Search

Background: Breast cancer heterogeneity reflects the complex biology of this disease. Breast cancer subtypes, as identified either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or by gene expression analysis, present different molecular characteristics and prognosis. In this context, molecular imaging techniques providing functional information, contribute in evaluating response to treatment and long-term prognosis among different subtypes. Nuclear imaging diagnosis modalities play an important role for conducting research on cancer biology and developing new treatment approaches. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a radionuclide based imaging method that has the potential to locate the tumor, define its staging, and monitor its response to treatment. Results: In the current study, we will review the utility of the most widely used molecular imaging technique, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET, in order to determine the relationship between standardized uptake values (SUVs) and immunohistopathological factors, as well as to clarify whether PET is able to predict breast cancer phenotypes. Moreover, we will discuss the rising development of new radiopharmaceuticals in PET imaging, such as 18F-fluoro-17-estradiol (FES), 18F-fluoro-l-thymidine (FLT), 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FISO), and 89Zr-immuno-PET, which give more information about tumor characteristics. Conclusions: In order to improve clinical decision making, enabling hereafter more successful individualized therapies, it is imperative to combine PET radiopharmaceuticals and imaging techniques of critical biologic and pathologic phenomena, including ER, PR and HER2 expression, angiogenesis, hypoxia, apoptosis and metabolic changes in the microenviroment of breast tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hippocampus protection, as an organ at risk in brain radiotherapy, might protect patients' quality of life. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been used traditionally in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients as it increases survival. This study aimed to discover the contributing parameters for a successful PCI with simultaneous protection of the hippocampus by using three different treatment machines. For this purpose, treatment plans were generated for 45 SCLC patients using three half-arcs in three linear accelerators (LINACs; Elekta Infinity, Synergy, and Axesse; Elekta Ltd, Stockholm, Sweden) with different radiation field sizes and multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf thickness characteristics. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Thresholds for the hippocampus were calculated based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 dose constraints. The planning and treatment system templates were common to all three LINACs. Plan evaluation was based on the dosimetric target coverage by the 95% isodose, the maximum dose of the plan, the conformity index (CI), the degree of plan modulation (MOD), and the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) pass rate. The mean target coverage was highest for Infinity (97.3%), followed by Axesse (96.6%) and Synergy (95.5%). The mean maximum dose was higher for Synergy (27.5 Gy), followed by Infinity (27.0 Gy) and Axesse (26.9 Gy). Axesse plans had the highest CI (0.93), followed by Infinity (0.91) and Synergy (0.88). Plan MOD was lower for Synergy (2.88) compared with Infinity (3.07) and Axesse (3.69). Finally, patient-specific QA was successful in all Infinity plans, in all but one Synergy plan, and in 17/45 Axesse plans, as was expected from the field size in that treatment unit. Based on overall performance, the most favorable combination of target coverage, hippocampus sparing, and plan deliverability was obtained with the LINAC, which has the largest field opening and thinnest MLC leaves., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. School of Medicine of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki issued approval 7149/28-6-2019. Patients who were eligible received written informed consent to store their anonymized data and publish the study results. If the patient could not give written informed consent (e.g., due to aphasia or altered consciousness state), it was asked for from the patient's legal representative. In the event that the patient withdraws their permission, the data will not be used. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Giakoumettis et al.)

This study aims to validate the Greek translation of the Questionnaire for Assessing Fear of Radiotherapy in Oncology Patients (QAFRT). Conducted as a cross-sectional pilot study, it involved 149 cancer patients from two radiotherapy departments in Thessaloniki, Greece. The sample included patients with various cancer types and stages, all of whom were undergoing radiation treatment. The QAFRT, originally containing 15 items measured on a Likert scale, was translated into Greek using the back-translation method. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the translated version, resulting in a refined 13-item questionnaire encompassing four factors: fear of radiotherapy effectiveness, fear of illness during radiotherapy, fear of radiotherapy's impact on daily life, and fear of side effects and relationships. The reliability of the QAFRT was confirmed with Cronbach's α of 0.82 and intraclass correlation coefficient coefficients ranging from 0.92 to 0.98. The study concludes that the Greek version of the QAFRT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the fear of radiotherapy in cancer patients, highlighting the need for adequate psychological support for those with high levels of fear., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethics Committee of the International Hellenic University of Thessaloniki issued approval 14/01.11.2022. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Ouzouni et al.)

Objective: Cancer of the thyroid is a relatively rare malignant neoplasm with an increasing incidence in the last decades. Ionizing radiation is the best documented risk factor for thyroid malignant neoplasms, in current medical literature. An increase in the global annual per caput effective radiation dose has been described, partly as a result of medical exposure. External beam radiation therapy of the head and neck region has also been attributed. Thyroid tissue is particularly vulnerable to the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiation because of its anatomical position and radiosensitivity. We review the relationship between external beam radiotherapy and secondary thyroid cancer and of factors influencing this correlation. Since 1950 this causal relationship has been confirmed by numerous researchers. The role of the primary disease, the administrated radiation dose, the irradiation field, sex, age and genetic background and also the time interval between radiation and the onset of thyroid cancer are the main factors that have been studied in medical literature. Developments in the field of radiotherapy, recent findings on the relationship between head and neck carcinomas and thyroid carcinomas and interactions between confounding factors, raise the need for further study on this subject.