Search

For two graphs $F,H$ and a positive integer $n$, the function $f_{F,H}(n)$ denotes the largest $m$ such that every $H$-free graph on $n$ vertices contains an $F$-free induced subgraph on $m$ vertices. This function has been extensively studied in the last 60 years when $F$ and $H$ are cliques and became known as the Erd\H{o}s-Rogers function. Recently, Balogh, Chen and Luo, and Mubayi and Verstra\"ete initiated the systematic study of this function in the case where $F$ is a general graph. Answering, in a strong form, a question of Mubayi and Verstra\"ete, we prove that for every positive integer $r$ and every $K_{r-1}$-free graph $F$, there exists some $\varepsilon_F>0$ such that $f_{F,K_r}(n)=O(n^{1/2-\varepsilon_F})$. This result is tight in two ways. Firstly, it is no longer true if $F$ contains $K_{r-1}$ as a subgraph. Secondly, we show that for all $r\geq 4$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a $K_{r-1}$-free graph $F$ for which $f_{F,K_r}(n)=\Omega(n^{1/2-\varepsilon})$. Along the way of proving this, we show in particular that for every graph $F$ with minimum degree $t$, we have $f_{F,K_4}(n)=\Omega(n^{1/2-6/\sqrt{t}})$. This answers (in a strong form) another question of Mubayi and Verstra\"ete. Finally, we prove that there exist absolute constants $0

The celebrated Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal conjecture says that any graph without a fixed induced subgraph $H$ contains a very large homogeneous set. A direct analog of this conjecture is not true for hypergraphs. In this paper we present two natural variants of this problem which do hold for hypergraphs. We show that for every $r \geq 3$, $m \geq m_0(r)$ and $0 \leq f \leq \binom{m}{r}$, if an $r$-graph $G$ does not contain $m$ vertices spanning exactly $f$ edges, then $G$ contains much bigger homogeneous sets than what is guaranteed to exist in general $r$-graphs. We also prove that if a $3$-graph $G$ does not contain homogeneous sets of polynomial size, then for every $m \geq 3$ there are $\Omega(m^3)$ values of $f$ such that $G$ contains $m$ vertices spanning exactly $f$ edges. This makes progress on a conjecture of Axenovich, Brada\v{c}, Gishboliner, Mubayi and Weber.

In this paper, we initiate the study of discrepancy questions for spanning subgraphs of $k$-uniform hypergraphs. Our main result is that any $2$-colouring of the edges of a $k$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraph $G$ with minimum $(k-1)$-degree $\delta(G) \ge (1/2+o(1))n$ contains a tight Hamilton cycle with high discrepancy, that is, with at least $n/2+\Omega(n)$ edges of one colour. The minimum degree condition is asymptotically best possible and our theorem also implies a corresponding result for perfect matchings. Our tools combine various structural techniques such as Tur\'an-type problems and hypergraph shadows with probabilistic techniques such as random walks and the nibble method. We also propose several intriguing problems for future research., Comment: 20 pages, 1 figure

Many well-studied problems in extremal combinatorics deal with the maximum possible size of a family of objects in which every pair of objects satisfies a given restriction. One problem of this type was recently raised by Alon, Gujgiczer, K\"orner, Milojevi\'c and Simonyi. They asked to determine the maximum size of a family $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs on $[n]$, such that for every two $G_1,G_2 \in \mathcal{G}$, the graphs $G_1 \setminus G_2$ and $G_2 \setminus G_1$ are isomorphic. We completely resolve this problem by showing that this maximum is exactly $2^{\frac{1}{2}\big(\binom{n}{2} - \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor\big)}$ and characterizing all the extremal constructions. We also prove an analogous result for $r$-uniform hypergraphs.

Graph modification problems ask for the minimal number of vertex/edge additions/deletions needed to make a graph satisfy some predetermined property. A (meta) problem of this type, which was raised by Yannakakis in 1981, asks to determine for which properties ${\mathcal P}$, it is NP-hard to compute the smallest number of edge deletions needed to make a graph satisfy ${\mathcal P}$. Despite being extensively studied in the past 40 years, this problem is still wide open. In fact, it is open even when ${\mathcal P}$ is the property of being $H$-free, for some fixed graph $H$. In this case we use $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ to denote the smallest number of edge deletions needed to turn $G$ into an $H$-free graph. Alon, Sudakov and Shapira [Annals of Math. 2009] proved that if $H$ is not bipartite, then computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. They left open the problem of classifying the bipartite graphs $H$ for which computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. In this paper we resolve this problem when $H$ is a forest, showing that computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is polynomial-time solvable if $H$ is a star forest and NP-hard otherwise. Our main innovation in this work lies in introducing a new graph theoretic approach for Yannakakis's problem, which differs significantly from all prior works on this subject. In particular, we prove new results concerning an old and famous conjecture of Erd\H{o}s and S\'os, which are of independent interest.

