Search

Background: Despite the fact that magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional pacemaker and lead systems have been introduced more than 5 years ago, it is still not clear whether they have actually facilitated the access of pacemaker patients to this important diagnostic tool. Factors limiting MR scans in daily practice in patients with MR-conditional cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) systems may be related to organizational, cultural and sometimes legal aspects. The Really ProMRI registry is an ongoing survey designed to assess the annual rate of MR examinations in patients with MR-conditional implants, with either pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and to detect the main factors limiting MRI., Methods: The primary endpoint of the Really ProMRI registry is to assess the current access to MRI of patients with MR-conditional pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems during normal practice. Data in the literature reported a 17% annual incidence of medical conditions requiring MRI in CIED patients. The Really ProMRI registry has been designed to detect 4.5% absolute difference with an 80% statistical power, by recruiting 600 patients already implanted with MR-conditional CIED implant. Patients will be followed up for 1 year, during which they will be asked to refer any prescription, execution or denial of an MR examination by patient questionnaires and original source documents., Conclusion: The ongoing Really ProMRI registry will assess the actual rate of and factors limiting the access to MRI for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs.

Background: Energy demand of remote monitoring in cardiac implantable electronic devices has never been investigated. Biotronik Home Monitoring (HM) is characterized by daily transmissions that may affect longevity., Objective: The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare longevity of a specific dual-chamber pacemaker model in patients with HM on and patients with HM off., Methods: Hospital files of 201 patients (mean age 87 ± 10 years, 78 men) who had received a Biotronik Cylos DR-T pacemaker between April 2006 and May 2010 for standard indication were reviewed. In 134 patients (67%), HM was activated. The primary end point was device replacement due to battery depletion., Results: The median follow-up period was 56.4 months (interquartile range 41.8-65.2 months). The estimated device longevity was 71.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.1-72.3 months) in the HM-on group and 60.4 months (CI 55.9-65.1 months) in the HM-off group (P < .0001). The frequency of inhospital visits with significant device reprogramming was higher in the HM-on group than in the HM-off group (33.3% vs 25.0%, respectively; P = .03). Lower ventricular pulse amplitude (2.3 ± 0.4 V vs 2.7 ± 0.5 V; P < .0001) and pacing percentage (49% ± 38% vs 64% ± 38%; P = .02), both calculated as time-weighted averages, were observed with HM on as compared with HM off. Patient attrition was significantly lower in the HM-on group (9.7%; 95% CI 3.0%-28.7%) than in the HM-off group (45.6%; 95% CI 30.3%-64.3%) (P < .0001)., Conclusion: In normal practice, energy demand of HM, if present, was overshadowed by programming optimization likely favored by continuous monitoring. Pacemakers controlled remotely with HM showed an 11-month longer longevity. Patient retention was superior., (Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)