Search

This study examines the strategic incorporation of various recycled materials into asphalt concrete, specifically focusing on municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWI BA), recycled asphalt shingle (RAS), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). Due to the high porosity of MSWI BA and RCA, and the significant asphalt binder content (30–40%) found in RAS, there is a need to increase the amount of liquid asphalt used. RAS is posited as an efficient substitute for the asphalt binder, helping to counterbalance the high absorption characteristics of MSWI BA and RCA. The research objective is to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of RAS, MSWI BA, and RCA in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). This study encompasses several laboratory evaluations (i.e., rutting and tensile strength tests) and a cost–benefit analysis, which is a life cycle cost analysis. The results indicate that the combined use of these materials results in a higher tensile strength and rut resistance when compared with the control (with virgin aggregate). According to the cost–benefit analysis result, when the three recycled materials are used for an HMA overlay over an existing aged pavement, it could be 60–80% more cost-effective compared to a conventional HMA overlay, thereby offering significant economical savings each year in the field of road construction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the positive effect of the combined use of recycled asphalt shingles (RASs) and municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash (B.A.) in asphalt concrete, which contributes to enhanced sustainability in pavement engineering. In addition, unlike traditional approaches that employ individual recycling material in hot mix asphalt (HMA), the combined use of the two waste materials maximizes the mechanical performance of the asphalt mixture. The addition of RAS (with 30–40% aged binder) as an additive generally enhances the strength/stiffness of the asphalt mixture. The high porosity/absorption of MSWI BA results in an additional amount of liquid asphalt binder in the mixture. As an admixture, RAS could supply the additional asphalt binder in the mixture when MSWI BA is used as an aggregate replacement. This research was conducted in two phases: (1) to examine the effect of MSWI BA alone and its optimal asphalt content (OAC), and (2) to assess the combined effect of B.A. and RAS in HMA. Multiple laboratory testing methods were employed for the mechanical performance investigation, including the Marshall stability test, rutting test, and indirect tensile test. The testing results show that the 20% B.A. replacement exhibits the best performance and that it requires an additional asphalt binder of 1.1%. For the combined use of MSWI BA and RAS, 5% RAS shows the best mechanical performance. All mixtures that contain the B.A. and RAS show greater strength than the control specimen (regular HMA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reflective Cracking (RC) has been a daunting challenge in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R), yet, still, after several decades of research, no exclusive solution prevails. Moreover, RC mitigation methods have shown significant variation inin situperformance. Therefore, a technique tailored to select an effective RC mitigation method is essential for the success of pavement M&R. In this study, a life cycle cost (LCC) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of currently available RC mitigation methods and to select the optimal method for an asphalt concrete overlay above flexible pavements. The MCDM includes three components: LCC, performance, and materials (recyclability). These criteria determine the selection ranking of each RC mitigation method. In addition, the effects of the priority level including cost, performance, and recyclability on the final decision were evaluated by conducting a series of sensitivity analysis under multiple scenarios; therefore, weight combination of the three criteria were recorded to define the measurements affecting the final decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]