Search

Introduction: BRM, a key catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, is a putative tumor susceptibility gene that is silenced in 15% of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two novel BRM promoter polymorphisms (BRM-741 and BRM-1321) are associated with reversible epigenetic silencing of BRM protein expression.Experimental Design: Advanced NSCLC patients from the Princess Margaret (PM) cohort study and from the CCTG BR.24 clinical trial were genotyped for BRM promoter polymorphisms. Associations of BRM variants with survival were assessed using log-rank tests, the method of Kaplan and Meier, and Cox proportional hazards models. Promoter swap, luciferase assays, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments evaluated polymorphism function. In silico analysis of publicly available gene expression datasets with outcome were performed.Results: Carrying the homozygous variants of both polymorphisms (“double homozygotes”, DH) when compared with those carrying the double wild-type was associated with worse overall survival, with an adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 2.74 (95% CI, 1.9–4.0). This was confirmed in the BR.24 trial (aHR, 8.97; 95% CI, 3.3–18.5). Lower BRM gene expression (by RNA-Seq or microarray) was associated with worse outcome (P < 0.04). ChIP and promoter swap experiments confirmed binding of MEF2D and HDAC9 only to homozygotes of each polymorphism, associated with reduced promoter activity in the DH.Conclusions: Epigenetic regulatory molecules bind to two BRM promoter sequence variants but not to their wild-type sequences. These variants are associated with adverse overall and progression-free survival. Decreased BRM gene expression, seen with these variants, is also associated with worse overall survival. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2460–70. ©2016 AACR.

Subgroup prognostic analyses of BRM polymorphisms in adjusted Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) - each comparison uses wildtype or double wildtype as the reference category.

Comparison of Analyzed and Non-Analyzed Data from the PM Cohort. This table was an analysis requested by a reviewer.

BACKGROUND: Combining anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies and agents that restore cancer cell susceptibility to apoptosis may enhance antitumor activity. We report results from a phase 1b dose-expansion cohort of xevinapant, a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis protein) inhibitor that restores cancer cell sensitivity to apoptosis, and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in pts with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 28-day cycles of xevinapant 200 mg/day [days 1-10 and 15-24] + avelumab 10 mg/kg [days 1 and 15]) was previously established during the dose-escalation part of this phase 1, open-label study. In this dose-expansion cohort, pts with advanced NSCLC who progressed on first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy (CTx) or anti-PD-1/L1 ± platinum-based CTx received xevinapant (at RP2D) + avelumab for 13 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK). RESULTS: 38 pts were treated: most had squamous cell carcinoma (45%) or adenocarcinoma (42%) of the lung, 11% had prior anti-PD-L1 therapy, 71% were men, and median age was 62 years (range, 35-75). 1 pt completed 13 cycles, and 37 permanently discontinued treatment; most common reasons were progressive disease (PD; 70%) and adverse events (AEs; 27%). ORR was 10.5% (95% CI 2.9-24.8). Best overall response (BOR): 4 pts had a confirmed partial response (PR), 19 had stable disease, and 15 had PD. Median DoR in responders was 15.9 months (95% CI 3.5-29.7); DCR was 60.5% (95% CI 43.4-76.0). Median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.9-5.1); median OS was 9.4 months (95% CI 6.7-16.2). Most pts (n=37; 97.4%) had treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs); 21 (55.3%) had grade ≥3. Most common TEAEs were decreased appetite (n=13; 34.2%) and ALT increase (n=11; 28.9%). Nine pts died due to TEAEs; none were considered treatment-related. Xevinapant and avelumab PK were comparable to monotherapy at the same doses. In exploratory biomarker analyses, plasma IL-10 levels increased during the study treatment period. In blood, activated CD4 T cells and Tregs increased during cycle 1, and activated CD8 T cells increased during the treatment period; however, these did not correlate with antitumor activity. In tumor samples, low Ki67 expression was associated with BOR of PR (n=4), and increases in macrophages, Tregs, Th1 cells, and dendritic cells were associated with disease control. CONCLUSION: Xevinapant + avelumab had tolerable safety in pts with advanced NSCLC who progressed on 1L platinum-based CTx or anti-PD-1/L1 ± platinum-based CTx; however, the study did not meet its primary endpoint as antitumor activity was comparable to historic data for avelumab second-line monotherapy. Citation Format: Quincy Chu, Tudor Ciuleanu, Rodryg Ramlau, Daniel Renouf, Rosalyn Juergens, Ewa Kalinka, Piotr Sawrycki, Jonathan Bramson, Brad Nelson, Rafael Crabbé, Daniela A. Sahlender, Philippa Crompton, Elisabeth Rouits, Dany Spaggiari, Franck Brichory, Luke Piggott, Mike Schenker, Glenwood Goss. Xevinapant plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Phase 1b dose-expansion results and exploratory biomarker analyses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT202.