The study of ordered Ramsey numbers of monotone paths for graphs and hypergraphs has a long history, going back to the celebrated work by Erd\H{o}s and Szekeres in the early days of Ramsey theory. In this paper we obtain several results in this area, establishing two conjectures of Mubayi and Suk and improving bounds due to Balko, Cibulka, Kr\'al and Kyn\v{c}l. We also obtain a color-monotone version of the well-known Canonical Ramsey Theorem of Erd\H{o}s and Rado, which could be of independent interest.

A theorem of R\"odl states that for every fixed $F$ and $\varepsilon>0$ there is $\delta=\delta_F(\varepsilon)$ so that every induced $F$-free graph contains a vertex set of size $\delta n$ whose edge density is either at most $\varepsilon$ or at least $1-\varepsilon$. R\"odl's proof relied on the regularity lemma, hence it supplied only a tower-type bound for $\delta$. Fox and Sudakov conjectured that $\delta$ can be made polynomial in $\varepsilon$, and a recent result of Fox, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour shows that this conjecture holds when $F=P_4$. In fact, they show that the same conclusion holds even if $G$ contains few copies of $P_4$. In this note we give a short proof of a more general statement.

We prove that for every ordered matching $H$ on $t$ vertices, if an ordered $n$-vertex graph $G$ is $\varepsilon$-far from being $H$-free, then $G$ contains $\text{poly}(\varepsilon) n^t$ copies of $H$. This proves a special case of a conjecture of Tomon and the first author. We also generalize this statement to uniform hypergraphs.

A distance estimator for a graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is an algorithm that given $G$ and $\alpha, \varepsilon >0$ distinguishes between the case that $G$ is $(\alpha-\varepsilon)$-close to $\mathcal{P}$ and the case that $G$ is $\alpha$-far from $\mathcal{P}$ (in edit distance). We say that $\mathcal{P}$ is estimable if it has a distance estimator whose query complexity depends only on $\varepsilon$. Every estimable property is also testable, since testing corresponds to estimating with $\alpha=\varepsilon$. A central result in the area of property testing, the Fischer--Newman theorem, gives an inverse statement: every testable property is in fact estimable. The proof of Fischer and Newman was highly ineffective, since it incurred a tower-type loss when transforming a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator. This raised the natural problem, studied recently by Fiat--Ron and by Hoppen--Kohayakawa--Lang--Lefmann--Stagni, whether one can find a transformation with a polynomial loss. We obtain the following results. 1. If $\mathcal{P}$ is hereditary, then one can turn a tester for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with an exponential loss. This is an exponential improvement over the result of Hoppen et. al., who obtained a transformation with a double exponential loss. 2. For every $\mathcal{P}$, one can turn a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with a double exponential loss. This improves over the transformation of Fischer--Newman that incurred a tower-type loss. Our main conceptual contribution in this work is that we manage to turn the approach of Fischer--Newman, which was inherently ineffective, into an efficient one. On the technical level, our main contribution is in establishing certain properties of Frieze--Kannan Weak Regular partitions that are of independent interest.

The well-known Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal conjecture states that for any graph $F$, there exists $\epsilon>0$ such that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ that contains no induced copy of $F$ has a homogeneous set of size at least $n^{\epsilon}$. We consider a variant of the Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal problem for hypergraphs where we forbid a family of hypergraphs described by their orders and sizes. For graphs, we observe that if we forbid induced subgraphs on $m$ vertices and $f$ edges for any positive $m$ and $0\leq f \leq \binom{m}{2}$, then we obtain large homogeneous sets. For triple systems, in the first nontrivial case $m=4$, for every $S \subseteq \{0,1,2,3,4\}$, we give bounds on the minimum size of a homogeneous set in a triple system where the number of edges spanned by every four vertices is not in $S$. In most cases the bounds are essentially tight. We also determine, for all $S$, whether the growth rate is polynomial or polylogarithmic. Some open problems remain., Comment: A preliminary version of this manuscript appeared as arXiv:2303.09578

Given a graph $H$, a perfect $H$-factor in a graph $G$ is a collection of vertex-disjoint copies of $H$ spanning $G$. K\"uhn and Osthus showed that the minimum degree threshold for a graph $G$ to contain a perfect $H$-factor is either given by $1-1/\chi(H)$ or by $1-1/\chi_{cr}(H)$ depending on certain natural divisibility considerations. Given a graph $G$ of order $n$, a $2$-edge-coloring of $G$ and a subgraph $G'$ of $G$, we say that $G'$ has high discrepancy if it contains significantly (linear in $n$) more edges of one color than the other. Balogh, Csaba, Pluh\'ar and Treglown asked for the minimum degree threshold guaranteeing that every 2-edge-coloring of $G$ has an $H$-factor with high discrepancy and they settled the case where $H$ is a clique. Here we completely resolve this question by determining the minimum degree threshold for high discrepancy of $H$-factors for every graph $H$.

