Search

Aim: To investigate the association of discordance in patient- and physician-reported symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients & methods: Data were drawn from a point-in-time survey of physicians and patients conducted in Germany, Italy and Spain (October 2018 - January 2019). Physicians and their consulting patients independently reported baseline characteristics, symptoms, treatment history and satisfaction, and HRQoL derived using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire. Results: Of 486 patients analysed, tiredness (73.3%, 73.7%), pain/aches (67.7%, 66.9%) and weight/appetite loss (54.3%, 53.7%) were the most common and concordant patient and physician-reported symptom domains, respectively. The symptom domains showing the largest discordance were reflux/indigestion (14.6%, 5.1%), neurological (11.9%, 5.6%), dermatological (9.3%, 6.2%) symptoms and jaundice (4.7%, 10.3%). Reduced HRQoL was observed with increasing symptom-reporting discordance. Conclusion: Further studies should investigate how symptom-reporting discordance influences patient satisfaction and HRQoL.

Background: Biliary tract cancers are aggressive, rare, gastrointestinal malignancies with a poor prognosis; approximately half of patients with these cancers survive for less than 1 year after diagnosis with advanced disease. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab or merestinib in addition to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer., Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study at 81 hospitals across 18 countries. We enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, non-resectable, recurrent, or metastatic biliary tract adenocarcinoma, who were treatment-naive, aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, estimated life expectancy of 3 months or more, and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (2:1:2:1) to receive either intravenous ramucirumab 8 mg/kg or placebo (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles) or oral merestinib 80 mg or placebo (once daily) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or patient or investigator request for discontinuation. All participants received intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 (on days 1 and 8 in 21-day cycles), for a maximum of eight cycles. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system using a permuted block method (blocks of six) and was stratified by primary tumour site, geographical region, and presence of metastatic disease. Participants, investigators, and the study funder were masked to treatment assignment within the intravenous and oral groups. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (in the intention-to-treat population). The safety analysis was done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02711553, and long-term follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between May 25, 2016, and Aug 8, 2017, 450 patients were assessed for eligibility and 309 (69%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to ramucirumab (n=106), merestinib (n=102), or pooled placebo (n=101); 306 received at least one dose of study treatment. The median follow-up time for progression-free survival at data cutoff (Feb 16, 2018) was 10·9 months (IQR 8·1-14·1). Median progression-free survival was 6·5 months (80% CI 5·7-7·1) in the ramucirumab group, 7·0 months (6·2-7·1) in the merestinib group, and 6·6 months (5·6-6·8) in the pooled placebo group (ramucirumab vs placebo hazard ratio 1·12 [80% CI 0·90-1·40], two-sided stratified p=0·48; merestinib vs placebo 0·92 [0·73-1·15], two-sided stratified p=0·64). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (51 [49%] of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group; 48 [47%] of 102 in the merestinib group; and 33 [33%] of 100 in the pooled placebo group), thrombocytopenia (36 [35%]; 19 [19%]; and 17 [17%]), and anaemia (28 [27%]; 16 [16%]; and 19 [19%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 53 (51%) patients in the ramucirumab group, 56 (55%) in the merestinib group, and 48 (48%) in the pooled placebo group. Treatment-related deaths (deemed related by the investigator) occurred in one (1%) of 104 patients in the ramucirumab group (cardiac arrest) and two (2%) of 102 patients in the merestinib group (pulmonary embolism [n=1] and sepsis [n=1])., Interpretation: Adding ramucirumab or merestinib to first-line cisplatin-gemcitabine was well tolerated, with no new safety signals, but neither improved progression-free survival in patients with molecularly unselected, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. The role of these targeted inhibitors remains investigational, highlighting the need for further understanding of biliary tract malignancies and the contribution of molecular selection., Funding: Eli Lilly and Company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JWV reports personal fees from Agios, AstraZeneca, Debiopharm, Delcath Systems, Genoscience Pharma, Imaging Equipment, Incyte, Ipsen, Keocyt, Merck, Mundipharma EDO, Novartis, PCI Biotech, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, QED, and Wren Laboratories; personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer; grants and personal fees from Servier; and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from NuCana, outside of the submitted work. AV reports personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, EISAI, Bayer, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Incyte, PierreFabre, Ipsen, and Sanofi, outside of the submitted work. CSD reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Zymeworks, BeiGene, Taiho Onoclogy, Exelixis, Eli Lilly and Company, Astellas, and Bayer; grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Zymeworks, Beigene, and Exelixis; personal fees from Merck, Taiho Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, Astellas, and Bayer; grants and non-financial support from AstraZeneca; and grants from Amgen, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Genmab, Macrogenics, and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. J-SC reports grants from Eli Lilly and Company, Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Merck KGaA, Astellas Pharma, Senhwa Biosciences, and Syncore, outside of the submitted work. EVC reports