Search

Intergenerational programs that bring the young and old together are known to facilitate social connections. However, benefits of intergenerational programs cannot be achieved by simply bringing the two generations together. We need to understand the factors which enhance intergenerational engagement. This paper specifically explores barriers and enablers for improving engagement of older people in an intergenerational program conducted within four research sites in South East Queensland and New South Wales, Australia. Video ethnography was used to examine the intergenerational environment and observe patterns of engagement between older people and children. Findings reveal the type of activity, group structure and length of activity to increase engagement of older people in an intergenerational program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Residential aged care (RAC) quality is often measured as part of regulatory compliance. To inform care delivery and service improvements, we developed a consumer experience survey. Methods: Validation study incorporating 2018–2019 survey data (n = 1504 individuals, 25 RAC homes) and test‐retest reliability evaluation. Results: Most of the respondents were women (67%) with 38% of the surveys completed by residents, 39% with staff support, and 23% by family members. Moderate‐to‐high correlations (0.46–0.84) between individual items indicate the survey is a coherent measure of satisfaction; good inter‐item correlation was found across all sections (0.61–0.70) with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.90–0.94); and moderate correlation for test‐retest reliability was found on the same individual when providing an overall recommendation score (individual ICC 0.684). Conclusions: The RAC Consumer Experience Survey is a validated measure of lived experience and satisfaction that aligns closely with the Australian Aged Care Quality Standards, affording providers a standardised tool for benchmarking and informing care quality across the sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Australian health and aged care reforms mandate a wellness and reablement (W&R) approach with services and the workforce needing to adjust their way of working with older people, to actively promote independence and participation in life's activities. Studies exploring the older person's perspective are sparse. This study aims to understand the older person's experience of a W&R approach, supplemented with experiences of staff trained in the approach. The study evaluates a W&R approach implemented across three community‐based sites of a large Australian aged care provider. Staff from participating sites underwent training and were asked to use a W&R approach with at least one older person. Eighteen older people aged 65+ were engaged in the 4‐month programme. Semi‐structured interviews with older people and staff were conducted on completion of the programme. The W&R approach showed variable benefits and experiences of older people related to goal setting and outcomes. Overall, older people were unfamiliar with goal setting or displayed negative attitudes. Negative emotional responses to health decline and ageing, such as apathy, frustration, embarrassment and sense of helplessness, were identified as barriers to goal pursual. In contrast, enabling factors, such as assistive equipment, staff and social connection, triggered positive emotional responses, which acted as protective factors and enhanced goal pursual. Staff knowledge and understanding of the W&R approach also influenced older people's experience and outcomes. These findings recommend a stronger focus on the social and emotional aspects of W&R and co‐developing goals in line with the older person's sense of wellbeing. This approach supports the multiple dimensions of W&R and aligns with principles of positive and healthy ageing. Additional training for staff should be provided, with ongoing mentoring and support from W&R champions. Ensuring that goals are meaningful and valuable to individual older people will enhance successful goal pursual and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the unique health and aged care needs of veterans in the Australian Defence Force, especially those with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who are at higher risk of developing dementia. It discusses a two-year research study, the Weaving Evidence into Action for Veterans with Dementia (WEAVE) project, which implemented non-pharmacological interventions such as music therapy, sensory modulation, reminiscence therapy.