The graph removal lemma is a fundamental result in extremal graph theory which says that for every fixed graph $H$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, if an $n$-vertex graph $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint copies of $H$ then $G$ contains $\delta n^{v(H)}$ copies of $H$ for some $\delta = \delta(\varepsilon,H) > 0$. The current proofs of the removal lemma give only very weak bounds on $\delta(\varepsilon,H)$, and it is also known that $\delta(\varepsilon,H)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon$ unless $H$ is bipartite. Recently, Fox and Wigderson initiated the study of minimum degree conditions guaranteeing that $\delta(\varepsilon,H)$ depends polynomially or linearly on $\varepsilon$. In this paper we answer several questions of Fox and Wigderson on this topic.

The triangle removal states that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $\delta(\varepsilon)n^3$ triangles. Unfortunately, there are no sensible bounds on the order of growth of $\delta(\varepsilon)$, and at any rate, it is known that $\delta(\varepsilon)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon$. Csaba recently obtained an asymmetric variant of the triangle removal, stating that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $2^{-\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^5$ copies of $C_5$. To this end, he devised a new variant of Szemer\'edi's regularity lemma. We obtain the following results: - We first give a regularity-free proof of Csaba's theorem, which improves the number of copies of $C_5$ to the optimal number $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^5$. - We say that $H$ is $K_3$-abundant if every graph containing $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles has $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{|V(H)|}$ copies of $H$. It is easy to see that a $K_3$-abundant graph must be triangle-free and tripartite. Given our first result, it is natural to ask if all triangle-free tripartite graphs are $K_3$-abundant. Our second result is that assuming a well-known conjecture of Ruzsa in additive number theory, the answer to this question is negative. Our proofs use a mix of combinatorial, number-theoretic, probabilistic, and Ramsey-type arguments., Comment: 20 pages

A chordal graph is a graph with no induced cycles of length at least $4$. Let $f(n,m)$ be the maximal integer such that every graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges has a chordal subgraph with at least $f(n,m)$ edges. In 1985 Erd\H{o}s and Laskar posed the problem of estimating $f(n,m)$. In the late '80s, Erd\H{o}s, Gy\'arf\'as, Ordman and Zalcstein determined the value of $f(n,n^2/4+1)$ and made a conjecture on the value of $f(n,n^2/3+1)$. In this paper we prove this conjecture and answer the question of Erd\H{o}s and Laskar, determining $f(n,m)$ asymptotically for all $m$ and exactly for $m \leq n^2/3+1$.

We propose the following conjecture extending Dirac's theorem: if $G$ is a graph with $n\ge 3$ vertices and minimum degree $\delta(G)\ge n/2$, then in every orientation of $G$ there is a Hamilton cycle with at least $\delta(G)$ edges oriented in the same direction. We prove an approximate version of this conjecture, showing that minimum degree $n/2 + O(k)$ guarantees a Hamilton cycle with at least $(n+k)/2$ edges oriented in the same direction. We also study the analogous problem for random graphs, showing that if the edge probability $p = p(n)$ is above the Hamiltonicity threshold, then, with high probability, in every orientation of $G \sim G(n,p)$ there is a Hamilton cycle with $(1-o(1))n$ edges oriented in the same direction.