Identification of biomarkers associated with clinical benefit may be crucial in establishing optimal treatment choice for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, the ability of the VeriStrat serum protein test to predict differential clinical benefit with afatinib versus erlotinib, and the association of VeriStrat status with clinical outcomes irrespective of EGFR-TKI used, was assessed in a retrospective analysis of the phase III LUX-Lung 8 trial.Pretreatment plasma samples were analyzed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Spectra were evaluated to assign a VeriStrat 'Good' (VS-G) or VeriStrat 'Poor' (VS-P) classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and other endpoints were assessed with respect to pretreatment VeriStrat status; OS was the primary efficacy variable. Outcomes with other efficacy endpoints were similar.Of 795 patients randomized in LUX-Lung 8, 675 were classified (VS-G: 412; VS-P: 263). In the VS-G group, OS was significantly longer with afatinib versus erlotinib (HR 0.79 [95% CI: 0.63-0.98]). In the VS-P group, there was no significant difference in OS between afatinib and erlotinib (HR 0.90 [0.70-1.16]). However, there was no interaction between VeriStrat classification and treatment group for OS (pVS-G classification is strongly associated with favorable survival outcomes with either afatinib or erlotinib compared with VS-P classification. In VS-G patients, survival outcomes with afatinib are superior to those with erlotinib. VeriStrat classification may guide treatment decisions in patients with SCC of the lung. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01523587.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) appears to play an important role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. We have performed a Phase I/II study of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in which serial biopsies were taken pre- and posttreatment to assess biological activity.Paired biopsies were obtained from colorectal cancer patients before and after treatment. Proliferation and apoptosis were assessed using Ki67 immunohistochemistry and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assays, respectively. Immunohistochemistry for EGFR, activated EGFR, phosphorylated Akt, phosphorylated ERK, p27(Kip1), and beta-catenin was also performed.Posttreatment samples showed a statistically significant reduction in the cancer cell proliferation index (mean proliferation index pretreatment 31%; posttreatment 21%; P = 0.047). The mean cancer cell apoptosis index also increased from 6 to 12% in posttreatment samples, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance. All pretreatment samples showed strong staining for EGFR. Loss of immunohistochemical staining for activated EGFR, phosphorylated Akt, and phosphorylated ERK in cancer cells was observed in some patients after treatment. p27(Kip1) was absent in the cancer cells of most pretreatment biopsies; two patients showed a marked increase in staining for nuclear p27(Kip1) after treatment with ZD1839. These two patients also showed large increases in apoptotic index.ZD1839 inhibits EGFR signaling and proliferation in the cancer cells of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. ZD1839 may also induce cancer cell apoptosis in a subset of colorectal cancer patients via up-regulation of p27(Kip1).

Additional file 3: Figure S3. Serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in the 4 patients with durable stable disease in this study. Their levels remained consistent throughout this study in all 4 patients.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Serum marker levels in Patient 11 who developed rhadbomyolysis on study. Baseline and Day 6 (erlotinib only) serum levels in the normal range for alanine transaminase (ALT), albumin and CPK, measures of hepatic, renal and muscle health, respectively. However at Day 28 (erlotinib and rosuvastatin treatment), significant increases in all three-serum markers were observed, particularly with CPK levels, which increased from 60U/L to over 2000U/L, suggesting rosuvastatin-induced muscle damage.

Additional file 3: Figure S3. Serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels in the 4 patients with durable stable disease in this study. Their levels remained consistent throughout this study in all 4 patients.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Serum marker levels in Patient 11 who developed rhadbomyolysis on study. Baseline and Day 6 (erlotinib only) serum levels in the normal range for alanine transaminase (ALT), albumin and CPK, measures of hepatic, renal and muscle health, respectively. However at Day 28 (erlotinib and rosuvastatin treatment), significant increases in all three-serum markers were observed, particularly with CPK levels, which increased from 60U/L to over 2000U/L, suggesting rosuvastatin-induced muscle damage.