consulting fees from Array, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi, Halozyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Ipsen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex, and Taiho; and grants from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Ipsen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, and Servier paid to the institution, outside of the submitted work. L-TC reports grants from Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono, OBI, and Polaris; personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company, PharamEngine, Shire, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, ONO, and Five Prime; grants and non-financial support from Celgene; and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, TTY, and Syncore, outside of the submitted work. HW reports personal fees and non-financial support from CELGENE; non-financial support from AstraZeneca; personal fees and honoraria from Incyte; grants, personal fees, and consulting from SIRTEX medical; personal fees from and advisory board for Zymeworks; and personal fees from BTG, outside of the submitted work. L-YB reports funding related to the JSBF clinical trial from Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study. RC was employed by Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study; and is a shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company, outside of the submitted work. RAW reports employment with and stock ownership in Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study; and has patents pending related to clinical use of merestinib and ramucirumab. ACG, WZ, JL, CT, PJE, AA, SCM, and BAM were employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study. JMO was an employee of Eli Lilly and Company, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Overactivation of TGF-β signaling is observed in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and is associated with dysplastic hematopoietic differentiation. Galunisertib, a first-in-class oral inhibitor of the TGF-β receptor type 1 kinase (ALK5) has shown effectiveness in preclinical models of MDS and acceptable toxicity in phase I studies of solid malignancies., Patients and Methods: A phase II multicenter study of galunisertib was conducted in patients with very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria with hemoglobin ≤ 10.0 g/dL. Patients received oral galunisertib 150 mg twice daily for 14 days on/14 days off., Results: Ten of 41 evaluable patients (24.4%; 95% confidence interval, 12.4-40.3) achieved hematologic improvement erythroid response by International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. A total of 18 of 41 patients (43.9%) achieved erythroid response as per IWG 2000 criteria. Nine of 28 (32.1%) of transfusion-dependent patients had hematologic improvement. A total of 18 of 41 (44%) patients had a significant reduction in fatigue. Overall median duration of response was 90 days in all patients. Rigorous stem and progenitor flow cytometry showed that patients with an early stem cell differentiation block were more likely to respond to galunisertib. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in 20 (49%) of 41 patients, including any-grade fatigue (8/41, 20%), diarrhea (7/41, 17%), pyrexia (5/41, 12%), and vomiting (5/41, 12%)., Conclusions: In summary, galunisertib treatment has an acceptable safety profile and was associated with hematologic improvements in lower- and intermediate-risk MDS, with responses in heavily transfusion-dependent patients and in those with signs of an early stem cell differentiation block., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: To report patient-focused outcomes as measured by quality of life (QoL) and performance status (PS) in REACH, a phase III placebo-controlled randomised study, assessing ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received prior sorafenib., Methods: Eligible patients had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, PS 0 or 1 and prior sorafenib. Patients received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo (1:1) on day 1 of a 2-week cycle. QoL was assessed by FACT Hepatobiliary Symptom Index (FHSI)-8 and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) at baseline; cycles 4, 10, and 16; and end of treatment. PS was assessed at baseline, each cycle, and end of treatment. Deterioration in FHSI-8 was defined as a ≥3-point decrease from baseline and PS deterioration was defined as a change of ≥2. Both intention-to-treat and pre-specified subgroup of patients with baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL were assessed., Results: There were 565 patients randomised to ramucirumab and placebo. Compliance with FHSI and EQ-5D was high and similar between groups. In the ITT population, deterioration in FHSI-8, EQ-5D, and PS was similar between ramucirumab and placebo. In patients with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL, ramucirumab significantly reduced deterioration in FHSI-8 at the end of treatment compared with placebo (P = 0.0381), and there was a trend towards a delay in the deterioration of symptoms in FHSI-8 (HR 0.690; P = 0.054) and PS (HR 0.642; P = 0.057) in favour of ramucirumab., Conclusions: We report one of the most comprehensive data sets of QoL and symptom burden in patients undergoing systemic therapy for advanced HCC. Ramucirumab was associated with no worsening of QoL. In patients with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL, the significant survival benefit observed in patients treated with ramucirumab was coupled with a trend in patient-focused outcome benefits., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01140347., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: FRAME was a prospective observational study that captured real-world data on patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving platinum-based chemotherapies as first-line treatment (FLT) across Europe. As previously reported, most patients observed in the study had initiated FLT with either pemetrexed, gemcitabine, vinorelbine or taxanes in combination with a platinum. Baseline patient and disease characteristics including age, performance status, and histology varied (all p<0.01) across cohorts., Methods: Consenting adult patients initiating FLT for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without a targeted agent, entered the study between April 2009 and February 2011. The choice of FLT was left to physicians' discretion per routine clinical practice. The primary objective was to evaluate overall survival (OS) across platinum-based doublet chemotherapy cohorts and key secondary objectives included the evaluation of OS in patients with different histological subtypes of NSCLC. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and unadjusted estimates are presented., Results: Median OS in months was 10.3 across cohorts (n=1524), 10.7 for pemetrexed (n=569), 10.0 for gemcitabine (n=360), 9.1 for taxanes (n=295), and 10.7 for vinorelbine (n=300). For patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received cisplatin (n=616, 40% of total), median OS in months was 10.6 across the cohorts, 11.6 for pemetrexed, 8.4 for gemcitabine, 9.6 for taxanes, and 9.9 for vinorelbine., Conclusions: FRAME describes real-world treatment patterns and survival for patients initiating FLT for advanced or metastatic NSCLC between 2009 and 2011 across Europe., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GB) treatment remains challenging because of recurrence and poorly defined treatment options after first-line therapy. To better understand real-world application of treatment paradigms and their impact on outcomes, we describe patterns of treatment, outcomes, and use of cancer-related healthcare resource for glioblastoma in the USA., Methods: A retrospective, online chart-abstraction study was conducted; each participating oncologist contributed ≤5 charts. Patients were ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary or secondary newly diagnosed GB on or after 1 January 2010, had received first- and second-line therapies, and had information collected for ≥3 months after initiation of second-line therapy or until death. Assessments were descriptive and included Kaplan- Meier analyses from initiation to end of second-line therapy, disease progression, or death., Results: One hundred sixty physicians contributed information on 503 patient charts. During first-line therapy, patients most commonly underwent temozolomide monotherapy (76.5%). During second-line therapy, patients most commonly underwent bevacizumab monotherapy (58.1%). Median duration of second-line therapy was 130 days; median time to disease progression was 113 days. Median survival was 153 days. Use of supportive care was observed to be numerically higher in first- compared with second-line therapy except for anti-depressants, growth factors, and stimulants. Frequently used resources included corticosteroids (78.8% of patients in first-line and 62.6% in second-line therapies), anti-epileptics (45.8% and 41.5%) and narcotic opioids (45.3% and 41.4%)., Conclusions: Most GB patients received temozolomide during first-line therapy and bevacizumab monotherapy or combination therapy during second-line therapy. Use of supportive care appeared to be higher in first- compared with second-line therapy for some agents.

Introduction: This prospective observational study evaluated the effect of race on disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC treated with second-line pemetrexed., Patients and Methods: Eligibility criteria included stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients receiving single-agent pemetrexed for second-line therapy in routine clinical practice. Noninferiority was evaluated using logistic regression analysis of DCR, controlling for predefined covariates. Noninferiority was considered if the upper 95% confidence bound on the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for Caucasian vs. African-American individuals was less than 1.78, corresponding to a difference in proportion of 14% assuming Caucasian individuals to have a DCR of approximately 50%. The bound was chosen to be half of the anticipated difference between treatment and no second-line treatment. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tools were used to measure functional status and symptom burden., Results: The unadjusted DCR was 43.7% (117/268) for Caucasian and 45.0% (27/60) for African-American individuals (unadjusted OR, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.66). The adjusted OR in the final logistic regression model was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.43-1.58). This upper 95% confidence bound was within the prespecified acceptable bound of 1.78. Median PFS times (months) were 2.7 (95% CI, 2.4-3.4) for Caucasian and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.3-4.7) for African-American individuals (P = .91). Median OS times (months) were 6.7 (95% CI, 5.7-7.9) for Caucasian and 6.9 (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) for African-American individuals (P = .92). Baseline and functional status after baseline assessment and mean symptom burden did not differ substantially among races., Conclusion: African-American race was not considered to be a significant predictor of disease control after second-line treatment with pemetrexed., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present the treatment rationale and study design of the PointBreak study, a phase III study of pemetrexed/ carboplatin/bevacizumab induction followed by pemetrexed/bevacizumab maintenance (arm A) compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab induction followed by bevacizumab maintenance (arm B) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Treatment consists of up to 4 cycles of induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy until disease progression or treatment discontinuation in approximately 900 patients (450 per treatment arm). The efficacy objectives of this study are to compare overall survival (OS), response rates, disease control rates, progression-free survival, and time to progressive disease between the 2 treatment arms. In addition, safety, quality of life, pharmacokinetics, and translational research will be investigated for both treatment arms. If the primary objective (OS) is achieved, this study will provide robust results on an alternative treatment option, pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab followed by maintenance therapy with pemetrexed/bevacizumab, for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.