For positive integers $s,t,r$, let $K_{s,t}^{(r)}$ denote the $r$-uniform hypergraph whose vertex set is the union of pairwise disjoint sets $X,Y_1,\dots,Y_t$, where $|X| = s$ and $|Y_1| = \dots = |Y_t| = r-1$, and whose edge set is $\{\{x\} \cup Y_i: x \in X, 1\leq i\leq t\}$. The study of the Tur\'an function of $K_{s,t}^{(r)}$ received considerable interest in recent years. Our main results are as follows. First, we show that \begin{equation} \mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(r)}) = O_{s,r}(t^{\frac{1}{s-1}}n^{r - \frac{1}{s-1}}) \end{equation} for all $s,t\geq 2$ and $r\geq 3$, improving the power of $n$ in the previously best bound and resolving a question of Mubayi and Verstra\"ete about the dependence of $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{2,t}^{(3)})$ on $t$. Second, we show that this upper bound is tight when $r$ is even and $t \gg s$. This disproves a conjecture of Xu, Zhang and Ge. Third, we show that the above upper bound is not tight for $r = 3$, namely that $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(3)}) = O_{s,t}(n^{3 - \frac{1}{s-1} - \varepsilon_s})$ (for all $s\geq 3$). This indicates that the behaviour of $\mathrm{ex}(n,K_{s,t}^{(r)})$ might depend on the parity of $r$. Lastly, we prove a conjecture of Ergemlidze, Jiang and Methuku on the hypergraph analogue of the bipartite Tur\'an problem for graphs with bounded degrees on one side. Our tools include a novel twist on the dependent random choice method as well as a variant of the celebrated norm graphs constructed by Koll\'ar, R\'onyai and Szab\'o., Comment: 14 pages

In this paper we prove several results on Ramsey numbers $R(H,F)$ for a fixed graph $H$ and a large graph $F$, in particular for $F = K_n$. These results extend earlier work of Erd\H{o}s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp and of Balister, Schelp and Simonovits on so-called Ramsey size-linear graphs. Among others, we show that if $H$ is a subdivision of $K_4$ with at least $6$ vertices, then $R(H,F) = O(v(F) + e(F))$ for every graph $F$. We also conjecture that if $H$ is a connected graph with $e(H) - v(H) \leq \binom{k+1}{2} - 2$, then $R(H,K_n) = O(n^k)$. The case $k=2$ was proved by Erd\H{o}s, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp. We prove the case $k=3$.

Given a fixed $k$-uniform hypergraph $F$, the $F$-removal lemma states that every hypergraph with few copies of $F$ can be made $F$-free by the removal of few edges. Unfortunately, for general $F$, the constants involved are given by incredibly fast-growing Ackermann-type functions. It is thus natural to ask for which $F$ one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. One trivial case where such bounds can be obtained is when $F$ is $k$-partite. Alon proved that when $k=2$ (i.e. when dealing with graphs), only bipartite graphs have a polynomial removal lemma. Kohayakawa, Nagle and R\"odl conjectured in 2002 that Alon's result can be extended to all $k>2$, namely, that the only $k$-graphs $F$ for which the hypergraph removal lemma has polynomial bounds are the trivial cases when $F$ is $k$-partite. In this paper we prove this conjecture.

We complete the characterization of the digraphs $D$ for which the induced $D$-removal lemma has polynomial bounds, answering a question of Alon and Shapira. We also study the analogous problem for $k$-colored complete graphs. In particular, we prove a removal lemma with polynomial bounds for Gallai colorings.

A recent result of Alon, Ben-Eliezer and Fischer establishes an induced removal lemma for ordered graphs. That is, if $F$ is an ordered graph and $\varepsilon>0$, then there exists $\delta_{F}(\varepsilon)>0$ such that every $n$-vertex ordered graph $G$ containing at most $\delta_{F}(\varepsilon) n^{v(F)}$ induced copies of $F$ can be made induced $F$-free by adding/deleting at most $\varepsilon n^2$ edges. We prove that $\delta_{F}(\varepsilon)$ can be chosen to be a polynomial function of $\varepsilon$ if and only if $|V(F)|=2$, or $F$ is the ordered graph with vertices $x

Let $D_2$ denote the $3$-uniform hypergraph with $4$ vertices and $2$ edges. Answering a question of Alon and Shapira, we prove an induced removal lemma for $D_2$ having polynomial bounds. We also prove an Erd\H{o}s-Hajnal-type result: every induced $D_2$-free hypergraph on $n$ vertices contains a clique or an independent set of size $n^{c}$ for some absolute constant $c > 0$. In the case of both problems, $D_2$ is the only nontrivial $k$-uniform hypergraph with $k\geq 3$ which admits a polynomial bound.

In 1999, Jacobson and Lehel conjectured that for $k \geq 3$, every $k$-regular Hamiltonian graph has cycles of at least linearly many different lengths. This was further strengthened by Verstra\"{e}te, who asked whether the regularity can be replaced with the weaker condition that the minimum degree is at least $3$. Despite attention from various researchers, until now, the best partial result towards both of these conjectures was a $\sqrt{n}$ lower bound on the number of cycle lengths. We resolve these conjectures asymptotically, by showing that the number of cycle lengths is at least $n^{1-o(1)}$.