Abstract Background Evidence-based practice aims to achieve better health outcomes in the community. It relies on high quality research to inform policy and practice; however research in primary health care continues to lag behind that of other medical professions. The literature suggests that research capacity building (RCB) functions across four levels; individual, team, organisation and external environment. Many RCB interventions are aimed at an individual or team level, yet evidence indicates that many barriers to RCB occur at an organisational or external environment level. This study asks senior managers from a large healthcare organisation to identify the barriers and enablers to RCB. The paper then describes strategies for building allied health (AH) research capacity at an organisational level from a senior managers’ perspective. Methods This qualitative study is part of a larger collaborative RCB project. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with nine allied health senior managers. Recorded interviews were transcribed and NVivo was used to analyse findings and emergent themes were defined. Results The dominant themes indicate that the organisation plays an integral role in building AH research capacity and is the critical link in creating synergy across the four levels of RCB. The organisation can achieve this by incorporating research into its core business with a whole of organisation approach including its mission, vision and strategic planning. Critical success factors include: developing a co-ordinated and multidisciplinary approach to attain critical mass of research-active AH and enhance learning and development; support from senior managers demonstrated through structures, processes and systems designed to facilitate research; forming partnerships to increase collaboration and sharing of resources and knowledge; and establishing in internal framework to promote recognition for research and career path opportunities. Conclusions This study identifies four key themes: whole of organisation approach; structures, processes and systems; partnerships and collaboration; and dedicated research centres, units and positions. These themes form the foundation of a model which can be applied to assist in achieving synergy across the four levels of RCB, overcome barriers and create an environment that supports and facilitates research development in AH.

Abstract Background There is a continuing need for research capacity building initiatives for primary health care professionals. Historically strategies have focused on interventions aimed at individuals but more recently theoretical frameworks have proposed team-based approaches. Few studies have evaluated these new approaches. This study aims to evaluate a team-based approach to research capacity building (RCB) in primary health using a validated quantitative measure of research capacity in individual, team and organisation domains. Methods A non-randomised matched-pairs trial design was used to evaluate the impact of a multi-strategy research capacity building intervention. Four intervention teams recruited from one health service district were compared with four control teams from outside the district, matched on service role and approximate size. All were multi-disciplinary allied health teams with a primary health care role. Random-effects mixed models, adjusting for the potential clustering effect of teams, were used to determine the significance of changes in mean scores from pre- to post-intervention. Comparisons of intervention versus control groups were made for each of the three domains: individual, team and organisation. The Individual Domain measures the research skills of the individual, whereas Team and Organisation Domains measure the team/organisation's capacity to support and foster research, including research culture. Results In all three domains (individual, team and organisation) there were no occasions where improvements were significantly greater for the control group (comprising the four control teams, n = 32) compared to the intervention group (comprising the four intervention teams, n = 37) either in total domain score or domain item scores. However, the intervention group had a significantly greater improvement in adjusted scores for the Individual Domain total score and for six of the fifteen Individual Domain items, and to a lesser extent with Team and Organisation Domains (two items in the Team and one in the Organisation domains). Conclusions A team-based approach to RCB resulted in considerable improvements in research skills held by individuals for the intervention group compared to controls; and some improvements in the team and organisation's capacity to support research. More strategies targeted at team and organisation research-related policies and procedures may have resulted in increased improvements in these domains.

The article focuses on the benefits of intergenerational learning. Topics include indicate the value of intergenerational care programs which act as an alternative model of care in Australia; its usage among quality childcare, older people, and cognitive impaired people; and improvement children's attitudes towards ageing and perceptions about older people.

Purpose: A sound, scientific base of high quality research is needed to inform service planning and decision making and enable improved policy and practice. However, some areas of health practice, particularly many of the allied health areas, are generally considered to have a low evidence base. In order to successfully build research capacity in allied health, a clearer understanding is required of what assists and encourages research as well as the barriers and challenges. Participants and methods: This study used written surveys to collect data relating to motivators, enablers, and barriers to research capacity building. Respondents were asked to answer questions relating to them as individuals and other questions relating to their team. Allied health professionals were recruited from multidisciplinary primary health care teams in Queensland Health. Eighty-five participants from ten healthcare teams completed a written version of the research capacity and culture survey. Results: The results of this study indicate that individual allied health professionals are more likely to report being motivated to do research by intrinsic factors such as a strong interest in research. Barriers they identified to research are more likely to be extrinsic factors such as workload and lack of time. Allied health professionals identified some additional factors that impact on their research capacity than those reported in the literature, such as a desire to keep at the"cutting edge" and a lack of exposure to research. Some of the factors influencing individuals to do research were different to those influencing teams. These results are discussed with reference to organizational behavior and theories of motivation. Conclusion: Supporting already motivated allied health professional individuals and teams to conduct research by increased skills training, infrastructure, and quarantined time is likely to produce better outcomes for research capacity building investment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]