1. Exploring Relative Preferences for HIV Service Features Using Discrete Choice Experiments: a Synthetic Review
- Author
-
Eshun-Wilson, I, Kim, H-Y, Schwartz, S, Conte, M, Glidden, DV, and Geng, EH
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Immunology ,HIV/AIDS ,Substance Misuse ,Clinical Research ,Health Services ,Infectious Diseases ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Drug Abuse (NIDA only) ,Health and social care services research ,8.1 Organisation and delivery of services ,Good Health and Well Being ,Adult ,Anti-Retroviral Agents ,Appointments and Schedules ,Choice Behavior ,Delivery of Health Care ,Female ,HIV Infections ,Humans ,Male ,Patient Preference ,Patient-Centered Care ,Physician-Patient Relations ,Preference ,Discrete choice experiment ,Review ,HIV ,Service delivery ,Differentiated care ,Medical Microbiology ,Virology ,Clinical sciences - Abstract
Purpose of reviewAligning HIV treatment services with patient preferences can promote long-term engagement. A rising number of studies solicit such preferences using discrete choice experiments, but have not been systematically reviewed to seek generalizable insights. Using a systematic search, we identified eleven choice experiments evaluating preferences for HIV treatment services published between 2004 and 2020.Recent findingsAcross settings, the strongest preference was for nice, patient-centered providers, for which participants were willing to trade considerable amounts of time, money, and travel distance. In low- and middle-income countries, participants also preferred collecting antiretroviral therapy (ART) less frequently than 1 monthly, but showed no strong preference for 3-compared with 6-month refill frequency. Facility waiting times and travel distances were also important but were frequently outranked by stronger preferences. Health facility-based services were preferred to community- or home-based services, but this preference varied by setting. In high-income countries, the availability of unscheduled appointments was highly valued. Stigma was rarely explored and costs were a ubiquitous driver of preferences. While present improvement efforts have focused on designs to enhance access (reduced waiting time, travel distance, and ART refill frequency), few initiatives focus on the patient-provider interaction, which represents a promising critical area for inquiry and investment. If HIV programs hope to truly deliver patient-centered care, they will need to incorporate patient preferences into service delivery strategies. Discrete choice experiments can not only inform such strategies but also contribute to prioritization efforts for policy-making decisions.
- Published
- 2020