Let $\mathcal{F}\subset 2^{[n]}$ be a set family such that the intersection of any two members of $\mathcal{F}$ has size divisible by $\ell$. The famous Eventown theorem states that if $\ell=2$ then $|\mathcal{F}|\leq 2^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$, and this bound can be achieved by, e.g., an `atomic' construction, i.e. splitting the ground set into disjoint pairs and taking their arbitrary unions. Similarly, splitting the ground set into disjoint sets of size $\ell$ gives a family with pairwise intersections divisible by $\ell$ and size $2^{\lfloor n/\ell\rfloor}$. Yet, as was shown by Frankl and Odlyzko, these families are far from maximal. For infinitely many $\ell$, they constructed families $\mathcal{F}$ as above of size $2^{\Omega(n\log \ell/\ell)}$. On the other hand, if the intersection of any number of sets in $\mathcal{F}\subset 2^{[n]}$ has size divisible by $\ell$, then it is easy to show that $|\mathcal{F}|\leq 2^{\lfloor n/\ell\rfloor}$. In 1983 Frankl and Odlyzko conjectured that $|\mathcal{F}|\leq 2^{(1+o(1)) n/\ell}$ holds already if one only requires that for some $k=k(\ell)$ any $k$ distinct members of $\mathcal{F}$ have an intersection of size divisible by $\ell$. We completely resolve this old conjecture in a strong form, showing that $|\mathcal{F}|\leq 2^{\lfloor n/\ell\rfloor}+O(1)$ if $k$ is chosen appropriately, and the $O(1)$ error term is not needed if (and only if) $\ell \, | \, n$, and $n$ is sufficiently large. Moreover the only extremal configurations have `atomic' structure as above. Our main tool, which might be of independent interest, is a structure theorem for set systems with small 'doubling'.

We study the multicolour discrepancy of spanning trees and Hamilton cycles in graphs. As our main result, we show that under very mild conditions, the $r$-colour spanning-tree discrepancy of a graph $G$ is equal, up to a constant, to the minimum $s$ such that $G$ can be separated into $r$ equal parts by deleting $s$ vertices. This result arguably resolves the question of estimating the spanning-tree discrepancy in essentially all graphs of interest. In particular, it allows us to immediately deduce as corollaries most of the results that appear in a recent paper of Balogh, Csaba, Jing and Pluh\'{a}r, proving them in wider generality and for any number of colours. We also obtain several new results, such as determining the spanning-tree discrepancy of the hypercube. For the special case of graphs possessing certain expansion properties, we obtain exact asymptotic bounds. We also study the multicolour discrepancy of Hamilton cycles in graphs of large minimum degree, showing that in any $r$-colouring of the edges of a graph with $n$ vertices and minimum degree at least $\frac{r+1}{2r}n + d$, there must exist a Hamilton cycle with at least $\frac{n}{r} + 2d$ edges in some colour. This extends a result of Balogh et al., who established the case $r = 2$. The constant $\frac{r+1}{2r}$ in this result is optimal; it cannot be replaced by any smaller constant., Comment: 25 pages, 5 figures

Since counting subgraphs in general graphs is, by and large, a computationally demanding problem, it is natural to try and design fast algorithms for restricted families of graphs. One such family that has been extensively studied is that of graphs of bounded degeneracy (e.g., planar graphs). This line of work, which started in the early 80's, culminated in a recent work of Gishboliner et al., which highlighted the importance of the task of counting homomorphic copies of cycles (i.e., cyclic walks) in graphs of bounded degeneracy. Our main result in this paper is a surprisingly tight relation between the above task and the well-studied problem of detecting (standard) copies of directed cycles in general directed graphs. More precisely, we prove the following: 1. One can compute the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ and $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy in time $\tilde{O}(n^{d_{k}})$, where the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs runs in time $\tilde{O}(m^{d_{k}})$. 2. Conversely, one can transform any $O(n^{b_{k}})$ algorithm for computing the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ or of $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy, into an $\tilde{O}(m^{b_{k}})$ time algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs. We emphasize that our first result does not use a black-box reduction (as opposed to the second result which does). Instead, we design an algorithm for computing the number of $C_k$-homomorphisms in degenerate graphs and show that one part of its analysis can be reduced to the analysis of the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed cycles in general digraphs, which was carried out in a recent breakthrough of Dalirrooyfard, Vuong and Vassilevska Williams.

We show that there exist linear $3$-uniform hypergraphs with $n$ vertices and $\Omega(n^2)$ edges which contain no copy of the $3 \times 3$ grid. This makes significant progress on a conjecture of F\"{u}redi and Ruszink\'{o}. We also discuss connections to proving lower bounds for the $(9,6)$ Brown-Erd\H{o}s-S\'{o}s problem and to a problem of Solymosi and Solymosi.

