Search

Background: Results from randomized trials designed to compare cryoenergy with radiofrequency for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation are lacking. Objective: To compare the efficacy of a simplified strategy for PV cryoablation (group C) vs PV isolation with open-irrigated radiofrequency catheters (group R). Methods: Fifty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and 4 independent PVs received a Reveal XT implantable cardiac monitor and were randomized to group C or group R. In group C, PV ablation was done with a single Arctic Front balloon (23 or 28 mm) per patient and two 300-second applications per PV. No further applications were delivered to close residual conduction gaps. In group R, bidirectional PV conduction block was pursued with Lasso and Navistar ThermoCool catheters and the CARTO system. The primary end point was the proportion of patients remaining free from AF recurrences ≥2 minutes without taking antiarrhythmic drugs 12 months after ablation. Results: The primary end point was met by 12 (48%) patients in group C and 25 (68%) patients in group R (odds ratio 0.43; P = .05). This difference disappeared after adjustment for acute procedural outcome. In patients for whom all 4 PVs were blocked at the end of the procedure, there was no difference between group C and group R in the primary end point (67% vs 68%; P = .94). Conclusions: The efficacy of the simplified strategy for PV cryoablation tested in this study is inferior to PV isolation using open-irrigated radiofrequency catheters with electrophysiological and electroanatomical guidance. Complete PV conduction block is critical to the success of AF ablation., Depto. de Medicina, Fac. de Medicina, TRUE, pub

Background: The Killip classification categorizes heart failure (HF) in acute myocardial infarction, and has a prognostic value. Although non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is increasing steadily, little information is available about the prognostic value of low Killip class in this scenario. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of mild HF in NSTEMI. Methods: 835 patients with NSTEMI between 2005 and 2007 were prospectively recruited. Patients in Killip-1 (K1=684) or Killip-2 class (K2=113) were selected (38, with K>2, excluded). Clinical, angiographic, treatment strategies, and 30-day all-cause mortality, together with other cardiovascular outcomes were recorded. Results: K2 patients were mostly women (K1 27.9% vs K2 48.0%, p<0.001) and older (K1 66.6years vs K2 73.8years, p<0.001) with a higher frequency of diabetes mellitus (p<0.001) and hypertension (p<0.001). Smoking was less frequent in the K2-group (p=0.003). A previous infarction/revascularization history was similar in both groups. The infarction size, assessed by Troponin I/Creatin kinase, did not differ between groups (p=0.378 and p=0.855). Multivessel coronary disease and revascularization procedures were less common in group K2 (p=0.015 and p=0.005 vs group K1, respectively). Patients in K2 had a worse prognosis in terms of maximum Killip class, death and major adverse cardiovascular events (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, mild HF at presentation was an independent risk factor for mortality (OR=6.50; IC 95%: 2.48-16.95; p<0.001). Conclusion: Mild HF at presentation in NSTEMI is linked to a poor prognosis, with increased short-term mortality. Thus, a more aggressive approach including early cardiac catheterization and revascularization should be considered., Depto. de Fisiología, Fac. de Medicina, TRUE, pub