AS1411 is a quadruplex-forming oligonucleotide aptamer that targets nucleolin. It is currently in clinical trials as a treatment for various cancers. We have proposed that AS1411 inhibits cancer cell proliferation by affecting the activities of certain nucleolin-containing complexes. Here, we report that protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), an enzyme that catalyzes the formation of symmetrical dimethylarginine (sDMA), is a nucleolin-associated protein whose localization and activity are altered by AS1411. Levels of PRMT5 were found to be decreased in the nucleus of AS1411-treated DU145 human prostate cancer cells, but increased in the cytoplasm. These changes were dependent on nucleolin and were not observed in cells pretreated with nucleolin-specific small interfering RNA. Treatment with AS1411 altered levels of PRMT5 activity (assessed by sDMA levels) in accord with changes in its localization. In addition, our data indicate that nucleolin itself is a substrate for PRMT5 and that distribution of sDMA-modified nucleolin is altered by AS1411. Because histone arginine methylation by PRMT5 causes transcriptional repression, we also examined expression of selected PRMT5 target genes in AS1411-treated cells. For some genes, including cyclin E2 and tumor suppressor ST7, a significant up-regulation was noted, which corresponded with decreased PRMT5 association with the gene promoter. We conclude that nucleolin is a novel binding partner and substrate for PRMT5, and that AS1411 causes relocalization of the nucleolin-PRMT5 complex from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Consequently, the nuclear activity of PRMT5 is decreased, leading to derepression of some PRMT5 target genes, which may contribute to the biological effects of AS1411.

AGRO100, also known as AS1411, is an experimental anticancer drug that recently entered human clinical trials. It is a member of a novel class of antiproliferative agents known as G-rich oligonucleotides (GRO), which are non-antisense, guanosine-rich phosphodiester oligodeoxynucleotides that form stable G-quadruplex structures. The biological activity of GROs results from their binding to specific cellular proteins as aptamers. One important target protein of GROs has been previously identified as nucleolin, a multifunctional protein expressed at high levels by cancer cells. Here, we report that AGRO100 also associates with nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) essential modulator (NEMO), which is a regulatory subunit of the inhibitor of kappaB (IkappaB) kinase (IKK) complex, and also called IKKgamma. In the classic NF-kappaB pathway, the IKK complex is required for phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha and subsequent activation of the transcription factor NF-kappaB. We found that treatment of cancer cells with AGRO100 inhibits IKK activity and reduces phosphorylation of IkappaBalpha in response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulation. Using a reporter gene assay, we showed that AGRO100 blocks both tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced and constitutive NF-kappaB activity in human cancer cell lines derived from cervical, prostate, breast, and lung carcinomas. In addition, we showed that, in AGRO100-treated cancer cells, NEMO is coprecipitated by nucleolin, indicating that both proteins are present in the same complex. Our studies suggest that abrogation of NF-kappaB activity may contribute to the anticancer effects of AGRO100 and that nucleolin may play a previously unknown role in regulating the NF-kappaB pathway.

The discovery of G-rich oligonucleotides (GROs) that have non-antisense antiproliferative activity against a number of cancer cell lines has been recently described. This biological activity of GROs was found to be associated with their ability to form stable G-quartet-containing structures and their binding to a specific cellular protein, most likely nucleolin (Bates, P. J., Kahlon, J. B., Thomas, S. D., Trent, J. O., and Miller, D. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26369-26377). In this report, we further investigate the novel mechanism of GRO activity by examining their effects on cell cycle progression and on nucleic acid and protein biosynthesis. Cell cycle analysis of several tumor cell lines showed that cells accumulate in S phase in response to treatment with an active GRO. Analysis of 5-bromodeoxyuridine incorporation by these cells indicated the absence of de novo DNA synthesis, suggesting an arrest of the cell cycle predominantly in S phase. At the same time point, RNA and protein synthesis were found to be ongoing, indicating that arrest of DNA replication is a primary event in GRO-mediated inhibition of proliferation. This specific blockade of DNA replication eventually resulted in altered cell morphology and induction of apoptosis. To characterize further GRO-mediated inhibition of DNA replication, we used an in vitro assay based on replication of SV40 DNA. GROs were found to be capable of inhibiting DNA replication in the in vitro assay, and this activity was correlated to their antiproliferative effects. Furthermore, the effect of GROs on DNA replication in this assay was related to their inhibition of SV40 large T antigen helicase activity. The data presented suggest that the antiproliferative activity of GROs is a direct result of their inhibition of DNA replication, which may result from modulation of a replicative helicase activity.