We consider the problem of counting the number of copies of a fixed graph $H$ within an input graph $G$. This is one of the most well-studied algorithmic graph problems, with many theoretical and practical applications. We focus on solving this problem when the input $G$ has bounded degeneracy. This is a rich family of graphs, containing all graphs without a fixed minor (e.g. planar graphs), as well as graphs generated by various random processes (e.g. preferential attachment graphs). We say that $H$ is easy if there is a linear-time algorithm for counting the number of copies of $H$ in an input $G$ of bounded degeneracy. A seminal result of Chiba and Nishizeki from '85 states that every $H$ on at most 4 vertices is easy. Bera, Pashanasangi, and Seshadhri recently extended this to all $H$ on 5 vertices, and further proved that for every $k > 5$ there is a $k$-vertex $H$ which is not easy. They left open the natural problem of characterizing all easy graphs $H$. Bressan has recently introduced a framework for counting subgraphs in degenerate graphs, from which one can extract a sufficient condition for a graph $H$ to be easy. Here we show that this sufficient condition is also necessary, thus fully answering the Bera--Pashanasangi--Seshadhri problem. We further resolve two closely related problems; namely characterizing the graphs that are easy with respect to counting induced copies, and with respect to counting homomorphisms.

We show that if the degree sequence of a graph $G$ is close in $\ell_1$-distance to a given realizable degree sequence $(d_1,\dots,d_n)$, then $G$ is close in edit distance to a graph with degree sequence $(d_1,\dots,d_n)$. We then use this result to prove that every graph property defined in terms of the degree sequence is testable in the dense graph model with query complexity independent of $n$.

In 1985, Mader conjectured that for every acyclic digraph $F$ there exists $K=K(F)$ such that every digraph $D$ with minimum out-degree at least $K$ contains a subdivision of $F$. This conjecture remains widely open, even for digraphs $F$ on five vertices. Recently, Aboulker, Cohen, Havet, Lochet, Moura and Thomass\'{e} studied special cases of Mader's problem and made the following conjecture: for every $\ell \geq 2$ there exists $K = K(\ell)$ such that every digraph $D$ with minimum out-degree at least $K$ contains a subdivision of every orientation of a cycle of length $\ell$. We prove this conjecture and answer further open questions raised by Aboulker et al., Comment: 28 pages, 3 figures

We investigate bounds on the dichromatic number of digraphs which avoid a fixed digraph as a topological minor. For a digraph $F$, denote by $\text{mader}_{\vec{\chi}}(F)$ the smallest integer $k$ such that every $k$-dichromatic digraph contains a subdivision of $F$. As our first main result, we prove that if $F$ is an orientation of a cycle then $\text{mader}_{\vec{\chi}}(F)=v(F)$. This settles a conjecture of Aboulker, Cohen, Havet, Lochet, Moura and Thomass\'{e}. We also extend this result to the more general class of orientations of cactus graphs, and to bioriented forests. Our second main result is that $\text{mader}_{\vec{\chi}}(F)=4$ for every tournament $F$ of order $4$. This is an extension of the classical result by Dirac that $4$-chromatic graphs contain a $K_4$-subdivision to directed graphs., Comment: 24 pages, 1 figure

We prove that a random graph $G(n,p)$, with $p$ above the Hamiltonicity threshold, is typically such that for any $r$-colouring of its edges there exists a Hamilton cycle with at least $(2/(r+ 1)-o(1))n$ edges of the same colour. This estimate is asymptotically optimal., Comment: 20 pages, minor corrections

Property testers are fast randomized algorithms whose task is to distinguish between inputs satisfying some predetermined property ${\cal P}$ and those that are far from satisfying it. Since these algorithms operate by inspecting a small randomly selected portion of the input, the most natural property one would like to be able to test is whether the input does not contain certain forbidden small substructures. In the setting of graphs, such a result was obtained by Alon et al., who proved that for any finite family of graphs ${\cal F}$, the property of being induced ${\cal F}$-free (i.e. not containing an induced copy of any $F \in {\cal F}$) is testable. It is natural to ask if one can go one step further and prove that more elaborate properties involving induced subgraphs are also testable. One such generalization of the result of Alon et al. was formulated by Goldreich and Shinkar who conjectured that for any finite family of graphs ${\cal F}$, and any linear inequality involving the densities of the graphs $F \in {\cal F}$ in the input graph, the property of satisfying this inequality can be tested in a certain restricted model of graph property testing. Our main result in this paper disproves this conjecture in the following strong form: some properties of this type are not testable even in the classical (i.e. unrestricted) model of graph property testing. The proof deviates significantly from prior non-testability results in this area. The main idea is to use a linear inequality relating induced subgraph densities in order to encode the property of being a quasirandom graph.

