finally, 25 measures were chosen (2 structural, 20 in procedures and 3 in results). Conclusions: The level of consensus and prioritization of measures achieved, will most likely translate in a widespread acceptance and viability for implementation in the National Health System. This could provide a valuable tool for quality assessment and equality in the care of renal cancer patients in Spain.

95 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) improves OS and rPFS in first line mCRPC patients (pts). After AA progression D is commonly used as standard second line therapy. However, the value of maintaining AA in combination with D despite progression has not been tested beyond small exploratory studies (Tagawa ST, Eur Urol 2016) ABIDO is a randomized-phase II trial that evaluates efficacy and safety of D + AA vs D after first-line AA progression in mCRPC. Methods: Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC pts with no visceral metastases, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate organ functions were included. The study has two stages: In stage I pts receive AA (1000 mg/d + prednisone (P) 10 mg qd) until radiological or unequivocal clinical progression. In stage II pts were randomized to D 75 mg/m2 q3wk in combination with AA 1000 mg/d (arm A) or without AA (arm B) The primary endpoint was rPFS and the secondary endpoints radiological response (RR), OS, PSA-response, PSA-PFS and safety. Results: 88 pts were randomized, (46 arm A, 42 Arm B). Median age was 69 y/o, 43% had ECOG 0 and 91%/11%/5% had bone, liver and lung metastases. Median rPFS was 11.4 months (m) in arm A vs 10.5 m in ARM B; 12-m rPFS was 43% vs 45%; Median PSA PFS was 6.2 vs 5.5 m and median OS was 17.3 vs 16.9 m. Twenty four pts (52%) in arm A and 19 (46%) in arm B achieve ≥50% PSA response. RR was achieved in 15% vs 7% of pts and disease control rate in 74% in both arms. No statistically significant differences were found in efficacy parameters. Half of pts received 10 cycles of D (median 7 and 8). D median dose intensity was 86% and 90% for each arm and 91% for AA. Eleven pts discontinued treatment due to non-hematological toxicity, 5 in arm A and 6 in arm B. Most frequent G3-4 toxicities per arm (A/B) were: neutropenia (57%/29%; P=0.027), febrile neutropenia (17%/10%), diarrhea (9%/7%), and asthenia (11%/10%). Conclusions: ABIDO trial was unable to demonstrate the significant clinical benefit of maintenance AA approach + D after AA first-line therapy. No differences were observed in RR, PSA PFS, rPFS and OS. In AA + D cohort, more frequent and severe hematological toxicity (neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) were reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02036060.

TMPRSS2-ERG expression in blood has been correlated with low docetaxel benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This multicenter study aimed to prospectively asses its role as a taxane-resistance biomarker in blood and retrospectively in tumors, exploring also the impact of prior abiraterone/enzalutamide (A/E) in patients and in vitro. TMPRSS2-ERG was tested by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR. We included 204 patients (137 blood and 124 tumor samples) treated with taxanes. TMPRSS2-ERG expression was correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-progression-free survival (PFS), radiological-PFS (RX-PFS), and overall survival (OS). Independent association with survival was evaluated by multivariate Cox modeling. In vitro ERG knockdown and combinatorial and sequential experiments with enzalutamide and docetaxel were performed in VCaP cells. Prior A/E (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8) and blood TMPRSS2-ERG detection (HR 2, 95% CI 1.1-3.7) were independently associated to lower PSA-PFS. In patients without prior A/E, blood and tumor TMPRSS2-ERG independently predicted lower PSA-PFS (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.9 and HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.02-3.3, respectively) to taxanes. When prior A/E was administered, TMPRSS2-ERG was not associated with outcome. There was a significant interaction between blood TMPRSS2-ERG and prior A/E related to PSA-PFS (p = 0.032) and RX-PFS (p = 0.009). In vitro stable ERG inhibition did not sensitize VCaP cells to docetaxel. Concomitant enzalutamide and taxanes were synergistic, but prior enzalutamide reduced docetaxel cytotoxicity in VCaP cells. Enzalutamide induced the expression of neuroendocrine markers and reduced that of E-cadherin. We conclude that prior hormone-therapy may influence taxanes response and TMPRSS2-ERG prognostic value. Thus, multiple and sequential biomarkers are needed in CRPC follow-up evaluation.

[Abstract] Background: A pivotal, randomized, phase III trial demonstrated a statistically significant superiority of sunitinib over interferon-α in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced or mRCC in routine clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective pooled analysis of clinical data from three observational and prospective studies carried out between 2007 and 2011 in 33 Spanish hospitals. Tumor response, Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and main sunitinib-related toxicities were registered. Results: 224 patients were analyzed. Median PFS 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.02–12.25), median OS 21.9 months (95% CI: 17.2–26.6). Objective response rate (ORR) 43.8% (95% CI: 36.8–50.7). Median time to PR was 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.86–5.99) and to CR 8.2 months (95% CI: 4.75–9.77). The most common ≥ grade-3 AEs were asthenia/fatigue (18.7%), hand-foot syndrome (6.2%), hypertension (5.8%) and neutropenia (4.8%). Hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea and mucositis were confirmed as independent predictors for PFS and/or OS in a multivariate analysis (p < 0.05) Conclusions: Outcomes with sunitinib in daily clinical practice resemble those obtained in clinical trials. Long-term benefit with sunitinib is possible in advanced RCC patients but the appropriate management of toxicities is mandatory to enable patients to remain on treatment.