Let $f(n,v,e)$ denote the maximum number of edges in a $3$-uniform hypergraph not containing $e$ edges spanned by at most $v$ vertices. One of the most influential open problems in extremal combinatorics then asks, for a given number of edges $e \geq 3$, what is the smallest integer $d=d(e)$ so that $f(n,e+d,e) = o(n^2)$? This question has its origins in work of Brown, Erd\H{o}s and S\'os from the early 70's and the standard conjecture is that $d(e)=3$ for every $e \geq 3$. The state of the art result regarding this problem was obtained in 2004 by S\'{a}rk\"{o}zy and Selkow, who showed that $f(n,e + 2 + \lfloor \log_2 e \rfloor,e) = o(n^2)$. The only improvement over this result was a recent breakthrough of Solymosi and Solymosi, who improved the bound for $d(10)$ from 5 to 4. We obtain the first asymptotic improvement over the S\'{a}rk\"{o}zy--Selkow bound, showing that $$ f(n, e + O(\log e/ \log\log e), e) = o(n^2). $$

Semi-random processes involve an adaptive decision-maker, whose goal is to achieve some predetermined objective in an online randomized environment. They have algorithmic implications in various areas of computer science, as well as connections to biological processes involving decision making. In this paper, we consider a recently proposed semi-random graph process, described as follows: we start with an empty graph on $n$ vertices, and in each round, the decision-maker, called Builder, receives a uniformly random vertex $v$, and must immediately (in an online manner) choose another vertex $u$, adding the edge $\{u,v\}$ to the graph. Builder's end goal is to make the constructed graph satisfy some predetermined monotone graph property. We consider the property of containing a spanning graph $H$ as a subgraph. It was asked by N. Alon whether for any bounded-degree $H$, Builder can construct a copy of $H$ w.h.p. in $O(n)$ rounds. We answer this question positively in a strong sense, showing that any graph with maximum degree $\Delta$ can be constructed w.h.p. in $(3\Delta/2 + o(\Delta)) n$ rounds. This is tight (even for the offline case) up to a multiplicative factor of $3 + o_{\Delta}(1)$. Furthermore, for the special case where $H$ is a spanning forest of maximum degree $\Delta$, we show that $H$ can be constructed w.h.p. in $O(n \log \Delta)$ rounds. This is tight up to a multiplicative constant, even for the offline setting. Finally, we show a separation between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies, proving a lower bound of $\Omega(n\sqrt{\log n})$ on the number of rounds necessary to eliminate all isolated vertices w.h.p. using a non-adaptive strategy. This bound is tight, and in fact there are non-adaptive strategies for constructing a Hamilton cycle or a $K_r$-factor, which are successful w.h.p. within $O(n\sqrt{\log n})$ rounds.

The area of graph property testing seeks to understand the relation between the global properties of a graph and its local statistics. In the classical model, the local statistics of a graph is defined relative to a uniform distribution over the graph's vertex set. A graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is said to be testable if the local statistics of a graph can allow one to distinguish between graphs satisfying $\mathcal{P}$ and those that are far from satisfying it. Goldreich recently introduced a generalization of this model in which one endows the vertex set of the input graph with an arbitrary and unknown distribution, and asked which of the properties that can be tested in the classical model can also be tested in this more general setting. We completely resolve this problem by giving a (surprisingly "clean") characterization of these properties. To this end, we prove a removal lemma for vertex weighted graphs which is of independent interest., Comment: A short version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of STOC '19

The minrank of a graph $G$ on the set of vertices $[n]$ over a field $\mathbb{F}$ is the minimum possible rank of a matrix $M\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$ with nonzero diagonal entries such that $M_{i,j}=0$ whenever $i$ and $j$ are distinct nonadjacent vertices of $G$. This notion, over the real field, arises in the study of the Lov\'asz theta function of a graph. We obtain tight bounds for the typical minrank of the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ over any finite or infinite field, showing that for every field $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb F(n)$ and every $p=p(n)$ satisfying $n^{-1} \leq p \leq 1-n^{-0.99}$, the minrank of $G=G(n,p)$ over $\mathbb{F}$ is $\Theta(\frac{n \log (1/p)}{\log n})$ with high probability. The result for the real field settles a problem raised by Knuth in 1994. The proof combines a recent argument of Golovnev, Regev, and Weinstein, who proved the above result for finite fields of size at most $n^{O(1)}$, with tools from linear algebra, including an estimate of R\'onyai, Babai, and Ganapathy for the number of zero-patterns of a sequence of polynomials.

The investigation of conditions guaranteeing the appearance of cycles of certain lengths is one of the most well-studied topics in graph theory. In this paper we consider a problem of this type which asks, for fixed integers ${\ell}$ and $k$, how many copies of the $k$-cycle guarantee the appearance of an $\ell$-cycle? Extending previous results of Bollob\'as--Gy\H{o}ri--Li and Alon--Shikhelman, we fully resolve this problem by giving tight (or nearly tight) bounds for all values of $\ell$ and $k$. We also present a somewhat surprising application of the above mentioned estimates to the study of the graph removal lemma. Prior to this work, all bounds for removal lemmas were either polynomial or there was a tower-type gap between the best known upper and lower bounds. We fill this gap by showing that for every super-polynomial function $f(\varepsilon)$, there is a family of graphs ${\cal F}$, such that the bounds for the ${\cal F}$ removal lemma are precisely given by $f(\varepsilon)$. We thus obtain the first examples of removal lemmas with tight super-polynomial bounds. A special case of this result resolves a problem of Alon and the second author, while another special case partially resolves a problem of Goldreich.

Suppose one needs to change the direction of at least $\epsilon n^2$ edges of an $n$-vertex tournament $T$, in order to make it $H$-free. A standard application of the regularity method shows that in this case $T$ contains at least $f^*_H(\epsilon)n^h$ copies of $H$, where $f^*_H$ is some tower-type function. It has long been observed that many graph/digraph problems become easier when assuming that the host graph is a tournament. It is thus natural to ask if the removal lemma becomes easier if we assume that the digraph $G$ is a tournament. Our main result here is a precise characterization of the tournaments $H$ for which $f^*_H(\epsilon)$ is polynomial in $\epsilon$, stating that such a bound is attainable if and only if $H$'s vertex set can be partitioned into two sets, each spanning an acyclic directed graph. The proof of this characterization relies, among other things, on a novel application of a regularity lemma for matrices due to Alon, Fischer and Newman, and on probabilistic variants of Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs. We finally show that even when restricted to tournaments, deciding if $H$ satisfies the condition of our characterization is an NP-hard problem.

Given a fixed graph $H$ with at least two edges and positive integers $n$ and $b$, the strict $(1 \colon b)$ Avoider-Enforcer $H$-game, played on the edge set of $K_n$, has the following rules: In each turn Avoider picks exactly one edge, and then Enforcer picks exactly $b$ edges. Avoider wins if and only if the subgraph containing her/his edges is $H$-free after all edges of $K_n$ are taken. The lower threshold of a graph $H$ with respect to $n$ is the largest $b_0$ for which Enforcer has a winning strategy for the $(1\colon b)$ $H$-game played on $K_n$ for any $b \leq b_0$, and the upper threshold is the largest $b$ for which Enforcer wins the $(1 \colon b)$ game. The separation conjecture of Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojakovi\'c and Szab\'o states that for any connected $H$, the lower threshold and the upper threshold of the Avoider-Enforcer $H$-game played on $K_n$ are not of the same order in $n$. Until now, the conjecture has been verified only for stars, by Grzesik, Mikala\v{c}ki, Nagy, Naor, Patkos and Skerman. We show that the conjecture holds for every connected graph $H$ with at most one cycle (and at least two edges), with a polynomial separation between the lower and upper thresholds. We also prove an upper bound for the lower threshold of any graph $H$ with at least two edges, and show that this bound is tight for all graphs in which each connected component contains at most one cycle. Along the way, we establish number-theoretic tools that might be useful for other problems of this type., Comment: The paper is reorganized

Obtaining an efficient bound for the triangle removal lemma is one of the most outstanding open problems of extremal combinatorics. Perhaps the main bottleneck for achieving this goal is that triangle-free graphs can be highly unstructured. For example, triangle-free graphs might have only regular partitions (in the sense of Szemer\'edi) of tower-type size. And indeed, essentially all the graph properties ${\cal P}$ for which removal lemmas with reasonable bounds were obtained, are such that every graph satisfying ${\cal P}$ has a small regular partition. So in some sense, a barrier for obtaining an efficient removal lemma for property ${\cal P}$ was having an efficient regularity lemma for graphs satisfying ${\cal P}$. In this paper we consider the property of being induced $C_4$-free, which also suffers from the fact that a graph might satisfy this property but still have only regular partitions of tower-type size. By developing a new approach for this problem we manage to overcome this barrier and thus obtain a merely exponential bound for the induced $C_4$ removal lemma. We thus obtain the first efficient removal lemma that does not rely on an efficient version of the regularity lemma. This is the first substantial progress on a problem raised by Alon in 2001, and more recently by Alon, Conlon and Fox.